The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Kozlov Yu.A.

Children’s Regional Clinical Hospital;
Irkutsk State Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education;
Irkutsk State Medical University

Poloyan S.S.

Children’s Regional Clinical Hospital;
Irkutsk State Medical University

Sapukhin E.V.

Children’s Regional Clinical Hospital

Strashinsky A.S.

Children’s Regional Clinical Hospital

Makarochkina M.V.

Children’s Regional Clinical Hospital

Marchuk A.A.

Children’s Regional Clinical Hospital

Rozhanski A.P.

Irkutsk State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia

Byrgazov A.A.

Children’s Regional Clinical Hospital

Romanovich E.S.

Irkutsk State Medical University

Narkevich A.N.

South Ural State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia;
Voino-Yasenetsky Krasnoyarsk State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia

Robot-assisted pyeloplasty in children using new Versius robotic platform

Authors:

Kozlov Yu.A., Poloyan S.S., Sapukhin E.V., Strashinsky A.S., Makarochkina M.V., Marchuk A.A., Rozhanski A.P., Byrgazov A.A., Romanovich E.S., Narkevich A.N.

More about the authors

Journal: Endoscopic Surgery. 2024;30(4): 46‑52

Read: 1006 times


To cite this article:

Kozlov YuA, Poloyan SS, Sapukhin EV, et al. . Robot-assisted pyeloplasty in children using new Versius robotic platform. Endoscopic Surgery. 2024;30(4):46‑52. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/endoskop20243004146

Recommended articles:
Epidemiology of suicidal beha­vior in children and adolescents worldwide. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2024;(11-2):16-26
Diagnosis of neuroinfections in children. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2024;(11-2):51-59
Modern approaches to diagnosis and treatment of syndrome of auto­nomic dysfunction in children. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2024;(11-2):66-75
Inte­rnal hernias stra­ngulated in mese­nteric openings in young children. Piro­gov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2024;(11):54-59
Problems of providing dental care to children using the example of the city of Chapaevsk, Samara region. Russian Journal of Operative Surgery and Clinical Anatomy. 2024;(4):35-42
Modern view on the etiology of gallstone disease in children. Russian Journal of Evidence-Based Gastroenterology. 2024;(4):59-68

References:

