The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Login
EN
+7 (495) 482-4118
+7 (495) 482-4329
+8 800 250-18-12
  • (toll-free number for subscriptions)
    Mon-Fri from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m.

  • © 1998-2026
+7 (495) 482-43-29
EN
All journals
Journal
Year
Year
Search result: 0

Khramtsova A.Yu.

Federal State Budgetary Institution «Ural Research Institute for Maternal and Child Health» of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

Semenov Yu.A.

Federal State Budgetary Institution «Ural Research Institute for Maternal and Child Health» of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

Melkozerova O.A.

Federal State Budgetary Institution «Ural Research Institute for Maternal and Child Health» of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

Danishevskaya A.A.

Federal State Budgetary Institution «Ural Research Institute for Maternal and Child Health» of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

Clinical and anamnestic predictors of embryo ploidy disorders in assisted reproductive technology programs

Authors:

Khramtsova A.Yu., Semenov Yu.A., Melkozerova O.A., Danishevskaya A.A.

More about the authors

Journal: Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2026;31(1): 69‑77

DOI: 10.17116/repro20263201169

Read: 254 times

Buy for 300₽
Contact the author
Table of contents

CLINICAL AND ANAMNESTIC PREDICTORS OF EMBRYO PLOIDY DISORDERS IN ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAMS
CLINICAL AND ANAMNESTIC PREDICTORS OF EMBRYO PLOIDY DISORDERS IN ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAMS

To cite this article:

Khramtsova AYu, Semenov YuA, Melkozerova OA, Danishevskaya AA. Clinical and anamnestic predictors of embryo ploidy disorders in assisted reproductive technology programs. Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2026;31(1):69‑77. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/repro20263201169

 
Подписка 2026 Проблемы репродукции (Russian Journal of Human Reproduction)
МСФ на ЯМ
Использование инфографики авторами научных работ
Recommended articles:
Nutrient status of follicular fluid and blood serum in women with infe­rtility as a marker of embryo quality. Pilot study. Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2025;(2):17-27
Age-related pecu­liarities of blood para­meters in women and their impact on the outcome of in vitro fertilization programs. Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2025;(2):28-36
To the question of human oocy­tes dysmorphism and its influence on the para­meters of early embryogenesis. Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2025;(3):48-54
Visualization of the mito­tic spindle in oocy­tes of patients with ovarian endo­metriosis as a prognostic factor for the effe­ctiveness of fertilization and early embryonic deve­lopment in IVF/ICSI programs. Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2025;(3):55-62
Impact of trophectoderm biopsy on the course of pregnancy and obstetric outcomes. Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2025;(3):63-69
Prediction of pregnancy in ART cycles in Hashimoto’s thyroiditis affe­cted women with anti­thyroid anti­bodies posi­tivity. Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2025;(3):70-76
Study of athrombogenic and thro­mbogenic factors of the endo­thelium in women with an unexpected poor and subo­ptimal ovarian response during the treatment of infe­rtility by methods of assi­sted reproductive technology. Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2025;(4):56-63
Clinical outcomes of «fresh» and frozen-thawed embryo transfers from own oocy­tes in women over 40 years. Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2025;(4):74-86
Medi­cal and social characteristics of mate­rnal deaths after extracorporeal fertilization. Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2025;(2):5-14
Primary ovarian insu­fficiency: oppo­rtunities and prospects for the realization of reproductive function. Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2025;(2):42-47
Abstract:

The success of assisted reproductive technologies depends on many factors, the main ones being the quality and genetic status of the embryo and endometrial receptivity. Preimplantation genetic testing is a tool that aims to reduce the risk of selecting an aneuploid embryo for transfer. Disputes surrounding the use of preimplantation genetic testing are conducted in the context of older patients, with recurrent miscarriage, with genetic karyotype abnormalities in a married couple, as well as multiple unsuccessful attempts at ART in the anamnesis. This study was conducted in the period from 2020 to 2024 on the basis of the Federal State Budgetary Institution «Ural Research Institute of Maternal and Infant Care» of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation. The study included 127 married couples with infertility, whose embryos underwent preimplantation genetic testing. All embryos were divided into two groups: the first group included 102 embryos with a euploid set of chromosomes, the second group included 93 embryos with an aneuploid and mosaic set of chromosomes. The main evaluation criteria were embryo quality and clinical pregnancy rates. his study made it possible to study the influence of clinical and anamnestic data of married couples on the chromosome set of embryos subjected to PGT-A. During a retrospective assessment of ART programs with PGT-A, it was revealed that the morphological quality of the embryo, the factor of infertility of the couple, as well as the number of ART attempts in history do not affect its chromosomal composition. However, with an increase in FSH levels and the age of a man or woman, the frequency of formation of a euploid embryo decreases.

