The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Login
EN
+7 (495) 482-4118
+7 (495) 482-4329
+8 800 250-18-12
  • (toll-free number for subscriptions)
    Mon-Fri from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m.

  • © 1998-2025
+7 (495) 482-43-29
EN
All journals
Journal
Year
Year
Search result: 0

Alimova S.M.

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Sharobaro V.I.

Federal Research and Clinical Center of Specialized types of Medical Care and Medical Technologies of FMBA of Russia

Shamanaeva L.S.

Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

Penaeva S.A.

Clinic of Dr. A.A. Penaev

Psychometric scales in assessing patient satisfaction with the results of aesthetic face and neck correction

Authors:

Alimova S.M., Sharobaro V.I., Shamanaeva L.S., Penaeva S.A.

More about the authors

Journal: Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine. 2021;(4): 77‑82

DOI: 10.17116/plast.hirurgia202104177

Read: 3925 times

Download PDF (RU)
Download PDF
Contact the author
Table of contents

PSYCHOMETRIC SCALES IN ASSESSING PATIENT SATISFACTION WITH THE RESULTS OF AESTHETIC FACE AND NECK CORRECTION
PSYCHOMETRIC SCALES IN ASSESSING PATIENT SATISFACTION WITH THE RESULTS OF AESTHETIC FACE AND NECK CORRECTION

To cite this article:

Alimova SM, Sharobaro VI, Shamanaeva LS, Penaeva SA. Psychometric scales in assessing patient satisfaction with the results of aesthetic face and neck correction. Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine. 2021;(4):77‑82. (In Russ., In Engl.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/plast.hirurgia202104177

Подписка 2026 Пластическая хирургия и эстетическая медицина (Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine)
МСФ на ЯМ
Использование инфографики авторами научных работ
Close metadata
Abstract:

OBJECTIVE

To assess the role of psychometric scales in assessing patient satisfaction with the results of aesthetic face and neck correction.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

On April 22, 2021, we performed searching for literature data in the PubMed database using the following keywords: facelift (lifting, rejuvenation), neck lift, quality of life, patient satisfaction. The manuscripts devoted to various surgical techniques for face and neck rejuvenation, quality of life and patient satisfaction with these procedures were included for the period from April 22, 2006 to April 22, 2021. We considered systematic reviews, primary literature and validated questionnaires. Primary searching resulted 184 articles. After removing the duplicates, the number was reduced up to 71 articles. Only these manuscripts were selected for analysis. Of these, 22 (31%) articles were devoted to correction of face and neck soft tissues. There were 13 (18%) systematic reviews, 7 (10%) manuscripts as primary literature and 29 (41%) articles devoted to validated questionnaires.

RESULTS

There are various scales and questionnaires in the foreign literature allowing psychometric assessment of patients before and after correction and comparison of quality of life and patient satisfaction with the results of aesthetic face and neck correction. Currently, linguistically validated questionnaires for assessing the effectiveness of aesthetic face and neck correction are practically not used in the Russian Federation. Validation is a confirmation of legality. To use and implement such questionnaires in the Russian practice, translation, permission from developers and observance of validation stages are required. Obviously, questionnaires are necessary for practitioners in aesthetic surgery of the face and neck despite their inaccessibility and cumbersomeness.

CONCLUSION

This review confirmed an importance of assessing the quality of life and patient satisfaction with the results of correction, as well as the need to use scales and questionnaires by patients and surgeons. The approved standardized scales for assessing of appearance, quality of life and side effects of aesthetic procedures are not widely used due to their low prevalence and cumbersomeness. Convenient and easy-to-use linguistically validated questionnaires are required.

Keywords:

rejuvenation
surgical correction
quality of life
patient satisfaction

Authors:

Alimova S.M.

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Sharobaro V.I.

Federal Research and Clinical Center of Specialized types of Medical Care and Medical Technologies of FMBA of Russia

Shamanaeva L.S.

Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

Penaeva S.A.

