Perforated duodenal ulcer in high risk patients

Beburishvili A.G.; Panin S.I.; Mikhaylov D.V.; Postolov M.P.

doi:https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia201811139

A.G. Beburishvili

Kafedra fakul'tetskoĭ khirurgii Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo meditsinskogo universiteta

S.I. Panin

Kafedra fakul'tetskoĭ khirurgii Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo meditsinskogo universiteta

SPIN RSCI: 8303-5413
Scopus AuthorID: 57198338379

D.V. Mikhaylov

Chair of Faculty Surgery, Volgograd State Medical University, Volgograd, Russia

M.P. Postolov

Chair of Faculty Surgery, Volgograd State Medical University, Volgograd, Russia

Perforated duodenal ulcer in high risk patients

Authors:

A.G. Beburishvili, S.I. Panin, D.V. Mikhaylov, M.P. Postolov

More about the authors

Journal: Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2018;(11): 39‑43

DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia201811139

Read: 6662 times

Download PDF (RU)

Contact the author

Table of contents

To cite this article:

Beburishvili AG, Panin SI, Mikhaylov DV, Postolov MP. Perforated duodenal ulcer in high risk patients. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2018;(11):39‑43. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia201811139

Подписка 2026 Хирургия. Журнал им. Н.И. Пирогова (Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery)

Использование инфографики авторами научных работ

Close metadata

Recommended articles:

Rapidly progressive periodontitis. (A successful experience of eighteen years of observation). Russian Journal of Stomatology. 2025;(2):61-67

Contribution of the Russian Academy of Sciences Academician R.G. Oganov to the development of the domestic preventive cardiology. Russian Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2025;(6):7-10

Pancreatoduodenalectomy with hemihepatectomy — analysis of clinical experience. P.A. Herzen Journal of Oncology. 2025;(3):25-30

Dynamics of the main indicators of medical care to the population of the Russian Federation for the period 1993—2023 in the “Oncology” profile. P.A. Herzen Journal of Oncology. 2025;(3):71-77

Vertebroplasty for pathological vertebral fracture with osteoporosis. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2025;(6):67-76

Bacterial vaginosis: modern views. Russian Journal of Clinical Dermatology and Venereology. 2025;(3):261-268

Method of photodynamic action in surgical treatment of local limited peritonitis in the experiment. Russian Journal of Operative Surgery and Clinical Anatomy. 2025;(2-2):77-86

Appendicular diverticulum in acute appendix. Russian Journal of Operative Surgery and Clinical Anatomy. 2025;(2-2):117-120

Vaccination against pneumococcal infection as a mean of reducing morbidity and mortality of the adult population from risk groups in the Russian Federation. (Resolution of the Council of Experts). Russian Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2025;(7):7-14

Risk factors for low back pain in healthcare professionals taking care for patients with reduced mobility. Russian Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2025;(7):75-80

Abstract:

Aim — to improve the outcomes in patients with perforated duodenal ulcers. Material and methods. Cohort study included 456 patients with perforated duodenal ulcer. High risk of mortality was determined in 9% of patients (n=40) considering Boey diagnostic criteria (1982, 1987). There were 19 women and 21 men aged 59±2.8 years. Results. Perforated duodenal ulcer was followed by overall mortality near 3.8%. In high risk group this value was 17.5% (7 out of 40 patients) while expected mortality was 45.5—100% in these patients in view of Boey criteria. The main causes of death were multiple organ failure, pulmonary embolism and acute myocardial infarction. Conclusion. Minimally invasive surgery including step-by-step procedures (mini-laparotomy, laparoscopy and navigation) are the key to improve the outcomes in patients with perforated duodenal ulcer.

Keywords:

perforated ulcer

treatment

mortality

risk factors

Authors:

A.G. Beburishvili

Kafedra fakul'tetskoĭ khirurgii Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo meditsinskogo universiteta

S.I. Panin

Kafedra fakul'tetskoĭ khirurgii Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo meditsinskogo universiteta

SPIN RSCI: 8303-5413
Scopus AuthorID: 57198338379

D.V. Mikhaylov

Chair of Faculty Surgery, Volgograd State Medical University, Volgograd, Russia

M.P. Postolov

Chair of Faculty Surgery, Volgograd State Medical University, Volgograd, Russia

Close metadata

References:

Thorsen K, Søreide J, Søreide K. Scoring systems for outcome prediction in patients with perforated peptic ulcer. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2013;21(1):25. https://doi.org/10.1186/1757-7241-21-25
Gostishhev VK, Evseev MA, Golovin RA. Radical surgery in the treatment of patients with perforated gastroduodenal ulcers. Khirurgiya. 2009;3:10-16. (In Russ.)
Ermolov AS, Smoliar AN, Shlyakhovskiy IA, Khramenkov MG. 20 years emergency surgery of abdominal organs in Moscow. Khirurgiya. Zhurnal im. N.I. Pirogova. 2014;(5):7-16. (In Russ.)
Lau J, Sung J, Hill C, Henderson C, Howden C and Metz D. Systematic review of the epidemiology of complicated peptic ulcer disease: incidence, recurrence, risk factors and mortality. Digestion. 2011;84(2):102-113.
Hermansson M, Ekedahl A, Ranstam J, Zilling T. Decreasing incidence of peptic ulcer complications after the introduction of the proton pump inhibitors, a study of the Swedish population from 1974-2002. BMC Gastroenterol. 2009;9(1):25. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-230x-9-25
Prudkov MI. Osnovy minimal’no invazivnoi khirurgii. Ekaterinburg. 2007. (In Russ.)
Boey J, Wong J, Ong GB. A prospective study of operative risk factors in perforated duodenal ulcers. Ann Surg. 1982;195:265-269. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-198203000-00004
Boey J, Choi SK, Poon A, Alagaratnam TT. Risk stratification in perforated duodenal ulcers. A prospective validation of predictive factors. Ann Surg. 1987;205:22-26. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-198701000-00005
Lohsiriwat V, Prapasrivorakul S, Lohsiriwat D. Perforated peptic ulcer: clinical presentation, surgical outcomes, and the accuracy of the Boey scoring system in predicting postoperative morbidity and mortality. World J Surg. 2009;33(1):80-85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-008-9796-1
Saber A, Gad M, Ellabban G. Perforated duodenal ulcer in high risk patients: Is percutaneous drainage justified? North American Journal of Medical Sciences. 2012;4(1):35. https://doi.org/10.4103/1947-2714.92902
Chan WH, Wong WK, Khin LW, Soo KC. Adverse operative risk factors for perforated peptic ulcer. Ann Acad Med. 2000;29:164-167.
Søreide K, Thorsen K, Søreide J. Strategies to improve the outcome of emergency surgery for perforated peptic ulcer. British Journal of Surgery. 2013;101(1):e51-e64. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9368
Sazhin IV, Sazhin VP, Bronshtein PG, Savel’ev VM, Nuzhdikhin AV, Klimov DE. Laparoscopic treatment of perforated ulcers. Khirurgiya. Zhurnal im. N.I. Pirogova. 2014;(7):12-16. (In Russ.)
Sovtsov SA. Management of perforative gastroduodenal ulcer Khirurgiya. Zhurnal im. N.I. Pirogova. 2015;11:41—45. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia20151141-45
Shulutko AM, Danilov AI, Burov KV. Probodnaya piloroduodenal’naya yazva: ushivanie ili kombinirovannoe khirurgicheskoe lechenie? Rus Med Zhurn. 2005;2:43-46. (In Russ.)
Val’ter VG, Kutukov VE, Zurnadzh’yants VA, Kutukov VV. Khirurgicheskoe lechenie perforatinykh gastroduodenal’nykh yazv. Astrakhan’. 2000. (In Russ.)
Thorsen K, Søreide JA, Søreide K. What is the best predictor of mortality in perforated peptic ulcer disease? A population-based, multivariable regression analysis including three clinical scoring systems. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18:1261-1268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-014-2485-5
Altaca G, Sayek I, Onat D, Cakmakci M, Kamiloglu S. Risk factors in perforated peptic ulcer disease: comparison of a new score system with the Mannheim Peritonitis Index. Eur J Surg. 1992;158(4):217-221.
Mishra A, Sharma D, Raina VK. A simplified prognostic scoring system for peptic ulcer perforation in developing countries. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2003;22(2):49-53.
Møller M, Engebjerg M, Adamsen S, Bendix J, Thomsen R. The Peptic Ulcer Perforation (PULP) score: a predictor of mortality following peptic ulcer perforation. A cohort study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2011;56(5):655-662. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-6576.2011.02609.x
Menekse E, Kocer B, Topcu R, Olmez A, Tez M, Kayaalp C. A practical scoring system to predict mortality in patients with perforated peptic ulcer. World J Emerg Surg. 2015;10(1):7.
Mugatasimov IG, Baranov AI, Khalepa VI, Shapran VT. Mini-invasive techologies in the treatment of perforated duodenzl ulcers: the analysis of treatment for 5 years. Voprosy rekonstruktivnoi i plasticheskoi khirurgii. 2014;1(48):55-61. (In Russ.)
Bucher P, Oulhaci W, Morel P, Ris F, Huber O. Conservative treatment of perforated gastroduodenal ulcer. Swiss Med Wkly. 2007;137:337-340.
Taylor H. Perforated peptic ulcer treated without operation. The Lancet. 1946;248(6422):441-444. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(46)90971-3
Hanumanthappa MB, Gopinathan S, Guruprasad Rai D, Neil Dsouza. A Non-operative treatment of perforated peptic ulcer: a prospective study with 50 cases. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2012 May;26(4):696-699.
Sanabria A, Villegas MI, Morales Uribe CH. Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer disease. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2013. CD004778. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004778.pub3
Sauerland S, Agresta F, Bergamaschi R, et al. Laparoscopy for abdominal emergencies: evidence-based guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery. Surg Endosc. 2006;20:14-29.
Lunevicius R, Morkevicius M. Comparison of laparoscopic versus open repair for perforated duodenal ulcers. Surg Endosc. 2005;19:1565-1571.