The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Martynov S.A.

Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology

Sukhareva T.A.

Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology

Asaturova A.V.

National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology Named After Academician V.I. Kulakov of the Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation

Badlaeva A.S.

National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology Named After Academician V.I. Kulakov of the Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation

Bystritskiy A.A.

Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology

Adamyan L.V.

Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology

Features of the structure of uterine scars after cesarean section

Authors:

Martynov S.A., Sukhareva T.A., Asaturova A.V., Badlaeva A.S., Bystritskiy A.A., Adamyan L.V.

More about the authors

Journal: Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2025;31(5): 75‑83

Read: 459 times


To cite this article:

Martynov SA, Sukhareva TA, Asaturova AV, Badlaeva AS, Bystritskiy AA, Adamyan LV. Features of the structure of uterine scars after cesarean section. Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2025;31(5):75‑83. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/repro20253105175

Recommended articles:
The expe­rience of performing metroplasty at placenta accreta in the Repu­blic of Crimea. Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2025;(1):77-81
Cesa­rean section in modern obstetrics: problems and ways to overcome them. Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2025;(4):5-18

References:

  1. Robson SJ, de Costa CM. Thirty years of the World Health Organization’s target caesarean section rate: time to move on. Medical Journal of Australia. 2017;206(4):181-185.  https://doi.org/10.5694/mja16.00832
  2. Betran AP, Ye J, Moller AB, Souza JP, Zhang J. Trends and projections of caesarean section rates: global and regional estimates. BMJ Global Health. 2021 June;6(6):e005671. PMID: 34130991; PMCID: PMC8208001. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005671
  3. Rotas MA, Haberman S, Levgur M. Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies: etiology, diagnosis, and management. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2006;107(6):1373-1381. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000218690.24494.ce
  4. Naji O, Wynants L, Smith A, Abdallah Y, Stalder C, Sayasneh A, McIndoe A, Ghaem-Maghami S, Van Huffel S, Van Calster B, Timmerman D, Bourne T. Predicting successful vaginal birth after Cesarean section using a model based on Cesarean scar features examined by transvaginal sonography. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2013;41(6):672-678.  https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.12423
  5. Tinelli A, Pacheco AL, Haimovich S, eds. Hysteroscopy. Springer; 2018;421-468. 
  6. Sidorova TA, Martynov SA. Risk factors and mechanisms of uterine scar defects formation after caesarean section: A review. Ginekologiya. 2022;24(1):11-17. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.26442/20795696.2022.1.201356
  7. Meyer JA, Silverstein J, Timor-Tritsch IE, Antoine C. The effect of uterine closure technique on cesarean scar niche development after multiple cesarean deliveries. Journal of Perinatal Medicine. 2023; 52(2):150-157.  https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2023-0211
  8. Vikhareva Osser O, Valentin L. Risk factors for incomplete healing of the uterine incision after caesarean section. BJOG. 2010;117(9): 1119-1126. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02631.x
  9. Wang CB, Chiu WW, Lee CY, Sun YL, Lin YH, Tseng CJ. Cesarean scar defect: correlation between Cesarean section number, defect size, clinical symptoms and uterine position. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2009;34(1):85-89.  https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.6405
  10. Vervoort AJ, Uittenbogaard LB, Hehenkamp WJ, Brölmann HA, Mol BW, Huirne JA. Why do niches develop in Caesarean uterine scars? Hypotheses on the aetiology of niche development. Human Reproduction. 2015;30(12):2695-2702. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dev240
  11. Martynov SA, Sukhareva TA, Adamyan LV. Comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of various laparoscopic metroplasty techniques in patients with significant uterine scar defects after cesarean section. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya. 2023;10:126-136. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18565/aig.2023.163
