The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Krasnopolskaja K.V.

Moscow Regional Scientific Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology;
Moscow Regional Clinical Research Institute named after M.F. Vladimirsky;
Reproductive health clinic «Prior-Clinic»

Samoilova A.A.

Moscow Regional Scientific Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Ershova I.Y.

Moscow Regional Scientific Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology;
Reproductive health clinic «Prior-Clinic»

Isakova K.M.

Moscow Regional Scientific Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Koneeva T.O.

Moscow Regional Scientific Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Bocharova T.V.

Moscow Regional Scientific Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology;
Reproductive health clinic «Prior-Clinic»

Peculiarities of reproductive status during embryo cultivation using traditional and time-lapse technology (TLT)

Authors:

Krasnopolskaja K.V., Samoilova A.A., Ershova I.Y., Isakova K.M., Koneeva T.O., Bocharova T.V.

More about the authors

Journal: Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2023;29(5): 45‑53

Read: 1099 times


To cite this article:

Krasnopolskaja KV, Samoilova AA, Ershova IY, Isakova KM, Koneeva TO, Bocharova TV. Peculiarities of reproductive status during embryo cultivation using traditional and time-lapse technology (TLT). Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2023;29(5):45‑53. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/repro20232905145

Recommended articles:
Reproductive aspe­cts in the treatment of colo­rectal endo­metriosis. Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2024;(6):140-148

References:

  1. Aparicio-Ruiz B, Romany L, Meseguer M. Selection of preimplantation embryos using time-lapse microscopy in in vitro fertilization: State of the technology and future directions. Birth Defects Research. 2018;110(8):648-653.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bdr2.1226
  2. Kirkegaard K, Agerholm IE, Ingerslev HJ. Time-lapse monitoring as a tool for clinical embryo assessment. Human Reproduction. 2012; 27(5):1277-1285. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/des079
  3. Sciorio R. Use of time-lapse monitoring in medically assisted reproduction treatments: a mini-review. Zygote. 2021;29(2):93-101.  https://doi.org/10.1017/s0967199420000623
  4. Racowsky C, Kovacs P, Martins WP. A critical appraisal of time-lapse imaging for embryo selection: where are we and where do we need to go? Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics. 2015;32(7): 1025-1030. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-015-0510-6
  5. Boueilh T, Reignier A, Barriere P, Freour T. Time-lapse imaging systems in IVF laboratories: a French national survey. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics. 2018;35(12):2181-2186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-018-1302-6
  6. Meseguer M, Hilligsøe KM, Pedersen KS, Herrero J, Tejera A, Garrido N. Pregnancy rates after incubation in new time-lapse incubator (embryoscope) providing detailed information about embryo development compared to incubation in a standard incubator. Fertility and Sterility. 2010;94(4): S150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.07.603
  7. Cruz M, Gadea B, Garrido N, Pedersen KS, Martínez M, Pérez-Cano I, Muñoz M, Meseguer M. Embryo quality, blastocyst and ongoing pregnancy rates in oocyte donation patients whose embryos were monitored by time-lapse imaging. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics. 2011;28(7):569-573.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-011-9549-1
  8. Storr A, Venetis CA, ooke S, Susetio D, Kilani S, Ledger W. Morphokinetic parameters using time-lapse technology and day 5 embryo quality: a prospective cohort study. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics. 2015;32(7):1151-1160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-015-0534-y
  9. Reignier A, Lefebvre T, Loubersac S, Lammers J, Barriere P, Freour T. Time-lapse technology improves total cumulative live birth rate and shortens time to live birth as compared to conventional incubation system in couples undergoing ICSI. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics. 2021;38(4):917-923.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-021-02099-z
  10. Shi W, Zhou H, Chen L, Xue X, Shi J. Live birth rate following frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer is higher in high-grade day 6 blastocysts than in low-grade day 5 blastocysts. Frontiers in Endocrinology (Lausanne). 2023;13:1066757. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.1066757
  11. Kemper JM, Liu Y, Afnan M, Hammond ER, Morbeck DE, Mol BWJ. Should we look for a low-grade threshold for blastocyst transfer? A scoping review. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 2021;42(4): 709-716.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.01.019
  12. Crawford NM. Age-related infertility. Obstetrics and Gynecology of Clinics of North America. 2015;42(1):15-25.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogc.2014.09.005
  13. Yan J, Wu K, Tang R, Ding L, Chen ZJ. Effect of maternal age on the outcomes of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET). Science China Life Sciences. 2012;55(8):694-698.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-012-4357-0
  14. Krasnopol’skaia KV, Nazarenko TA, Zdanovskiĭ VM, Ankina OA, Bocharova TV. The impact of quantitative parameters of folliculogenesis in controlled ovarian stimulation on IVF. Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2017;23(3):55-61. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/repro201723355-61
  15. Paffoni A, Cesana S, Corti L, Ballabio E, Salemi C, Kunderfranco A, Bianchi MC. Pregnancy rate in IVF patients with unexpected poor response to ovarian stimulation. Gynecological Endocrinology. 2022;38(9):736-741.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09513590.2022.2100339
  16. Bashiri A, Halper KI, Orvieto R. Recurrent Implantation Failure-update overview on etiology, diagnosis, treatment and future directions. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology. 2018;16(1):121.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-018-0414-2.
  17. Shaulov T, Sierra S, Sylvestre C. Recurrent implantation failure in IVF: A Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society Clinical Practice Guideline. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 2020;41(5):819-833.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.08.007
  18. Armstrong A, Bhide P, Jordan V, Pacey A, Marjoribanks J, Farquhar C. Time-lapse systems for embryo incubation and assessment in assisted reproduction. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2019;5(5):CD011320. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd011320.pub4
  19. Kieslinger DC, Vergouw CG, Ramos L, Arends B, Curfs MHJM, Slappendel E, Kostelijk EH, Pieters MHEC, Consten D, Verhoeven MO, Besselink DE, Broekmans F, Cohlen BJ, Smeenk JMJ, Mastenbroek S, de Koning CH, van Kasteren YM, Moll E, van Disseldorp J, Brinkhuis EA, Kuijper EAM, van Baal WM, van Weering HGI, van der Linden, Gerards MH, Bossuyt PM, van Wely M, Lambalk CB. Clinical outcomes of uninterrupted embryo culture with or without time-lapse-based embryo selection versus interrupted standard culture (SelecTIMO): a three-armed, multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2023; 401(10386): 1438-1446. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00168-X
  20. Ahlström A, Lundin K, Lind A-K, Gunnarsson K, Westlander G, Park H, Thurin-Kjellberg A, Thorsteinsdottir SA, Einarsson S, Åström M, Löfdahl K, Menezes J, Callender S, Nyberg C, Winerdal J, Stenfelt C, Jonassen BR, Oldereid N, Nolte L, Sundler M, Hardarson T. A double-blind randomized controlled trial investigating a time-lapse algorithm for selecting Day 5 blastocysts for transfer. Human Reproduction. 2022;37(4):708-717.  https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deac020

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.