The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Login
EN
+7 (495) 482-4118
+7 (495) 482-0604
+8 800 250-18-12
  • (toll-free number for subscriptions)
    Mon-Fri from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m.

  • © 1998-2025
+7 (495) 482-43-29
EN
All journals
Journal
Year
Year
Search result: 0

Lebedev N.V.

Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia

Popov V.S.

Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia

Klimov A.E.

Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia

Svanadze G.T.

Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia

Eritonitis outcome prediction

Authors:

Lebedev N.V., Popov V.S., Klimov A.E., Svanadze G.T.

More about the authors

Journal: Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2021;(12): 92‑98

DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia202112192

Read: 10743 times

Download PDF (RU)
Contact the author
Table of contents

ERITONITIS OUTCOME PREDICTION
ERITONITIS OUTCOME PREDICTION

To cite this article:

Lebedev NV, Popov VS, Klimov AE, Svanadze GT. Eritonitis outcome prediction. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2021;(12):92‑98. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia202112192

Подписка 2026 Хирургия. Журнал им. Н.И. Пирогова (Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery)
МСФ на ЯМ
Использование инфографики авторами научных работ
Close metadata
Recommended articles:
The role of some inflammatory markers in diagnosis of acute peri­tonitis in patients with HIV infe­ction. Piro­gov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2024;(12):29-37
Pulmonary distress syndrome in urgent surgery: A concept, pathogenesis, and fundamentals of treatment. Piro­gov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2025;(2):77-85
Fascial abdo­minal closure is a key factor of effe­ctive VAC-assisted lapa­rostomy. Piro­gov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2025;(4):61-70
Difficult intu­bation risk asse­ssment in bariatric surgery. Russian Journal of Anesthesiology and Reanimatology. 2025;(1):62-68
Analysis of dyna­mics and fore­cast of morbidity of diseases of the urogenital system in the child popu­lation living in the Repu­blic of Sakha (Yakutia). Russian Journal of Preventive Medi­cine. 2025;(3):60-66
Rela­tionship between stroke-associated pneumonia and long-term outcomes of ischemic stroke. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2025;(3):57-61
Prognostic significance of NT-proBNP and sST2 in patients with chro­nic heart failure and redu­ced ejection fraction after previous deco­mpensation. Russian Cardiology Bulletin. 2025;(1):49-56
The phenomenon of tumor budding in gastric cancer. Russian Journal of Archive of Pathology. 2025;(2):79-87
Diagnostic and prognostic pote­ntial of modern biomarkers in community-acquired pneumonia in children. Russian Journal of Preventive Medi­cine. 2025;(4):130-135
Pathogenetic aspe­cts of autoantibody formation to central nervous system stru­ctures in patients with ence­phalitis. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2025;(4):53-58
Abstract:

The review is devoted to the most common general clinical and specific grading systems for peritonitis outcome prediction. Particular attention is paid to methodological approaches, prediction reliability, simplicity of use in clinical practice and their importance in decision-making. It is shown that none of the modern grading systems is universal and absolutely reliable. Combining several systems is quite difficult and will take additional time that is impossible for intraoperative environment. Despite various systems for peritonitis outcome prediction, none of them can completely satisfy surgeons, primarily in choice of surgical access, intervention type and option for its completion.

Keywords:

peritonitis
prognosis
scales
analysis

Authors:

Lebedev N.V.

Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia

Popov V.S.

Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia

Klimov A.E.

Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia

Svanadze G.T.

Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia

Received:

17.02.2021

Accepted:

12.03.2021

Close metadata

References:

