ЖурналыПодпискаАрхивКнигиПроектыО насРекламаДоставка/ОплатаКонтакты
+7 (495) 482-43-29
  • Главная
  • / Журналы
  • / Вернуться в журнал
  • / Содержание номера
  • / Статья
A new surgical approach to circumcision

A new surgical approach to circumcision

Authors:
Михаил Даниелович Павлюк

Журнал: Пластическая хирургия и эстетическая медицина. 2026;(2-2):24-28.

DOI: 10.17116/plast.hirurgia202602224

Read: 1390 раз

Download PDF (RU)Download PDF (EN)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To develop a new surgical approach to circumcision that would reduce the incidence of postoperative complications, optimize aesthetic results and be widely reproducible by physicians without the need for special equipment.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This article describes a new circumcision technique using special preoperative markings and original method of postoperative wound closure. The authors present 42 patients who underwent original circumcision.

RESULTS

There were low incidence of complications, rapid recovery, and good functional and aesthetic outcomes.

CONCLUSION

This is the first description of new circumcision technique that increases patient satisfaction due to better aesthetic and functional outcomes. Further multiple-center studies will confirm the advantages of this technique and facilitate its widespread adoption in everyday practice.

Keywords

  • circumcision
  • male circumcision
  • aesthetic results of circumcision
  • optimization of surgical technique
  • new surgical technique

Дата поступления: 11.03.2026

Дата принятия в печать: 29.03.2026

Дата публикации: 21.05.2026

References
  1. Morris BJ, Wamai RG, Henebeng EB, Tobian AA, Klausner JD, Banerjee J, Hankins CA. Estimation of country-specific and global prevalence of male circumcision. Population Health Metrics. 2016;14:4. Erratum in: Population Health Metrics. 2016 Apr 04;14:11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12963-016-0073-5
  2. Morris BJ, Bailis SA, Wiswell TE. Circumcision rates in the United States: rising or falling? What effect might the new affirmative pediatric policy statement have? Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 2014;89(5):677-686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.01.001
  3. Elsayed B, Elmarasi M, Madzime RJ, Mapahla L, ElBadway MMS, Chivese T. Estimates of the prevalence of male circumcision in sub-Saharan Africa from 2010-2023-A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2024;19(3):e0298387. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0298387
  4. Barone MA, Li PS, Awori QD, Lee R, Goldstein M. Clinical trials using the Shang Ring device for male circumcision in Africa: a review. Translational Andrology and Urology. 2014;3(1):113-124. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2223-4683.2014.01.09
  5. Feldblum P, Martinson N, Bvulani B, Taruberekera N, Mahomed M, Chintu N, Milovanovic M, Hart C, Billy S, Necochea E, Samona A, Mhazo M, Bossemeyer D, Lai JJ, Lebinai L, Ashengo TA, Macaringue L, Veena V, Hatzold K. Safety and Efficacy of the PrePex Male Circumcision Device: Results From Pilot Implementation Studies in Mozambique, South Africa, and Zambia. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes: JAIDS. 2016;72 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S43-48. https://doi.org/10.1097/qai.0000000000000742
  6. Jin XD, Lu JJ, Liu WH, Zhou J, Yu RK, Yu B, Zhang XJ, Shen BH. Adult male circumcision with a circular stapler versus conventional circumcision: A prospective randomized clinical trial. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research. 2015;48(6):577-582. https://doi.org/10.1590/1414-431x20154530
  7. Tabei SS, Raheem OA. Comment on: Efficacy and safety of two disposable circumcision suture devices for circumcision in adults: a prospective comparative multicenter study. International Journal of Impotence Research. 2025;37:408. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-024-00947-x
  8. Kotov SV, Pavlov IS, Kurochkin ND, Alekberov EM. Device-based circumcision: advantages, choice of device and surgical technique. Vestnik urologii. 2024;12(4):114-120. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21886/2308-6424-2024-12-4-114-120
  9. Ronchi P, Manno S, Dell’Atti L. Technology Meets Tradition: CO2 Laser Circumcision versus Conventional Surgical Technique. Research and Reports in Urology. 2020;12:255-260. https://doi.org/10.2147/rru.s260636
  10. Scarcella S, Law YXT, Bravi CA, Piazza P, Heldwein FL, Ronchi P, Lacetera V, Beatrici V, Gauhar V, Castellani D. Does using a laser improve outcomes of conventional circumcision in adult and children populations? Results from a systematic review and meta-analysis. Andrology. 2023;11(1):54-64. https://doi.org/10.1111/andr.13321
  11. Shabanzadeh DM, Clausen S, Maigaard K, Fode M. Male Circumcision Complications — A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression. Urology. 2021;152:25-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2021.01.041
  12. Hohlfeld AS, Ebrahim S, Zaki Shaik M, Kredo T. Circumcision devices versus standard surgical techniques in adolescent and adult male circumcisions: a Cochrane review. BJU International. 2022;130(1):26-34. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.15604
  13. Taş T, Çakıroğlu B, Ekici U. Cosmetic results of circumcision and scar wrinkling: Do we exaggerate in terms of hemostasis and sutures? Urologia Journal. 2022;89(1):108-113. https://doi.org/10.1177/0391560320911526
  14. Iacob SI, Feinn RS, Sardi L. Systematic review of complications arising from male circumcision. BJUI Compass. 2022;3(2):99-123. https://doi.org/10.1002/bco2.123
  15. Grabb and Smith’s Plastic Surgery. 8th Edition. Thorne CH, ed. Wolters Kluwer; 2019.
  16. Tirana R, Othman D, Gad D, Elsadek M, Fahmy MAB. Pigmentary complications after non-medical male circumcision. BMC Urology. 2022; 22(1):50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-022-00999-5
slide-cover