Clinic of Dr. A.A. Penaev

Received:

11.06.2021

Accepted:

23.07.2021

Close metadata

References:

  1. Coutrot A, Guyader N. How saliency, faces, and sound influence gaze in dynamic social scenes. Journal of Vision. 2014;14(8):5.  https://doi.org/10.1167/14.8.5
  2. Short LA, Mondloch CJ, de Jong J, Chan H. Evidence for a young adult face bias in accuracy and consensus of age estimates. Br Journal Psychol. 2019; 110(4):652-669.  https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12370
  3. Oruc I, Balas B, Landy MS. Face perception: A brief journey through recent discoveries and current directions. Vision Res. 2019;157:1-9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2019.06.005
  4. Alanko OM, Svedström-Oristo AL, Tuomisto MT. Patients’ perceptions of orthognathic treatment, well-being, and psychological or psychiatric status: a systematic review. Acta Odontol Scand. 2010;68(5):249-260.  https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2010.494618
  5. Al-Asfour A, Waheedi M, Koshy S. Survey of patient experiences of orthognathic surgery: health-related quality of life and satisfaction. Int Journal Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018;47(6):726-731.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2017.12.010
  6. Kelly JD, Comstock B, Kowalewski TM, Smartt JM. Crowd-Sourced Reliability of an Assessment of Lower Facial Aging Using a Validated Visual Scale. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021;25:9(1):e3315. https://doi.org/10.1097/gox.0000000000003315
  7. Park DM. Total Facelift: Forehead Lift, Midface Lift, and Neck Lift. Arch Plast Surg. 2015;42:111-125.  https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2015.42.2.111
  8. Danel DP, Kalinowski K, Nowak-Szczepanska N, Ziomkiewicz-Wichary A, Apanasewicz A, Borysławski K, Kozieł S, Kornafel D, Fedurek P. Shifts in Female Facial Attractiveness during Pregnancy. Int Journal Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17;17(14):5176. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17145176
  9. Kuraguchi K, Kanari K. Face Inversion Effect on Perceived Cuteness and Pupillary Response. Front Psychol. 202003;11:558478. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.558478
  10. Coleman SR, Grover R. The anatomy of the aging face: volume loss and changes in 3-dimensional topography. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2006;26:1(Suppl):4-9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asj.2005.09.012
  11. Okuda I, Akita K, Komemushi T, Irimoto M, Nakajima Y. Basic Consideration for Facial Aging: Analyses of the Superficial Musculoaponeurotic System (SMAS) Based on Anatomy. Aesthetic Surgery Journal. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjaa305
  12. Sykes JM, Riedler KL, Cotofana S, Palhazi P. Superficial and Deep Facial Anatomy and Its Implications for Rhytidectomy. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2020;28(3):243-251.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsc.2020.03.005
  13. Luu NN, Friedman O. Facelift Surgery: History, Anatomy, and Recent Innovations. Facial Plastic Surgery. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1715616
  14. Jacono AA. A Novel Volumizing Extended Deep-Plane Facelift. Facial Plastic Surgery Clinics of North America. 2020;28(3):331368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsc.2020.03.001
  15. Weinstein AL, Nahai F. A layered approach to neck lift. Plast Aesthet Res. 2021;8:11.  https://doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2020.192
  16. Rohrich RJ, Narasimhan K. Long-Term Results in Face Lifting: Observational Results and Evolution of Technique. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;138(1): 97-108.  https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000002318
  17. Bravo FG. Reduction Neck Lift: The Importance of the Deep Structures of the Neck to the Successful Neck Lift. Clin Plast Surg. 2018;45(4):485-506.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cps.2018.05.002
  18. Ruiz R, Hersant B, La Padula S, Meningaud J-P. Facelifts: Improving the long-term outcomes of lower face and neck rejuvenation surgery: The lower face and neck rejuvenation combined method. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery. 2018;46(4):697-704.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2018.01.013
  19. Rezaee KS, Jebreili R, Aalipour E, Saljoughi N, Shahidi A. Outcomes in thread lift for face and neck: A study performed with Silhouette Soft and Promo Happy Lift double needle, innovative and classic techniques. Journal Cosmet Dermatol. 2019;18(1):84-93.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.12745
