ЖурналыПодпискаАрхивКнигиПроектыО насРекламаДоставка/ОплатаКонтакты
+7 (495) 482-43-29
  • Главная
  • / Журналы
  • / Вернуться в журнал
  • / Содержание номера
  • / Статья
A new surgical approach to circumcision

A new surgical approach to circumcision

Authors:
Михаил Даниелович Павлюк

Журнал: Пластическая хирургия и эстетическая медицина. 2026;(2-2):24-28.

DOI: 10.17116/plast.hirurgia202602224

Read: 684 раза

Download PDF (RU)Download PDF (EN)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To develop a new surgical approach to circumcision that would reduce the incidence of postoperative complications, optimize aesthetic results and be widely reproducible by physicians without the need for special equipment.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This article describes a new circumcision technique using special preoperative markings and original method of postoperative wound closure. The authors present 42 patients who underwent original circumcision.

RESULTS

There were low incidence of complications, rapid recovery, and good functional and aesthetic outcomes.

CONCLUSION

This is the first description of new circumcision technique that increases patient satisfaction due to better aesthetic and functional outcomes. Further multiple-center studies will confirm the advantages of this technique and facilitate its widespread adoption in everyday practice.

Keywords

  • circumcision
  • male circumcision
  • aesthetic results of circumcision
  • optimization of surgical technique
  • new surgical technique

Дата поступления: 11.03.2026

Дата принятия в печать: 29.03.2026

Дата публикации: 21.05.2026

References
  1. Morris BJ, Wamai RG, Henebeng EB, Tobian AA, Klausner JD, Banerjee J, Hankins CA. Estimation of country-specific and global prevalence of male circumcision. Population Health Metrics. 2016;14:4. Erratum in: Population Health Metrics. 2016 Apr 04;14:11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12963-016-0073-5
  2. Morris BJ, Bailis SA, Wiswell TE. Circumcision rates in the United States: rising or falling? What effect might the new affirmative pediatric policy statement have? Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 2014;89(5):677-686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.01.001
  3. Elsayed B, Elmarasi M, Madzime RJ, Mapahla L, ElBadway MMS, Chivese T. Estimates of the prevalence of male circumcision in sub-Saharan Africa from 2010-2023-A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2024;19(3):e0298387. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0298387
  4. Barone MA, Li PS, Awori QD, Lee R, Goldstein M. Clinical trials using the Shang Ring device for male circumcision in Africa: a review. Translational Andrology and Urology. 2014;3(1):113-124. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2223-4683.2014.01.09
  5. Feldblum P, Martinson N, Bvulani B, Taruberekera N, Mahomed M, Chintu N, Milovanovic M, Hart C, Billy S, Necochea E, Samona A, Mhazo M, Bossemeyer D, Lai JJ, Lebinai L, Ashengo TA, Macaringue L, Veena V, Hatzold K. Safety and Efficacy of the PrePex Male Circumcision Device: Results From Pilot Implementation Studies in Mozambique, South Africa, and Zambia. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes: JAIDS. 2016;72 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S43-48. https://doi.org/10.1097/qai.0000000000000742
  6. Jin XD, Lu JJ, Liu WH, Zhou J, Yu RK, Yu B, Zhang XJ, Shen BH. Adult male circumcision with a circular stapler versus conventional circumcision: A prospective randomized clinical trial. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research. 2015;48(6):577-582. https://doi.org/10.1590/1414-431x20154530
  7. Tabei SS, Raheem OA. Comment on: Efficacy and safety of two disposable circumcision suture devices for circumcision in adults: a prospective comparative multicenter study. International Journal of Impotence Research. 2025;37:408. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-024-00947-x
  8. Kotov SV, Pavlov IS, Kurochkin ND, Alekberov EM. Device-based circumcision: advantages, choice of device and surgical technique. Vestnik urologii. 2024;12(4):114-120. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21886/2308-6424-2024-12-4-114-120
  9. Ronchi P, Manno S, Dell’Atti L. Technology Meets Tradition: CO2 Laser Circumcision versus Conventional Surgical Technique. Research and Reports in Urology. 2020;12:255-260. https://doi.org/10.2147/rru.s260636
  10. Scarcella S, Law YXT, Bravi CA, Piazza P, Heldwein FL, Ronchi P, Lacetera V, Beatrici V, Gauhar V, Castellani D. Does using a laser improve outcomes of conventional circumcision in adult and children populations? Results from a systematic review and meta-analysis. Andrology. 2023;11(1):54-64. https://doi.org/10.1111/andr.13321
  11. Shabanzadeh DM, Clausen S, Maigaard K, Fode M. Male Circumcision Complications — A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression. Urology. 2021;152:25-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2021.01.041
  12. Hohlfeld AS, Ebrahim S, Zaki Shaik M, Kredo T. Circumcision devices versus standard surgical techniques in adolescent and adult male circumcisions: a Cochrane review. BJU International. 2022;130(1):26-34. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.15604
  13. Taş T, Çakıroğlu B, Ekici U. Cosmetic results of circumcision and scar wrinkling: Do we exaggerate in terms of hemostasis and sutures? Urologia Journal. 2022;89(1):108-113. https://doi.org/10.1177/0391560320911526
  14. Iacob SI, Feinn RS, Sardi L. Systematic review of complications arising from male circumcision. BJUI Compass. 2022;3(2):99-123. https://doi.org/10.1002/bco2.123
  15. Grabb and Smith’s Plastic Surgery. 8th Edition. Thorne CH, ed. Wolters Kluwer; 2019.
  16. Tirana R, Othman D, Gad D, Elsadek M, Fahmy MAB. Pigmentary complications after non-medical male circumcision. BMC Urology. 2022; 22(1):50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-022-00999-5
slide-cover
slide-cover
slide-cover

