The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Paskar S.S.

Pavlov of First Saint Petersburg State Medical University

Kalugina A.S.

Pavlov of First Saint Petersburg State Medical University

Rating assessment of the effectiveness of IVF and ICSI methods in female patients of young reproductive age in the first ART protocol

Authors:

Paskar S.S., Kalugina A.S.

More about the authors

Journal: Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2022;28(2): 96‑101

Read: 1089 times


To cite this article:

Paskar SS, Kalugina AS. Rating assessment of the effectiveness of IVF and ICSI methods in female patients of young reproductive age in the first ART protocol. Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2022;28(2):96‑101. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/repro20222802196

Recommended articles:
Reproductive aspe­cts in the treatment of colo­rectal endo­metriosis. Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2024;(6):140-148

References:

  1. Stimpfel M, Jancar N, Vrtacnik-Bokal E, Virant-Klun I. Conventional IVF improves blastocyst rate and quality compared to ICSI when used in patients with mild or moderate teratozoospermia. Systems Biology in Reproductive Medicine. 2019;65(6):458-464.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19396368.2019.1666436
  2. Rubino P, Viganò P, Luddi A, Piomboni P. The ICSI procedure from past to future: a systematic review of the more controversial aspects. Human Reproduction Update. 2016;22(2):194-227.  https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmv050
  3. Jančar N, Mihevc Ponikvar B, Tomšič S, Vrtačnik Bokal E, Korošec S. Is IVF/ICSI [corrected] an Independent Risk Factor for Spontaneous Preterm Birth in Singletons? A Population-Based Cohort Study. BioMed Research International. 2018;2018:7124362. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7124362
  4. Esteves SC, Roque M, Bedoschi G, Haahr T, Humaidan P. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection for male infertility and consequences for offspring. Nature Reviews. Urology. 2018;15(9):535-562.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-018-0051-8
  5. Gerilovich LA, Egorova AT, Bazina MI, Maiseenko DA. Assessment of the health status of women using assisted reproductive technology programs. Medicinskij al’manah. 2015;39(4):76-79. (In Russ.).
  6. Macer ML, Taylor HS. Endometriosis and infertility: a review of the pathogenesis and treatment of endometriosis-associated infertility. Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America. 2012;39(4):535-549.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogc.2012.10.002
  7. Younes G, Tannus S, Son WY, Dahan MH. When to do intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a prospective comparison. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2019;300(5):1461-1471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-019-05324-4
  8. Zhu J, Zhu Q, Wang Y, Wang B, Lyu Q, Kuang Y. Comparative study on risk for birth defects among infants after in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Systems Biology in Reproductive Medicine. 2019;65(1):54-60.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19396368.2018.1554012
  9. Davies MJ, Moore VM, Willson KJ, Van Essen P, Priest K, Scott H, Haan EA, Chan A. Reproductive technologies and the risk of birth defects. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2012;366(19):1803-1813. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1008095

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.