The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Sorokina N.D.

Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry

Zherdeva A.S.

Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry

Selitsky G.V.

Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry

Tsagashek A.V.

Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry

Neurophysiological methods in the assessment of different forms of migraine

Authors:

Sorokina N.D., Zherdeva A.S., Selitsky G.V., Tsagashek A.V.

More about the authors

Read: 5608 times


To cite this article:

Sorokina ND, Zherdeva AS, Selitsky GV, Tsagashek AV. Neurophysiological methods in the assessment of different forms of migraine. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2021;121(4):121‑126. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/jnevro2021121041121

Recommended articles:
Biochemical features of migraine pathogenesis. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2025;(4):21-26
Effe­cts of rhythmic transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of inso­mnia. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2025;(5-2):64-69
Clinical and instrumental diagnostics of facial neuropathy in children. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2025;(6):31-36
Recu­rrent pain syndromes in adolescents of different ages. Russian Journal of Pain. 2025;(2):24-31

References:

  1. Magisa D, Lisicki M, Coppola G. Highlights in migraine electrophysiology: are controversies just reflecting disease heterogeneity? Curr Opin Neurol. 2016;29(3):320–330.  https://doi.org/10.1097/WCO.0000000000000335
  2. Sorokina ND, Pertsov SS, Selitsky GV. Neurobiological mechanisms of tension and migraine headache: similarities and differences. Rossijskij Zhurnal Boli. 2018;(3):96–108. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.25731/RASP.2018.03.024
  3. Sorokina ND, Pertsov SS, Selitsky GV. Neurobiological mechanisms of transcranial magnetic stimulation and its comparative efficacy in tension-type headache and migraine. Rossijskij Mediko-Biologicheskij Vestnik im. akad. I.P. Pavlova. 2018;26(3):417–429. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.23888/PAVLOVJ2018263417-429
  4. Sorokina ND, Selitsky GV, Zherdeva AS. Neurobiological aspects of the effectiveness of biofeedback in the treatment of migraine in epilepsy. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry = Zhurnal nevrologii i psikhiatrii imeni S.S. Korsakova. 2016;116(12):39–43. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/jnevro201611612139-43
  5. Ambrosini A. Neurophysiology of migraine. Neurol Sci. 2018;39 (Suppl 1): 59–60.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-018-3385-3
  6. Miskov S. Neurophysiological methods in headache diagnosis. Acta Med Croatica. 2008;62(2):189–196. 
  7. de Tommaso M, Stramaglia S, Marinazzo D, et al. Functional and effective connectivity in EEG alpha and beta bands during intermittent flash stimulation in migraine with and without aura. Cephalalgia. 2013;33(11):938–947.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102413477741
  8. Nyrke T, Kangasniemi P, Lang H. Alpha rhythm in classical migraine (migraine with aura): abnormalities in the headache-free interval. Cephalalgia. 1990;10(4):177–182.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-2982.1990.1004177.x
  9. Bjork M, Sand T. Quantitative EEG power and asymmetry increase 36 h before a migraine attack. Cephalalgia. 2008;28(9):960–968.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2982.2008.01638.x
  10. Bjork MH, Stovner LJ, Engstrøm M, et al. Interictal quantitative EEG in migraine: a blinded controlled study. J Headache Pain. 2009;10(5):331–339.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10194-009-0140-4
  11. Cao Z, Lin Ch, Chuang Ch-H, et al. Resting-state EEG power and coherence vary between migraine phases. J Headache Pain. 2016;17(1):102.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-016-0697-7
  12. Bjørk M, Stovner LJ, Hagen K, Sand T. What initiates a migraine attack? Conclusions from four longitudinal studies of quantitative EEG and steady-state visual-evoked potentials in migraineurs. Acta Neurol Scand Suppl. 2011;(191):56–63.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0404.2011.01545.x
  13. Restuccia D, Vollono C, Del Piero I, et al. Somatosensory High Frequency Oscillations reflect clinical fluctuations in migraine. Clin Neurophysiol. 2012;123(10):2050-6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2012.03.009
  14. Wein AM, Yefremova IN, Filatova EG. Clinical and neurophysiological features of migraine with aura in comparison with migraine without aura. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry = Zhurnal nevrologii i psikhiatrii imeni S.S. Korsakova. 2003;(10):45–49. (In Russ.).
  15. Kotov AS. Comorbidity of migraine and epilepsy. Poliklinika. 2012;(4):35–39. (In Russ.).
  16. Sorokina ND, Selitsky GV, Tsagashek AV, Zherdeva AS. Evaluation of neurophysiological parameters and tone of the autonomic nervous system in migraine patients with epilepsy. Epilepsiya i Paroksizmal’nye Sostoyaniya. 2018;10(3):6–13. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17749/2077-8333.2018.10.3.006-013
  17. Aurora SK, Wilkinson F. The brain is hyperexcitable in migraine. Cephalalgia. 2007;27(12):1442–1453. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2982.2007.01502.x
  18. Coppola G, Pierelli F, Schoenen J. Is the cerebral cortex hyperexcitable or hyperresponsive in migraine? Cephalalgia. 2007;27(12):1427–1439. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2982.2007.01500.x
  19. Deen M, Christensen CE, Hougaard A, et al. Serotonergic mechanisms in the migraine brain — a systematic review. Cephalalgia. 2017;37(3):251–264.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102416640501
  20. Sand T, Zhitniy N, White LR, Stovner LJ. Visual evoked potential latency, amplitude and habituation in migraine: a longitudinal study. Clin Neurophysiol. 2008;119(5):1020–1027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2008.01.009
