The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Filippov O.S.

Federal Scientific and Clinical Center for Children and Adolescents of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency of Russia;
Russian University of Medicine

Guseva E.V.

National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology named after Academician V.I. Kulakov

Medical and social characteristics of maternal deaths after extracorporeal fertilization

Authors:

Filippov O.S., Guseva E.V.

More about the authors

Read: 826 times


To cite this article:

Filippov OS, Guseva EV. Medical and social characteristics of maternal deaths after extracorporeal fertilization. Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2025;25(2):5‑14. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/rosakush2025250215

Recommended articles:
The expe­rience of using the nasal form of GnRH agonists in in vitro fertilization programs. Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2024;(6):79-84

References:

  1. Tai W, Hu L, Wen J. Maternal and neonatal outcomes after assisted reproductive technology: A Retrospective cohort study in China. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022;9:837762. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.837762
  2. Luke B, Brown MB, Eisenberg ML, Callan C, Botting BJ, Pacey A, Sutcliffe AG, Baker VL. In vitro fertilization and risk for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: associations with treatment parameters. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;222:4:350.e1-350.e13.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2019.10.003
  3. Nagata C, Yang L, Yamamoto-Hanada K, Mezawa H, Ayabe T, Ishizuka K, Konishi M, Ohya Y, Saito H, Sago H; Japan Environment & Children’s Study Group. Complications and adverse outcomes in pregnancy and childbirth among women who conceived by assisted reproductive technologies: a nationwide birth cohort study of Japan environment and children’s study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19:1:77.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2213-y
  4. Dayan N, Joseph KS, Fell DB, Laskin CA, Basso O, Park AL, Luo J, Guan J, Ray JG. Infertility treatment and risk of severe maternal morbidity: a propensity score-matched cohort study. CMAJ. 2019;191:5:E118-E127. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.181124
  5. Singh N, Malhotra N, Mahey R, Saini M, Patel G, Sethi A. Comparing maternal outcomes in spontaneous singleton pregnancies versus in vitro fertilization conception: Single-center 10-year cohort study. JBRA Assisted Reprod. 2022;26:4:583-588.  https://doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20220002
  6. Lei LL, Lan YL, Wang SY, Feng W, Zhai ZJ. Perinatal complications and live-birth outcomes following assisted reproductive technology: a retrospective cohort study. Chinese Med J. 2019; 132:20:2408-2416. https://doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000000484
  7. Tang D, Cheng Y, Feng X, Li X and Coyte PC. The use of IVF/ICSI and risk of postpartum hemorrhage: A retrospective cohort study of 153,765 women in China. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1016457  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1016457
  8. Sullivan-Pyke CS, Senapati S, Mainigi MA, Barnhart KT. In Vitro fertilization and adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes. Semin Perinatol. 2017;41:6:345-353.  https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semperi.2017.07.001
  9. Kamath MS, Kirubakaran R, Mascarenhas M, Sunkara SK. Perinatal outcomes after stimulated versus natural cycle IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod BioMed Online. 2018;36:1:94-101.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.09.009
  10. Kalashnikov SA. Specific characteristics of multiple pregnancies after in vitro fertilization. Voprosy ginekologii, akusherstva i perinatologii. 2020;19:5:114-123. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.20953/1726-1678-2020-5-114-123
  11. Rudenko EE, Kogan EA, Trifonova NS, Zhukova EV, Demura TA, Aleksandrov LS, Ishchenko AI, Zharkov NV, Bayanova SN, Lavrent’eva KI. Structural foundations for the development of hypertensive complications of pregnancy following oocyte donation in surrogate mothers. Voprosy ginekologii, akusherstva i perinatologii. 2020;19:1:58-67. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.20953/1726-1678-2020-1-58-67
  12. Storgaard M, Loft A, Bergh C, Wennerholm UB, Söderström-Anttila V, Romundstad LB, Aittomaki K, Oldereid N, Forman J, Pinborg A. Obstetric and neonatal complications in pregnancies conceived after oocyte donation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2017;124:4:561-572.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.14257
  13. Qin J, Liu X, Sheng X, Wang H, Gao S. Assisted reproductive technology and the risk of pregnancy-related complications and adverse pregnancy outcomes in singleton pregnancies: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Fertil Steril. 2016;105:1:73-85.e1-6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.09.007
