The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Sokolov A.D.

National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology Named After Academician V.I. Kulakov of the Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation

Arakelyan A.S.

National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology Named After Academician V.I. Kulakov of the Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation

Bychenko V.G.

Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology

Stepanian A.A.

Academia of Women’s Health and Endoscopic Surgery

Asaturova A.V.

National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology Named After Academician V.I. Kulakov of the Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation

Adamyan L.V.

Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology;
Russian University of Medicine

Three-dimensional modeling and intraoperative navigation in the diagnosis and treatment of various forms of adenomyosis

Authors:

Sokolov A.D., Arakelyan A.S., Bychenko V.G., Stepanian A.A., Asaturova A.V., Adamyan L.V.

More about the authors

Journal: Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2025;31(2): 92‑100

Read: 792 times


To cite this article:

Sokolov AD, Arakelyan AS, Bychenko VG, Stepanian AA, Asaturova AV, Adamyan LV. Three-dimensional modeling and intraoperative navigation in the diagnosis and treatment of various forms of adenomyosis. Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2025;31(2):92‑100. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/repro20253102192

Recommended articles:
Giant peri­cranial sinus with exte­nsive occi­pital calvarium defect. Burdenko's Journal of Neurosurgery. 2024;(6):77-87
Clinical case of auri­cular gouty tophi. Russian Bulletin of Otorhinolaryngology. 2024;(6):80-84

References:

  1. Senturk LM, Imamoglu M. Adenomyosis: what is new?.Women’s Health. 2015;11(5):717-724.  https://doi.org/10.2217/whe.15.60
  2. Abbott JA. Adenomyosis and Abnormal Uterine Bleeding (AUB-A)-Pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. Best Practice and Research. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2017;40:68-81.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2016.09.006
  3. Dzhamalutdinova KM, Kozachenko IF, Gus AI, Adamyan LV. Modern aspects of pathogenesis and diagnostics of adenomyosis. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya. 2018;1:29-34. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18565/aig.2018.1.29-34
  4. Mark AS, Hricak H, Heinrichs LW, Hendrickson MR, Winkler ML, Bachica JA, Stickler JE. Adenomyosis and leiomyoma: differential diagnosis with MR imaging. Radiology. 1987;163(2):527-529.  https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.163.2.3562836
  5. Fedele L, Bianchi S, Dorta M, Arcaini L, Zanotti F, Carinelli S. Transvaginal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of diffuse adenomyosis. Fertility and Sterility. 1992;58(1):94-97. 
  6. Bourdon M, Oliveira J, Marcellin L, Santulli P, Bordonne C, Maitrot Mantelet L, Millischer AE, Plu Bureau G, Chapron C. Adenomyosis of the inner and outer myometrium are associated with different clinical profiles. Human Reproduction. 2021;36(2):349-357.  https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deaa307
  7. Bourdon M, Santulli P, Oliveira J, Marcellin L, Maignien C, Melka L, Bordonne C, Millisher AE, Plu-Bureau G, Cormier J, Chapron C. Focal adenomyosis is associated with primary infertility. Fertility and Sterility. 2020;114(6):1271-1277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.06.018
  8. Tamura H, Kishi H, Kitade M, Asai-Sato M, Tanaka A, Murakami T, Minegishi T, Sugino N. Clinical outcomes of infertility treatment for women with adenomyosis in Japan. Reproductive Medicine and Biology. 2017;16(3):276-282.  https://doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12036
  9. Kishi Y, Suginami H, Kuramori R, Yabuta M, Suginami R, Taniguchi F. Four subtypes of adenomyosis assessed by magnetic resonance imaging and their specification. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2012;207(2):114.e1114.e1147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2012.06.027
  10. Van den Bosch T, Dueholm M, Leone FP, Valentin L, Rasmussen CK, Votino A, Van Schoubroeck D, Landolfo C, Installé AJ, Guerriero S, Exacoustos C, Gordts S, Benacerraf B, D’Hooghe T, De Moor B, Brölmann H, Goldstein S, Epstein E, Bourne T, Timmerman D. Terms, definitions and measurements to describe sonographic features of myometrium and uterine masses: a consensus opinion from the Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) group. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2015;46(3):284-298.  https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.14806
  11. Kepkep K, Tuncay YA, Göynümer G, Tutal E. Transvaginal sonography in the diagnosis of adenomyosis: which findings are most accurate?. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2007;30(3):341-345.  https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.3985
  12. Sencha AN, Kondratovich LM, Bykov AG, Adamyan LV. Ultrasound elastography in the diagnosis of adenomyosis. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya. 2020;3:86-99. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18565/aig.2020.3.86-99
  13. Shklyar AA, Adamyan LV, Kogan EA, Paramonova NB, Kozachenko IF, Gavrilova TYu, Kononov SN. Difficulties in diagnosing nodular and diffuse adenomyosis. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya. 2015;3:67-72. (In Russ.).
  14. Sencha AN, Arakelyan AS, Bykov AG, Adamyan LV. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging in the diagnosis of adenomyosis. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya. 2021;6:115-121. (In Russ.).
  15. Habiba M, Benagiano G. Classifying Adenomyosis: Progress and Challenges. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021;18(23):12386. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182312386
  16. Kishi Y, Suginami H, Kuramori R, Yabuta M, Suginami R, Taniguchi F. Four subtypes of adenomyosis assessed by magnetic resonance imaging and their specification. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2012;207(2):114.e1114.e1147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2012.06.027
  17. Bazot M, Daraï E. Role of transvaginal sonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of uterine adenomyosis. Fertility and Sterility. 2018;109(3):389-397.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.01.024
  18. Chapron C, Tosti C, Marcellin L, Bourdon M, Lafay-Pillet MC, Millischer AE, Streuli I, Borghese B, Petraglia F, Santulli P. Relationship between the magnetic resonance imaging appearance of adenomyosis and endometriosis phenotypes. Human Reproduction. 2017;32(7):1393-1401. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dex088
  19. Adamyan LV, Kulakov VI. Endometriozy. M.: Meditsina; 1998. (In Russ.).
  20. Reinhold C, McCarthy S, Bret PM, Mehio A, Atri M, Zakarian R, Glaude Y, Liang L, Seymour RJ. Diffuse adenomyosis: comparison of endovaginal US and MR imaging with histopathologic correlation. Radiology. 1996;199(1):151-158.  https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.199.1.8633139