  1. van Ruler O, Mahler MW, Boer KR, Reuland A, Gooszen MG. Comparison of on-demand vs planned relaparotomy strategy in patients with severe peritonitis. A randomized trial. JAMA. 2007;298(8):865.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.298.8.865
  2. Budamala S, Penugonda A, Prakash GV, Ramaniah NV, et al. Evaluation of various prognostic factors in perforative peritonitis management. Journal of evidence based medicine and healthcare. 2015;2(38):6027-6035. https://doi.org/10.18410/jebmh/2015/831
  3. Sartelli M. Antimicrobial management of intra-abdominal infections: Literature’s guidelines. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2012;18(9):865.  https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v18.i9.865
  4. Pieracci FM, Barie PS. Management of severe sepsis of abdominal origin. Scandinavian Journal of Surgery. 2007;96(3):184-196.  https://doi.org/10.1177/145749690709600302
  5. Abdel-Kader S, Sartelli M, Abu-Zidan FM. Complicated intra-abdominal infections: a prospective validation study of the WSES Sepsis Severity Score. Singapore Medical Journal. 2019;60(6):317-321.  https://doi.org/10.11622/smedj.2018120
  6. Gel’fand BR, Kirienko AI, Dibirov MD, Khachatryan NN. Abdominal’naya infektsiya i sepsis. Rossiiskie natsional’nye rekomendatsii. Rossiiskoe obshchestvo khirurgov. M. 2017.
  7. De Simone B, Coccolini F, Catena F, et al. Benefits of WSES guidelines application for the management of intra-abdominal infections. World Journal of Emergency Surgery. 2015;10(3). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-015-0013-x
  8. Sartelli M, Catena F, Ansaloni L, et al. Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infections Observational European study (CIAO Study). World Journal of Emergency Surgery. 2011;6(1):40.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-7922-6-40
  9. Tolonen M, Sallinen V, Mentula P, Leppaniemi A. Preoperative prognostic factors for severe diffuse secondary peritonitis: a retrospective study. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg. 2016;401(5):611-617.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-016-1454-8
  10. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315(8):801.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.0287
  11. Khatri R, Sawyer R. Global Perspectives in Controversies Related to the Management of Intra-Abdominal Infections. Surgical Infections. 2020;21(7):626-633.  https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2020.174
  12. Tolonen M, Coccolini F, Ansaloni L, Sartelli M, Roberts DJ, McKee JL, et al. Getting the invite list right: a discussion of sepsis severity scoring systems in severe complicated intra-abdominal sepsis and randomized trial inclusion criteria. World J Emerg Surg. 2018;13(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-018-0177-2
  13. Tolonen M, Sallinen M, Leppäniemi A, Bäcklund M, Mentula P. The role of the intra-abdominal view in complicated intra-abdominal infections. World Journal of Emergency Surgery. 2019;14(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-019-0232-7
  14. Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP. APACHE II: A severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med. 1985;13(11):818-829.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00003246-198510000-00009
  15. Le Gall JR. A. new Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study». JAMA. 1993;270(24):2957-2963.
  16. Vincent JL, de Mendonca A, Cantraine F, Monero R, Takala J, Suter PM, Sprung CL. Use of the SOFA score to assess the incidence of organ dysfunction/failure in intensive care units: results of a multicenter, prospective study. Working group on «sepsis-related problems» of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Critical Care Medicine. 1998;26(11):1793-1800. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003246-199811000-00016
  17. Aliev SA, Aliev ES. Abdominal sepsis: the state of the problem, integral system for assessing the severity of sepsis and criteria for predicting the result. Grekov’s Bulletin of Surgery. 2018;177(5):108-112.  https://doi.org/10.24884/0042-4625-2018-177-5-108-112
  18. Savel’ev VS, Gel’fand BR, Filimonov MI. Peritonit. Prakticheskoe rukovodstvo. M.: Littera; 2006.
  19. Khorwal B, Yadav KS, Joshi V. Study of predictive ability of modified apache ii score to prognosticate the outcome and severity of generalized peritonitis secondary to typhoid ileal perforation. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences. 2015;4(90):15498-15501. https://doi.org/10.14260/jemds/2015/2217
  20. Chandan CS, Mohan Kumar, Sudarsan S. Application of APACHE II scoring system in assessing prognosis of critically ill surgical and trauma patients. International Surgery Journal. 2018;5(6):2328. https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20182248
