The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Gotovtseva U.A.

Institute of Plastic Surgery and Cosmetology, Moscow, Russia

Manturova N.E.

Institute of Plastic Surgery and Cosmetology, Moscow, Russia

Melnikov D.V.

Institute of Plastic Surgery and Cosmetology, Moscow, Russia

Shpitser A.E.

Institute of Plastic Surgery and Cosmetology, Moscow, Russia

Tserr A.E.

Institute of Plastic Surgery and Cosmetology, Moscow, Russia

Comparison of Breast-Q scores following T-inverted augmentation mastopexy using split-thickness fascioglandular flap and standard technique: a prospective study

Authors:

Gotovtseva U.A., Manturova N.E., Melnikov D.V., Shpitser A.E., Tserr A.E.

More about the authors

Journal: Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine. 2026;(2‑2): 29‑34

Read: 373 times


To cite this article:

Gotovtseva UA, Manturova NE, Melnikov DV, Shpitser AE, Tserr AE. Comparison of Breast-Q scores following T-inverted augmentation mastopexy using split-thickness fascioglandular flap and standard technique: a prospective study. Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine. 2026;(2‑2):29‑34. (In Russ., In Engl.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/plast.hirurgia202602229

Recommended articles:
Quality of life after prophylactic mastectomy with simu­ltaneous reco­nstruction. Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medi­cine. 2025;(2-2):5-12
Key specific tools for asse­ssment of life quality of patients with psoriasis. Russian Journal of Clinical Dermatology and Vene­reology. 2025;(3):319-325
Dysfunctional pelvic pain in women. Russian Journal of Pain. 2025;(2):32-37

References:

  1. Khavanin N, Jordan SW, Rambachan A, Kim JYS. A systematic review of single-stage augmentation-mastopexy. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2014;134(5):922-931.  https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000000582
  2. Messa CA, Messa CA. One-stage augmentation mastopexy: a retrospective ten-year review of 2183 consecutive procedures. Aesthetic Surgery Journal. 2019;39(12):1352-1367. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjz143
  3. Calobrace MB, Herdt DR, Cothron KJ. Simultaneous augmentation/mastopexy: a retrospective 5-year review of 332 consecutive cases. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2013;131(1):145-156.  https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0b013e318272bf86
  4. Mansur AEC, Graf RM, Fadul R Jr, Balbinot P, Nasser IG, de Paula DR, Maschio AG, Chahine F, Atiyeh B. Simultaneous augmentation mastopexy: an innovative anatomical approach — the fascioglandular flap for improved lower pole support. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. 2020;44(5):1414-1420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-01702-5
  5. Selvarajoo G, See MH, Lee Lai L, Ng JH, Mosiun JA, Sikin SM, Baghawi A. Patient‐Reported Outcomes and Quality of Life Assessment in Breast Surgery Using BREAST‐Q: A Multi‐Center Prospective Study. World Journal of Surgery. 2025;49(11):2981-2989. https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.70045
  6. Hanson SE, Lei X, Roubaud MS, DeSnyder SM, Caudle AS, Shaitelman SF, Hoffman KE, Smith GL, Jagsi R, Peterson SK, Smith BD. Long-term quality of life in patients with breast cancer after breast conservation vs mastectomy and reconstruction. JAMA Surgery. 2022;157(6):e220631. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2022.0631
  7. Zaussinger M, Wenny R, Huemer GM. Auto-augmentation mastopexy: inferiorly based parenchymal flap technique and evaluation of outcomes using BREAST-Q after 151 consecutive patients. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. 2022; 46(6):2723-2732. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-022-02868-w
  8. Bistoni G, Sofo F, Cagli B, Buccheri EM, Mallucci P. Artificial intelligence, genuine outcome: analysis of 72 consecutive cases of subfascial augmentation mastopexy with smooth round implants supported by P4HB scaffold. Aesthetic Surgery Journal. 2024;44(11):1154-1166. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjae109
  9. Danilla S, Cayupán C, Cala L, Durán H. Long-term satisfaction with breast augmentation and augmentation mastopexy in the Latin American population. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. 2024;48(17):3370-3377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-024-03900-x
  10. Malanichev MYu, Garipov RR, Gabeev AI, Zakirov EZ, Pakhomov RA, Demyashkin GA, Vadyukhin MA. Comparative characteristics of complications after mastopexy in combination with or without augmentation mammoplasty (literature review). Voprosy` rekonstruktivnoj i plasticheskoj xirurgii.. 2024;27(4):31-41. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.52581/1814-1471/91/04
  11. Regnault P. Breast ptosis. Definition and treatment. Clinics in Plastic Surgery. 1976;3(2):193-203. 
  12. Pusic AL, Klassen AF, Scott AM, Klok JA, Cordeiro PG, Cano SJ. Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure for breast surgery: the BREAST-Q. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2009;124(2):345-353.  https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0b013e3181aee807
  13. Marino M, Alessandri-Bonetti M, Carbonaro R, Amendola F. Technical refinements for reducing reoperations in single-stage augmentation mastopexy: a retrospective matched cohort study. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. 2024;48(20): 4144-4155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-024-03917-2
  14. Sanniec K, Adams Jr WP. The tissue-based triad in augmentation mastopexy: single-stage technical refinements. Aesthetic Surgery Journal. 2019;39(12): 1331-1341. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjz006
  15. Luong KP, Peters M, Slijper HP, Hummelink S, Ulrich DJO. Patient-reported satisfaction and health-related quality of life in patients with breast augmentation: a follow-up of 6 months. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2024;154(2):299-309.  https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000011029
  16. Kalaaji A, Dreyer S, Brinkmann J, Maric I, Nordahl C, Olafsen K. Quality of life after breast enlargement with implants versus augmentation mastopexy: a comparative study. Aesthetic Surgery Journal. 2018;38(12):1304-1315. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjy047
  17. Richards C, Patel S, Markham H, Varghese J, Cutress RI. The inframammary fold: Structure, clinical considerations, and reconstructive techniques. JPRAS Open. 2025;48:457-472.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpra.2025.11.022
  18. Cano SJ, Klassen AF, Scott AM, Cordeiro PG, Pusic AL. The BREAST-Q: further validation in independent clinical samples. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2012;129(2):293-302.  https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0b013e31823aec6b

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.