  21. Sand T, White LR, Hagen K, Stovner LJ. Visual evoked potential and spatial frequency in migraine: a longitudinal study. Acta Neurol Scand Suppl. 2009;(189):33–37.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0404.2009.01211.x
  22. Ambrosini A, Coppola G, Gerardy PY, et al. Intensity dependence of auditory evoked potentials during light interference in migraine. Neurosci Lett. 2011;492(2):80–83.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2011.01.060
  23. Sand T, Zhitniy N, White LR, Stovner LJ. Visual evoked potential latency, amplitudeand habituation in migraine: a longitudinal study. Clin Neurophysiol. 2008;119(5):1020–1027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2008.01.009
  24. Kuznetsova EA, Yakupov EZ. Changes in evoked potentials and reflex activity of brain stem structures in chronic headache. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry = Zhurnal nevrologii i psikhiatrii imeni S.S. Korsakova. 2011;(8):27–30. (In Russ.).
  25. Yakupov ZE, Kuznetsova EA. peculiarities of evoked potentials in secondary headaches. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry = Zhurnal nevrologii i psikhiatrii imeni S.S. Korsakova. 2010;(1):73–77. (In Russ.).
  26. Chen WT, Wang SJ, Fuh JL, et al. Visual cortex excitability and plasticity associated with remission from chronic to episodic migraine. Cephalalgia. 2012;32(7):537–543.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102412443337
  27. Coppola G, Schoenen J. Cortical excitability in chronic migraine. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2012;16(1):93–100.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-011-0231-1
  28. de Tommaso M, Ambrosini A, Brighina F, et al. Altered processing of sensory stimuli in patients with migraine. Nat Rev Neurol. 2014;10(3):144–155.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2014.14
  29. Magis D, Ambrosini A, Bendtsen L, et al. Evaluation and proposal for optimalization of neurophysiological tests in migraine: part 1 — electrophysiological tests. Cephalalgia. 2007;27(12):1323–1338. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2982.2007.01440.x
  30. Singh A, Joshi D, Yadav R, et al. Central cognitive processing assessed by P300 in migraine, tension-type headache, and cluster headache. Int J Clin Exp Physiol. 2015;2(4):220–223. 
  31. Deen M, Christensen CE, Hougaard A, et al. Serotonergic mechanisms in the migraine brain — a systematic review. Cephalalgia. 2017;37(3):251–264.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102416640501
  32. Sakuma K, Takeshima T, Ishizaki K, Nakashima K. Somatosensory evoked high frequency oscillations in migraine patients. Clin Neurophysiol. 2004;115(8):1857–1862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2004.03.011
  33. Coppola G, Vandenheede M, Di Clemente L, et al. Somatosensory evoked high-frequency oscillations reflecting thalamo-cortical activity are decreased in migraine patients between attacks. Brain. 2005;128(Pt 1):98–103.  https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awh334
  34. Coppola G, Iacovelli E, Bracaglia M, et al. Electrophysiological correlates of episodic migraine chronifi cation: evidence for thalamic involvement. J Headache Pain. 2013;14(1):76.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1129-2377-14-76
  35. Restuccia D, Vollono C, Virdis D, et al. Patterns of habituation and clinical fluctuations in migraine. Cephalalgia. 2014;34(3):201–210.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102413508241
  36. Sowmiya R, Vinodha R. Evaluation of brainstem auditory evoked potential in migraine patient. Int J Med Res Health Sci. 2015;4(4):771–774.  https://doi.org/10.5958/2319-5886.2015.00151.4
  37. Tabeeva G.R., Yakhno N.N. Migren’. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2011. (In Russ.).
  38. Aurora SK, Wilkinson F. The brain is hyperexcitable in migraine. Cephalalgia. 2007;27:1442-1453.
  39. Sorokina ND, Selitsky GV, Teremenceva EC. Neurophysiological aspects of pain syndromes of the maxillofacial region. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry = Zhurnal nevrologii i psikhiatrii imeni S.S. Korsakova. 2014;114(4):105–110. (In Russ.).
  40. Tommaso M. Laser-evoked potentials in primary headaches and cranial neuralgias. Expert Rev Neurother. 2008;8(9):1339–1345. https://doi.org/10.1586/14737175.8.9.1339
  41. Iannetti GD, Hughes NP, Lee MC, Mouraux A. Determinants of Laser-Evoked EEG Responses: Pain Perception or Stimulus Saliency? J Neurophysiol. 2008;100:815–828.  https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00097.2008
  42. Tommaso M, Libro G, Guido M, et al. Habituation of single CO2 laser-evoked responses during interictal phase of migraine. J Headache Pain. 2005;6(4):195–198.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10194-005-0183-0
  43. Tommaso M, Lo Sito L, Fruscolo O, et al. Lack of habituation of nociceptive evoked responses and pain sensitivity during migraine attack. Clin Neurophysiol. 2005;116(6):1254–1264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2005.02.018
  44. Yildiz SK, Yildiz N, Korkmaz B, et al. Sympathetic skin responses from frontal region in migraine headache: a pilot study. Cephalalgia. 2008;28(7):696–704.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2982.2008.01574.x
  45. Vecchio E, Bassez I, Ricci K, et al. Effect of Non-invasive Vagus Nerve Stimulation on Resting-State Electroencephalography and Laser-Evoked Potentials in Migraine Patients: Mechanistic Insights. Front Hum Neurosci. 2018;12:366.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00366
  46. Bortoletto M, Veniero D, Thut G, Miniussi C. The contribution of TMS-EEG coregistration in the exploration of the human cortical connectome. Neurosci Biobehav. 2015;49:114-124.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.12.014
  47. Misra UK, Kalita J, Tripathi G, Bhoi SK. Role of β endorphin in pain relief following high rate repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in migraine. Brain Stimul. 2017;10(3):618–623.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2017.02.006

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.