The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Bobkova M.V.

Federal State Budget Institution «Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology» (dir. — Acad. RAN G.T. Sukhikh) Moscow, Russia, 117997

Puchko T.K.

Nauchnyĭ tsentr akusherstva, ginekologii i perinatologii im. akad. V.I. Kulakova

Adamyan L.V.

Department of Reproductive Medicine and Surgery, Faculty of Postgraduate Professional Education, A.I. Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry, Ministry of Health of Russia, Moscow, Russia

Reproduction in women with congenital uterus and vagina anomalies

Authors:

Bobkova M.V., Puchko T.K., Adamyan L.V.

More about the authors

Journal: Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2018;24(2): 42‑53

Read: 1712 times


To cite this article:

Bobkova MV, Puchko TK, Adamyan LV. Reproduction in women with congenital uterus and vagina anomalies. Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2018;24(2):42‑53. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/repro201824242-53

Recommended articles:
Immu­nological aspe­cts of reccurent pregnancy loss. Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2024;(5):64-71
Surgical treatment of perianal abscess and fistula-in-ano in neonates and infa­nts. Piro­gov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2024;(11):46-53
Cere­bral protection in transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Piro­gov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2024;(12-2):150-158
Capsular contracture after reco­nstructive plastic surgery for breast cancer. P.A. Herzen Journal of Onco­logy. 2024;(6):78-83
Sexual function of women during pregnancy. Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2024;(6):112-117

References:

  1. Saravelos SH, Cocksedge KA, Li TC. Prevalence and diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies in women with reproductive failure: a critical appraisal. Hum Reprod Update. 2008 Sep-Oct;14(5):415-429. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmn018
  2. Chan YY, Jayaprakasan K, Zamora J, Thornton JG, Raine-Fenning N, Coomarasamy A. The prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies in unselected and high-risk populations: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2011 Nov-Dec;17(6):761-771. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmr028
  3. Jaslow CR. Uterine factors. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am.  2014 Mar;41(1):57-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogc.2013.10.002
  4. Tofoski GGJ. Reproductive outcome after hysteroscopic metroplasty in patients with infertility and recurrent pregnancy loss. Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences. 2014;7(1):103-108.
  5. Fedele L, Bianchi S. Hysteroscopic metroplasty for septate uterus. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1995 Sep;22(3):473-489.
  6. Pang LH, Li MJ, Li M, Xu H, Wei ZL. Not every subseptate uterus requires surgical correction to reduce poor reproductive outcome. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011 Dec;115(3):260-263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.07.030
  7. Rikken JF, Kowalik CR, Emanuel MH, Mol BW, Van der Veen F, van Wely M, et al. Septum resection for women of reproductive age with a septate uterus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 17;1:CD008576. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008576.pub4
  8. Gergolet M, Campo R, Verdenik I, Kenda Suster N, Gordts S, Gianaroli L. No clinical relevance of the height of fundal indentation in subseptate or arcuate uterus: a prospective study. Reprod Biomed Online. 2012 May;24(5):576-582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.01.025
  9. Murry JB, Santos XM, Wang X, Wan YW, Van den Veyver IB, Dietrich JE. A genome-wide screen for copy number alterations in an adolescent pilot cohort with mullerian anomalies. Fertil Steril. 2015 Feb;103(2):487-493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.10.044
  10. Bobkova MV, Baranova EE, Kuznetsova MV, Trofimov DYu, Adamyan LV. Semeinyi sluchai sindroma Meiera—Rokitansky—Kyuster—Chauzer i obzor literatury. Problem reprod. 2015;21:17-22. (In Russ.)
  11. Vera-Carbonell A, Lopez-Gonzalez V, Bafalliu JA, Ballesta-Martinez MJ, Fernandez A, Guillen-Navarro E, et al. Clinical comparison of 10q26 overlapping deletions: delineating the critical region for urogenital anomalies. Am J Med Genet A. 2015 Apr;167A(4):786-790. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.36949
  12. Acien P, Acien M. The presentation and management of complex female genital malformations. Hum Reprod Update. 2016 Jan-Feb;22(1):48-69. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmv048
  13. Ludwin A, Ludwin I. Comparison of the ESHRE-ESGE and ASRM classifications of Mullerian duct anomalies in everyday practice. Hum Reprod. 2015 Mar;30(3):569-580. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deu344
  14. Grimbizis GF, Di Spiezio Sardo A, Saravelos SH, Gordts S, Exacoustos C, Van Schoubroeck D, et al. The Thessaloniki ESHRE/ESGE consensus on diagnosis of female genital anomalies. Gynecol Surg. 2016;13:1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10397-015-0909-1
  15. Heinonen PK. Distribution of female genital tract anomalies in two classifications. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016 Nov;206:141-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.09.009
  16. Adamyan LV, Kulakov VI, Chaschukoeva AZ. Poroki razvitiya matki vlagalischa. M.: Meditsina. 1998;328. (In Russ.)
  17. Adamyan LV, Kulakov VV, Murvatov KD, Zurabiani Z. Application of Endoscopy in Surgery for Malformations of Genitalia. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1994 Aug;1(4, Part 2):S1.
  18. Hourvitz A, Ledee N, Gervaise A, Fernandez H, Frydman R, Olivennes F. Should diagnostic hysteroscopy be a routine procedure during diagnostic laparoscopy in women with normal hysterosalpingography? Reprod Biomed Online. 2002 May-Jun;4(3): 256-260.
  19. Shokeir TA, Shalan HM, El-Shafei MM. Combined diagnostic approach of laparoscopy and hysteroscopy in the evaluation of female infertility: results of 612 patients. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2004 Feb;30(1):9-14.
  20. Paradisi R, Barzanti R, Natali F, Guerrini M, Battaglia C, Seracchioli R, et al. Hysteroscopic metroplasty: reproductive outcome in relation to septum size. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014 Mar;289(3):671-676. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-013-3003-9
  21. Esmaeilzadeh S, Delavar MA, Andarieh MG. Reproductive outcome following hysteroscopic treatment of uterine septum. Mater Sociomed. 2014 Dec;26(6):366-371. https://doi.org/10.5455/msm.2014.26.366-371
  22. Adamyan LV, Corur EA, Murvatov KD. Laparoscopiya, gisterorezoktoskopiya i lasernaya chirurgiya v korrekcii porokov razvitiya genitaliy. Akush i gin. 1996;51:39-41. (In Russ.)
  23. Adamyan LV, Gaschenko VO, Danilov AYu, Kogan EA. Rezultaty vosstanovleniya reproduktivnoi funkcii u bolnykh s vnutrimatochnoi peregorodkoi posle chirurgicheskogo lecheniya i novye puti rescheniya problemy (obzor literatury). Problem reprod. 2011;1:35-40. (In Russ.)
  24. Zhang Y, Zhao YY, Qiao J. Obstetric outcome of women with uterine anomalies in China. Chin Med J (Engl). 2010 Feb 20;123(4):418-422.
  25. Reichman D, Laufer MR, Robinson BK. Pregnancy outcomes in unicornuate uteri: a review. Fertil Steril. 2009 May;91(5):1886-1894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.02.163
  26. Sugiura-Ogasawara M, Ozaki Y, Katano K, Suzumori N, Mizutani E. Uterine anomaly and recurrent pregnancy loss. Semin Reprod Med. 2011 Nov;29(6):514-521. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1293205
  27. Caserta D, Mallozzi M, Meldolesi C, Bianchi P, Moscarini M. Pregnancy in a unicornuate uterus: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2014 Apr 29;8:130. https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-1947-8-130
  28. Fedele L, Bianchi S, Marchini M, Mezzopane R, Di Nola G, Tozzi L. Residual uterine septum of less than 1 cm after hysteroscopic metroplasty does not impair reproductive outcome. Hum Reprod. 1996 Apr;11(4):727-729.
  29. Kupesic S. Clinical implications of sonographic detection of uterine anomalies for reproductive outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Oct;18(4):387-400. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0960-7692.2001.00539.x
  30. Abdel Moety GA, Gaafar HM, Shawki O, Faisal M. Histological structure and vascularity of hysteroscopically removed uterine septa in patients with primary infertility and patients with recurrent pregnancy loss. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 Jan;23(1):66-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2015.08.880
  31. Propst AM, Hill JA 3rd. Anatomic factors associated with recurrent pregnancy loss. Semin Reprod Med. 2000;18(4):341-350. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2000-13723
  32. Taylor E, Gomel V. The uterus and fertility. Fertil Steril. 2008 Jan;89(1):1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.09.069
  33. Gordts S. New developments in reproductive surgery. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2013 Jun;27(3):431-440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2012.11.004
  34. Bailey AP, Jaslow CR, Kutteh WH. Minimally invasive surgical options for congenital and acquired uterine factors associated with recurrent pregnancy loss. Womens Health (Lond Engl). 2015 Mar;11(2):161-167. https://doi.org/10.2217/whe.14.81
  35. Adamyan LV, Panov VO, Makiyan ZN, Panova MM, Kulabukhova EA. Magnitno-rezonansnaya tomographia v differencial’noi diagnostike anomaliy razvitiya matki i vlagalischa. Problem. reprod. 2009;14-27. (In Russ.)
  36. Ludwin A, Pitynski K, Ludwin I, Banas T, Knafel A. Two- and three-dimensional ultrasonography and sonohysterography versus hysteroscopy with laparoscopy in the differential diagnosis of septate, bicornuate, and arcuate uteri. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013 Jan-Feb;20(1):90-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2012.09.011
  37. Faivre E, Fernandez H, Deffieux X, Gervaise A, Frydman R, Levaillant JM. Accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasonography in differential diagnosis of septate and bicornuate uterus compared with office hysteroscopy and pelvic magnetic resonance imaging. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2012 Jan-Feb;19(1):101-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2011.08.724
  38. Tomazevic T, Ban-Frangez H, Ribic-Pucelj M, Premru-Srsen T, Verdenik I. Small uterine septum is an important risk variable for preterm birth. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007 Dec;135(2): 154-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.12.001

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.