  14. Qin J, Wang H, Sheng X, Liang D, Tan H, Xia J. Pregnancy-related complications and adverse pregnancy outcomes in multiple pregnancies resulting from assisted reproductive technology: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Fertil Steril. 2015;103:6:1492-508.e1-7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.03.018
  15. Vermey BG, Buchanan A, Chambers GM, Kolibianakis EM, Bosdou J, Chapman MG, Venetis CA. Are singleton pregnancies after assisted reproduction technology (ART) associated with a higher risk of placental anomalies compared with non-ART singleton pregnancies? A systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2019;126:2:209-218.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15227
  16. Engin Üstün Y, Sanisoğlu S, Çınar M, Keskin HL, Uygur D, Özcan A, Karaahmetoğlu S, Kabasakal A, Çolak G, Keskinkılıç B, Şencan İ. A view of maternal mortalities in women conceiving through assisted reproductive techniques: A nation-based study of Turkey. J Chin Med Assoc. 2018;81:11:985—989.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcma.2018.05.006
  17. Luke B, Gopal D, Cabral H, Stern JE, Diop H. Pregnancy, birth, and infant outcomes by maternal fertility status: the Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technology. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217:3:327.e1-327.e14.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2017.04.006
  18. Wu P, Sharma GV, Mehta LS, Chew-Graham CA, Lundberg GP, Nerenberg KA, Graham MM, Chappell LC, Kadam UT, Jordan KP, Mamas MA. In-Hospital Complications in Pregnancies Conceived by Assisted Reproductive Technology. J Am Heart Assoc. 2022;11:5:e022658. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.022658
  19. Chih HJ, Elias FTS, Gaudet L, Velez MP. Assisted reproductive technology and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analyses. BMC Pregn Childbirth. 2021;21:1:449.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03938-8
  20. Pandey S, Shetty A, Hamilton M, Bhattacharya S, Maheshwari A. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from IVF/ICSI: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2012;18:5:485-503.  https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dms018
  21. Nam JY, Hwang S, Jang S-I, Park EC. Effects of assisted reproductive technology on severe maternal morbidity risk in both singleton and multiple births in Korea: A nationwide population-based cohort study. PLoS ONE. 2022;17:10:e0275857. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275857
  22. Martin AS, Monsour M, Kissin DM, Jamieson DJ, Callaghan WM, Boulet SL. Trends in severe maternal morbidity after assisted reproductive technology in the United States, 2008—2012. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;127:1:59-66.  https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000001197
  23. Wang ET, Ozimek J, Greene N, Ramos L, Vyas N, Kilpatrick SJ, Pisarska MD. Impact of fertility treatment on severe maternal morbidity. Fertil Steril. 2016;106:2:423-426.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.03.039
  24. Belanoff C, Declercq ER, Diop H, Gopal D, Kotelchuck M, Luke B, Nguyen T, Stern JE. Severe maternal morbidity and the use of assisted reproductive technology in Massachusetts. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;127:3:527-534.  https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000001292
  25. Luke B, Brown MB, Wantman E, Baker VL, Doody KJ, Seifer DB, Spector LG. Risk of severe maternal morbidity by maternal fertility status: a US study in 8 states. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;220:2:195.e1-195.e12.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2018.10.012
  26. Cromi A, Marconi N., Casarin J, Cominotti S, Pinelli C, Riccardi M, Ghezzi F. Maternal intra- and postpartum near-miss following assisted reproductive technology: a retrospective study. BJOG. 2018;125:12:1569-1578. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15308
  27. Rova K, Passmark H, Lindqvist PG. Venous thromboembolism in relation to in vitro fertilization: an approach to determining the incidence and increase in risk in successful cycles. Fertil Steril. 2012;97:1:95-100.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.10.038
  28. Venn A, Hemminki E, Watson L, Bruinsma F, Healy D. Mortality in cohort of IVF patients. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:12:2691-2696. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/16.12.2691
  29. Braat DD, Schutte JM, Bernardus RE, Mooij TM, van Leeuwen FE. Maternal death related to IVF in the Netherlands 1984—2008. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:7:1782-1786. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deq080

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.