Choice for a reconstruction method in breast cancer patients

Khakimova Sh.G.; Zikiryakhodzhaev A.D.

doi:https://doi.org/10.17116/onkolog20211004153

Khakimova Sh.G.

Tashkent Pediatric Medical Institute

Zikiryakhodzhaev A.D.

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University) of the Ministry of Russia;
P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute — Branch of the National Medical Radiology Research Center of the Ministry of Russia;
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia

SPIN RSCI: 8421-0364
Scopus AuthorID: 57220129122
ORCID: 0000-0001-7141-2502

Choice for a reconstruction method in breast cancer patients

Authors:

Khakimova Sh.G., Zikiryakhodzhaev A.D.

More about the authors

Journal: P.A. Herzen Journal of Oncology. 2021;10(4): 53‑58

DOI: 10.17116/onkolog20211004153

Read: 1805 times

Download PDF (RU)

Contact the author

Table of contents

To cite this article:

Khakimova ShG, Zikiryakhodzhaev AD. Choice for a reconstruction method in breast cancer patients. P.A. Herzen Journal of Oncology. 2021;10(4):53‑58. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/onkolog20211004153

Подписка 2026 Онкология. Журнал им. П.А. Герцена (P.A. Herzen Journal of Oncology)

Использование инфографики авторами научных работ

Close metadata

Recommended articles:

Capsular contracture after reconstructive plastic surgery for breast cancer. P.A. Herzen Journal of Oncology. 2024;(6):78-83

Neoadjuvant drug therapy and oncological outcomes in patients with stage I–II breast cancer. P.A. Herzen Journal of Oncology. 2025;(1):5-12

Free nipple-areolar complex grafting combined with reconstruction for unavoidable mastectomy. Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine. 2024;(4):60-64

Breast reconstruction after single-stage autologous reconstruction and subsequent flap liponecrosis. Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine. 2024;(4):77-83

NDRG1 protein expression in breast cancer samples, relationship with lymph nodes metastasis. Russian Journal of Archive of Pathology. 2024;(6):36-42

Impact of tumor size on actuarial survival of patients with primary breast sarcoma: a case-control study. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2024;(12):38-43

Assessment of risk factors for breast cancer development in women living in the Saratov region. Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2024;(6):100-106

Left ventricular myocardial performance index (Tei index) as an early marker of cardiotoxicity in antitumor therapy. Russian Cardiology Bulletin. 2024;(4-2):137-143

Nottingham Prognostic Index relation to cytokine-producing tumor molecular subtypes in breast cancer. Russian Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2025;(1):63-68

The possibilities of predicting and reducing the risk of breast cancer in women against the background of the use of assisted reproductive technologies. Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2025;(1):59-64

Abstract:

The paper reflects main current approaches to breast reconstruction using implants, autologous flaps, and their combinations, as well as technical solutions that allow for expanding the indications and achieving better aesthetic results. It also presents the advantages and disadvantages of simultaneous reconstructions using patients’ own tissues and a silicone endoprosthesis. Studies dealing with one- and two-stage reconstructions, the possibilities of adjuvant radiation therapy, and their impact on reconstruction the results are reviewed. Current evaluation is given to the careful individual planning of a breast reconstruction method in order to make a plan of actions to achieve a high quality of life.

Keywords:

breast cancer

breast reconstruction

breast implants

adjuvant radiation therapy

Authors:

Khakimova Sh.G.

Tashkent Pediatric Medical Institute

Zikiryakhodzhaev A.D.

SPIN RSCI: 8421-0364
Scopus AuthorID: 57220129122
ORCID: 0000-0001-7141-2502

Received:

23.04.2021

Accepted:

27.04.2021

Close metadata

References:

