Objective and subjective assessment of the quality and effectiveness of orthodontic treatment

Close metadata

Recommended articles:

The duration of orthodontic treatment and the number of visits depending on the degree of difficulty when using modern orthodontic equipment. Stomatology. 2024;(4):54-58

Minimally invasive interventions for complications associated with intra-abdominal calculi after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2024;(5):14-20

Our experience in the treatment of congenital nasal median heterotopias in children and an overview of various treatment tactics. Russian Bulletin of Otorhinolaryngology. 2024;(2):28-32

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps as the first stage in the development of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis. Russian Rhinology. 2024;(2):157-166

Artificial intelligence in dermatology: opportunities and prospects. Russian Journal of Clinical Dermatology and Venereology. 2024;(3):246-252

Differential diagnosis of coccidioidomycosis manifested by peripheral pulmonary lesion. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2024;(8):77-85

Compression elastography as a new method of ultrasound imaging in the differential diagnosis of chronic tonsillitis. Russian Bulletin of Otorhinolaryngology. 2024;(4):20-25

The central vein sign in the differential diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2024;(7-2):58-65

Pathogenetic aspects of chronic pelvic pain in endometriosis: diagnostic prospects (literature review). Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2024;(4):112-120

Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy in HIV-positive individuals. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2024;(8):39-46

Dentofacial anomalies occupy one of the leading places among dental diseases in people of different age groups. Analysis of epidemiological data on the prevalence of dentoalveolar anomalies indicates that there is no tendency to decrease it in Russia and abroad countries. The demand for orthodontic treatment is increasing with the development of new technologies and materials, the development of modern methods of treatment in the field of dentistry. This trend is accompanied by increased requirements for the quality of orthodontic care. The patient’s dissatisfaction with the result of treatment most often arises because of a discrepancy between his subjective assessment of treatment and the objective anatomical, functional and aesthetic state of occlusion. The use of methods for quantitative assessment of dentoalveolar anomalies and the quality of orthodontic treatment makes it possible to objectively substantiate the choice of tactics of orthodontic care and increase its effectiveness. At the same time, the patient’s subjective assessment of the quality of orthodontic treatment allows one to see how the proposed (implemented) treatment plan reflects the patient’s main complaints and to assess the degree of his satisfaction with the achieved result. That`s why, the issue of using methods of objective and subjective assessment of the quality and effectiveness of orthodontic treatment is relevant today. The purpose of the literature review is to consider the development and implementation of criteria for an objective and subjective assessment of the outcome of orthodontic treatment.

Keywords:

diagnostics

orthodontic treatment

results

objective and subjective indicators

quality of treatment

Authors:

Popova N.V.

Central Research Institute of Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery»;
Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of Federal Medical Biological Agency

ORCID: 0000-0002-3686-5263

Arsenina O.I.

Central Research Institute of Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery»;
Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education

ORCID: 0000-0002-0738-1227

Gavrilova M.V.

Central Research Institute of Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery

Glukhova N.V.

Central Research Institute of Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery

Received:

02.12.2020

Accepted:

19.12.2020

List of references:

Daniels CP, Richmond S. The Development of the Index of Complexity, Outcome and Need (ICON). J Orthod. 2000;27:149-162. https://doi.org/10.1093/ortho/27.2.149
Deepan Kumar CV, Mohamed S, Chandrashekar Janakiram, Joseph J. Validation of dental impact on daily living questionnaire among tribal population of India. Contemporary Clin Dent. 2015;6:235-241. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.166841
Vidaković R, Špalj S, Šlaj M, Šlaj M, Katić V. Correlation between the DAI and ICON Indices used for Assessment of Orthodontic Treatment need in Croatian Schoolchildren. Zdr Varst. 2018;57(4):218-226. https://doi.org/10.2478/sjph-2018-0027
Richmond S, Daniels CP. International comparisons of professional assessments in orthodontics: Part 1 — Treatment need. Am J Orthodon Dentofac Orthoped. 1998;113(2):180-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0889-5406(98)70290-2
Richmond S, Daniels CP. International comparisons of professional assessments in orthodontics: Part 2 — Treatment need. Am J Orthodont Dentofac Orthoped. 1998;113(3):324-328. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(98)70304-X
Ferreira, Dominique Abergail. A critique of the index of complexity, outcome and need. Faculty of Dentistry Dept of Orthodontics Msc University of the Western Cape. 2005.
Firestone AR, Michael B, Beglin FM, Katherine WL. Valitidy of the Index of Complexity, Outcome and Need (ICON) in Determining Orthodontic Treatment Need. Angle Orthod. 2002;72(1):15-20. https://doi.org/10.1043/00033219(2002)072%3C0015:VOTIOC%3E2.0.CO2
Fox NA, Daniels C, Gilgrass T. A comparison of The Index of Complexity, Outcome and Need (ICON) with the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) and the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN). Br Dental J. 2004;193(4):225-230. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4801530
Roya Naseh, Zahra Mohammadi, Parviz Padisar The Use of Orthodontic Treatment Need Index (IOTN) in a Referred Iranian Population. Res J Biol Scie. 2009;4:438-443. https://doi=rjbsci.2009.438.443
The American Board of Orthodontics Grading System for Dental Casts and Panoramic Radiographs. 2012.
Casko JS, Vaden JL, Kokich VG, Damone J, James RD, Cangialosi TJ, Riolo ML, Owens SE Jr, Bills ED. Objective grading system for dental casts and panoramic radiographs. American Board of Orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;114(5):589-599. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0889-5406(98)70179-9
Owens SE Jr, Dykhouse VJ, Moffitt AH, Grubb JE, Greco PM, English JD, Briss BS, Jamieson SA, Riolo ML. The case management form of the American Board of Orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;129(3): 325-329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.11.004
Slade GD, Spencer AJ. Development and evaluation of the Oral Health Impact Profile. Community Dental Health. 1994;11(1):3-11.
Kushnir D, Zusman SP, Robinson PG. Validation of a Hebrew version of the oral health impact profile 14. J Public Health Dent. 2004;64(2):71-75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-7325.2004.tb02730.x
Ravaghi V, Farrahi-Avval N, Locker D, Underwood M. Validation of the Persian short version of the oral health impact profile (OHIP-14). Oral Health Prevent Dent. 2010;8(3):229-235.
Papagiannopoulou V, Oulis CJ, Papaioannou W, Antonogeorgos G, Yfantopoulos J. Validation of a Greek version of the oral health impact profile (OHIP-14) for use among adults. Health Quality Life Outcomes. 2012;10:7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-10-7
Locker D, Allen F. What do measures of «oral health-related quality of life» measure? Comm Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2007;35:401-411. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.2007.00418.x
Slade GD, Nuttall N, Sanders AE, Steele JG, Allen PF, Lahti S. Impacts of oral disorders in the United Kingdom and Australia. Br Dental J. 2005; 198(8):489-493. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4812252
Leao A, Sheiham A. The development of a socio-dental measure of Dental Impact on Daily Living. Comm Dental Health. 1996;13:22-26.
Leao A, Sheiham A. Relation between Clinical Dental Status and Subjective Impacts on Daily Living. J Dental Res. 1995;74(7):1408-1413. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F00220345950740071301
Mansur UP. Ispol’zovaniye kriteriyev kachestva zhizni v vybore metodiki lecheniya patsiyentov s ortodonticheskoy patologiyey. Vestnik RUDN. Seriya: Meditsina. 2009;4:630-632. (In Russ.).
Trezubov VV, Mikhaylov SM. Sistema otsenki kachestva ortopedicheskoy stomatologicheskoy pomoshchi. Stomatologiya. 2012;6:69-71. (in Russ.).
Spitsyna OB, Trezubov VN, Trezubov VV. Sistema ekspertnoy otsenki kachestva ortodonticheskogo lecheniya patsiyentov s zubochelyustnymi anomaliyami. Uchenyye zapiski Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo meditsinskogo universiteta im. akad. I.P. Pavlova. 2015;22(2):41-43. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24884/1607-4181-2015-22-2-41-43
Fadeyev RA, Lanina AN, Li PV. Primeneniye kolichestvennoy otsenki zubochelyustno-litsevykh anomaliy vrachom i patsiyentom dlya vybora i korrektsii taktiki lecheniya. Institut Stomatologii. 2019;3:34-36. (In Russ.).
Fadeyev RA, Li PV, Malkova YeYe. Modifitsirovannyy sposob kolichestvennoy otsenki zubochelyustnykh anomaliy. Institut Stomatologii. 2016;3(72):82-83. (In Russ.).
Fadeyev RA, Ispravnikova AN. Sistema kolichestvennoy otsenki zubochelyustnykh anomaliy (chast’ 1). Institut Stomatologii. 2010;2:22-23. (In Russ.).
Fadeyev RA, Ispravnikova AN. Sistema kolichestvennoy otsenki zubochelyustnykh anomaliy (chast’ 2). Institut Stomatologii. 2010;3:24-27. (In Russ.).
Fadeyev RA, Ispravnikova AN. Sistema kolichestvennoy otsenki zubochelyustnykh anomaliy (chast’ 3). Institut Stomatologii. 2010;4:28-31. (In Russ.).
Fadeyev RA, Ispravnikova AN. Sistema kolichestvennoy otsenki zubochelyustnykh anomaliy (chast’ 4). Institut Stomatologii. 2011;1:30-32. (In Russ.).
Fadeyev RA, Ispravnikova AN. Sistema kolichestvennoy otsenki zubochelyustnykh anomaliy (chast’ 5). Institut Stomatologii. 2011;2:28-31. (In Russ.).

Close metadata