  21. Mishra A, Singh K, Jain V. A comparative analysis between Mannheim peritonitis score and acute physiological and chronic health evaluation II score in predicting prognosis of patients of perforation peritonitis. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences. 2019;8(1):10.  https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20195574
  22. Todi S, Doxit SB, Zirpe K, Mehta Y. Critical Care Update 2017. JP Medical Ltd.; 2018. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp/books/13063
  23. Gupta A, Sachan PK, Agrawal S. Predicting the outcome of perforation peritonitis by using APACHE II scoring system. International Surgery Journal. 2018;5(2):402.  https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20180020
  24. Deb Sanjay Nag, Dembla A, Mahanty P, Kant S, Chatterjee A, Prasad D Samaddar, Chugh P. Comparative analysis of APACHE-II and P-POSSUM scoring systems in predicting postoperative mortality in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy. World Journal of Clinical Cases. 2019;7(16):2227-2237. https://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v7.i16.2227
  25. Salakhov EK, Salakhov KK. Intra-abdominal pressure monitoring in postoperative period in patients with diffuse peritonitis. Kazan medical journal. 2015;96(2):214-219.  https://doi.org/10.17750/KMJ2015-214
  26. Ahuja A. Prognostic Scoring Indicator in Evaluation of Clinical Outcome In Intestinal Perforations. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research. 2013;7(9):1953-1955. https://doi.org/10.7860/jcdr/2013/6572.3375
  27. Khorwal B, Yadav KS, Joshi V, et al. Study of predictive ability of modified apache ii score to prognosticate the outcome and severity of generalized peritonitis secondary to typhoid ileal perforation. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences. 2015;4(90):15498-15501. https://doi.org/10.14260/jemds/2015/2217
  28. Falcão ALE, Barros AGdA, Bezerra AAM, et al. The prognostic accuracy evaluation of SAPS 3, SOFA and APACHE II scores for mortality prediction in the surgical ICU: an external validation study and decision-making analysis. Annals of Intensive Care. 2019;9(18). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-019-0488-9
  29. Knaus WA, Zimmerman JE, Wagner DP, Draper EA, Lawrence DE. APACHE — acute physiology and chronic health evaluation: a physiologically based classification system. Critical Care Medicine. 1981;9(8):591-597.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00003246-198108000-00008
  30. Parsons P, Wiener-Kronish J. Critical Care Secrets 4th Edition, Mosby; 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-4160-3206-9.10096-5
  31. Ozban M. The Analysis of Scoring Systems Predicting Mortality in Geriatric Emergency Abdominal Surgery. Turkish Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery. 2015;21(3):182-186.  https://doi.org/10.5505/tjtes.2015.05046
  32. Hanisch E, Brause R, Paetz J, Arlt B. Review of A Large Clinical Series: Predicting Death for Patients with Abdominal Septic Shock. Journal of Intensive Care Medicine. 2011;26(1):27-33.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0885066610384058
  33. Sekulic A, Trpkovic S, Pavlovic A, Marinkovic O, Ilic A. Scoring Systems in Assessing Survival of Critically Ill ICU Patients. Medical Science Monitor. 2015;21:2621-2629. https://doi.org/10.12659/msm.894153
  34. Wacha H, Linder M, Feldmann U, Wesch G, Steifensand R, Gundlach E. Der Mannheimer Peritonitis-Index — ein Instrument zur intraoperativen Prognose der Peritonitis. Peritonitis. 1987:73-100.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-73008-5_6
  35. Sazhin AV, Ivakhov GB, Stradymov EA, Petukhov VA. Surgical treatment of perforated gastric and duodenum ulcers complicated by diffuse peritonitis: prediction factors (part 2). Endoscopic Surgery. 2019;25(4):46-54.  https://doi.org/10.17116/endoskop20192504146
  36. Krylov NN, Babkin OV, Babkin DO. Mannheim peritonitis index as a surgical criterion for perforative duodenal ulcer. Surgery. 2016;(7):18-22.  https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia2016718-22
  37. Girard E, Abba J, Boussat B, Trilling B, et al. Damage Control Surgery for Non-traumatic Abdominal Emergencies. World Journal of Surgery. 2018;42(4):965-973.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-4262-6
  38. Radhita KF, Toar L, Aria K. Merit of APACHE II, MPI and ARPI scores as determinants On Demand Relaparotomy. The New Ropanasuri Journal of Surgery. 2016;1(1):16-18.  https://doi.org/10.7454/nrjs.v1i1.5
