The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Login
EN
+7 (495) 482-4118
+7 (495) 482-4329
+8 800 250-18-12
  • (toll-free number for subscriptions)
    Mon-Fri from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m.

  • © 1998-2026
+7 (495) 482-43-29
EN
All journals
Journal
Year
Year
Search result: 0

Semenkov A.V.

Sklifosovsky Institute for Emergency Care;
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

Subbot V.S.

Sklifosovsky Institute for Emergency Care;
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

Systematic review of current trends in preoperative planning of surgery for liver tumors

Authors:

Semenkov A.V., Subbot V.S.

More about the authors

Journal: Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2021;(8): 84‑97

DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia202108184

Read: 1844 times

Download PDF (RU)
Contact the author
Table of contents

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF CURRENT TRENDS IN PREOPERATIVE PLANNING OF SURGERY FOR LIVER TUMORS
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF CURRENT TRENDS IN PREOPERATIVE PLANNING OF SURGERY FOR LIVER TUMORS

To cite this article:

Semenkov AV, Subbot VS. Systematic review of current trends in preoperative planning of surgery for liver tumors. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2021;(8):84‑97. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia202108184

Подписка 2026 Хирургия. Журнал им. Н.И. Пирогова (Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery)
МСФ на ЯМ
Использование инфографики авторами научных работ
Close metadata
Recommended articles:
Prognostic factors and preoperative therapy in rese­ctable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Piro­gov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2025;(1):5-13
Lapa­roscopic ALPPS procedure: a series of cases. Piro­gov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2025;(2):20-26
Textbook outcome for liver rese­ction. Survey of respondents in national centers. Piro­gov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2025;(4):5-11
Primary outcomes after major anatomical liver rese­ctions in infa­nts at the National Children’s Medi­cal Center. Piro­gov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2025;(4):86-94
Features of comprehensive treatment in a patient with complicated type 2 diabetes mellitus: A clinical case. Piro­gov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2025;(6):128-132
3D printing for airway stenting in patients with complex benign tracheobronchial stenosis. Piro­gov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2025;(7):87-93
Mini­mally inva­sive surgery for liver echi­nococcosis. Piro­gov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2025;(9):61-68
Three-dimensional mode­ling and intraoperative navi­gation in the diagnosis and treatment of various forms of adenomyosis. Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2025;(2):92-100
Three-dimensional mode­ling in modern cardiac surgery. Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2025;(4):440-444
Expe­rience of 100 lapa­roscopic liver rese­ctions in an onco­logy hospital. P.A. Herzen Journal of Onco­logy. 2025;(4):7-13
Abstract:

The purpose of the study was a systematic review of current trends in preoperative planning of surgery for liver tumors. These data will be valuable to determine the advantages and disadvantages of 3D modeling, augmented reality technology and 3D printing in preoperative planning of surgery for focal liver lesions.

Keywords:

liver tumor
liver resection
preoperative planning
3D modeling
3D printing

Authors:

Semenkov A.V.

Sklifosovsky Institute for Emergency Care;
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

Subbot V.S.

Sklifosovsky Institute for Emergency Care;
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

Received:

27.10.2020

Accepted:

29.11.2020

Close metadata

References:

  1. Xue-Dong Wang, Hong-Guang Wang, Jun Shi, Wei-Dong Duan, et al. Traditional surgical planning of liver surgery is modified by 3D interactive quantitative surgical planning approach: a single-center experience with 305 patients. Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases International. 2017;16.3:271-278.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s1499-3872(17)60021-3
  2. Chlebus G, Meine H, Moltz HJ, et al. Neurealnetwork-basedautomatic liver tumor segmentation with random forest-based candidate filtering. Computing Research Repository. 2017;10. 
  3. Selle D, Preim B, Schenk A, et al. Analysis of vasculature for liver surgical planning. IEEE Trans MedImaging. 2002;1344-1357. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmi.2002.801166
  4. Lamata P, Lamata F, Sojar V, et al. Use of the Resection Map system as guidance during hepatectomy. Surgery Endosc. 2010;2327-2337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-0915-3
  5. Kingham TP, Scherer MA, et al. Image-guided liver surgery: intraoperative projection of computed tomography images utilizing tracked ultrasound. HPB. 2012;14(9):594-603.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-2574.2012.00487.x
  6. Kingham TP, Jayaraman S, Clements LW, et al. Evolution of Image-Guided Liver Surgery: Transition from Open to Laparoscopic Procedures. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013;1274-1282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-013-2214-5
  7. Hallet J, Gayet B, Tsung A, Wakabayashi G, Pessaux P. Systematic review of the use of pre-operative simulation and navigation for hepatectomy: current status and future perspectives. Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences. 2015;22(5):353-362.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.220
  8. Lang H, Radtke A, Hindenmach M, Schroeder T, Frühauf NR, Malago M, et al. Impact of Virtual Tumor Resection and Computer Assisted Risk Analysis on Operation Planning and Intraoperative Strategyin Major Hepatic Resection. Arch Surg. 2005;140:629-638.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.140.7.629
  9. Takamoto T, Hashimoto T, Ogata S, Inoue K, Maruyama Y, Miyazaki A, Makuuchi M. Planning of anatomical liver segmentectomy and subsegmentectomy with 3-dimensional simulation software. The American Journal of Surgery. 2013;206(4):530-538.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.01.041
  10. Nakayama K, Oshiro Y, Miyamoto R, et al. The Effect of Three-Dimensional Preoperative Simulation on Liver Surgery. World J Surg. 2017;1840-1847. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-3933-7
  11. Hirooka M, Koizumi Y, Imai Y, Nakamura Y, Yukimoto A, Watanabe T, Hiasa Y. Clinical utility of multipolar ablation with a 3-D simulator system for patients with liver cancer. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2017;32(11):1852-1858. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.13772
  12. Kolsanov AV, Manukjan AA, Zel’ter PM, Chaplygin SS, Kapishnikov AV. Preoperative Virtual Modeling of Liver Based on Computerized Tomography Data. Annaly hirurgicheskoj gepatologii. 2016;21(4). (In Russ.).
  13. Chen G, Li X, Wu G, Wang Y, Fang B, Xiong X, Dong J. The use of virtual reality for the functional simulation of hepatic tumors (case control study). International Journal of Surgery. 2010;8(1):72-78.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2009.11.005
  14. Tian F, Wu JX, Rong WQ, Wang LM, Wu F, Yu WB, An SL, Liu FQ, Feng L, Bi C, Liu YH. Three-dimensional morphometric analysis for hepatectomy of centrally located hepatocellular carcinoma: A pilot study. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21(15):4607-4619. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i15.4607
  15. Wang Y, Zhang Y, Peitgen H-O, Schenk A, Yuan L, Wei G, Sun Y. Precise Local Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Based on Tumor-Surrounding Vascular Anatomy Revealed by 3D Analysis. Dig Surg. 2012;99-106.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000336289
  16. Lujan J, Valero G, Biondo S, Espin E, Parrilla P, Ortiz H. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: results of a prospective multicentre analysis of 4,970 patients. Surg Endosc. 2013;295-302.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2444-8
  17. Dong J, Yang S, Zeng J, Cai S, Ji W, Duan W, et al. Precision in liver surgery. Semin Liver Dis. 2013;189-203.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1351781
  18. Peterhans M, vom Berg A, Dagon B, Inderbitzin D, Baur C, Candinas D, et al. A navigation system for open liver surgery: design, workflow and first clinical applications. Int J Med Robot. 2011;7-16.  https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.360
  19. Azuma R, Baillot Y, Behringer R, Feiner S, Julier S, MacIntyre B. Recent advances in augmented reality. Computers & Graphics. 2001;21:34-47.  https://doi.org/10.1109/38.963459