  20. Belyi I, Tymofii O, Barannik M. Triple-S Lift for Facial Rejuvenation. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2019;43(5):1204-1211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-019-01319-3
  21. Sadati K, Motakef S. Triple-C SMAS Plication Facelift for Natural Facial Rejuvenation. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019;7:e2575. https://doi.org/10.1097/gox.0000000000002575
  22. Saleh DB, Brierley N, Riaz M. “R” face and neck lift: a modified technique for en-bloc facial rejuvenation. Plast Aesthet Res. 2021;8:10.  https://doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2020.207
  23. Mohammadi S, Ahmadi A, Salem MM, Safdarian M, Ilkhani S. A Comparison Between Two Methods of Face-Lift Surgery in Nine Cadavers: SMAS (Superficial Musculo-Aponeurotic System) Versus MACS (Minimal Access Cranial Suspension). Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2015;39(5):680-685.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-015-0543-3
  24. Alexander L, Patel BC. Platysmaplasty Facelift. 2021 Feb 25. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2021.
  25. Del Toro E, Aldrich J. Extended SMAS Facelift. 2020 Sept 19. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2021.
  26. Truswell WH, Putman HC, Perkins SW, Johnson N. The Superficial Musculoaponeurotic System and Other Considerations in Rejuvenation of the Lower Face and Neck. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2018; 26(2):135–161.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsc.2017.12.011
  27. Quatela V, Montague A, Manning JP, Antunes M. Extended Superficial Musculoaponeurotic System Flap Rhytidectomy. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2020;28(3):303-310.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsc.2020.03.007
  28. Auersvald LA, Auersvald A. Sternohyoid muscles plication and sternocleidomastoid muscles rejuvenation in neck lift: a retrospective study of 1,019 consecutive patients. Plast Aesthet Res. 2021;8:4.  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2020.187
  29. Sharobaro V, Alimova S, Telnova A, Shamanaeva L. Ultrasound diagnosis of age-related involutional changes in the lower third of face and neck to determine treatment techniques. Pak Journal Med Sci. 2021;37(1):272-276.  https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.37.1.3034
  30. Ye H, Lv L, Liu Y, Liu Y, Zhou Y. Evaluation of the Accuracy, Reliability, and Reproducibility of Two Different 3D Face-Scanning Systems. Int J Prosthodont. 2016;29(3):213-218.  https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.4397
  31. Kim SH, Shin HS. Three-Dimensional Analysis of the Correlation Between Soft Tissue and Bone of the Lower Face Using Three-Dimensional Facial Laser Scan. Journal Craniofac Surg. 2018;29(8):2048-2054. https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000004781
  32. Yamaguchi Y, Yamauchi K, Suzuki H, Sai Y, Nogami S, Takahashi T. Volumetric comparison of maxillofacial soft tissue morphology: computed tomography in the supine position versus three-dimensional optical scanning in the sitting position. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2018; 125(4):351-357.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2017.12.018
  33. Carruthers A, Carruthers J. A validated facial grading scale: the future of facial ageing measurement tools? Journal Cosmet Laser Ther. 2010;12(5):235-241.  https://doi.org/10.3109/14764172.2010.514920
  34. Kantor J. Reliability and Photographic Equivalency of the Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating (SCAR) Scale, an Outcome Measure for Postoperative Scars. JAMA Dermatol. 2017;1:153(1):55-60.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.3757
  35. Pusic AL, Lemaine V, Klassen AF, Scott AM, Cano SJ. Patient-reported outcome measures in plastic surgery: use and interpretation in evidence-based medicine. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127(3):1361-1367. https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0b013e3182063276
  36. Klassen AF, Cano SJ, Scott A, Snell L, Pusic AL. Measuring patient-reported outcomes in facial aesthetic patients: development of the FACE-Q. Facial Plast Surg. 2010;26(4):303-309.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1262313
  37. Zimm AJ, Modabber M, Fernandes V, Karimi K, Adamson PA. Objective assessment of perceived age reversal and improvement in attractiveness after aging face surgery. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2013;15(6):405-410.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2013.268
  38. Kappos EA, Temp M, Schaefer DJ, Haug M, Kalbermatten DF, Toth BA. Validating Facial Aesthetic Surgery Results with the FACE-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;139(4):839-845.  https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000003164