  12. Vervoort A, Vissers J, Hehenkamp W, Brölmann H, Huirne J. The effect of laparoscopic resection of large niches in the uterine caesarean scar on symptoms, ultrasound findings and quality of life: a prospective cohort study. BJOG. 2018;125(3):317-325.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.14822
  13. Donnez O, Donnez J, Orellana R, Dolmans MM. Gynecological and obstetrical outcomes after laparoscopic repair of a cesarean scar defect in a series of 38 women. Fertility and Sterility. 2017;107(1): 289-296.e2.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.09.033
  14. Ingber DE. Control of capillary growth and differentiation by extracellular matrix. Use of a tensegrity (tensional integrity) mechanism for signal processing. Chest. 1991;99(3 Suppl):34S-40S. 
  15. Pienta KJ, Coffey DS. Cellular harmonic information transfer through a tissue tensegrity-matrix system. Medical Hypotheses. 1991;34(1):88-95.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-9877(91)90072-7
  16. Ingber DE. Cellular tensegrity: defining new rules of biological design that govern the cytoskeleton. The Journal of Cell Science. 1993; 104(Pt 3):613-627.  https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.104.3.613
  17. Ermakov AS. Theory of tensegrity and spatial organization of the living. Ontogenez. 2018;49(2):101-115. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.7868/S0475145018020039
  18. Kilpadi DV, Lessing C, Derrick K. Healed porcine incisions previously treated with a surgical incision management system: mechanical, histomorphometric, and gene expression properties. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. 2014;38(4):767-778.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-014-0339-x
  19. Zwanenburg PR, Timmermans FW, Timmer AS, Middelkoop E, Tol BT, Lapid O, Obdeijn MC, Gans SL, Boermeester MA. A systematic review evaluating the influence of incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy on scarring. Wound Repair and Regeneration. 2021;29(1):8-19.  https://doi.org/10.1111/wrr.12858
  20. Wang Z, Huang X, Zan T, Li Q, Li H. A modified scar model with controlled tension on secondary wound healing in mice. Burns and Trauma. 2020;8:tkaa013. https://doi.org/10.1093/burnst/tkaa013
  21. Kesova MI. The course of pregnancy and childbirth in patients with connective tissue dysplasia. Vestnik Natsional’nogo mediko-khirurgicheskogo tsentra im. N.I. Pirogova. 2011;6(2):81-84. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/618.2/.4:616-055.2-007.17
  22. Shchukina NA, Buianova SN, Chechneva MA, Zemskova NYu, Puchkova NV, Barto RA, Barinova IV, Blagina EI. Causes of a postcesarean incompetent uterine scar: a role of connective tissue dysplasia. Rossijskij vestnik akushera-ginekologa. 2018;18(5):4-11. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/rosakush2018180514
  23. Lou W, Ding B, Zhong G, Du C, Fan W, Fu P. Dysregulation of pseudogene/lncRNA-hsa-miR-363-3p-SPOCK2 pathway fuels stage progression of ovarian cancer. Aging (Albany NY). 2019;11(23): 11416-11439. https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.102538
  24. Piehler AP, Hellum M, Wenzel JJ, Kaminski E, Haug KB, Kierulf P, Kaminski WE. The human ABC transporter pseudogene family: Evidence for transcription and gene-pseudogene interference. BMC Genomics. 2008;9:165.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-9-165
  25. Laheri S, Ashary N, Bhatt P, Modi D. Oviductal glycoprotein 1 (OVGP1) is expressed by endometrial epithelium that regulates receptivity and trophoblast adhesion. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics. 2018;35(8):1419-1429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-018-1231-4
  26. Verhage HG, Fazleabas AT, Mavrogianis PA, O’Day-Bowman MB, Schmidt A, Arias EB, Jaffe RC. Characteristics of an oviductal glycoprotein and its potential role in fertility control. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility. Supplement. 1997;51:217-226. 
  27. Laheri S, Modi D, Bhatt P. Extra-oviductal expression of oviductal glycoprotein 1 in mouse: Detection in testis, epididymis and ovary. Journal of Biosciences. 2017;42(1):69-80.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12038-016-9657-2
  28. Liu W, Rodgers GP. Olfactomedin 4 Is a Biomarker for the Severity of Infectious Diseases. Open Forum Infectious Diseases. 2022;9(4):ofac061. https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac061
  29. Wu X, Ivanchenko MV, Al Jandal H, Cicconet M, Indzhykulian AA, Corey DP. PKHD1L1 is a coat protein of hair-cell stereocilia and is required for normal hearing. Nature Communications. 2019; 10(1):3801. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-11712-w

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.