The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Kaprin A.D.

National Medical Research Center of Radiology;
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba

Drapkina O.M.

National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine

Mazo M.L.

National Medical Research Center of Radiology;
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba;
National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine

Rozhkova N.I.

National Medical Research Center of Radiology;
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba;
National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine

Bochkareva E.V.

National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine

Mikushin S.Yu.

National Medical Research Center of Radiology;
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba;
National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine

Prokopenko S.P.

National Medical Research Center of Radiology;
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba;
National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine

Labazanova P.G.

National Medical Research Center of Radiology;
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba;
National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine

Guidelines for assessing the quality of mammographic images

Authors:

Kaprin A.D., Drapkina O.M., Mazo M.L., Rozhkova N.I., Bochkareva E.V., Mikushin S.Yu., Prokopenko S.P., Labazanova P.G.

More about the authors

Journal: Russian Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2025;28(6): 21‑32

Read: 712 times


To cite this article:

Kaprin AD, Drapkina OM, Mazo ML, et al. . Guidelines for assessing the quality of mammographic images. Russian Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2025;28(6):21‑32. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/profmed20252806121

Recommended articles:
Gastric cancer: inci­dence, risk factors, screening. Russian Journal of Preventive Medi­cine. 2024;(12):135-139
Capsular contracture after reco­nstructive plastic surgery for breast cancer. P.A. Herzen Journal of Onco­logy. 2024;(6):78-83

References:

  1. The Global Cancer Observatory. Accessed March 27, 2025. https://gco.iarc.fr/en
  2. Zlokachestvenny`e novoobrazovaniya v Rossii v 2023 godu (zabolevaemost` i smertnost`). Pod red. Kaprina AD, Starinskogo VV, Shaxzadovoj AO. M.: MNIOI im. P.A. Gercena — filial FGBU «NMICz radiologii» Minzdrava Rossii; 2024. (In Russ.).
  3. Mammologija: Nacional'noe rukovodstvo. Kratkoe izdanie. Pod red. AD Kaprina, NI Rozhkovoj. M.: OOO Izdatel`skaya gruppa «GE`OTAR-Media»; 2021. (In Russ).
  4. Taplin SH, Rutter CM, Finder C, et al. Screening mammography: clinical image quality and the risk of interval breast cancer. AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2002;178(4):797-803.  https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.178.4.1780797
  5. Eklund GW, Cardenosa G. The art of mammographic positioning. Radiologic Clinics of North America. 1992;30(1):21-53. 
  6. Hofvind S, Vee B, Sørum R, et al. Quality assurance of mammograms in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program. European Journal of Radiography. 2009;(1):22-29.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejradi.2008.11.002
  7. Bassett LW, Farria DM, Bansal S, et al. Reasons for failure of a mammography unit at clinical image review in the American College of Radiology Mammography Accreditation Program. Radiology. 2000;215(3):698-702.  https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.215.3.r00jn32698
  8. Spuur K, Webb J, Poulos A, et al. Mammography image quality and evidence based practice: Analysis of the demonstration of the inframammary angle in the digital setting. European Journal of Radiology. 2018;100:76-84.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.01.004
  9. Tehnologicheskij process rentgenovskoj mammografii. Pod red. AD Kaprina, NI Rozhkovoj. M.: OOO Izdatel`skaya gruppa «GE`OTAR-Media»; 2024. (In Russ).
  10. Buist DS, Porter PL, Lehman C, et al. Factors contributing to mammography failure in women aged 40-49 years. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2004;96(19):1432-1440. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djh269
  11. Лилль Ш.Л., Маршал В.Дж. Атлас маммографии. Пер. с англ. Под ред. Н.И. Рожковой. М.: ООО Издательская группа «ГЭОТАР-Медиа»; 2024.
  12. Lill` ShL, Marshal VDzh. Atlas mammografii. Per. s angl. Pod red. N.I. Rozhkovoj.M.: OOO Izdatel`skaya gruppa «GE`OTAR-Media»; 2024. (In Russ).
  13. Department of Health and Human Services. Food and Drug Administration. Mammography Quality Standards Act. Federal Register. 2023;88(47): 15126-15171. Accessed March 27, 2025. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/03/10/2023-04550/mammography-quality-standards-act#action
  14. National Health Service Cancer Screening Programmes, and National Quality Assurance Coordinating Group for Radiography. Quality Assurance Guidelines for Mammography Including Radiographic Quality Control. Sheffield. U.K: NHS Cancer Screening Programmes, 2006.
  15. The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists. Standards of Practice for Clinical Radiology, Version 11.2. Sydney: RANZCR; 2020. https://www.ranzcr.edu.au/quality-a-safety/radiology/standards-of-practice
  16. Public Health England. Guidance for breast screening mammographers. Updated 16 September 2020. Accessed March 27, 2025. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/breast-screening-quality-assurance-for-mammography-and-radiography/guidance-for-breast-screening-mammographers
  17. BreastScreen Australia 2022. BreastScreen Australia National Accreditation Standards. Accessed March 27, 2025. https://www.health.gov.au/sites/default/files/2023-04/breastscreen-australia-national-accreditation-standards-nas.pdf
  18. Ministry of Health. 2013. BreastScreen Aotearoa National Policy and Quality Standards. Wellington: Ministry of Health. Accessed March 27, 2025. https://www.tewhatuora.govt.nz/assets/For-the-health-sector/NSU/For-Health-professionals/Breast-screening-/BreastScreen-Aotearoa-National-Policy-and-Quality-Standards-2013-Revised-November-2022-pdf-2.6-MB.pdf
  19. Kanal KM, Krupinski E, Berns EA, et al. ACR-AAPM-SIIM practice guideline for determinants of image quality in digital mammography. Journal of Digital Imaging. 2013;26(1):10-25.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-012-9521-3
  20. Perry N, Broeders M, de Wolf C, et al. European Commission. European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis. 4th edition. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg: 2006.
  21. Abdulla Hamid SA, Wan Mustaffa Fikr WSK, Khairi FL, et al. PGMI.Vision: A Mobile Application for Breast Mammographic Image Quality Evaluation with Usability Analysis. Journal of Medical Device Technology. 2024; 3(2):139-147.  https://doi.org/10.11113/jmeditec.v3.63
  22. Huppe AI, Overman KL, Gatewood JB, et al. Mammography Positioning Standards in the Digital Era: Is the Status Quo Acceptable? AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2017;209(6):1419-1425. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.16.17522

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.