World Health Organization. 2020. https://www.who.int
Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, Parkin DM, Forman D, Bray F. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2018. Int J Cancer. 2019;136(5):359-386. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.29210
Kaprin AD, Starinsky VV, Petrova GV, eds. Malignant neoplasms in Russia in 2018 (morbidity and mortality). M.: MNIOI im. P.A. Gertsena — filial FGBU «NMITs radiologii» Minsdrava Rossii; 2019. (In Russ.).
American Cancer Society. Surveillance research. Cancer Facts & Figures 2019. [cited 2017 05/25/2019]. https://www.cancer.org/content/dam/cancer-org/research/cancer-facts-and-statistics/annual-cancer-facts-and-figures/2017/cancer-facts-and-figures-2017.pdf
Weir HK, Anderson RN, Coleman King SM, Soman A, Thompson TD, Hong Y, Moller B, Leadbetter S. Heart disease and cancer deaths — trends and projections in the United States, 1969—2020. Prev Chronic Dis. 2016;13:E157. https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd13.160211
Baichorov EA, Zikiryakhodzhaev AD, Przhedetskii YaV, Sukhot’ko AS. Functional-sparing reconstructive plastic surgery in patients with breast cancer. Literature review. Vestnik Rossiiskogo nauchnogo tsentra rentgenoradiologii. 2020;20(1):45-59. (In Russ.).
American Society of Plastic Surgeons. 2020. https://www.plasticsurgery.org/
Cuomo R. Submuscular and pre-pectoral ADM assisted immediate breast reconstruction: A literature review. Medicina (Kaunas). 2020;56(6):256. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina56060256
Donnely E, Griffin M, Butler PE. Breast reconstruction with a tissue engineering and regenerative medicine approach: systematic review. Ann Biomed Eng. 2020;48(1):9-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-019-02373-3
Spiegel AJ, Kania K, Hamilton KL. 2020 special issue: Twenty years of breast reconstruction: Past, present, and future. Breast J. 2020;26(1):39-41. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbj.13716
Vlasova MYu, Zikiryakhodzhaev AD, Reshetov IV, Sukhot’ko AS, Saribekyun EK, Usov FN, Shirokikh IM, Berestok TS, Tregubova AV. Prepectoral reconstruction with polyurethane-coated implant after skin-sparing mastectomy in patients with breast cancer. Research’n Practical Medicine Journal= Issledovaniya i praktika v meditsine. 2020;7(3):63-73.(In Russ.).
Nahabedian MY. Innovations and advancements with prosthetic breast reconstruction. Breast J. 2018. 24(4):586-591.
Zikiryakhodzhaev A, Shirokikh IM, Ablitsova NV, Ermoshchenkova MV, Khakimova ShG, Khakimova GG, Tukmakov AYu. Effect of radiation therapy on breast immediate reconstruction in breast cancer patients. Problems in Oncology=Voprosy onkologii. 2019;65(3):374-385. (In Russ.).
Moshurov IP, Mikhailov AA, Vasil’ev MB, Ovsyannikov AA, Azarov GA, Gusev S, Martynov AK, Vasil’eva MM, Nazliev DK. One-time reconstruction of the breast with the use of becker expander-implant 35, as an early stage of rehabilitation of breast cancer patients who underwent a mastectomy Research’n Practical Medicine Journal= Issledovaniya i praktika v meditsine. 2018;5(suppl 2)):213.(In Russ.).
Panchal H, Matros E. Current trends in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;140(5 suppl):7-13.
Ganusevich ON, Nesterovich TN, Fedorkevich IV, Yakovenko AS, Rukhlya MN, Prezov AV, Zabiran AV. Rekonstruktivno-plasticheskie operatsii pri rake molochnoi zhelezy c ispol’zovaniem implantov. In: Lazarenko VA, ed. Ot fundamental’nykh znanii k tonkomu vladeniyu skal’pelem. Sbornik nauchnykh trudov Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii, posvyashchennoi pamyati professora V.F. Voino-Yasenetskogo (Svyatitelya Luki, arkhiepiskopa Simferopol’skogo i Krymskogo). Kursk, 3—4 October 2019. Kursk. 2019;47-9. (In Russ.).
Zikiryakhodzhaev AD, Ermoshchenkova MV. Primenenie titanirovannykh setchatykh implantatov v rekonstruktivnoi khirurgii raka molochnykh zhelez. Povolzhskii onkologicheskii vestnik. 2016;1:42-49. (In Russ.).
Zikiryakhodzhaev AD, Ermoshchenkova MV, Fetisova EYu, Sukhot’ko AS, Tukmakov AYu. Opyt primeneniya silikonovykh implantatov Mentor pri rekonstruktsii molochnoi zhelezy po povodu raka v 2015. Povolzhskii onkologicheskii vestnik. 2016;1:37-41. (In Russ.).
