The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Melkozerova O.A.

Ural'skiĭ nauchno-issledovatel'skiĭ institut okhrany materinstva i mladenchestva, Ekaterinburg

Bashmakova N.V.

Ural Scientific Research Institute of Maternity and Child Health Ministry of the Russia, Yekaterinburg, Russia

Chistiakova G.N.

FGBU "Ural'skiĭ nauchno-issledovatel'skiĭ institut okhrany materinstva i mladenchestva", Ekaterinburg

Mikhelson A.A.

Ural Research Institute of Maternal and Infant Care, Ministry of Health of Russia, Yekaterinburg, Russia

Shchedrina I.D.

Ural Research Institute of Maternal and Infant Care, Ministry of Health of Russia, Yekaterinburg, Russia

New aspects of the diagnosis of endometrial receptivity in patients with reproductive failure

Authors:

Melkozerova O.A., Bashmakova N.V., Chistiakova G.N., Mikhelson A.A., Shchedrina I.D.

More about the authors

Read: 2915 times


To cite this article:

Melkozerova OA, Bashmakova NV, Chistiakova GN, Mikhelson AA, Shchedrina ID. New aspects of the diagnosis of endometrial receptivity in patients with reproductive failure. Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2018;18(6):73‑82. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/rosakush20181806173

Recommended articles:
Early pregnancy loss: the influence of endo­genous risk factors. Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2024;(6):50-58
Difficulties in life­time diagnosis of Creutzfeldt—Jakob disease. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2024;(11):19-27
Clinical case of auri­cular gouty tophi. Russian Bulletin of Otorhinolaryngology. 2024;(6):80-84

References:

  1. Leviashvili MM, Demura TA, Mishiyeva NG, Fazullina NM. Evaluation of endometrial receptivity in patients with ineffective extracorporeal fertilization programs in anamnesis. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya. 2012;4:1:65-69. (In Russ.)
  2. Burmenskaya OV, Bozhenko VK, Smol`nikova VYu. Search for markers of a personal «implantation window» in women in the program of in vitro fertilization with the help of determining the transcriptional profile of genes. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya. 2017;5:72-80. (In Russ) https://doi.org/10.18565/aig.2017.5.72-80
  3. Maslova MA, Smol`nikova VYu, Donnikov AE, Burmenskaya OV. Evaluation of the importance of molecular-genetic markers in the endometrium in predicting the outcome of pregnancy in the program of extracorporeal fertilization. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya. 2015;3:26-32. (In Russ.)
  4. Pal`tsev MA, Ailamazyan EK, Kvetnoy IM. Molecular mechanisms of diseases of the reproductive system. SPb.: Eko-vektor, 2017;256. (In Russ.)
  5. Niauri DA, Gzgzyan AM, Kvetnoi IM, Kogan IYu. Immunohistochemical characteristics of endometrial receptivity in IVF cycles. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya. 2014;9:44-50. (In Russ.)
  6. Tabolova VK, Korneeva IE, Donnikov AE, Burmenskaya OV. Profile of local expression of growth factor and cytokine genes in the endometrium of the period of the «implantation window» in chronic endometrium. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya. 2014;12:74-78. (In Russ.)
  7. Berlanga O, Bradshaw HB, Vilella-Mitjana F. How endometrial secretomics can help in predicting implantation. Placenta. 2011; 32:3:271-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.placenta.2011.06.002
  8. Garrido-Gómez T, Ruiz-Alonso M, Blesa D. Profiling the gene signature of endometrial receptivity: clinical results. Fertil Steril. 2013;99:1078-1085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.12.005
  9. Basir GS, WSO, WWSo. Evaluation of cycle-to-cycle variation of endometrial responsiveness using transvaginal sonography in women undergoing assisted reproduction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002;19:484-489. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00685.x
  10. Kasius A, Smit JG, Torrance HL. Endometrial thickness and pregnancy rates after IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2014;20:4:530-541. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmu011
  11. Check JH, Cohen R. Live fetus following embryo transfer in a woman with diminished egg reserve whose maximal endometrial thickness was less than 4 mm. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2011;38:330-332.
  12. Casper RF. It is time to pay attention to the endometrium. Fertil Steril. 2011;96:519-521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.07.1096
  13. Gaidukov SN, Boyarskii YuK, Pal`chenko NA. Modern view on problem of receptivity and thin endometrium in programs ART. Probltmy reprodyktsii. 2013;4:51-60. (In Russ.)
  14. Bland M. An Introduction to Medical Statistics. 4th edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 448;335-347.
  15. Melkozerova OA, Bashmakova NV, Esareva AV, Chistyakova GN, Barlit OG, Giniyatova AA. Patent RF №2017120910. Metod of evaluation of endometrial receptivity in the periof of the «implantation window». Moscow. 2017;6. (In Russ.)
  16. Di Spiezio SA, Carlo CDi, Minozzi S. Efficacy of hysteroscopy in improving reproductive outcomes of infertile couples: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2016;22:4:479-496. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmw008
  17. Pundir J, Pundir V, Omanwa K. Hysteroscopy prior to the first IVF cycle: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014;28:2:151-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.09.025
  18. Smit JG, Torrance T, Broekmans FJ. Hysteroscopy prior to a first IVF treatment cycle: the need for well-performed RCT. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014;29:1:1-42. https://doi.org/10.1517/14712598.7.9.1311
  19. Romero R, Espinoza J. Can endometrial infection/inflammation explain implantation failure, spontaneous abortion, and preterm birth after in vitro fertilization? Fertil Steril. 2004;82:799-804.
  20. Mitchell CM, Haick A, Nkwopara E. Colonization of the upper genital tract by vaginal bacterial species in nonpregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212:611-619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2014.11.043
  21. Moreno I, Codoñer FM, Vilella F. Evidence that the endometrial microbiota has an effect on implantation success or failure. Am J of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2016;215:1:684-703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2016.09.075
  22. Ravel J, Gajer P, Abdo Z. Vaginal microbiome of reproductive-age women. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:4680-4687. https://doi.org/10.1073%2Fpnas.1002611107
  23. Sirota I, Zarek SM, Segars JH. Potential influence of the microbiome on infertility and assisted reproductive technology. Semin Reprod Med. 2014;32:35-42. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1361821

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.