The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Login
EN
+7 (495) 482-4118
+7 (495) 482-4329
+8 800 250-18-12
  • (toll-free number for subscriptions)
    Mon-Fri from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m.

  • © 1998-2026
+7 (495) 482-43-29
EN
All journals
Journal
Year
Year
Search result: 0

Trufanov S.V.

Research Institute of Eye Diseases

Malozhen S.A.

Krasnov Research Institute of Eye Diseases

Antonov A.A.

Krasnov Research Institute of Eye Diseases

Makarova M.A.

Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)

Modern capabilities of ophthalmic tonometry in pathologically altered corneas

Authors:

Trufanov S.V., Malozhen S.A., Antonov A.A., Makarova M.A.

More about the authors

Journal: Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2022;138(1): 71‑77

DOI: 10.17116/oftalma202213801171

Read: 1912 times

Download PDF (RU)
Contact the author
Table of contents

MODERN CAPABILITIES OF OPHTHALMIC TONOMETRY IN PATHOLOGICALLY ALTERED CORNEAS
MODERN CAPABILITIES OF OPHTHALMIC TONOMETRY IN PATHOLOGICALLY ALTERED CORNEAS

To cite this article:

Trufanov SV, Malozhen SA, Antonov AA, Makarova MA. Modern capabilities of ophthalmic tonometry in pathologically altered corneas. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2022;138(1):71‑77. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma202213801171

Подписка 2026 Вестник офтальмологии (Russian Annals of Ophthalmology)
МСФ на ЯМ
Использование инфографики авторами научных работ
Close metadata
Recommended articles:
Long-term outcomes of phakic intraocular lens implantation in high myopia. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2025;(1):28-31
The resu­lts of fistulizing glaucoma surgeries in pseudophackic patients. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2025;(1):45-52
The possibilities of antioxidant neuroretinoprotection in the treatment of primary open-angle glaucoma. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2025;(4):49-59
Electrophysiological methods in the diagnosis and moni­toring of glaucoma. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2025;(4):102-109
The effect of initial conservative hypo­tensive therapy on the outcomes of sele­ctive laser trabeculoplasty in primary open-angle glaucoma. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2025;(5):16-22
Modern devi­ces for microinvasive glaucoma surgery. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2025;(5):101-108
Comparative evaluation of tono­metry methods in kera­toconus. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2025;(6):7-13
Neuroprotective therapy in adva­nced primary open-angle glaucoma. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2025;(6):75-80
Abstract:

Changes in intraocular pressure have great influence on the course of various processes in ocular tissues. Presently, the scientific discussion has returned to the theoretical issues of tonometry and the creation of models that would allow assessing the influence of various ocular parameters on IOP values. Some of the modern tonometers (Icare, Tono-Pen) are convenient and effective when measuring IOP in eyes with damaged, uneven or edematous cornea. It is necessary to analyze the results of ophthalmic tonometry by modern methods in accordance with the data of direct intracameral manometry in pathological conditions of the cornea and after keratoplasty.

Keywords:

intraocular pressure
tonometry
biomechanics
glaucoma
corneal pathology

Authors:

Trufanov S.V.

Research Institute of Eye Diseases

Malozhen S.A.

Krasnov Research Institute of Eye Diseases

Antonov A.A.

Krasnov Research Institute of Eye Diseases

Makarova M.A.

Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)

Received:

16.08.2021

Accepted:

13.10.2021

Close metadata

References:

  1. Avetisov SE, Egorova GB, Kobzova MV, Mitichkina TS, Rogova AI. Clinical significance of modern methods of corneal assessment. Vestnik oftal’mologii = The Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2013;129(5):22-31. (In Russ.).
  2. Iomdina EN, Bauer SM, Kotliar KE. Biomekhanika glaza: teoreticheskie aspekty i klinicheskie prilozheniya [Biomechanics of the eye: theoretical aspects and clinical applications]. M.: Real Taim; 2015. (In Russ.).
  3. Nesterov AP, Piletsky GK, Piletsky NG. Transpalpebral tonometer for measuring the intraocular pressure. Vestnik oftal’mologii = The Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2003;119(1):3-5. (In Russ.).
  4. Egorov EA, Vasina MV. IOP and corneal thickness. Glaucoma. 2006;(2):34-36. (In Russ.).
  5. Amaral WO, Teixeira RM, Alencar LM, Cronemberger S, Calixto N. Central and peripheral corneal thickness: influence on the iop measurement by Tonopen. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2006;69(1):41-45.  https://doi.org/10.1590/s0004-27492006000100009
  6. Bergmanson JP, Horne J, Doughty MJ, Garcia M, Gondo M. Assessment of the number of lamellae in the central region of the normal human corneal stroma at the resolution of the transmission electron microscope. Eye Contact Lens. 2005;31(6):281-287.  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.icl.0000165280.94927.0d
  7. Morishige N, Petroll WM, Nishida T, Kenney MC, Jester JV. Noninvasive corneal stromal collagen imaging using two-photon-generated second-harmonic signals. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006 Nov;32(11):1784-1791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.08.027
  8. Sanchis-Gimeno JA, Lleo-Perez A, Alonso L, Rahhal MS, Martinez Soriano F. Corneal endothelial cell density decreases with age in emmetropic eyes. Histol Histopathol. 2005;20(2):423-427.  https://doi.org/10.14670/HH-20.423
  9. Roberts CJ, Dupps WJ, Downs JC. Biomechanics of the Eye. Kugler Publications; 2018.
  10. Meek KM. Corneal collagen-its role in maintaining corneal shape and transparency. Biophys Rev. 2009;1(2):83-93.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12551-009-0011-x
  11. Trufanov SV, Salovarova EP. Corneal endothelial dysfunction: etiology, pathogenesis, and current treatment approaches. RMZH. Klinicheskaya oftal’mologiya. 2009;(2):116-119. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.32364/2311-7729-2019-19-2-116-119
  12. Avetisov SE, Chernenkova NA, Surnina ZV. Anatomical and functional features of corneal nerve fibers and methods of their evaluation. Vestnik oftal’mologii = The Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2018;134(6):102-106. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma2018134061102
  13. Avetisov SE, Bubnova IA, Antonov AA. The study of the effect of the corneal biomechanical properties on the intraocular pressure measurement. Byulleten’ Sibirskogo otdeleniya Rossijskoj akademii medicinskih nauk. 2009; 29(4):30-33. (In Russ.).
  14. Avetisov SE, Bubnova IA, Novikov IA, Antonov AA, Siplivy VI, Kuznetsov AV. Fibrous tunic biomechanics and biometric indicies. Report 1. The impact of axial length, thickness and corneal curvature. Vestnik oftal’mologii = The Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2011;127(3):3-5. (In Russ.).
  15. Antonov AA, Karlova EV, Brezhnev AYu, Dorofeev DA. Current state of ophthalmic tonometry. Vestnik oftal’mologii = The Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 220;136(6):100-107. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma2020136061100
  16. Avetisov SE, Novikov IA, Bubnova IA, Siplivyj VI, Antonov AA. Intravital evaluation of cornea’s elastic characteristics method. Patent RF na izobretenie № 2391951/20.06.2010. Bull. №17. Accessed 16.11.20. (In Russ.). https://yandex.ru/patents/doc/RU2391951C1_20100620
  17. Friedenwald JS. Contribution to the theory and practice of tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol. 1937;20(10):985-1024. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9394(37)90425-2
  18. Jaycock PD, Lobo L, Ibragim J, Tyrer J, Marshall J. Interferometric technique to measure biomechanical changes in the cornea induced by refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31(1):175-184.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.10.038
  19. Grabner G, Eilmsteiner R, Steindl C, Ruckhofer J, Mattioli R, Husinsky W. Dynamic corneal imaging. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31(1):163-174.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.09.042
  20. Avetisov SE, Bubnova IA, Antonov AA. Corneal biomechanics: clinical importance, evalution, possibilities of systemization of examination approaches. Vestnik oftal’mologii = The Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2010;126(6):3-7 (In Russ.).]
  21. Luce DA. Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31(1):156-162.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.10.044
  22. del Buey MA, Cristobal JA, Ascaso FJ, Lavilla L, Lanchares E. Biomechanical properties of the cornea in Fuchs’ corneal dystrophy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50(7):3199-3202. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.08-3312
  23. Kirwan C, O’Malley D, O’Keefe M. Corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor in keratoectasia: findings using the Reichert ocular response analyzer. Ophthalmologica. 2008;222(5):334-337.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000145333
  24. Shen M, Fan F, Xue A, Wang J, Zhou X, Lu F. Biomechanical properties of the cornea in high myopia. Vision Res. 2008;48(21):2167-2171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2008.06.020
  25. Lam A, Chen D, Chiu R, Chui WS. Comparison of IOP measurements between ORA and GAT in normal Chinese. Optom Vis Sci. 2007;84(9):909-914.  https://doi.org/10.1097/opx.0b013e3181559db2
  26. Ortiz D, Pinero D, Shabayek MH, Arnalich-Montiel F, Aliy JL. Corneal biomechanical properties in normal, post-laser in situ keratomileusis, and keratoconic eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33(8):1371-1375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.04.021