Recommended articles:

Evaluation of the efficacy of functional endoscopic instrumental correction of post-traumatic external nasal deformity using a novel instrument (a chisel with integrated suction).Russian Rhinology. 2026;34(3):6-12

History of the study of the frontal sinus anatomy in the age of the Scientific Revolution beginning.Russian Rhinology. 2026;34(3):81-90

Application of genetically engineered biological therapy in a patient with type 2-mediated chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps complicated by multiple sclerosis.Russian Rhinology. 2026;34(3):73-80

A rare cause of oronasal fistula.Russian Rhinology. 2026;34(3):69-72

Multifactorial assessment of septoplasty outcomes: from anatomical correction to improved quality of life.Russian Rhinology. 2026;34(3):62-68

Aestetic complications of septoplasty.Russian Rhinology. 2026;34(3):53-61

Comparative evaluation of surgical treatment methods for adult patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. A systematic review. Part II.Russian Rhinology. 2026;34(3):47-52

Clinical and morphological predictors of recurrence of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps.Russian Rhinology. 2026;34(3):40-46

Immune and cytological features of restoration of the nasal mucosa after combined treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis.Russian Rhinology. 2026;34(3):32-39

Surfactant protein A in nasal secretions: correlation with bronchial asthma severity in children.Russian Rhinology. 2026;34(3):27-31

Издательство «Медиа Сфера»
РекламаДоставка/ОплатаО насКонтактыОбучение для редакцийПолитика конфиденциальностиПолитика обработки персональных данныхПубличная оферта на реализацию издательской продукции
ЖурналыПодпискаАрхивКнигиПроекты
  • RuStore

© 1998-2026

  • Телефоны издательства:

  • +7 (495) 482-41-18
  • +7 (495) 482-43-29

  • Прямой телефон отдела подписки
    (только по вопросам заказов и доставки журналов)

  • +7 (800) 250-18-12

  • пн-пт с 10:00 до 18:00

  • Telegram
  • VK
info@mediasphera.ru

  • Почтовый адрес:

  • Издательство «Медиа Сфера»,
    а/я 54, Москва, Россия, 127238

  • RuStore

© 1998-2026