The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Login
EN
+7 (495) 482-4118
+7 (495) 482-0604
+8 800 250-18-12
  • (toll-free number for subscriptions)
    Mon-Fri from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m.

  • © 1998-2025
+7 (495) 482-43-29
EN
All journals
Journal
Year
Year
Search result: 0

Galchina Yu.S.

Vishnevsky Institute of Surgery, Moscow, Russia

Karmazanovskiĭ G.G.

FGBU "Institut khirurgii im. A.V. Vishnevskogo" Minzdrava Rossii, Moskva

Kondratyev E.V.

Vishnevsky National Medical Research Center for Surgery of the Ministry of Health of Russia, Moscow, Russia

Gorin D.S.

Institut khirurgii im. A.V. Vishnevskogo, Moskva

Galkin G.V.

Vishnevsky National Medical Research Center of Surgery of Healthcare Ministry of Russia, Moscow, Russia

Kriger A.G.

Institut khirurgii im. A.V. Vishnevskogo, Moskva

Contrast-enhanced computed tomography in evaluation of pancreatic stump volume in pancreaticoduodenectomy

Authors:

Galchina Yu.S., Karmazanovskiĭ G.G., Kondratyev E.V., Gorin D.S., Galkin G.V., Kriger A.G.

More about the authors

Journal: Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2020;(6): 31‑37

DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia202006131

Read: 996 times

Download PDF (RU)
Contact the author
Table of contents

CONTRAST-ENHANCED COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY IN EVALUATION OF PANCREATIC STUMP VOLUME IN PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY
CONTRAST-ENHANCED COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY IN EVALUATION OF PANCREATIC STUMP VOLUME IN PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY

To cite this article:

Galchina YuS, Karmazanovskiĭ GG, Kondratyev EV, Gorin DS, Galkin GV, Kriger AG. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography in evaluation of pancreatic stump volume in pancreaticoduodenectomy. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2020;(6):31‑37. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia202006131

Подписка 2026 Хирургия. Журнал им. Н.И. Пирогова (Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery)
МСФ на ЯМ
Использование инфографики авторами научных работ
Close metadata
Recommended articles:
Treatment of postoperative complications in cardiothoracic surgery: single-center 10-year expe­rience. Piro­gov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2024;(12-2):66-71
Cere­bral protection in transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Piro­gov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2024;(12-2):150-158
Short- and mid-term outcomes after posterolateral endo­scopic discectomy in patients with lumbosacral junction disc herniations. Piro­gov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2024;(12):52-59
Early complications after surgical treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax: risk factors analysis. Piro­gov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2025;(3):24-32
The role of early predictors in diagnosis of stapler suture and anastomotic failure in bariatric patients. Piro­gov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2025;(3):76-86
Capsular contracture after reco­nstructive plastic surgery for breast cancer. P.A. Herzen Journal of Onco­logy. 2024;(6):78-83
Complications after Laser Treatment. Journal of Venous Diso­rders. 2024;(4):317-327
Instrumental and labo­ratory indi­cators in evaluating the effe­ctiveness of suba­ntral sinus lifting in severe bone atro­phy. Russian Journal of Operative Surgery and Clinical Anatomy. 2025;(1):48-55
Possibilities surgical treatment of atypical forms of pelvic organ prolapse. Endo­scopic Surgery. 2025;(2):35-42
Transluminal extraction of intramural duodenal wall calculus after videolaparoscopic cholecystectomy. Endo­scopic Surgery. 2025;(2):50-55
Abstract:

Objective. To analyze the role of contrast-enhanced computed tomography in evaluation of pancreatic stump volume for prediction of significant pancreatic fistula. Material and methods. A retrospective analysis enrolled 99 patients. Patients were divided into 2 groups depending on the course of postoperative period and development of clinically significant pancreatic fistula. The first group included 24 patients (25%) with clinically significant postoperative pancreatic fistula. The second group included 75 patients (75%) without postoperative complications. Pancreatic structure, pancreatic parenchyma thickness (mm), pancreatic duct diameter (mm) and volume of pancreatic stump (cm3) were preoperatively analyzed considering contrast-enhanced computed tomography data. Results. The risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula is 10 times higher in case of soft structure of the pancreas, 1,7 times higher in decrease of pancreatic duct diameter, 9,3 times higher in increased volume of residual pancreatic parenchyma, 8.6 times higher in increase of pancreatic parenchyma thickness. Conclusion. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography is valuable for preoperative evaluation of the volume of residual pancreatic parenchyma and identification of patients with high risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula.

Keywords:

contrast-enhanced computed tomography
pancreatic stump volume
pancreatic fistula
complications
pancreas thickness

Authors:

Galchina Yu.S.

Vishnevsky Institute of Surgery, Moscow, Russia

Karmazanovskiĭ G.G.

FGBU "Institut khirurgii im. A.V. Vishnevskogo" Minzdrava Rossii, Moskva

Kondratyev E.V.

Vishnevsky National Medical Research Center for Surgery of the Ministry of Health of Russia, Moscow, Russia

Gorin D.S.

Institut khirurgii im. A.V. Vishnevskogo, Moskva

Galkin G.V.

Vishnevsky National Medical Research Center of Surgery of Healthcare Ministry of Russia, Moscow, Russia

Kriger A.G.