  39. Panchapakesan V, Klassen AF, Cano SJ, Scott AM, Pusic AL. Development and psychometric evaluation of the FACE-Q Aging Appraisal Scale and Patient-Perceived Age Visual Analog Scale. Aesthet Surg Journal. 2013:33(8):1099-1109. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090820x13510170
  40. Berger M, Weigert R, Pascal E, Hufschmidt K, Casoli V. Assessing Improvement of Patient Satisfaction Following Facelift Surgery Using the FACE-Q Scales: A Prospective and Multicenter Study. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. 2019;43:370-375. Published: 28 November 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-018-1277-9
  41. Przylipiak M, Przylipiak J, Terlikowski R, Lubowicka E, Chrostek L, Przylipiak A. Improvements in the perception of facial attractiveness following surgical aesthetic treatment; study based on online before and after photos. Journal Cosmet Dermatol. 2019;18(1):296-300.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.12818
  42. Tan SK, Leung WK, Tang ATH, Zwahlen RA. Patient’s satisfaction with facial appearance and psycho-social wellness after orthognathic surgery among Hong Kong Chinese using the FACE-Q. Journal Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2020;48(12):1106-1111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2020.09.012
  43. Pascali M, Quarato D, Bocchini I, Cervelli V. Midface-lift patient satisfaction: A 5-year follow-up study. Indian Journal Plast Surg. 2016;49(3): 329-335.  https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-0358.197223
  44. Naini FB, Cobourne MT, Garagiola U, McDonald F, Wertheim D. Mentolabial angle and aesthetics: a quantitative investigation of idealized and normative values. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;05:39(1):4.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-017-0102-8
  45. Schwitzer JA, Albino FP, Mathis RK, Scott AM, Gamble L, Baker SB. Assessing Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Orthognathic Surgery and Osseous Genioplasty. Journal Craniofac Surg. 2015;26(8):2293-2298. https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000001983
  46. Gunn DA, Murray PG, Tomlin CC, Rexbye H, Christensen K, Mayes AE. Perceived age as a biomarker of ageing: a clinical methodology. Biogerontology. 2008;9(5):357-364.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10522-008-9141-y
  47. Clifford CWG, Watson TL, White D. Two sources of bias explain errors in facial age estimation. R Soc Open Sci. 2018;17:5(10):180841. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.180841
  48. Imai T, Okami K. Facial cues to age perception using three-dimensional analysis. PLoS One. 2019;14(2):e0209639. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209639
  49. Denadai R, Chou PY, Su YY, Lin HH, Ho CT, Lo LJ. The Impacts of Orthognathic Surgery on the Facial Appearance and Age Perception of Patients Presenting Skeletal Class III Deformity: An Outcome Study Using the FACE-Q Report and Surgical Professional-Based Panel Assessment. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020;145(4):1035-1046. https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000006650
  50. Denadai R, Chou PY, Su YY, Lo CC, Lin HH, Ho CT, Lo LJ. Facial Appearance and Psychosocial Features in Orthognathic Surgery: A FACE-Q- and 3D Facial Image-Based Comparative Study of Patient-, Clinician-, and Lay-Observer-Reported Outcomes. Journal Clin Med. 2019;8(6):909.  https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8060909
  51. Carruthers A, Carruthers J. A validated facial grading scale: The future of facial ageing measurement tools? Journal of Cosmetic and Laser Therapy. 2010; 12(5):235-241.  https://doi.org/10.3109/14764172.2010.514920
  52. Honigman RJ, Jackson AC, Dowling NA. The PreFACE. Annals of Plastic Surgery. 2011;66(1):16-23.  https://doi.org/10.1097/sap.0b013e3181d50e54
  53. Pusic AL, Klassen AF, Scott AM, Cano SJ. Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the FACE-Q Satisfaction with Appearance Scale. Clinics in Plastic Surgery. 2013;40(2):249-260.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cps.2012.12.001
  54. Brunton G, Paraskeva N, Caird J, Bird KS, Kavanagh J, Kwan I,Thomas J. Psychosocial Predictors, Assessment, and Outcomes of Cosmetic Procedures: A Systematic Rapid Evidence Assessment. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. 2014;38(5):1030-1040. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-014-0369-4
  55. Ribeiro RV. Prevalence of Body Dysmorphic Disorder in Plastic Surgery and Dermatology Patients: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. 2017;41(4):964-970.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-017-0869-0