  27. Avetisov SE, Tyurina AA, Surnina ZV. Condition of corneal nerve fibers after laser keratorefractive surgery. Vestnik oftal’mologii = The Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2019;135(1):112-116. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma2019135011112
  28. Mamikonian VR, Trufanov SV, Borodina NV. The results of up-to-date techniques of automated endothelial keratoplasty. Vestnik oftal’mologii = The Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2012;128(4):3-11. (In Russ.).
  29. Mamikonian VR, Trufanov SV, Borodina NV. Top-hat keratoplasty in surgical treatment of bullous keratopathy. Vestnik oftal’mologii = The Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2013;129(3):4-11. (In Russ.).
  30. Kurysheva N, Parshunina O, Shatalova E, Kiseleva T. Value of Structural and Hemodynamic Parameters for the Early Detection of Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma. Curr Eye Res. 2016;42(3):1-7.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02713683.2016.1184281
  31. Trufanov SV, Antonov AA, Malozhen SA, Siplivyy VI. Evaluation of corneal biomechanics before and after up-to-date keratoplasty in patients with bullous keratopathy. Vestnik oftal’mologii = The Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2015;131(6):20-25. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma2015131620-25
  32. Ortiz D, Pinero D, Shabayek MH, Arnalich-Montiel F, Aliy JL. Corneal biomechanical properties in normal, post-laser in situ keratomileusis, and keratoconic eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33(8):1371-1375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.04.021
  33. Lu F, Yu S, Qu J, Shen M, Wang X, Fang H, Wang J. Central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis during corneal swelling induced by contact lens wear with eye closure. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;143(4):616-622.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2006.12.031
  34. Medeiros FA, Weinreb RN. Evaluation of the influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurements using the ocular response analyzer. J Glaucoma. 2006;15(5):364-370.  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ijg.0000212268.42606.97
  35. Liu J, Roberts CJ. Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurement: quantitative analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31(1):146-155.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.09.031
  36. Malozhen SA, Beloysova EV. The modern IOP measurement approaches in patients with corneal diseases and after penetrating keratoplasty. Glaukoma. 2010;(3):55-60. (In Russ.).
  37. Malozhhen A, Belousova EV, Trufanov SV. Options for intraocular pressure measurement in patients with corneal disorders. Vestnik oftal’mologii = The Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2011;127(4):62-63. (In Russ.).
  38. Avetisov SE, Erichev VP, Antonov AA. Transpalpebral tonometry: a comparative evaluation. Glaucoma. 2010;(3):45-48. (In Russ.).
  39. Queiros A, Gonzalez-Meijome JM, Fernandes P, Jorge J, Montes-Mico R, Almeida JB, Parafita MA. Technical note: a comparison of central and peripheral intraocular pressure using rebound tonometry. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2007;27(5):506-511.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-1313.2007.00508.x
  40. Malozhen SA, Antonov AA, Belousova EV, Bubnova IA. The comparative analysis of tonometry methods in patients with corneal pathology. Glaucoma. 2010;(4):25-28. (In Russ.).
  41. Kurysheva NI, Pechenkina AA, Goncharova AS. Methods of examination of patients with glaucoma during the COVID-19 pandemic. Vestnik oftal’mologii = The Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2021;137(2):75-83. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma2021137021
  42. Kontiola AI. A new inductionbased impact method for measuring intraocular pressure. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2000;78(2):142-145.  https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0420.2000.078002142.x
  43. Gao F, Liu X, Zhao Q, Pan Y. Comparison of the iCare rebound tonometer and the Goldmann applanation tonometer. Exp Ther Med. 2017;13(5):1912-1916. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2017.4164.
  44. Maier AK, Gundlach E, Pahlitzsch M, Gonnermann J, Corkhill C, Bertelmann E, Joussen AM, Klamann MK, Torun N. Intraocular pressure measurements after descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. J Glaucoma. 2017;26(3):258-265.  https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000000593
  45. Galgauskas S, Strupaite R, Strelkauskaite E, Asoklis R. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements with different contact tonometers in young healthy persons. Int J Ophthalmol. 2016;9(1):76-80.  https://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2016.01.13
  46. Avetisov SE, Antonov AA, Vostrukhin SV, Avetisov KS. Intraocular pressure measurement inside the anterior chamber: A new technical solution and results. Vestnik oftal’mologii = The Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2016; 132(6):4-10. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma201613264-10
  47. Avetisov SE, Antonov AA, Vostrukhin SV. Sposob izmereniya vnutriglaznogo davleniya u pacientov, perenesshih radial’nuyu keratotomiyu. Patent RF na izobretenie № 2610556/13.02.2017. Bull. №5. Accessed 16.11.20. (In Russ.). https://yandex.ru/patents/doc/RU2610556C1_20170213
Contact the author
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

Submit Application

You can become an author of one of our magazines, send a request and we will consider it in during the day.

Name
Phone
E-mail
Message
Login
Registration
E-mail
Password
Forgot Password?

Log in to the site using your account in one of the services

Password recovery
E-mail
Login
Register

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.