ЖурналыПодпискаАрхивКнигиПроектыО насРекламаДоставка/ОплатаКонтакты
+7 (495) 482-43-29
  • Главная
  • / Журналы
  • / Вернуться в журнал
  • / Содержание номера
  • / Статья
Abdominoplasty without scars in umbilical area

Abdominoplasty without scars in umbilical area

Authors:
Валентин Ильич Шаробаро,
Дония Аббаси,
Дмитрий Александрович Сидоренков,
Юрий Викторович Иванов,
Михаил Владимирович Ануров,
Зорий Цолакович Григорян,
Илья Юрьевич Аристов

Журнал: Пластическая хирургия и эстетическая медицина. 2026;(3):26-34.

DOI: 10.17116/plast.hirurgia202603126

Read: 462 раза

Download PDF (RU)Download PDF (EN)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the results of abdominoplasty without umbilical scar compared to classical techniques regarding advantages and limitations of this method.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study included retrospective and prospective analysis of 64 patients (57 women and 7 men) aged 25-68 years (mean 44.2±9.1 years). All ones underwent abdominoplasty in 2021-2025. Patients were divided into two groups: no umbilical scar (n=32) and classical umbilicoplasty (n=32). Liposuction of anterior abdominal wall was performed by VASER ultrasound in 35 patients. Surgical results and aesthetic satisfaction of patients were assessed using a validated BODY-Q.

RESULTS

The navel-free technique demonstrated significant (p<0.001) superiority over classical umbiliplasty in all domains of the validated BODY-Q questionnaire (scale 0—100). Psychological distress was lower in the group without scarring by 14.4 (95% CI 16.2 — 12.6) points (18.3±4.1 vs. 32.7±6.8 points). Body image perception improved by 14.4 (95% CI 11.2; 17.6) points (86.5±5.2 vs. 72.1±7.9 points). Satisfaction with abdominal contour was higher by 13.4 (95% CI 10.1 — 16.7) points (89.2±4.7 vs. 75.8±8.3 points). Scar assessment demonstrated maximum differences (22.6 (95% CI 19.3 — 25.9) points, 91.0±3.5 vs. 68.4±9.1 points). Differences remained clinically and statistically significant (p<0.001) after 6-month follow-up. The incidence of complications did not differ (6.3% in both groups; p=0.74).

CONCLUSION

The navel-free technique of abdominoplasty provides natural abdominal contour, minimizes postoperative scars and accelerates rehabilitation. It is indicated for patients with moderate skin excess and preserved elasticity, high or normal navel position and provides optimal aesthetic results. Ultrasound liposuction technique reduces moderate excess skin above the navel and expands the indications for original technique of abdominoplasty.

Keywords

  • abdominoplasty
  • rectus abdominis
  • liposuction
  • lipoabdominoplasty
  • VASER