  20. Diana M, Marescaux J. Robotic surgery. Br J Surg. 2015;15-28.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9711
  21. Pessaux P, Diana M, Soler L, Piardi T, Mutter D, Marescaux J. Towards cybernetic surgery: robotic and augmented reality-assisted liver segmentectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2015;381-385.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-014-1256-9
  22. Onda S, Okamoto T, Kanehira M, Fujioka S, Suzuki N, Hattori A, et al. Short rigid scope and stereo-scope designed specifically for open abdominal navigation surgery: clinical application for hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2013;448-453.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-012-0582-y
  23. Oldhafer KJ, Peterhans M, Kantas A, Schenk A, Makridis G, Pelzl S, Donati M. Navigierte Leberchirurgie. Der Chirurg. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-018-0713-3
  24. Katić D, Wekerle AL, Görtler J, Spengler P, Bodenstedt S, Röhl S, et al. Context-aware augmented reality in laparoscopic surgery. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2013;174-182.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compmedimag.2013.03.003
  25. Ntourakis D, Memeo R, Soler L, Marescaux J, Mutter D & Pessaux P. Augmented Reality Guidance for the Resection of Missing Colorectal Liver Metastases: An Initial Experience. World Journal of Surgery. 2015;40(2):419-426.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-015-3229-8
  26. Okamoto T, Onda S, Matsumoto M, Gocho T, Futagawa Y, Fujioka S, et al. Utility of augmented reality system in hepatobiliary surgery. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2013;249-253.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-012-0504-z
  27. Belkov DS, Egiev VN, Machul’skij DS. Experience in creating and using 3D-models of organs for liver and lung tumor. Moskovskij hirurgicheskij zhurnal. 2017;1.53. (In Russ.).
  28. Madurska MJ, Poyade M, Eason D, Rea P & Watson AJM. Development of a Patient-Specific 3D-Printed Liver Model for Preoperative Planning. Surgical Innovation. 2017;24(2):145-150.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1553350616689414
  29. Hu M, Hu H, Cai W, Mo Z, Xiang N, Yang J & Fang C. The Safety and Feasibility of Three-Dimensional Visualization Technology Assisted Right Posterior Lobe Allied with Part of V and VIII Sectionectomy for Right Hepatic Malignancy Therapy. Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques. 2018;28(5):586-594.  https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2017.0479
  30. Souzaki R, Kinoshita Y, Ieiri S, Hayashida M, Koga Y, Shirabe K, Taguchi T. Three-dimensional liver model based on preoperative CT images as a tool to assist in surgical planning for hepatoblastoma in a child. Pediatric Surgery International. 2015;31(6):593-596.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-015-3709-9
  31. Oshiro Y, Mitani J, Okada T & Ohkohchi N. A novel three-dimensional print of liver vessels and tumors in hepatectomy. Surgery Today. 2016;47(4):521-524.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-016-1383-8
  32. Igami T, Nakamura Y, Hirose T, Ebata T, Yokoyama Y, Sugawara G, Nagino M. Application of a Three-dimensional Print of a Liver in Hepatectomy for Small Tumors Invisible by Intraoperative Ultrasonography: Preliminary Experience. World Journal of Surgery. 2014;38(12):3163-3166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2740-7
  33. Igami T, Nakamura Y, Oda M, Tanaka H, Nojiri M, Ebata T, Nagino M. Application of three-dimensional print in minor hepatectomy following liver partition between anterior and posterior sectors. ANZ Journal of Surgery. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.14331
  34. Perica E, Sun Z. Patient-specific three-dimensional printing for pre-surgical planning in hepatocellular carcinoma treatment. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2017;7(6):668-677.  https://doi.org/10.21037/qims.2017.11.02
  35. Witowski JS, Pędziwiatr M, Major P & Budzyński A. Cost-effective, personalized, 3D-printed liver model for preoperative planning before laparoscopic liver hemihepatectomy for colorectal cancer metastases. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery. 2017;12(12):2047-2054. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-017-1527-3
  36. Oshiro Y, Ohkohchi N. Three-Dimensional Liver Surgery Simulation: Computer-Assisted Surgical Planning with Three-Dimensional Simulation Software and Three-Dimensional Printing. Tissue Engineering Part A. 2017;23(11-12):474-480.  https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2016.0528
  37. Xiang N, Fang CH, Fan YF, et al. Application of liver three-dimensional printing in hepatectomy for complex massive hepatocarcinoma with rare variations of portal vein: preliminary experience. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8(10):18873-18878.
