The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Login
EN
+7 (495) 482-4118
+7 (495) 482-4329
+8 800 250-18-12
  • (toll-free number for subscriptions)
    Mon-Fri from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m.

  • © 1998-2026
+7 (495) 482-43-29
EN
All journals
Journal
Year
Year
Search result: 0

Lebedeva Yu.V.

St. Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University;
Academy of Plastic Surgery, A3BEAUTE CLINIQUE

Zholtikov V.V.

St. Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University;
Academy of Plastic Surgery, A3BEAUTE CLINIQUE

Korableva N.P.

St. Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University;
Academy of Plastic Surgery, A3BEAUTE CLINIQUE

Statistical analysis of complaints in primary and secondary rhinoplasty

Authors:

Lebedeva Yu.V., Zholtikov V.V., Korableva N.P.

More about the authors

Journal: Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine. 2024;(3): 28‑35

DOI: 10.17116/plast.hirurgia202403128

Read: 1721 times

Download PDF (RU)
Contact the author
Table of contents

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF COMPLAINTS IN PRIMARY AND SECONDARY RHINOPLASTY
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF COMPLAINTS IN PRIMARY AND SECONDARY RHINOPLASTY

To cite this article:

Lebedeva YuV, Zholtikov VV, Korableva NP. Statistical analysis of complaints in primary and secondary rhinoplasty. Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine. 2024;(3):28‑35. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/plast.hirurgia202403128

Подписка 2026 Пластическая хирургия и эстетическая медицина (Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine)
МСФ на ЯМ
Использование инфографики авторами научных работ
Close metadata
Recommended articles:
Ethnic rhinoplasty: a review of modern approaches and ethnocultural aspe­cts. Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medi­cine. 2025;(2-2):82-90
Inci­dence of complications in periorbitoplasty. Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medi­cine. 2025;(3-2):14-33
Modern methods for nasal dorsal augmentation in seco­ndary rhinoplasty. Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medi­cine. 2025;(3-2):78-92
Osteotomy methods in rhinoplasty. Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medi­cine. 2025;(3-2):93-96
The effe­ctiveness of wellness programs in correcting risk factors for athe­rosclerosis in a sana­torium. Problems of Balneology, Physiotherapy and Exercise Therapy. 2024;(6-2):102-109
Correction of myopia with implantable collamer lenses. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2025;(2):5-15
Expe­rience of inclusion of rema­xol in reha­bilitation therapy of patients after radi­cal prostatectomy. P.A. Herzen Journal of Onco­logy. 2025;(4):54-60
Obje­ctification of complaints of patients dissatisfied with the result of direct aesthetic restoration of teeth. Russian Journal of Stomatology. 2025;(3):5-12
Postural diso­rders in practice of reha­bilitation specialist (Handbook, 2025). Rege­nerative Biotechnologies, Preventive, Digi­tal and Predictive Medi­cine. 2025;(4):91-129
Abstract:

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the complaints motivating patients to seek for primary or secondary rhinoplasty.

MATERIAL AND METHODS. A

Retrospective analysis of 527 cases was carried out between 2015 and 2022. We estimated demographic data, interventions and complaints. These data were ranked by frequency and significance for a particular patient.

RESULTS

Patients seeking for primary rhinoplasty often complain of bulb-shaped tip, drooped tip or hump. Patients seeking for secondary rhinoplasty often complain of crooked nose, wide back and outline deformities. There were specific complaints after previous rhinoplasty (visible scars, A-deformation and pinch-deformation).

CONCLUSION

It is necessary to consider specific complaints, accurately identify the patient’s expectations from rhinoplasty and prevent postoperative asymmetry or crooked nose.

Keywords:

complaints
nose
rhinoplasty
secondary rhinoplasty
patient satisfaction
correction
hump
bulb-shaped tip
primary rhinoplasty

Authors:

Lebedeva Yu.V.

St. Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University;
Academy of Plastic Surgery, A3BEAUTE CLINIQUE

Zholtikov V.V.

St. Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University;
Academy of Plastic Surgery, A3BEAUTE CLINIQUE

Korableva N.P.

St. Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University;
Academy of Plastic Surgery, A3BEAUTE CLINIQUE

Received:

30.11.2023

Accepted:

07.03.2024

Close metadata

References:

  1. Adamson PA, Litner JA. Psychologic aspects of revision rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2006;14:269-277. 
  2. Thomson C, Mendelsohn M. Reducing the incidence of revision rhinoplasty. J Otolaryngol. 2007;36(2):130-134. PMID: 17459286. https://doi.org/10.2310/7070.2007.0012
  3. Daniel RK. The Preservation Rhinoplasty: A New Rhinoplasty Revolution. Aesthetic Surgery Journal. 2018;38(2):228-229. PMID: 29319790. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjx258
  4. Parkes ML, Kanodia R, Machida BK. Revision rhinoplasty: An analysis of aesthetic deformities. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1992;118:695-701. 
  5. Toriumi DM. New concepts in nasal tip contouring. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2006;8:156-185. 
  6. McKinney P. Management of the bulbous nose. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000; 106:906-917. 
  7. Roofe SB, Murakami CS. Treatment of the posttraumatic and postrhinoplasty crooked nose. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2006;14:279-289. 
  8. Gruber RP, Kryger G, Chang D. The intercartilaginous graft for actual and potential alar retraction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008 May;121(5):288e-296e. Erratum in: Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;122(1):326. PMID: 18453941. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31816c3b9a
  9. Jung D-H, Kwak ES, Kim HS. Correction of severe alar retraction with use of a cutaneous alar rotation flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;123(3):1088-1095. PMID: 19319078. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e318199f914
  10. Chauhan N, Alexander AJ, Sepehr A, Adamson PA. Patient complaints with primary versus revision rhinoplasty: analysis and practice implications. Aesthet Surg J. 2011;31(7):775-780. PMID: 21908809. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090820X11417427
  11. Neaman KC, Boettcher AK, Do VH, Mulder C, Baca M, Renucci JD, VanderWoude DL. Cosmetic rhinoplasty: revision rates revisited. Aesthet Surg J. 2013;33(1):31-37. PMID: 23277618. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090820X12469221
  12. Constantian MB. Differing characteristics in 100 consecutive secondary rhinoplasty patients following closed versus open surgical approaches. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109(6):2097-2111. PMID: 11994620. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200205000-00048
  13. Rohrich RJ, Muzaffar AR, Janis JE. Component dorsal hump reduction: The importance of maintaining dorsal aesthetic lines in rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;114:1298-1308.
  14. Rohrich RJ, Sheen JH, Burget G. Secondary Rhinoplasty. St Louis, MO: Quality Medical Publishers; 1995.
  15. Rohrich RJ, Janis JE, Kenkel JM. Male rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;112:1071-1085.
  16. Lee M, Zwiebel S, Guyuron B. Frequency of the preoperative flaws and commonly required maneuvers to correct them: a guide to reducing the revision rhinoplasty rate. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132(4):769-776. PMID: 23783064. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182a01457
  17. Hellings PW, Nolst Trenité GJ. Long-term patient satisfaction after revision rhinoplasty. Laryngoscope. 2007;117(6):985-989. PMID: 17460577. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLG.0b013e31804f8152
  18. Khansa I, Khansa L, Pearson GD. Patient Satisfaction After Rhinoplasty: A Social Media Analysis. Aesthet Surg J. 2016;36(1):NP1-NP5. Epub 2015 June 10. PMID: 26063834. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjv095
  19. Rohrich RJ Mirror, mirror on the wall: when the postoperative reflection does not meet patients’ expectations Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;108:507-509. 
Contact the author
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

Contact us
If you have any questions, complaints or suggestions, please use this feedback form.
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.
Submit Application

You can become an author of one of our magazines, send a request and we will consider it in during the day.

Name
Phone
E-mail
Message
Login
Registration
E-mail
Password
Forgot Password?

Log in to the site using your account in one of the services

Password recovery
E-mail
Login
Register

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.