Institut khirurgii im. A.V. Vishnevskogo, Moskva

Close metadata

References:

  1. Fang C-H, Chen Q-S, Yang J, Xiang F, Fang Z-S, Zhu W. Body mass index and stump morphology predict an increased incidence of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. . 2016;40(6):1467-1476.
  2. Muscari F, Suc B, Kirzin S, et al. Risk factors for mortality and intra-abdominal complications after pancreatoduodenectomy: multivariate analysis in 300 patients. . 2006;139:591-598. 
  3. Butturini G, Marcucci S, Molinari E, et al. Complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy: the problem of current definitions. 2006;13:207-211. 
  4. Van Berge Henegouwen MI, De Wit LT, Van Gulik TM, et al. Incidence, risk factors, and treatment of pancreatic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy: drainage versus resection of the pancreatic remnant. 1997 July;185(1):18-24. 
  5. Gouma, DJ, et al. Rates of complications and death after pancreaticoduodenectomy risk factors and the impact of hospital volume. 2000;232(6):786-795. 
  6. Pratt W, et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistulas are not equivalent after proximal, distal, and central pancreatectomy. 2006;10(9):1264-1278.
  7. Callery MP, Pratt WB, Vollmer CM Jr. Prevention and management of pancreatic fistula 2009;13(1):163-173. 
  8. Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C, Sarr M, Hilal MA, Adham M, Allen P, Andersson R, Asbun HJ, Besselink MG, Conlon K, Chiaro MD, Falconi M, Fernandez-Cruz L, Castillo CF, Fingerhu Abe, Friess H, Gouma D, Buchler M. The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years after. 2017;161(3):584-591. 
  9. Mathur A, et al. Fatty pancreas: a factor in postoperative pancreatic fistula. 2007;246(6):1058-1064.
  10. Gaujoux S, et al. Fatty pancreas and increased body mass index are risk factors of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. . 2010;148(1):15-23. 
  11. Roberts KJ, et al. Scoring System to Predict Pancreatic Fistula After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A UK Multicenter Study. . 2015;261(6):1191-1197.
  12. Tranchart H, Gaujoux S, Rebours V, Vullierme MP, Dokmak S, Levy P, Couvelard A, Belghiti J, Sauvanet A. Preoperative CT scan helps to predict the occurrence of severe pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. . 2012;256(1):139-45. 
  13. Sugimoto M, Takahashi S, Kojima M, Kobayashi T, Gotohda N, Konishi M. In patients with a soft pancreas, a thick parenchyma, a small duct, and fatty infiltration are significant risks for pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy 2017;21(5):846-854. 
  14. Kang JH, Park JS, Yu JS, Chung JJ, Kim JH, Cho ES, Yoon DS. Prediction of pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy by preoperative dynamic CT and fecal elastase-1 levels. 2017;12(5):e0177052.
  15. Frozanpor F, Loizou L, Ansorge C, Segersvärd R, Lundell L, Albiin N. Preoperative pancreas CT/MRI characteristics predict fistula rate after pancreaticoduodenectomy. . 2012;36(8): 1858-1865.
  16. Frozanpor F, Albiin N, Linder S, Segersvärd R, Lundell L, Arnelo U. Impact of pancreatic gland volume on fistula formation after pancreatic tail resection. 2010;11(5):439-443.
  17. Duzkoylu Y, Ozdemir M, Sair E, Ozgun YM, Okten S, Aksoy E, Bostanci EB. A Novel Method for the Prediction of Pancreatic Fistula Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy by the Assessment of Fatty Infiltration. I. 2019;81(3)225-231. 
  18. Reid-Lombardo KM, FarnellMB, Crippa S, et al. Pancreatic anastomotic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy in 1,507 patients: a report from the Pancreatic Anastomotic Leak Study Group. . 2007;11:1451-1458.
  19. Sohn TA, Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy: role of interventional radiologists in managing patients and complications. . 2003;7:209-219. 
  20. Standop J, Glowka T, Schmitz V, et al. Operative re-intervention following pancreatic head resection: indications and outcome. . 2009;13:1503-1509.
  21. Büchler MW, Friess H, Wagner M, et al. Pancreatic fistula after pancreatic head resection. . 2000;87:883-889. 
  22. Rosso E, Bachellier P, Oussoultzoglou E, et al. Toward zero pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy with pancreaticogastrostomy. . 2006;191:726-732. 
  23. He T, et al. Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. . 2013;30(1):56-69. 
  24. Büchler M, Friess H, Klempa I, Hermanek P, Sulkowski U, Becker H, Schafmayer A, Baca I, Lorenz D, Meister R, et al. Role of octreotide in prevention of post operative complications following pancreatic resection. . 1992;163:125-130. PMID: 1733360
  25. Akgul O, Merath K, Mehta R, Hyer JM, Chakedis J, Wiemann B... & Pawlik TM. Postoperative pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy — stratification of patient risk. 2019;23(9):1817-1824.
  26. Kirihara Y, et al. Prediction of pancreatic anastomotic failure after pancreatoduodenectomy: the use of preoperative, quantitative computed tomography to measure remnant pancreatic volume and body composition. . 2013;257(3):512-519. 
Contact the author
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

Contact us
If you have any questions, complaints or suggestions, please use this feedback form.
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.
Submit Application

You can become an author of one of our magazines, send a request and we will consider it in during the day.

Name
Phone
E-mail
Message
Login
Registration
E-mail
Password
Forgot Password?

Log in to the site using your account in one of the services

Password recovery
E-mail
Login
Register

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.