The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Login
EN
+7 (495) 482-4118
+7 (495) 482-0604

  • © 1998-2025
+7 (495) 482-43-29
EN
All journals
Journal
Year
Year
Search result: 0

Khodorovich O.S.

Russian Scientific Center of Roentgenoradiology

Solodkiy V.A.

Russian Research Center of Radiology

Sarkisyan K.D.

Russian Scientific Center of Roentgenoradiology

Kalinina-Masri A.A.

Russian Scientific Center of Roentgenoradiology

Sherstneva T.V.

Russian Scientific Center of Roentgenoradiology

Kleshneva V.O.

Russian Scientific Center of Roentgenoradiology

Kanakhina L.B.

Russian Scientific Center of Roentgenoradiology

Prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction in patients with breast cancer

Authors:

Khodorovich O.S., Solodkiy V.A., Sarkisyan K.D., Kalinina-Masri A.A., Sherstneva T.V., Kleshneva V.O., Kanakhina L.B.

More about the authors

Journal: Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine. 2022;(1): 32‑40

DOI: 10.17116/plast.hirurgia202201132

Views: 3603

Downloaded: 177

Download PDF (RU)
Download PDF
Contact the author
Table of contents

To cite this article:

Khodorovich OS, Solodkiy VA, Sarkisyan KD, Kalinina-Masri AA, Sherstneva TV, Kleshneva VO, Kanakhina LB. Prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction in patients with breast cancer. Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine. 2022;(1):32‑40. (In Russ., In Engl.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/plast.hirurgia202201132

 
МСФ на ЯМ
Close metadata
Recommended articles:
Complications after one-stage and two-stage breast reco­nstruction depe­nding on the method of reco­nstruction and risk factors. Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medi­cine. 2024;(2):16-21
Perforator fasciocutaneous flaps in rese­ctions for breast cancer. Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medi­cine. 2024;(2):81-86
Comparative immu­nohistochemistry study of different anti­bodies clones for dete­ction of breast cancer markers (estrogen rece­ptor, progesterone rece­ptor, HER2/neu, Ki-67). Russian Journal of Archive of Pathology. 2024;(2):14-20
The impact of arti­ficial inte­lligence on double reading of mammograms. Russian Journal of Preventive Medi­cine. 2024;(5):32-37
Reco­nstructive plastic surgery in combined treatment of breast cancer: predictive risk factors of complications and reco­nstruction failure. P.A. Herzen Journal of Onco­logy. 2024;(3):13-19
Targeted lymphadenectomy with sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with breast cancer cT1-3N1M0 after neoadjuvant poly­chemotherapy. P.A. Herzen Journal of Onco­logy. 2024;(3):73-78
Breast cancer: types of implantable mate­rials for replacement of postresection defe­cts. P.A. Herzen Journal of Onco­logy. 2024;(3):85-89
Intrathecal chemotherapy for leptomeningeal meta­stases in patients with breast cancer. Burdenko's Journal of Neurosurgery. 2024;(3):31-37
Expression of transferrin rece­ptor 1 and β1-integrins correlates with estrogen rece­ptor status and immune infi­ltration in breast cancer. Russian Journal of Archive of Pathology. 2024;(4):23-30
Indo­cyanine green is an inte­gral part of breast reco­nstructive surgery using perforator flaps. Piro­gov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2024;(8):34-40

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the results of prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction in patients with breast cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study included 130 patients with breast cancer who underwent simultaneous mastectomy and implant-based breast reconstruction.

RESULTS

Polyurethane-coated implants were used in 69% of cases, textured implants — in 31% of cases. Most often, this reconstruction was performed in patients with cancer stage 0-IIa (87%). Sixty-two (47.7%) women underwent postoperative chemotherapy. Radiotherapy was performed in 35 (27%) cases including 60% of patients with polyurethane implants and 40% of women with textured implants. Some patients had complications associated with radio- and/or chemotherapy in most cases.

CONCLUSION

Simultaneous prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction is a reliable and affordable method of breast reconstruction. The influence of radio- and chemotherapy on the risk of some complications is obvious. Improvement of surgical techniques and prevention of complications will allow a more effective prepectoral implantation for breast reconstruction.

Keywords:

prepectoral reconstruction
breast reconstruction with implants
breast cancer

Authors:

Khodorovich O.S.