Дата поступления: 21.01.2025

Дата принятия в печать: 25.05.2025

Дата публикации: 21.09.2026

References
  1. Shestak KC, Rios L, Pollock TA, Aly A. Evidenced-Based Approach to Abdominoplasty Update. Aesthet Surg J. 2019 May 16;39(6):628-642. PMID: 30481261. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjy215
  2. Rosenfield LK, Davis CR. Evidence-Based Abdominoplasty Review With Body Contouring Algorithm. Aesthet Surg J. 2019 May 16;39(6):643-661. PMID: 30649214. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjz013
  3. Çelik V, Tuluy Y, Sır E. Modified Diamond-Shaped Umbilicoplasty in Abdominoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023 Oct;47(5):1911-1919. Epub 2023 Mar 01. PMID: 36856779. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-023-03303-4
  4. Daskalopoulou D, Moustakis N, Barkolias C. Scarless Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Combined With Lipoabdominoplasty. Cureus. 2024 July 15; 16(7):e64561. PMID: 39144907; PMCID: PMC11323721. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.64561
  5. Regan JP, Casaubon JT. Abdominoplasty. 2023 July 24. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 Jan—. PMID: 28613712.
  6. Hoyos Ariza AE, Perez Pachon ME. High-Definition Excisional Body Contouring: Mini Lipoabdominoplasty (FIT Mommy) and Enhanced Viability Abdominoplasty. Clin Plast Surg. 2020 July;47(3):415-428. PMID: 32448478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cps.2020.03.008
  7. Shermak MA. Abdominoplasty with Combined Surgery. Clin Plast Surg. 2020 July;47(3):365-377. Epub 2020 Apr 2. PMID: 32448473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cps.2020.02.001
  8. O’Kelly N, Nguyen K, Gibstein A, Bradley JP, Tanna N, Matarasso A. Standards and Trends in Lipoabdominoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020 Oct 26;8(10):e3144. PMID: 33173672; PMCID: PMC7647643. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003144
  9. Borille G, Pereira Filho G, Zancanaro M, Giannini R, Reynosso L, Avalos V, Nahas F. Medium Definition Liposuction Abdominoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 May 16;10(5):e4053. PMID: 35702541; PMCID: PMC9187221. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004053
  10. Sharobaro VI, Abbasi D, Sidorenkov DA, Anurov MV, Ivanov YuV. Modern trends in umbilicoplasty. Literature review. Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine. 2024;(2):74-80. (In Russ., In Engl.). https://doi.org/10.17116/plast.hirurgia202402174
  11. Reho A, Randisi F, Ferrario A, Taibi D, Russo F, De Santo L, Stefanizzi G. ‘Scarless reverse umbilicoplasty’: A new technique of umbilical transposition in abdominoplasty. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2019 Apr;72(4):656-661. Epub 2019 Feb 10. PMID: 30808599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2019.01.024
  12. Sarukhanov GM, Mirzabekov SG, Pshenisnov KP. Umbilikoplastika, ili Vsyo o pupke. Izbrannye voprosy plasticheskoj khirurgii. 2022;2(5):44. (In Russ.).
  13. Şentürk S, Özkan A, Gemici K, Efe D. The dome procedure: A new technique for the reconstruction of the umbilicus. Hernia. 2016;20(4):505-508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-015-1420-3
  14. Khajuria A, Charles WN, Dutt A, Hoyos A. The 100 Most-cited Articles in Abdominoplasty: A Bibliometric Analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021;9(3):e3426. PMID: 33786256; PMCID: PMC7997088. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003426
  15. Márquez-Gutiérrez EA, Tamez-Pedroza L, Morales-Naya ED, Vélez-Palafox M, Cuartero-Castro G, Zacaula-Juárez N, Sánchez-Sánchez R, González-Torres M. A randomized intraindividual comparative study evaluating the effects of two ultrasound-assisted liposuction devices on the abdomen. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2024 July;94:20-26. Epub 2024 Apr 25. PMID: 38733713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2024.04.040
  16. Tran BNN, Didzbalis CJ, Chen T, Shulzhenko NO, Asaadi M. Safety and Efficacy of Third-Generation Ultrasound-Assisted Liposuction: A Series of 261 Cases. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2022 Oct;46(5):2310-2318. Epub 2022 July 27. PMID: 35896731. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-022-02992-7
  17. Lanzano G, Napoli F, Zannella T, Colucci R, Cantiello I, Scalera G. Correlation between BMI, amount of aspirated fat and post-operative complications in VASER liposuction: A single centre experience. JPRAS Open. 2024 Aug 23;42:170-177. PMID: 39351309; PMCID: PMC11440265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpra.2024.08.007
  18. Cala Uribe LC, Perez Pachon ME, Babaitis R, Zannin Ferrero A, Aljure Diaz MF. Variable Energy and Ultrasound-based Liposculpture of the Arms: Multicenter and Multidevice Study. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Mar 19;12(3):e5649. PMID: 38948160; PMCID: PMC11213598. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000005649
  19. Ahmed MB, Shraim BA, Abuelgasim M, Hammouda A. Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infection Post VASER-Assisted Liposuction and Lipofilling: A Case Report. Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2023 Feb 06;5:ojad013. PMID: 36844459; PMCID: PMC9954960. https://doi.org/10.1093/asjof/ojad013
slide-cover
slide-cover
slide-cover

Recommended articles:

Dorsocervical fat pads: searching for effective treatment.Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine. 2026;(3):104-112

TECAR therapy for complications after brachioplasty.Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine. 2026;(2):62-67

Innovative technique of monsplasty for correction of pubic deformities: functional and aesthetic aspects.Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine. 2026;(2):33-40

Optimization of perioperative analgesia in abdominoplasty using TAP block.Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine. 2026;(2):28-32

Perfusion disorders in abdominoplasty: anatomical basis and clinical implications.Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine. 2026;(2-2):103-110

S.A.F.E. Score 2.0 — evolution of integral surgical risk stratification scale in aesthetic plastic surgery.Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine. 2026;(2-2):51-57

Results of various brachioplasty options after massive weight loss.Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine. 2026;(1):49-55

Vibration amplification of sound energy at resonance (VASER): guidelines based on consensus of experts.Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine. 2025;(4):5-12

Liposuction and abdominoplasty in body contouring: synergy or antagonism?Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine. 2025;(3):71-78

Modern approaches for abdominoplasty.Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine. 2025;(2):109-116

Издательство «Медиа Сфера»
РекламаДоставка/ОплатаО насКонтактыОбучение для редакцийПолитика конфиденциальностиПолитика обработки персональных данныхПубличная оферта на реализацию издательской продукции
ЖурналыПодпискаАрхивКнигиПроекты
  • RuStore

© 1998-2026

  • Телефоны издательства:

  • +7 (495) 482-41-18
  • +7 (495) 482-43-29
  • Прямой телефон отдела подписки
    (только по вопросам заказов и доставки журналов)

  • +7 (800) 250-18-12
  • пн-пт с 10:00 до 18:00

  • Telegram
  • VK
info@mediasphera.ru
  • Почтовый адрес:

  • Издательство «Медиа Сфера»,
    а/я 54, Москва, Россия, 127238

  • RuStore

© 1998-2026