  21. Arakelyan AS, Gus AI, Adamyan LV, Popryadukhin AYu, Boykova YuV. The role of 3D echographic diagnostics in the choice of tactics for reconstructive plastic surgery in case of abnormalities of the development of the uterus and vagina. Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2021;27(4):32-42. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/repro20212704132
  22. Marmulla R, Niederdellmann H. Computer-assisted bone segment navigation. Journal of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.1998;26(6): 347-359.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s1010-5182(98)80067-x
  23. Shchadenko SV, Gorbyachova AS, Arslanova AR, Tolmachyov IV. 3D visualization for surgical modelling and surgical planning. Byulleten’ sibirskoj meditsiny. 2014;13(4):165-171. (In Russ.).
  24. Tejo-Otero A, Buj-Corral I, Fenollosa-Artés F. 3D Printing in Medicine for Preoperative Surgical Planning: A Review. Annals of Biomedical Engineering. 2020;48(2):536-555.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-019-02411-0
  25. Fedorov VD, Karmazanovskiy GG, Guzeeva EB, Tsvirkun VV. Virtual’noe khirurgicheskoe modelirovanie na osnove dannykh komp’yuternoj tomografii. M.: Vidar; 2003. (In Russ.).
  26. Sabri SA, York PJ. Preoperative planning for intraoperative navigation guidance. Annals of Translational Medicine. 2021;9(1):87.  https://doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-1369
  27. Baldwin KD, Kadiyala M, Talwar D, Sankar WN, Flynn JJM, Anari JB. Does intraoperative CT navigation increase the accuracy of pedicle screw placement in pediatric spinal deformity surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Spine Deformity. 2022; 10(1):19-29.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-021-00385-5
  28. Kimmig R, Aktas B, Buderath P, Rusch P, Heubner M. Intraoperative navigation in robotically assisted compartmental surgery of uterine cancer by visualisation of embryologically derived lymphatic networks with indocyanine-green (ICG). Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2016;113(5):554-559.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.24174
  29. Shi J, Wu Y, Li X, Gu Z, Zhang C, Yan H, Dai Y, Leng J. Effects of localization of uterine adenomyosis on clinical features and pregnancy outcome. Scientific Reports. 2023;13(1):14714. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-40816-z
  30. Ajao MO, Clark NV, Kelil T, Cohen SL, Einarsson JI. Case Report: Three-Dimensional Printed Model for Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 2017;24(7): 1239-1242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2017.06.006
  31. Mackey A, Ng JI, Core J, Nguyen L, Cross D, Lim P, Woodfield C, Pugliese R, Ku B. Three-Dimensional-Printed Uterine Model for Surgical Planning of a Cesarean Delivery Complicated by Multiple Myomas. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2019;133(4):720-724.  https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003107
  • Tejada MA, Antunez C, Nunez-Badinez P, De Leo B, Saunders PT, Vincent K, Cano A, Nagel J, Gomez R. Rodent Animal Models of Endometriosis-Associated Pain: Unmet Needs and Resources Available for Improving Translational Research in Endometriosis. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023;24(3):2422. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms2403242
  • Deseure K, Hans GH. Chronic Constriction Injury of the Rat’s Infraorbital Nerve (IoN-CCI) to Study Trigeminal Neuropathic Pain. Journal of Visualized Experiments. 2015;(103):53167. https://doi.org/10.3791/53167
  • Cordaro M, Trovato Salinaro A, Siracusa R, D\’Amico R, Impellizzeri D, Scuto M, Ontario ML, Interdonato L, Crea R, Fusco R, Cuzzocrea S, Di Paola R, Calabrese V. Hidrox® and Endometriosis: Biochemical Evaluation of Oxidative Stress and Pain. Antioxidants. 2021;10(5):720.  https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10050720
  • Tejada MA, Santos-Llamas AI, Escriva L, Tarin JJ, Cano A, Fernández-Ramírez MJ, Nunez-Badinez P, De Leo B, Saunders PTK, Vidal V, Barthas F, Vincent K, Sweeney PJ, Sillito RR, Armstrong JD, Nagel J, Gomez R. Identification of Altered Evoked and Non-Evoked Responses in a Heterologous Mouse Model of Endometriosis-Associated Pain. Biomedicines. 2022;10(2):501.  https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10020501
  • Pattison LA, Cloake A, Chakrabarti S, Hilton H, Rickman RH, Higham JP, Meng MY, Paine LW, Dannawi M, Qiu L, Ritoux A, Bulmer DC, Callejo G, Smith ESJ. Digging deeper into pain — an ethological behavior assay correlating well-being in mice with human pain experience. Pain. 2024;165(8):1761-1773. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.08.18.553862
  • Leung VSY, Benoit-Biancamano MO, Pang DSJ. Performance of behavioral assays: the Rat Grimace Scale, burrowing activity and a composite behavior score to identify visceral pain in an acute and chronic colitis model. Pain Reports. 2019;4(2):e718. https://doi.org/10.1097/PR9.0000000000000712
  • Persoons E, De Clercq K, Van den Eynde C, Pinto SJPC, Luyten K, Van Bree R, Tomassetti C, Voets T, Vriens J. Mimicking Sampson’s Retrograde Menstrual Theory in Rats: A New Rat Model for Ongoing Endometriosis-Associated Pain. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020;21(7):2326. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21072326
  • Email Confirmation

    An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

    Email Confirmation

    We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.