Russian Scientific Center of Roentgenoradiology

Solodkiy V.A.

Russian Research Center of Radiology

Sarkisyan K.D.

Russian Scientific Center of Roentgenoradiology

Kalinina-Masri A.A.

Russian Scientific Center of Roentgenoradiology

Sherstneva T.V.

Russian Scientific Center of Roentgenoradiology

Kleshneva V.O.

Russian Scientific Center of Roentgenoradiology

Kanakhina L.B.

Russian Scientific Center of Roentgenoradiology

Received:

05.08.2021

Accepted:

04.10.2021

List of references:

  1. Heimes A-S, Stewen K, Hasenburg A. Psychosocial Aspects of Immediate versus Delayed Breast Reconstruction. Breast Care (Basel). 2017;12(6):374-377.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000485234
  2. Malignant neoplasms in Russia in 2018 year (morbidity and mortality). Kaprin AD, Starinsky VV, Petrova GV, eds. M. 2019. (In Russ.).
  3. Letyagin VP. The evolution of cancer surgery breast. Tumors of the Female Reproductive System. 2012;(1):32-37. (In Russ.).
  4. Sobolevsky VA, Egorov YuS, Krokhina OV. Variants of reconstructive surgery in patients with breast cancer. Together Against Cancer. 2007;(1-2):10-14. (In Russ.).
  5. Semiglazov VF. Breast cancer surgery (history and modernity). Practical Oncology. 2002;3(1):21-28. (In Russ.).
  6. Goldman YuI, Tsarev ON. The evolution of surgical treatment breast cancer. Academic Journal of Western Siberia. 2016;12(4):42-45. (In Russ.).
  7. Shinkarev SA, Kozlovskaya EV, Ostroushko AP. An experience the use of reconstructive interventions in cancer patients. Experimental and Clinical Surgery Bulletin. 2015;8(1):120-130. (In Russ.).
  8. Ciancio F, Parisi D, Portincasa A, Innocenti A. Innovative Management of Implant Exposure in ADM/Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction with Negative Pressure Wound Therapy. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2017;41(5):1237-1238. Epub 2017 Apr 03.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-017-0850-y
  9. Alderton GK. Breast cancer: breast cancer classification. Nat Rev Cancer. 2014;24(3):155. 
  10. Henry LR, Morris LL, Downs R, Schwarz RE. The impact of immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy on time to first adjuvant 130 treatment in women with breast cancer in a community setting. Am J Surg. 2017; 213(3):534-538. 
  11. Olivari N. The latissimus flap. Br J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1976;29:126-128. 
  12. Solodkiy VA, Khodorovich OS, Sarkisyan KD, Kalinina-Masri AA. Symmetrical interventions in organ-preserving and reconstructive operations in patients with breast cancer. Vestnik RNTsRR. 2019;19:52-63. (In Russ.).
  13. Anokhin AS. Prevention of complications in breast cancer surgery. Siberian Journal of Oncology. 2011;2(44):86-88. (In Russ.).
  14. Razdan SN, Cordeiro PG, Albornoz CR, Disa JJ, Panchal HJ, Ho AY, et al. National Breast Reconstruction Utilization in the Setting of Postmastectomy Radiotherapy. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2017;33(5):312-317.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1598201
  15. Zikiryakhodzhaev AD, Ermoshchenkova MV, Fetisova EYu, Sukhotko AS, Tukmakov AYu. Experience of using Mentor silicone implants in breast reconstruction glands for cancer in 2015. Povolzhsky Oncological Bulletin. 2016;(1):37-41. (In Russ.).
  16. Zikiryakhodzhaev AD, Rasskazova EA. Recurrences of breast cancer after subcutaneous radical mastectomies with simultaneous reconstruction. Research and Practice in Medicine. 2014;1(1):24-28. (In Russ.).
  17. Weichman K, Disa J. Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction with Acellular Dermal Matrix. Breast Reconstruction — Current Perspectives and State of the Art Techniques. Spiegel AJ, ed. IntechOpen. 2013 July 31. Corpus ID: 6375587. https://doi.org/10.5772/56331
  18. Fernandez-Delgado J, López-Pedraza MJ, Blasco JA, Andradas-Aragones E, Sánchez-Méndez JI, Sordo-Miralles G, et al. Satisfaction with and psychological impact of immediate and deferred breast reconstruction. Ann Oncol. 2008;19(8):1430-1434. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdn153
  19. Zikiryakhodzhaev AD, Ermoshchenkova MV, Efanov VV, et al. Use of a thoracodorsal flap in difficult cases of breast reconstruction. Research and Practice in Medicine. 2015;1:72. (In Russ.).
  20. Ter Louw RP, Nahabedian MY. Prepectoral breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;140:51.  https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000003942
  21. Rebowe RE, Allred LJ, Nahabedian MY. The evolution from subcutaneous to prepectoral prosthetic breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018;6:e1797. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001797