  38. Patyutko YuI, Mamontov KG, Kotelnikov AG, Ponomarenko AA, Lazarev AF. Extensive liver resection with preoperative chemotherapy for colorectal metastases with high risk of complications. Rossijskij onkologicheskij zhurnal. 2014;4-11. (In Russ.).
  39. Patjutko JuI, Kotel’nikov AG, Mamontov KG, Ponomarenko AA, Lazarev AF. Immediate results of hepatectomy for metastatic colorectal cancer. Onkologicheskaja koloproktologija. 2014;14-20. (In Russ.).
  40. Melehina OV, Efanov MG, Alihanov RB i soavt. Surgical Methods for Liver Failure Prevention after Advanced Hepatectomies. Annaly hirurgicheskoj gepatologii. 2016;21(3):47-55. (In Russ.).
  41. Chardarov NK, Bagmet NN, Skipenko OG. Biliary complications after liver resection. Hirurgija. Zhurnal im NI Pirogova. 2010;61-68. (In Russ.).
  42. Chardarov NK, Ganiev FA, Bagmet NN, Skipenko OG. Liver Hemangiomas: the Surgical View (review). Annaly hirurgicheskoj gepatologii. 2011;91-98. (In Russ.).
  43. Vishnevskij VA, Efanov MG, Ikranov RZ i soavtory. Remote Results Influence of the Resections in the Colorectal Cancer Metastasis and Primary Liver Cancer Patients. Annaly hirurgicheskoj gepatologii. 2010;15(1):43-52. (In Russ.).
  44. Sostoyaniye onkologicheskoy pomoshchi naseleniyu Rossii v 2018 godu. Pod red. Kaprin A.D., Starinskiy V.V., Petrova G.V. Izdatel’stvo: MNIOI im. P.A. Gertsena — filial FGBU «NMIC radiologii» Minzdrava Rossii; 2019. (In Russ.).
  45. Yasuda J, Okamoto T, Onda S, Futagawa Y, Yanaga K, Suzuki N, Hattori A. Novel navigation system by augmented reality technology using a tablet PC for hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery. The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery. 2018;1921. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.1921
  46. Watson RA. A Low-Cost Surgical Application of Additive Fabrication. Journal of Surgical Education. 2014;71(1):14-17.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2013.10.012
  47. Tang R, Ma L-F, Rong Z-X, Li M-D, Zeng J-P, Wang X-D… Dong J-H. Augmented reality technology for preoperative planning and intraoperative navigation during hepatobiliary surgery: A review of current methods. Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases Internationa. 2018;17(2):101-112.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hbpd.2018.02.002
  48. Soon DSC, Chae MP, Pilgrim CHC, Rozen WM, Spychal RT, Hunter-Smith DJ. 3D haptic modelling for preoperative planning of hepatic resection: A systematic review. Annals of Medicine and Surgery. 2016;1-7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2016.07.002
  49. Phutane P, Buc E, Poirot K, Ozgur E, Pezet D, Bartoli A & Le Roy B. Preliminary trial of augmented reality performed on a laparoscopic left hepatectomy. Surgical Endoscopy. 2017;32(1):51-515.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5733-4
  50. Nuh N Rahbari, O James Garden, Robert Padbury, et al. Posthepatectomy liver failure: A definition and grading. The International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS). Surgery. 2011;149(5):713-724.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2010.10.001
  51. Hallet J, Soler L, Diana M, Mutter D, Baumert TF, Habersetzer F, et al. Trans-thoracic minimally invasive liver resection guided by augmented reality. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;55-60.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.12.053
  52. Fasel JD, Schenk A. Concepts for Liver Segment Classification: Neither Old Ones nor New Ones, but a Comprehensive One. Journal of Clinical Imaging Science. 2013;3(1):48.  https://doi.org/10.4103/2156-7514.120803
  53. Buchs NC, Volonte F, Pugin F, Toso C, Fusaglia M, Gavaghan K, et al. Augmented environments for the targeting of hepatic lesions during image-guided robotic liver surgery. J Surg Res. 2013;825-831.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2013.04.032
  54. Bégin A, Martel G, Lapointe R, et al. Accuracy of preoperative automatic measurement of the liver volume by CT-scan combined to a 3D virtual surgical planning software (3DVSP). Surg Endosc. 2014;3408-3412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3611-x
Contact the author
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

Contact us
If you have any questions, complaints or suggestions, please use this feedback form.
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.
Submit Application

You can become an author of one of our magazines, send a request and we will consider it in during the day.

Name
Phone
E-mail
Message
Login
Registration
E-mail
Password
Forgot Password?

Log in to the site using your account in one of the services

Password recovery
E-mail
Login
Register

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.