Keywords:

assisted reproductive technologies (ART)
IVF
preimplantation genetic testing (PGT-A)

Authors:

Khramtsova A.Yu.

Federal State Budgetary Institution «Ural Research Institute for Maternal and Child Health» of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

Semenov Yu.A.

Federal State Budgetary Institution «Ural Research Institute for Maternal and Child Health» of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

Melkozerova O.A.

Federal State Budgetary Institution «Ural Research Institute for Maternal and Child Health» of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

Danishevskaya A.A.

Federal State Budgetary Institution «Ural Research Institute for Maternal and Child Health» of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

Received:

02.08.2024

Accepted:

17.12.2024

Close metadata

References:

  1. Webster A, Schuh M. Mechanisms of Aneuploidy in Human Eggs. Trends in Cell Biology. 2017;27(1):55-68.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2016.09.002
  2. Mikwar M, MacFarlane AJ, Marchetti F. Mechanisms of oocyte aneuploidy associated with advanced maternal age. Reviews in Mutation Research. 2020;785:108320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrrev.2020.108320
  3. Delhanty JD, Griffin DK, Handyside AH, Harper J, Atkinson GH, Pieters MH, Winston RM. Detection of aneuploidy and chromosomal mosaicism in human embryos during preimplantation sex determination by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). Human Molecular Genetics. 1993;2(8):1183-1185. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/2.8.1183
  4. Munné S, Blazek J, Large M, Martinez-Ortiz PA, Nisson H, Liu E, Tarozzi N, Borini A, Becker A, Zhang J, Maxwell S, Grifo J, Babariya D, Wells D, Fragouli E. Detailed investigation into the cytogenetic constitution and pregnancy outcome of replacing mosaic blastocysts detected with the use of high-resolution next-generation sequencing. Fertility and Sterility. 2017;108(1):62-71.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.05.002
  5. Fiorentino F, Biricik A, Bono S, Spizzichino L, Cotroneo E, Cottone G, Kokocinski F, Michel CE. Development and validation of a next-generation sequencing-based protocol for 24-chromosome aneuploidy screening of embryos. Fertility and Sterility. 2014;101(5): 1375-1382. https://doi.org/10.1016/i.fertnstert.2014.01.051
  6. Munné S, Wells D. Detection of mosaicism at blastocyst stage with the use of high-resolution next-generation sequencing. Fertility and Sterility. 2017;107(5):1085-1091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.03.024
  7. Yang Z, Lin J, Zhang J, Fong WI, LiP, Zhao R, Liu X, Podevin W, Kuang Y, Liu J. Randomized comparison of next-generation sequencing and array comparative genomic hybridization for preimplantation genetic screening; a pilot study. BMC Medical Genomics. 2015;8:30.  https://doi.org/10.1186/12920-015-0110-4
  8. Friedenthal J, Maxwell S, Munné S, Kramer Y, McCulloh D, McCaffrey C, Grifo JA. Next generation sequencing for preimplantation genetic screening improves pregnancy outcomes compared with array comparative genomic hybridization in single thawed euploid embryo transfer cycles. Fertility and Sterility. 2018;109(4):627-632.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.12.017
  9. Murphy NM, Samarasekera TS, Macaskill L, Mullen J, Rombauts LJF. Genome sequencing of human in vitro fertilization embryos for pathogenic variation screening. Scientific Reports. 2020; 10(1):3795. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-60704-0
  10. Rocafort E, Enciso M, Leza A, Sarasa J, Aizpurua J. Euploid embryos selected by an automated time-lapse system have superior SET outcomes than selected solely by conventional morphology assessment. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics. 2018;35(9): 1573-1583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-018-1265-7
  11. Krausz C, Riera-Escamilla A. Genetics of male infertility. Nature Reviews. Urology. 2018;15(6):369-384.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-018-0003-3
  12. O’Brien K, Varghese A, Agarwal A. The genetic causes of male factor infertility: a review. Fertility and Sterility. 2010;93(1):1-12.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.10.045
  13. Doroftei B, Ilie O, Anton N, Armeanu T, Ilea C. A Mini-Review Regarding the Clinical Outcomes of In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) Following Pre-Implantation Genetic Testing (PGT)-Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) Approach. Diagnostics. 2022;12(8):1911. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12081911