  22. Spiegel AJ, Butler CE. Recurrence following treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ with skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111(2):706-711.  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000041440.12442.05
  23. Casella D, Bernini M, Bencini L, et al. TiLOOP® Bra mesh used for immediate breast reconstruction: comparison of retropectoral and subcutaneous implant placement in a prospective single-institution series. Eur J Plast Surg. 2014;37(11):599-604.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-014-1001-1
  24. Salzberg CA. Nonexpansive immediate breast reconstruction using human acellular tissue matrix graft (AlloDerm). Ann Plast Surg. 2006;57(1):1-5.  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sap.0000214873.13102.9f
  25. Logan Ellis H, Asaolu O, Nebo V, Kasem A. Biological and synthetic mesh use in breast reconstructive surgery: A literature review. World J Surg Oncol. 2016;14:121.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-016-0874-9
  26. Vardanian AJ, Clayton JL, Roostaeian J, et al. Comparison of implant-based immediate breast reconstruction with and without Acellular Dermal Matrix. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128(5):403-10.  https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31822b6637
  27. Hartzell TL, Taghinia AH, Chang J, et al. The use of human acellular dermal matrix for the correction of secondary deformities after breast augmentation: results and costs. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126(5):1711-1720. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181ef900c
  28. Ibrahim AM, Shuster M, Koolen PG, et al. Analysis of the national surgical quality improvement program database in 19,100 patients undergoing implant-based breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132(5):1057-1066. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182a3beec
  29. Batiukov D, Podgaiski V, Ladutko D. Removal of Polyurethane Implants. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. 2019;43:70-75. Published: October 11, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-018-1254-3
  30. Vázquez G, Pellón A. Polyurethane-coated silicone gel breast implants used for 18 years. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2007;31(4):330-336.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-006-0207-4
  31. Frame J, Kamel D, Olivan M, Cintra H. The In Vivo Pericapsular Tissue Response to Modern Polyurethane Breast Implants. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2015; 39(5):713-723. Published: August 25, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-015-0550-4
  32. Tanne JH. FDA approves silicone breast implants 14 years after their withdrawal. BMJ. 2006;333(7579):1139. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39048.332650.DB
  33. Gfrerer L, Liao EC. Technique Refinement in Prepectoral Implant Breast Reconstruction with Vicryl Mesh Pocket and Acellular Dermal Matrix Support. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018;6(4):e1749.
  34. Vidya R, Masià J, Cawthorn S, Berna G, Bozza F, Gardetto A, et al. Evaluation of the effectiveness of the prepectoral breast reconstruction with Braxon dermal matrix: first multicenter European report on 100 cases. Breast J. 2017;23(6):670-676.  https://doi.org/10.1111/tbj.12810
  35. Vlasova MYu, Zikiryakhodzhaev AD, Reshetov IV, Sukhotko AS, Saribekyan EK, Usov FN, Shirokikh IM, Berestok TS, Tregubova AV. Pre-implantation of a polyurethane implant after subcutaneous mastectomy in breast cancer patients. Research and Practice in Medicine. 2020;7(3):63-73. (In Russ.).
  36. Tashchyan AA, Khodorovich OS, Astaturyan KS, Kanakhina LB. Sposob odnomomentnoj rekonstruktsii molochnoj zhelezy pri khirurgicheskom lechenii raka molochnoj zhelezy. Patent RF na izobretenie №2020107165/14(011384) 24.12.2019.

Close metadata

Contact the author
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

Contact us
If you have any questions, complaints or suggestions, please use this feedback form.
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.
Submit Application

You can become an author of one of our magazines, send a request and we will consider it in during the day.

Name
Phone
E-mail
Message
Login
Registration
E-mail
Password
Forgot Password?

Log in to the site using your account in one of the services

Password recovery
E-mail
Login
Register

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.