Recommended articles:

Subretinal fibrosis in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: risk factors, mechanisms of development, and current options for prevention and treatment.Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2026;142(5):122-132

Modern principles of ophthalmic surgery for combat trauma: analysis of experience from the Special Military Operation.Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2026;142(5):110-120

Biological basis and clinical potential of wound healing modulators in glaucoma surgery.Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2026;142(5):98-109

Choroidal status in angle-closure glaucoma.Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2026;142(5):92-96

Modern diagnostic methods for dislocation of the natural lens.Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2026;142(5):82-90

Epidemiological features of primary glaucoma in the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia).Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2026;142(5):73-81

Clinical case of branch retinal artery occlusion in inherited thrombophilia.Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2026;142(5):69-72

The value of blue light reflectance analysis in the multimodal diagnosis of macular telangiectasia.Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2026;142(5):64-68

Functional and anatomical outcomes of various perioperative treatment strategies for diabetic macular edema after cataract phacoemulsification.Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2026;142(5):56-63

Changes in retinal light sensitivity and morphometry during surgical treatment of primary glaucoma with physiotherapeutic stimulation.Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2026;142(5):48-55

Издательство «Медиа Сфера»
РекламаДоставка/ОплатаО насКонтактыОбучение для редакцийПолитика конфиденциальностиПолитика обработки персональных данныхПубличная оферта на реализацию издательской продукции
ЖурналыПодпискаАрхивКнигиПроекты
  • RuStore

© 1998-2026

  • Телефоны издательства:

  • +7 (495) 482-41-18
  • +7 (495) 482-43-29

  • Прямой телефон отдела подписки
    (только по вопросам заказов и доставки журналов)

  • +7 (800) 250-18-12

  • пн-пт с 10:00 до 18:00

  • Telegram
  • VK
info@mediasphera.ru

  • Почтовый адрес:

  • Издательство «Медиа Сфера»,
    а/я 54, Москва, Россия, 127238

  • RuStore

© 1998-2026