Quality of life in breast cancer patients after immediate two-stage reconstruction

Berestok T.S.

P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute — Branch of the National Medical Radiology Research Center of the Ministry of Russia;
City Clinical Oncology Hospital One

ORCID: 0000-0002-7261-8956

Zikiryakhodzhaev A.D.

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University) of the Ministry of Russia;
P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute — Branch of the National Medical Radiology Research Center of the Ministry of Russia;
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia

SPIN RSCI: 8421-0364
Scopus AuthorID: 57220129122
ORCID: 0000-0001-7141-2502

Ermoshchenkova M.V.

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University) of the Ministry of Russia;
City Clinical Oncology Hospital One

ORCID: 0000-0002-4178-9592

Ablitsova N.V.

P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute — Branch of the National Medical Radiology Research Center of the Ministry of Russia

Onofriychuk I.M.

P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute — Branch of the National Medical Radiology Research Center of the Ministry of Russia;
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia

ORCID: 0000-0003-1742-3205

Vlasova M.Yu.

P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute — Branch of the National Medical Radiology Research Center of the Ministry of Russia

ORCID: 0000-0001-7502-2288

Quality of life in breast cancer patients after immediate two-stage reconstruction

Authors:

Berestok T.S., Zikiryakhodzhaev A.D., Ermoshchenkova M.V., Ablitsova N.V., Onofriychuk I.M., Vlasova M.Yu.

More about the authors

Journal: Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine. 2023;(2): 47‑53

DOI: 10.17116/plast.hirurgia202302147

Downloaded: 146

To cite this article:

Berestok TS, Zikiryakhodzhaev AD, Ermoshchenkova MV, Ablitsova NV, Onofriychuk IM, Vlasova MYu. Quality of life in breast cancer patients after immediate two-stage reconstruction. Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine. 2023;(2):47‑53. (In Russ., In Engl.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/plast.hirurgia202302147

Подписка 2025 (Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine)

Close metadata

OBJECTIVE

To assess the quality of life and satisfaction with postoperative outcomes in patients with breast cancer after immediate two-stage breast reconstruction.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We analyzed aesthetic results and satisfaction with postoperative outcomes in 176 women aged 23-63 years (mean 42.9±8.1) with various stages of breast cancer. All patients underwent total mastectomy and immediate two-stage breast reconstruction with tissue expander/implant.

RESULTS

According to the Assessment of Cosmetic Results after Organ-Preserving Operations, Oncoplastic Resections, Reconstructive Plastic Surgery in Patients with Breast Cancer questionnaire, mastectomy with immediate two-stage breast reconstruction was followed by excellent results in 21.9% (16/73) of cases, good results — 64.4% (47/73), satisfactory results — 13.7% (10/73). According to the BREAST-Q questionnaire, all women were satisfied with post-reconstruction outcomes: reconstructed mammary gland — 64 scores, postoperative result — 70 scores, psychosocial well-being — 68 scores, sexual well-being — 64 scores, physical well-being — 80 scores.

CONCLUSION

Immediate two-stage breast reconstruction has a beneficial effect on psycho-emotional state of women. A two-stage breast reconstruction technique with tissue expanders and implants usually provides good and excellent cosmetic results.

Keywords:

breast cancer

immediate single-stage and two-stage reconstruction

radiotherapy

silicone implant

tissue expander

BREAST-Q

Authors:

Berestok T.S.

P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute — Branch of the National Medical Radiology Research Center of the Ministry of Russia;
City Clinical Oncology Hospital One

ORCID: 0000-0002-7261-8956

Zikiryakhodzhaev A.D.

SPIN RSCI: 8421-0364
Scopus AuthorID: 57220129122
ORCID: 0000-0001-7141-2502

Ermoshchenkova M.V.

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University) of the Ministry of Russia;
City Clinical Oncology Hospital One

ORCID: 0000-0002-4178-9592

Ablitsova N.V.

P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute — Branch of the National Medical Radiology Research Center of the Ministry of Russia

Onofriychuk I.M.

P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute — Branch of the National Medical Radiology Research Center of the Ministry of Russia;
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia

ORCID: 0000-0003-1742-3205

Vlasova M.Yu.

P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute — Branch of the National Medical Radiology Research Center of the Ministry of Russia

ORCID: 0000-0001-7502-2288

Received:

07.02.2023

Accepted:

20.02.2023

List of references:

Sostoyanie onkologicheskoj pomoshchi naseleniyu Rossii v 2021 godu. Kaprin AD, Starinsky VV, Shakhzadova AO, eds. M.: MNIOI im. P.A. Gertsena — filial FGBU «NMITs radiologii» Minzdrava Rossii; 2022:23. (In Russ.).
Schmauss D, Machens H-G, Harder Y. Breast Reconstruction after Mastectomy. Frontiers Surgery. 2016;2:71. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2015.00071
Platt J, Zhong T. Patient-centered breast reconstruction based on health- related quality-of-life evidence. Clinics in Plastic Surgery. 2018;45:137-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cps.2017.08.011
Freeman MD, Gopman JM, Salzberg CA. The evolution of mastectomy surgical technique: From mutilation to medicine. Gland Surgery. 2018;7(3): 308-315. https://doi.org/10.21037/gs.2017.09.07
Metcalfe KA, Zhong T, Narod SA, Quan ML, Holloway C, Hofer S, Bagher S, Semple J. A prospective study of mastectomy patients with and without delayed breast reconstruction: Long-term psycho-social functioning in the breast cancersurvivorship period. Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2015; 111(3):258-264. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.23829
Ho AY, Hu ZI, Mehrara BJ, Wilkins EG. Radiotherapy in the setting of breast reconstruction: types, techniques, and timing. Lancet Oncology. 2017; 18(12):742-753. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30617-4
Carter SA, Lyons GR, Kuerer HM, et al. Operative and oncologic outcomes in 9861 patients with operable breast cancer: single institution analysis of breast conservation with oncoplastic reconstruction. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 2016;23(10):3190-3198. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5407-9
Siotos C, Naska A, Bello RJ, et al. Survival and Disease Recurrence Rates among Breast Cancer Patients following Mastectomy with or without Breast Reconstruction. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2019;144(2):169-177. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000005798
Garcia-Etienne CA, Forcellini D, Sagona A, Caviggioli F, Barbieri E, Cornegliani G, Giannasi S, Tinterri C. Breast reconstruction: A quality measure for breast cancer care? Breast. 2012;21(1):105-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2011.08.133
Lei C, Xu L, Xu F, Li J, Jiang H, Guan S, Wang X, Wen B, Li J, Li X, Geng C, Yin J. Patient satisfaction in one-stage immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy: A multi-center comparative patient evaluation of prosthesis, LDMF, and TRAM techniques. Medicine. 2020;99(22):e19991. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019991
Schmidt JL, Wetzel CM, Lange KW, Heine N, Ortmann O. Patients’ experience of breast reconstruction after mastectomy and its influence on postoperative satisfaction. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2017;296: 827-834. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-017-4495-5
Davies CF, Macefield R, Avery K, Blazeby JM, Potter S. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Post-mastectomy Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Development and Measurement Properties. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 2021;28:386-404. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-08736-8
Davies CF, Macefield R, Avery K, Blazeby JM, Potter S. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Post-mastectomy Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Development and Measurement Properties. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 2021;28:386-404. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-08736-8
Pusic AL, Klassen AF, Scott AM, Klok JA, Cordeiro PG, Cano SJ. Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure for breast surgery: The BREAST-Q. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2009;124:345-353. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181aee807
Pusic A, Klassen A, Cano S. BREAST-Q Version 2.0. A Guide for Researcheres and Clinicians. November 2017. https://qportfolio.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/BREAST-Q-USERS-GUIDE.pdf
Santosa KB, Qi J, Kim HM, Hamill JB, Wilkins EG, Pusic AL. Long-term Patient-Reported Outcomes in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction. JAMA Surgery. 2018;153:891-899. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2018.1677
Nelson JA, Allen RJ Jr, Polanco T, Shamsunder M, Patel AR, McCarthy CM, Matros E, Dayan JH, Disa JJ, Cordeiro PG, Mehrara BJ, Pusic AL. Long-term Patient-reported Outcomes Following Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: An 8-year Examination of 3268 Patients. Annals of Surgery. 2019;270(3):473-483. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003467
Ermoshchenkova MV, Zikiryakhodzhaev AD. Anketa-oprosnik «Otsenka kosmeticheskikh rezul’tatov, psikhologicheskikh kriteriev posle organosokhranyayushchikh operatsij, onkoplasticheskikh rezektsij, rekonstruktivno-plasticheskikh operatsij u bol’nykh rakom molochnoj zhelezy». Avtorskoe pravo, zaregistrirovannoe v baze dannykh intellektual’nogo registratora IREG №201399 ot 15.05.2020, v n’RIS (Natsional’nyj reestr intellektual’noj sobstvennosti) №458-929-626 ot 13.05.20. Obnovlennaya versiya ankety-oprosnika «Otsenka esteticheskikh rezul’tatov, psikhologicheskikh kriteriev posle organosokhranyayushchikh operatsij, onkoplasticheskikh rezektsij, rekonstruktivno-plasticheskikh operatsij u bol’nykh rakom molochnoj zhelezy» v baze dannykh intellektual’nogo registratora IREG №2193709 ot 13.06.2022, v n’RIS №466-220-384 ot 13.06.2022. (In Russ.).
Ermoshchenkova MV, Zikiryakhodzhaev AD, Shirokikh IM, Tukmakov AYu, Masri AA, Zapirov MM. Surgical rehabilitation of patients with breast cancer at various stages of combined and combination treatment. P.A. Herzen Journal of Oncology. 2019;8(3):161-168. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/onkolog2019803115161
Madden JL, Kandalaft S, Bourque RA. Modified radical mastectomy. Annals of Surgery. 1972;175(5):624-634. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-197205000-00002
Dauplat J, Kwiatkowski F, Rouanet P, Delay E, Clough K, Verhaeghe JL. Quality of life after mastectomy with or without immediate breast reconstruction. British Journal of Surgery. 2017;104(9):1197-1206. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10537
Wendy KY, Chesney A, Farrokhyar F, Hodgson N, Dal Cin A. One stage placement of permanent implant compared to two stage tissue expander reconstruction. Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery. 2017;51(4): 240-246. https://doi.org/10.1080/2000656X.2016.1237957
Plesca M, Bordea C, El Houcheimi B, et al. Evolution of radical mastectomy for breast cancer. Journal of Medicine and Life. 2016;9(2):183-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2018.04.003
Patey DH, Dyson WH. The prognosis of carcinoma of the breast in relation to the type of operation performed. British Journal of Cancer. 1948;2(1):7-13.
Scanlon EF, Caprini JA. Modified radical mastectomy. Cancer. 1975;35(3): 710-713. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1948.2
Korableva NP, Zholtikov VV, Ismagilov AKh, Dokhov MA, Lebedeva YuV. Valid BREAST-Q questionnaire for analysis of the outcomes in aesthetic breast surgery. Journal of Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine. 2020;4:17-22. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/plast.hirurgia202004117

Close metadata