Reconstructive plastic surgery in patients with breast cancer using the acellular dermal matrix and mesh implant

Baichorov E.A.

Stavropol Medical University

Zikiryakhodzhaev A.D.

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University) of the Ministry of Russia;
P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute — Branch of the National Medical Radiology Research Center of the Ministry of Russia;
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia

SPIN RSCI: 8421-0364
Scopus AuthorID: 57220129122
ORCID: 0000-0001-7141-2502

Przhedetsky Yu.V.

National Medical Research Center of Oncology

Duadze I.S.

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University) of the Ministry of Health of Russia;
P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute — Branch of the National Medical Radiology Research Center of the Ministry of Health of Russia

ORCID: 0000-0002-9577-584X

Reconstructive plastic surgery in patients with breast cancer using the acellular dermal matrix and mesh implant

Authors:

Baichorov E.A., Zikiryakhodzhaev A.D., Przhedetsky Yu.V., Duadze I.S.

More about the authors

Journal: P.A. Herzen Journal of Oncology. 2020;9(4): 25‑31

DOI: 10.17116/onkolog2020904125

Downloaded: 103

Download PDF (RU)

Contact the author

Table of contents

To cite this article:

Baichorov EA, Zikiryakhodzhaev AD, Przhedetsky YuV, Duadze IS. Reconstructive plastic surgery in patients with breast cancer using the acellular dermal matrix and mesh implant. P.A. Herzen Journal of Oncology. 2020;9(4):25‑31. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/onkolog2020904125

Close metadata

AIM OF STUDY

Improving the quality of life of patients with breast cancer by introducing into practice functional-sparing reconstructive-plastic surgeries using an acellular dermal matrix or synthetic implant.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included 91 patients with breast cancer: group 1 (n=49) — patients with breast cancer who underwent reconstructive plastic surgery using the acellular dermal matrix (ADM) and a synthetic implant and additional material in the form of pectoralis major muscle; Group 2 (n=42) — patients with breast cancer who underwent reconstructive plastic surgery using ADM and a synthetic implant without additional intersection of the pectoralis major muscle.

RESULTS

There is a clear improvement in the quality of life of patients in group 2 in almost all parameters of the Breast-Q questionnaire.

CONCLUSION

Biological and synthetic materials are essential components used in breast reconstruction. They become adequate substitutes for autologous muscle flaps, if patients are correctly selected for surgery.

Keywords:

breast cancer

skin-guarding radical mastectomy with simultaneous implant reconstruction

subcutaneous radical mastectomy with simultaneous implant reconstruction

acellular dermal matrix

mesh implant

Authors:

Baichorov E.A.

Stavropol Medical University

Zikiryakhodzhaev A.D.

SPIN RSCI: 8421-0364
Scopus AuthorID: 57220129122
ORCID: 0000-0001-7141-2502

Przhedetsky Yu.V.

National Medical Research Center of Oncology

Duadze I.S.

ORCID: 0000-0002-9577-584X

Received:

07.04.2020

Accepted:

28.04.2020

List of references:

Kaprin AD, Starinsky VV, PPetrova GV, eds. Malignant neoplasms in Russia in 2017 (morbidity and mortality). M.: MNIOI im. P.A. Gertsena — filial FGBU «NMIRTs» Minzdrava Rossii; 2018. (In Russ.).
Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65(2):87-108. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21262
Glicenstein J. History of augmentation mammoplasty. Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2005;50(5):337-349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anplas.2005.07.003
Laktionov KP, Blokhin SN. Reconstructive surgery for breast cancer. M.: GEOTAR-Media; 2008. (In Russ).
Chao AH, Garza R III, Povoski SP. A review of the use of silicone implants in breast surgery. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2016;13(2):143-156. https://doi.org/10.1586/17434440.2016.1134310
Hyung-Bo Sim. Revisiting prepectoral breast augmentation: indications and refinements. Aesthet Surg J. 2019;39(5):113-122. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjy294
Ter Louw RP, Nahabedian MY. Prepectoral breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;140(5, Suppl.: Advances in Breast Reconstruction):51-59. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000003942
Sigalove S, Maxwell GP, Sigalove NM, Storm-Dickerson TL, Pope N, Rice J, Gabriel A. Prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction: rationale, indications, and preliminary results. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;139(2):287-294. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000002950
Salibian AA, Frey JD, Choi M, Karp NS. Subcutaneous implant-based breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix/mesh: a systematic review. Plast Reconst Surg Glob Open. 2016;4(11):e1139. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001139
Becker S, Saint-Cyr M, Wong C, Dauwe P, Nagarkar P, Thornton JF, Peng Y. AlloDerm versus DermaMatrix in immediate expander-based breast reconstruction: a preliminary comparison of complication profiles and material compliance. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;123(1):1-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181904bff
Dieterich M, Paepke S, Zwiefel K, Dieterich H, Blohmer J, Faridi A, Klein E, Gerber B, Nestle-Kraemling C. Implant-based breast reconstruction using a titanium-coated polypropylene mesh (TiLOOP Bra): a multicenter study of 231 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132(1):8-19. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e318290f8a0
Vardanian AJ, Clayton JL, Roostaeian J, Shirvanian V, Da Lio A, Lipa JE, Crisera C, Festekjian JH. Comparison of implant-based immediate breast reconstruction with and without acellular dermal matrix. Plasti Reconstr Surg. 2011;128(5):403-410. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31822b6637

Close metadata