The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Login
EN
+7 (495) 482-4118
+7 (495) 482-4329
+8 800 250-18-12
  • (toll-free number for subscriptions)
    Mon-Fri from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m.

  • © 1998-2026
+7 (495) 482-43-29
EN
All journals
Journal
Year
Year
Search result: 0

Lysenko A.V.

Petrovsky Russian Scientific Center of Surgery

Lednev P.V.

Petrovsky Russian Scientific Center of Surgery

Salagaev G.I.

Petrovsky Russian Scientific Center of Surgery

Markina A.D.

Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

Belov Yu.V.

Petrovsky National Research Center of Surgery;
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

Comparative analysis of the results of cardiac surgery via median sternotomy and right-sided thoracotomy

Authors:

Lysenko A.V., Lednev P.V., Salagaev G.I., Markina A.D., Belov Yu.V.

More about the authors

Journal: Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2021;14(4): 314‑319

DOI: 10.17116/kardio202114041314

Read: 1740 times

Download PDF (RU)
Contact the author
Table of contents

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE RESULTS OF CARDIAC SURGERY VIA MEDIAN STERNOTOMY AND RIGHT-SIDED THORACOTOMY
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE RESULTS OF CARDIAC SURGERY VIA MEDIAN STERNOTOMY AND RIGHT-SIDED THORACOTOMY

To cite this article:

Lysenko AV, Lednev PV, Salagaev GI, Markina AD, Belov YuV. Comparative analysis of the results of cardiac surgery via median sternotomy and right-sided thoracotomy. Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2021;14(4):314‑319. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/kardio202114041314

Подписка 2026 Кардиология и сердечно-сосудистая хирургия (Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery)
МСФ на ЯМ
Использование инфографики авторами научных работ
Close metadata
Recommended articles:
Imme­diate resu­lts of mitral and aortic valve replacement with simu­ltaneous Cox-Maze IV procedure. Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2025;(1):28-33
Endo­vascular treatment and sele­ction criteria for acute mese­nteric ischemia. Piro­gov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2025;(2):13-19
Influence of cardiovascular complications on 30-day mortality after major abdo­minal surgery: a regional multiple-center study. Russian Journal of Anesthesiology and Reanimatology. 2025;(1):69-75
Instrumental and labo­ratory indi­cators in evaluating the effe­ctiveness of suba­ntral sinus lifting in severe bone atro­phy. Russian Journal of Operative Surgery and Clinical Anatomy. 2025;(1):48-55
Early complications after surgical treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax: risk factors analysis. Piro­gov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2025;(3):24-32
The role of early predictors in diagnosis of stapler suture and anastomotic failure in bariatric patients. Piro­gov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2025;(3):76-86
Possibilities surgical treatment of atypical forms of pelvic organ prolapse. Endo­scopic Surgery. 2025;(2):35-42
Transluminal extraction of intramural duodenal wall calculus after videolaparoscopic cholecystectomy. Endo­scopic Surgery. 2025;(2):50-55
Controversial issues of colon stenting in case of tumor obstructive inte­stinal obstruction: surgical and onco­logical aspe­cts. Endo­scopic Surgery. 2025;(2):65-75
A rational approach to the prevention and treatment of ARVI and influenza, as a medico-economic and socially significant problem of the XXI century. Journal of Respiratory Medi­cine. 2025;(1):43-48
Abstract:

OBJECTIVE

To compare the outcomes of median sternotomy and right-sided thoracotomy in cardiac surgery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective observational study included 28 patients (20 women and 8 men) aged 49.9±13.5 years who underwent correction of various cardiac diseases. All patients were retrospectively divided into 2 groups depending on surgical approach: group 1 — right-sided thoracotomy, group 2 — median sternotomy.

RESULTS

Complication rate and in-hospital mortality were similar in both groups. Thoracotomy was accompanied by more intense pain syndrome in postoperative period and better cosmetic outcome.

CONCLUSION

Considering no need for additional resources (robotic console, endoscopic equipment, manipulators, special instruments and additional consumables), anterolateral thoracotomy is a compromise option between conventional sternotomy and minimally invasive approaches.

Keywords:

median sternotomy
right-sided thoracotomy
myxoma
mitral valve
complications
mortality
cosmetic result

Authors:

Lysenko A.V.

Petrovsky Russian Scientific Center of Surgery

Lednev P.V.