  39. Naveen P, Dhannur PK. Modified APACHE II scoring and Mannheims peritonitis Index (MPI) in predicting the outcome of patients with peritonitis secondary to hollow viscous perforation. International Journal of Surgery Science. 2019;3(3):403-407.  https://doi.org/10.33545/surgery.2019.v3.i3g.202
  40. Billing A, Frölich D, Schildberg FW. Prediction of outcome using the Mannheim peritonitis index in 2003 patients. British Journal of Surgery. 1994;81:209-213.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800810217
  41. Lebedev NV, Klimov AE, Agrba SB, Gaidukevich EK. Combined forecasting system of peritonitis outcome. Surgery. 2017;(9):33-37.  https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia2017933-37
  42. Ouf TI, Jumuah WAA, Mahmoud MA, Abdelbaset RI. Mortality rate in patients with Secondary Peritonitis in Ain Shams University Hospitals as regard Mannheim Peritonitis Index (MPI) score. QJM: An International Journal of Medicine. 2020;113(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcaa050.073
  43. Irpatgire RN, Badane A. Efficacy of Mannheim peritonitis index (Mpi) score in patients with perforation peritonitis. International Journal of Surgery Science. 2019;3(4):457-459.  https://doi.org/10.33545/surgery.2019.v3.i4h.285
  44. Sartelli M. A focus on intra-abdominal infections. World Journal of Emergency Surgery. 2009;5(1):9.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-7922-5-9
  45. Ceresoli M, Coccolini F, Biffl WL, et al. WSES guidelines updates. World Journal of Emergency Surgery. 2020;15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-020-00318-z
  46. Payá-Llorente C, Martínez-López E, Sebastián-Tomás J, Santarrufina-Martínez S, de’Angelis N, Martínez-Pérez A. The impact of age and comorbidity on the postoperative outcomes after emergency surgical management of complicated intra-abdominal infections. Scientific Reports. 2020;10(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-58453-1
  47. Barie P, Hydo L, Eachempati S. Longitudinal Outcomes of Intra-abdominal Infection Complicated by Critical Illness. Surgical Infections. 2004;5(4):365-373.  https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2004.5.365
  48. Mwenda KI, Ojuka D, Awory M. Utility of World Society of Emergency Surgery Sepsis Severity Score in Predicting Outcomes of Intra-abdominal Infections. Annals of African Surgery. 2020;17(2):65-68.  https://doi.org/10.4314/aas.v17i2.5
  49. Tolonen M, Sallinen V, Leppäniemi A, Bäcklund M, Mentula P. The role of the intra-abdominal view in complicated intra-abdominal infections. World Journal of Emergency Surgery. 2019;14(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-019-0232-7
  50. Geethapriya S. Possum Scoring In Hollow Viscus Perforation. IOSR. Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences. 2017;16(02):102-108.  https://doi.org/10.9790/0853-160206102108
  51. Raimondo S, Sartelli M, Coccolini F, Fugazzola P, et al. Which prognostic score for abdominal sepsis? Analysis of final results of PIPAS (Physiological Indicators for Prognosis in Abdominal Sepsis) study in a single center. Journal of Peritoneum (and other serosal surfaces). 2018. https://doi.org/10.4081/joper.2018.106
  52. Gomes CA, Sartelli M, Podda M, Di Saverio S. Laparoscopic versus open approach for diffuse peritonitis from appendicitis ethiology: a subgroup analysis from the Physiological parameters for Prognosis in Abdominal Sepsis (PIPAS) study. Updates in Surgery. 2020;72(1):185-191.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-020-00711-y
  53. Lebedev NV, Popov VS, Klimov AE, Svanadze GT. Comparative assessment of prognostic systems for secondary peritonitis outcome. Khirurgiya. 2021;(2):27-31.  https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia202102127
  54. Seymour CW, Liu VX, Iwashyna TJ. Assessment of Clinical Criteria for Sepsis. JAMA. 2016;315(8):762.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.0288
  55. Bosscha K, Reijnders K, Hulstaert PF, Algra A, van der Werken C. Prognostic scoring systems to predict outcome in peritonitis and intra-abdominal sepsis. The British Journal of Surgery. 1997;84(11):1532-1534. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2168.1997.02809.x
Contact the author
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

Contact us
If you have any questions, complaints or suggestions, please use this feedback form.
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.
Submit Application

You can become an author of one of our magazines, send a request and we will consider it in during the day.

Name
Phone
E-mail
Message
Login
Registration
E-mail
Password
Forgot Password?

Log in to the site using your account in one of the services

Password recovery
E-mail
Login
Register

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.