Holmstrom H. The free abdominoplasty flap and its use in breast reconstruction. An experimental study and clinical case report. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1979;13(3):423-427. https://doi.org/10.3109/02844317909013092
Ilonzo N, Tsang A, Tsantes S, Estabrook A, Thu Ma AM. Breast reconstruction after mastectomy: A ten-year analysis of trends and immediate postoperative outcomes. Breast. 2017;32:7-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2016.11.023
O’Halloran N, Lowery A, Kalinina O, Sweeney K, Malone C, McLoughlin R, Kelly J, Hussey A, Kerin M.Trends in breast reconstruction practices in a specialized breast tertiary referral centre. BJS Open. 2017;5(1):148-157.
Chao AH, Garza R 3rd, Povoski SP. A review of the use of silicone implants in breast surgery. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2016;13(2):143-156. https://doi.org/10.1586/17434440.2016.1134310
Nelson JA, Sobti N, Patel A, Matros E, McCarthy CM, Dayan JH, Disa JJ, Cordeiro PG, Mehrara BJ, Pusic AL, Allen RJ Jr. The impact of obesity on patient-reported outcomes following autologous breast reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020;27(6):1877-1888. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-08073-5
Brauman D. Textured breast implants and spherical capsular contracture. Aesthet Surg J. 2018;38(11):NP178-179. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjy136
Baichorov EA, Zikiryakhodzhayev AD, Przhedetsky YuV, Duadze IS. Reconstructive plastic surgery in patients with breast cancer using the acellular dermal matrix and mesh implant. P.A. Herzen Journal of Oncology. 2020;9(4):25-31. https://doi.org/10.17116/onkolog2020904125
American Society for Reconstructive Microsurgery. 2020. https://www.microsurg.org/
Freeman MD, Gopman JM, Salzberg CA. The evolution of mastectomy surgical technique: From mutilation to medicine. Gland Surg. 2018;7(3):308-315. https://doi.org/10.21037/gs.2017.09.07.
Ismagilov A, Vanesyan A, Kamaletdinov I. Small refinements in breast reconstruction: A technique for inframammary fold creation. Gland Surg. 2017;6(2):132-140. https://doi.org/10.21037/gs.2016.11.01
Yuce Sari S, Guler OC, Gultekin M, Akkus Yildirim B, Onal C, Ozyigit G, Yildiz F. Radiotherapy after skin-sparing mastectomy and implant-based breast reconstruction. Clin Breast Cancer. 2019;19(5):e611-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2019.04.002
Rocco N, Catanuto G, Nava MB. Radiotherapy and breast reconstruction. Minerva Chir. 2018;73(3):322-328. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4733.18.07615-0
Cordeiro PG, Albornoz CR, McCormick B, Hudis CA, Hu Q, Heerdt A, Matros E. What is the optimum timing of postmastectomy radiotherapy in two-stage prosthetic reconstruction: radiation to the tissue expander or permanent implant? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;135(6):1509-1517. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000001278
Sekiguchi K. Controversies in the role of postmastectomy radiotherapy in breast cancer patients with one to three positive axillary nodes and safety of integrating radiotherapy and breast reconstruction. Breast Cancer. 2017;24(4):493-495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-017-0788-6
Doherty C, Pearce S, Baxter N, Knowles S, Ross D, McClure JA, Brackstone M. Trends in immediate breast reconstruction and radiation after mastectomy: A population study. Breast J. 2020;26(3):446-453. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbj.13500
Thorarinsson A, Fröjd V, Kölby L, Lewin R, Molinder N, Lundberg J, Elander A, Mark H. A retrospective review of the incidence of various complications in different delayed breast reconstruction methods. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2016;50(1):25-34. https://doi.org/10.3109/2000656X.2015.1066683
Naoum GE, Salama L, Niemierko A, Vieira BL, Belkacemi Y, Colwell AS, Winograd J, Smith B, Ho A, Taghian AG. Single stage direct-to-implant breast reconstruction has lower complication rates than tissue expander and implant and comparable rates to autologous reconstruction in patients receiving postmastectomy radiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020;106(3):514-524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.11.008