Petrovsky Russian Scientific Center of Surgery

Salagaev G.I.

Petrovsky Russian Scientific Center of Surgery

Markina A.D.

Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

Belov Yu.V.

Petrovsky National Research Center of Surgery;
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

Received:

10.05.2021

Accepted:

05.06.2021

Close metadata

References:

  1. Cao H, Zhou Q, Fan F, Xue Y, Pan J, Wang D. Right anterolateral thoracotomy: an attractive alternative to repeat sternotomy for high-risk patients undergoing reoperative mitral and tricuspid valve surgery. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017;12(1):85.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-017-0645-x
  2. Srivastava AK, Garg SK, Ganjoo AK. Approach for primary mitral valve surgery: right anterolateral thoracotomy or median sternotomy. J Heart Valve Dis. 1998;7(4):370-375. 
  3. Al Otaibi A, Gupta S, Belley-Cote EP, Alsagheir A, Spence J, Parry D, Whitlock RP. Mini-thoracotomy vs. conventional sternotomy mitral valve surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2017;58(3):489-496.  https://doi.org/10.23736/S0021-9509.16.09603-8
  4. Goldstone AB, Atluri P, Szeto WY, Trubelja A, Howard JL, MacArthur JW Jr, Newcomb C, Donnelly JP, Kobrin DM, Sheridan MA, Powers C, Gorman RC, Gorman JH 3rd, Pochettino A, Bavaria JE, Acker MA, Hargrove WC 3rd, Woo YJ. Minimally invasive approach provides at least equivalent results for surgical correction of mitral regurgitation: a propensity-matched comparison. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;145(3):748-756.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.09.093
  5. Basaran M, Kocailik A, Ozbek C, Ucak A, Kafali E, Us M. Comparison of 3 different incisions used for atrial-septal defect closure. Heart Surg Forum. 2008;11(5):E290-4.  https://doi.org/10.1532/HSF98.20081060
  6. Woo YJ, Seeburger J, Mohr FW. Minimally invasive valve surgery. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;19(4):289-298.  https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semtcvs.2007.10.005
  7. Argenziano M, Katz M, Bonatti J, Srivastava S, Murphy D, Poirier R, Loulmet D, Siwek L, Kreaden U, Ligon D; TECAB Trial Investigators. Results of the prospective multicenter trial of robotically assisted totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;81(5):1666-1674; discussion 1674-1675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.11.007
  8. Wimmer-Greinecker G, Dogan S, Aybek T, Khan MF, Mierdl S, Byhahn C, Moritz A. Totally endoscopic atrial septal repair in adults with computer-enhanced telemanipulation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;126(2):465-468.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5223(03)00053-9
  9. Folliguet TA, Vanhuyse F, Konstantinos Z, Laborde F. Early experience with robotic aortic valve replacement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005;28(1):172-173.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2005.03.021
  10. Tatooles AJ, Pappas PS, Gordon PJ, Slaughter MS. Minimally invasive mitral valve repair using the da Vinci robotic system. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;77(6):1978-1982; discussion 1982-1984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2003.11.024
  11. Murphy DA, Byrne JJ, Malave HA. Robotic endoscopic excision of accessory mitral leaflet. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;131(2):468-469.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2005.08.053
  12. Folliguet T, Vanhuyse F, Constantino X, Realli M, Laborde F. Mitral valve repair robotic versus sternotomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006;29(3):362-366.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2005.12.004
  13. Woo YJ, Nacke EA. Robotic minimally invasive mitral valve reconstruction yields less blood product transfusion and shorter length of stay. Surgery. 2006;140(2):263-267.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2006.05.003
  14. Salagaev GI, Lysenko AV, Lednev PV, Belov YuV, Semenyakin IV. Robot-assisted resection of pericardial cyst and left atrial tumor. Russ Jour of Card and Cardiovasc Surg = Kard i serd-sosud khir. 2019;6:580-583. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/kardio201912061580
Contact the author
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

Contact us
If you have any questions, complaints or suggestions, please use this feedback form.
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.
Submit Application

You can become an author of one of our magazines, send a request and we will consider it in during the day.

Name
Phone
E-mail
Message
Login
Registration
E-mail
Password
Forgot Password?

Log in to the site using your account in one of the services

Password recovery
E-mail
Login
Register

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.