  14. Sordia-Hernandez LH, Morales-Martinez FA, González-Colmenero FD, Flores-Rodriguez A, Leyva-Camacho PC, Sordia-Piñeyro MO, Valdés-Martínez OH, García-Luna SM, Rodríguez-Guajardo R, Sordia-Piñeyro LH. The Effects of Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy (PGT-A) on Patient-Important Outcomes in Embryo Transfer Cases: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Reproduction and Infertility. 2022;23(4):231-246.  https://doi.org/10.18502/jri.v23i4.10808
  15. Simopoulou M, Sfakianoudis K, Maziotis E, Tsioulou P, Grigoriadis S, Rapani A, Giannelou P, Asimakopoulou M, Kokkali G, Pantou A, Nikolettos K, Vlahos N, Pantos K. PGT-A: who and when? Α systematic review and network meta-analysis of RCTs. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics. 2021;25(38):1939-1957. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-021-02227-9
  16. Munné S, Kaplan B, Frattarelli JL, Child T, Nakhuda G, Shamma FN, Silverberg K, Kalista T, Handyside AH, Katz-Jaffe M, Wells D, Gordon T, Stock-Myer S, Willman S; STAR Study Group. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy versus morphology as selection criteria for single frozen-thawed embryo transfer in good-prognosis patients: a multicenter randomized clinical trial. Fertility and Sterility Home. 2019;112(6):1071-1079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.07.1346
  17. Smirnova AA, Zyryaeva NA, Zhordanidze DO, Sergeev SA, Matveeva EO, Rizhinashvili SI, Torchinov AR, Anshina MB, Kira EF. Preimplantation genetic testing for the prevention of miscarriage after IVF. Reproduktivnaya medicina. 2019;3(40):65-71. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17816/JOWD68575-82
  18. Franasiak JM, Forman EJ, Hong KH, Werner MD, Upham KM, Treff NR, Scott RT Jr. The nature of aneuploidy with increasing age of the female partner: a review of 15,169 consecutive trophectoderm biopsies evaluated with comprehensive chromosomal screening. Fertility and Sterility Home. 2014;101(3):656-663.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.11.004
  19. Gleicher N, Patrizio P, Brivanlou A. Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy — a Castle Built on Sand. Trends in Molecular Medicine. 2021;27(8):731-742.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmed.2020.11.009
  20. Tiegs AW, Tao X, Zhan Y, Whitehead C, Kim J, Hanson B, Osman E, Kim TJ, Patounakis G, Gutmann J, Castelbaum A, Seli E, Jalas C, Scott RT Jr. A multicenter, prospective, blinded, nonselection study evaluating the predictive value of an aneuploid diagnosis using a targeted next-generation sequencing–based preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy assay and impact of biopsy. Fertility and Sterility. 2020;115(3):627-637.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.07.052
  21. Shurygina OV, Yuldasheva SZ, Tugushev MT, Minaeva TV, Petrova AA, Belyaeva LA, Mironov SYu, Shurygin SA, Kutikhin DYu. Evaluation of the effectiveness of preimplantation genetic testing in assisted reproductive technology programs: a retrospective study. Reproduktivnaya medicina. 2022;4(53):32-37. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.37800/RM.3.2022.32-39
  22. Viotti M. Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Chromosomal Abnormalities: Aneuploidy, Mosaicism, and Structural Rearrangements. Genes. 2020;11(6):602.  https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11060602
  23. Capalbo A, Ubaldi FM, Rienzi L, Scott R, Treff N. Detecting mosaicism in trophectoderm biopsies: current challenges and future possibilities. Human Reproduction. 2017;32(3):492-498.  https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dew250
  24. Treff NR, Treff MD. The «mosaic» embryo: misconceptions and misinterpretations in preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy. Views and Reviews. 2021;116(5):1205-1211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.06.027
  25. Cornelisse S, Zagers M, Kostova E, Fleischer K, van Wely M, Mastenbroek S. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (abnormal number of chromosomes) in in vitro fertilization. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2020;9(9):CD005291. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005291.pub3
  26. Greco E, Litwicka K, Minasi MG, Cursio E, Greco PF, Barillari P. Preimplantation Genetic Testing: Where We Are Today. International. Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020;21(12):4381. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21124381
Contact the author
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

Submit Application

You can become an author of one of our magazines, send a request and we will consider it in during the day.

Name
Phone
E-mail
Message
Login
Registration
E-mail
Password
Forgot Password?

Log in to the site using your account in one of the services

Password recovery
E-mail
Login
Register

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.