An integrated approach to endometrial examination in case of repeated failures in ART cycles: a pilot study

Close metadata

BACKGROUND

Female infertility is still an actual issue in gynecology, despite the numerous advances in reproductive medicine. According to the World Health Organization, 17.5% of couples suffer from infertility. At the same time, there is no tendency for this indicator to decrease. A special place in the solution of this problem is occupied by the methods of the assisted reproductive technologies (ART). However, the reasons for repeated unsuccessful attempts of in vitro fertilization have not yet been sufficiently studied. A number of studies have shown that the uterine microbiome of infertile and fertile women differs significantly [1, 2]. In this connection, the study of the influence of the endometrial biotope on embryo implantation ability in order to increase the pregnancy rate in ART cycles remains an urgent issue.

AIM

To assess the influence of the endometrial microbiome on the outcome of in vitro fertilization (IVF) programs in patients with infertility and previous failed attempts of assisted reproductive technologies.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A pilot prospective pilot prospective single-center non-randomized study including 22 patients of reproductive age (18 to 45 years) with infertility and repeated failed IVF attempts in history was conducted. All patients were fully examined in accordance with Order No. 803n of 31.07.20 «On the procedure for the use of assisted reproductive technologies, contraindications and limitations to their use». Additionally, from the 15th to the 25th day of the menstrual cycle was performed an endometrial biopsy in order to assess the endometrial microbiome by metagenomic analysis (MEMA). The distribution of patients into groups was carried out on the basis of test results: the first group consisted of patients with a predominance of Lactobacillus>90% of total microorganisms, and the second group consisted of patients with a predominance of pathogenic flora who were treated with etiotropic therapy. The final point of our pilot study was to evaluate the results of in vitro fertilization.

RESULTS

According to the results of the metagenomic analysis of the endometrial microbiome of 22 women, only 7 (31.8%) were dominated by Lactobacilli strains, 15 (68.1%) women were dominated by opportunistic microorganisms such as Gardnerella, Streptococcus, Apotobium, Prevotella, Enterococcus, Corynebacterium and others. This group of patients, underwent etiological therapy with antibacterial drugs followed by probiotics was carried out. As a result, the following data were obtained: in group 1, 6 (85.7%) out of 7 women became pregnant after frozen-thawed embryo transfer, in group 2, only 5 (33.3%) out of 15 women became pregnant after the recommended treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Women with infertility and repeated failed IVF attempts more often have a «non-lactobacillus» uterine microbiome. In the group with a predominance of Lactobacillus bacteria in the endometrial microflora, more favourable IVF outcomes are observed. Etiotropic antibiotic therapy and probiotic supplementation also increase pregnancy rates. However, given the small number of patients, large-scale studies are needed in this area.

Keywords:

microbiome of the endometrium

lactobacilli

infertility

IVF

receptivity

Authors:

Dobrokhotova Yu.E.

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

SPIN RSCI: 2925-9948
Scopus AuthorID: 57188592250
ORCID: 0000-0002-7830-2290

Lapina I.A.

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University;
Medsi Clinical Diagnostic Center on Solyanka

ORCID: 0000-0001-9680-4887

Elchieva G.I.

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

ORCID: 0009-0002-1330-0451

Gomzikova V.M.

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

ORCID: 0000-0001-6297-8811

Sorokin Yu.A.

Medsi Clinical Diagnostic Center on Solyanka

ORCID: 0000-0001-9305-323X

Tverdikova M.A.

Medsi Clinical Diagnostic Center on Solyanka

ORCID: 0000-0003-0462-2838

Received:

21.07.2023

Accepted:

20.10.2023

List of references:

Barinova VV, Kuznetsova NB, Bushtyreva IO, Oksenyuk OS, Dudurich VV, Shatalov AE. Endometrial microbiome in women with and without a history of repeated failures of assisted reproductive technology: what are norm and pathology? Akusherstvo i ginekologiya. 2021;6:105-114. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18565/aig.2021.6.105-114
Moreno I, Codoñer FM, Vilella F, Valbuena D, Martinez-Blanch JF, Jimenez- Almazán J, Alonso R, Alamá P, Remohí J, Pellicer A, Ramon D, Simon C. Evidence that the endometrial microbiota has an effect on implantation success or failure. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2016;215(6):684-703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2016.09.075
Tissier H. Recherches sur la flore intestinale des nourrissons (État Normal Et Pathologique). Paris: G.Carré et C.Naud;1900.
Whipps JM, Lewis K, Cooke RC. Mycoparasitism and plant disease control 161-187. In: Fungi in Biological Control Systems. Burge NM, ed. Manchester University Press: Manchester, UK; 1988.
Turnbaugh PJ, Ley RE, Hamady M, Fraser-Liggett CM, Knight R, Gordon JI. The human microbiome project. Nature. 2007;449(7164):804-810. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06244
Allaband C, McDonald D, Vazquez-Baeza Y, Minich JJ, Tripathi A, Brenner DA, Loomba R, Smarr L, Sandborn WJ, Schnabl B, Dorrestein P, Zarrinpar A, Knight R. Microbiome 101: Studying, analyzing, and interpreting gut microbiome data for clinicians. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2019;17(2):218-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2018.09.017
Berg G, Rybakova D, Fischer D, Cernava T, Verges MC, Charles T, Chen X, Cocolin L, Eversole K, Corral GH, Kazou M, Kinkel L, Lange L, Lima N, Loy A, Macklin JA, Maguin E, Mauchline T, McClure R, Mitter B, Ryan M, Sarand I, Smidt H, Schelkle B, Roume H, Kiran GS, Selvin J, Souza RSC, van Overbeek L, Singh BK, Wagner M, Walsh A, Sessitsch A, Schloter M. Microbiome definition re-visited: Old concepts and new challenges. Microbiome. 2020;8(1):103. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-020-00875-0
Al-Nasiry S, Ambrosino E, Schlaepfer M, Morré SA, Wieten L, Voncken JW, Spinelli M, Mueller M, Kramer BW. The Interplay between Reproductive Tract Microbiota and Immunological System in Human Reproduction. Frontiers in Immunology. 2020;11:378. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.00378
Dobrokhotova YuE, Yakubova KK. Microbiota of the reproductive tract and endometrial hyperplastic processes (literature review). RMZh. Medicinskoe obozrenie. 2018;2(10):14-16. (In Russ.).
Adamyan LV, Priputnevich TV, Grigorian IE, Gavrilova TYu, Sarkisyan RM, Antonova AA. Modern concepts of endometrial microbiota. Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2022;28(6):159-163. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/repro202228061159
Adamyan LV, Priputnevich TV, Gavrilova TYu, Grigorian IE. Uterine fibroids and endometrial microbiota: is there a relationship? Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2022;28(6):164-169. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/repro202228061164
Khan KN, Fujishita A, Masumoto H, Muto H, Kitajima M, Masuzaki H, Kitawaki J. Molecular detection of intrauterine microbial colonization in women with endometriosis. European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2016;199:69-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.01.040
O’Callaghan JL, Turner R, Dekker Nitert M, Barrett HL, Clifton V, Pelzer ES. Re-assessing microbiomes in the low-biomass reproductive niche. BJOG. 2020;127(2):147-158. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15974
Shamilova AM, Il’ina IYu, Borovkova EI, Dobrokhotova YuE. Chronic endometritis. Towards the improvement of diagnostic methods. RMZh. Mat` i ditya. 2021;4(3):243-249. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.32364/2618-8430-2021-4-3-243-249
Tagini F, Greub G. Bacterial genome sequencing in clinical microbiology: A pathogen-oriented review. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. 2017;36:2007-2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-017-3024-6
Molina NM, Sola-Leyva A, Saez-Lara MJ, Plaza-Diaz J, Tubić-Pavlović A, Romero B, Clavero A, Mozas-Moreno J, Fontes J, Altmäe S. New Opportunities for Endometrial Health by Modifying Uterine Microbial Composition: Present or Future? Biomolecules. 2020;10(4):593. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10040593
Dobrokhotova YuE, Borovkova EI, Burdenko MV. Modification of the probability of the implementation of ascending infection of the uterine cavity during gynecological procedures. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya. 2022;10:150-158. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18565/aig.2022.10.150-158
Riganelli L, Iebba V, Piccioni M, Illuminati I, Bonfiglio G, Neroni B, Calvo L, Gagliardi A, Levrero M, Merlino L, Mariani M, Capri O, Pietrangeli D, Schippa S, Guerrieri F. Structural Variations of Vaginal and Endometrial Microbiota: Hints on Female Infertility. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology. 2020;10:350. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2020.00350
Mitchell CM, Haick A, Nkwopara E, Garcia R, Rendi M, Agnew K, Fredricks DN, Eschenbach D. Colonization of the upper genital tract by vaginal bacterial species in nonpregnant women. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2015;212:611.e1-611.e19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2014.11.043
Kogan EA, Askolskaya SI, Burykina PN, Faizulina NM. Endometrial receptivity in patients with uterine myoma. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya. 2012;(8-2):42-48. (In Russ.).
Fang RL, Chen LX, Shu WS, Yao SZ, Wang SW, Chen YQ. Barcoded sequencing reveals diverse intrauterine microbiomes in patients suffering with endometrial polyps. American Journal of Translational Research. 2016;8:1581-1592.

Close metadata