  56. Veale D, Gledhill LJ, Christodoulou P, Hodsoll J. Body dysmorphic disorder in different settings: A systematic review and estimated weighted prevalence. Body Image. 2016;18:168-186.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2016.07.003
  57. Nakamura M, Koo J. Personality disorders and the “difficult” dermatology patient: Maximizing patient satisfaction. Clinics in Dermatology. 2017;35(3): 312-318.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clindermatol.2017.01.009
  58. Herruer JM, Prins JB, van Heerbeek N, Verhage-Damen GWJA, Ingels KJAO. Negative predictors for satisfaction in patients seeking facial cosmetic surgery: A systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;135(6):1596-1605. https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000001264
  59. Karraker A, Sicinski K, Moynihan D. Your Face is Your Fortune: Does Adolescent Attractiveness Predict Intimate Relationships Later in Life? Journal Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2017;72(1):187-199.  https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbv112
  60. Sampson A, Jeremiah HG, Andiappan M, Newton JT. The effect of viewing idealised smile images versus nature images via social media on immediate facial satisfaction in young adults: A randomised controlled trial. Journal Orthod. 2020;47(1):55-64.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1465312519899664
  61. Kandathil CK, Patel PN, Spataro EA, Most SP. Examining Preoperative Expectations and Postoperative Satisfaction in Rhinoplasty Patients: A Single-Center Study. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med. 2020 Dec 18.  https://doi.org/10.1089/fpsam.2020.0406
  62. Jacono A, Chastant RP, Dibelius G. Association of Patient Self-esteem With Perceived Outcome After Face-lift Surgery. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2016; 18(1):42-46. 
  63. Smith RM, Papel ID. Difficult Necks and Unresolved Problems in Neck Rejuvenation. Clin Plast Surg. 2018;45(4):611-622.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cps.2018.06.009
  64. Chauhan N, Warner JP, Adamson PA. Perceived age change after aesthetic facial surgical procedures quantifying outcomes of aging face surgery. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2012;14(4):258-262.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archfacial.2011.1561
  65. Nellis JC, Ishii M, Papel ID, Kontis TC, Byrne PJ, Boahene KDO, Bater KL, Ishii LE. Association of Face-lift Surgery With Social Perception, Age, Attractiveness, Health, and Success. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2017;01:19(4): 311-317.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2016.2206
  66. Balas B, Verdugo MQ. Low-level orientation information for social evaluation in face images. Psychon Bull Rev. 2018;25(6):2224-2230. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-018-1438-5
  67. Dey JK, Ishii M, Boahene KD, Byrne P, Ishii LE. Impact of facial defect reconstruction on attractiveness and negative facial perception. Laryngoscope. 2015;125(6):1316-1321. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.25130
  68. Reilly MJ, Tomsic JA, Fernandez SJ, Davison SP. Effect of facial rejuvenation surgery on perceived attractiveness, femininity, and personality. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2015;17(3):202-207.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2015.0158
  69. Nellis JC, Ishii M, Byrne PJ, Boahene KDO, Dey JK, Ishii LE. Association Among Facial Paralysis, Depression, and Quality of Life in Facial Plastic Surgery Patients. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2017;19(3):190-196.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2016.1462
  70. Dayan S, Rivkin A, Sykes JM, Teller CF, Weinkle SH, Shumate GT, Gallagher CJ. Aesthetic Treatment Positively Impacts Social Perception: Analysis of Subjects From the HARMONY Study. Aesthet Surg Journal. 2019;13: 39(12):1380-1389. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjy239
  71. Parsa KM, Hancock M, Nguy PL, Donalek HM, Wang H, Barth J, Reilly MJ. Association of Facial Paralysis With Perceptions of Personality and Physical Traits. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;01:3(6):e205495. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.5495
Contact the author
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

Contact us
If you have any questions, complaints or suggestions, please use this feedback form.
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.
Submit Application

You can become an author of one of our magazines, send a request and we will consider it in during the day.

Name
Phone
E-mail
Message
Login
Registration
E-mail
Password
Forgot Password?

Log in to the site using your account in one of the services

Password recovery
E-mail
Login
Register

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.