  1. Denning NL, Kallis MP, Prince JM. Pediatric Robotic Surgery. Surg Clin North Am. 2020;100(2):431-443.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2019.12.004
  2. Shen LT, Tou J. Application and prospects of robotic surgery in children: a scoping review. World J Pediatr Surg. 2022;5(4):e000482. https://doi.org/10.1136/wjps-2022-000482
  3. Mei H, Tang S. Robotic-assisted surgery in the pediatric surgeons’ world: Current situation and future prospectives. Front Pediatr. 2023;11:1120831. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2023.1120831
  4. Sung GT, Gill IS, Hsu TH. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a pilot study. Urology. 1999;53(6):1099-1103. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0090-4295(99)00030-8
  5. Olsen LH, Jorgensen TM. Computer assisted pyeloplasty in children: the retroperitoneal approach. J Urol. 2004;171(6 Pt 2):2629-2631. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000110655.38368.56
  6. Atug F, Woods M, Burgess SV, Castle EP, Thomas R. Robotic assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children. J Urol. 2005;174(4 Pt 1):1440-1332. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000173131.64558.c9
  7. Koukourikis P, Rha KH. Robotic surgical systems in urology: What is currently available? Investig Clin Urol. 2021;62:14-22. 
  8. Sheth KR, Koh CJ. The future of robotic surgery in pediatric urology: Upcoming technology and evolution within the field. Front Pediatr. 2019;7:259. 
  9. Hares L, Roberts P, Marshall K, Slack M. Using end-user feedback to optimize the design of the versius surgical system, a new robot-assisted device for use in minimal access surgery. BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol. 2019;1:e000019.
  10. Brownlee EM, Slack M. The Role of the Versius Surgical Robotic System in the Paediatric Population. Children (Basel). 2022;9(6):805.  https://doi.org/10.3390/children9060805
  11. Esposito C, Cerulo M, Lepore B, Coppola V, D’Auria D, Esposito G, Carulli R, Del Conte F, Escolino M. Robotic-assisted pyeloplasty in children: a systematic review of the literature. J Robot Surg. 2023;17(4):1239-1246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-023-01559-1
  12. Chan YY, Durbin-Johnson B, Sturm RM, Kurzrock EA. Outcomes after pediatric open, laparoscopic, and robotic pyeloplasty at academic institutions. J Pediatr Urol. 2017;13(1):49.e1-49.e6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2016.08.029
  13. Tomaszewski JJ, Casella DP, Turner RM 2nd, Casale P, Ost MC. Pediatric laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery: technical considerations. J Endourol. 2012;26(6):602-613.  https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2011.0252
  14. Peters CA. Robotically assisted surgery in pediatric urology. Urol Clin North Am. 2004;31(4):743-752.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ucl.2004.06.007
  15. Esposito C, Masieri L, Castagnetti M, Sforza S, Farina A, Cerulo M, Cini C, Del Conte F, Escolino M. Robot-assisted vs laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children with uretero-pelvic junction obstruction (UPJO): technical considerations and results. J Pediatr Urol. 2019;15(6):667.e1-667.e8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.09.018
  16. Silay MS, Spinoit AF, Undre S, Fiala V, Tandogdu Z, Garmanova T, Guttilla A, Sancaktutar AA, Haid B, Waldert M, Goyal A, Serefoglu EC, Baldassarre E, Manzoni G, Radford A, Subramaniam R, Cherian A, Hoebeke P, Jacobs M, Rocco B, Yuriy R, Zattoni F, Kocvara R, Koh CJ. Global minimally invasive pyeloplasty study in children: Results from the Pediatric Urology Expert Group of the European Association of Urology Young Academic Urologists working party. J Pediatr Urol. 2016;12(4):229.e1-7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2016.04.007
  17. Masieri L, Sforza S, Grosso AA, Cini C, Viola L, Tellini R, Mari A, Di Maida F, Minervini A, Carini M. Does the body weight influence the outcome in children treated with robotic pyeloplasty? J Pediatr Urol. 2020;16(1):109.e1-109.e6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.10.023
  18. Kafka IZ, Kocherov S, Jaber J, Chertin B. Pediatric robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP): does weight matter? Pediatr Surg Int. 2019;35(3):391-396.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-019-04435-y
  19. Andolfi C, Lombardo AM, Aizen J, Recabal X, Walker JP, Barashi NS, Reed F, Lopez PJ, Wilcox DT, Gundeti MS. Laparoscopic and robotic pyeloplasty as minimally invasive alternatives to the open approach for the treatment of uretero-pelvic junction obstruction in infants: a multi-institutional comparison of outcomes and learning curves. World J Urol. 2022;40(4):1049-1056. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-022-03929-0
  20. Kawal T, Sahadev R, Srinivasan A, Chu D, Weiss D, Long C, Van Batavia J, Bodar Y, Shah J, Shukla AR. Robotic surgery in infants and children: an argument for smaller and fewer incisions. World J Urol. 2020;38(8):1835-1840. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-02765-z
  21. Blanc T, Kohaut J, Elie C, Clermidi P, Pio L, Harte C, Brönnimann E, Botto N, Rousseau V, Sonigo P, Vaessen C, Lottmann H, Aigrain Y. Retroperitoneal Approach for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction: Encouraging Preliminary Results With Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Repair. Front Pediatr. 2019;7:209.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2019.00209
  22. Blanc T, Abbo O, Vatta F, Grosman J, Marquant F, Elie C, Juricic M, Laraqui S, Broch A, Arnaud A. Transperitoneal Versus Retroperitoneal Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Children. A Multicentre, Prospective Study. Eur Urol Open Sci. 2022;41:134-140.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2022.05.009
  23. Kang SK, Jang WS, Kim SH, Kim SW, Han SW, Lee YS. Comparison of intraoperative and short-term postoperative outcomes between robot-assisted laparoscopic multi-port pyeloplasty using the da Vinci Si system and single-port pyeloplasty using the da Vinci SP system in children. Investig Clin Urol. 2021;62(5):592-599.  https://doi.org/10.4111/icu.20200569
  24. Hong YH, DeFoor WR Jr, Reddy PP, Schulte M, Minevich EA, VanderBrink BA, Noh PH. Hidden incision endoscopic surgery (HIdES) trocar placement for pediatric robotic pyeloplasty: comparison to traditional port placement. J Robot Surg. 2018;12(1):43-47.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-017-0684-2
  25. Dangle PP, Shah AB, Gundeti MS. Cutaneous pyeloureteral stent for laparoscopic (robot)-assisted pyeloplasty. J Endourol. 2014;28(10):1168-1171. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2013.0499
  26. Silva MV, Levy AC, Finkelstein JB, Van Batavia JP, Casale P. Is peri-operative urethral catheter drainage enough? The case for stentless pediatric robotic pyeloplasty. J Pediatr Urol. 2015;11(4):175.e1-5.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2015.06.003
  27. Avery DI, Herbst KW, Lendvay TS, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: multi-institutional experience in infants. J Pediatr Urol. 2015;11(3):139.e1-e5 
  28. Dy GW, Hsi RS, Holt SK, Lendvay TS, Gore JL, Harper JD. National Trends in Secondary Procedures Following Pediatric Pyeloplasty. J Urol. 2016;195(4 Pt 2):1209-1214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2015.11.010
  29. Mittal S, Aghababian A, Eftekharzadeh S, Dinardo L, Weaver J, Weiss DA, Long C, Srinivasan AK, Shukla AR. Primary vs redo robotic pyeloplasty: A comparison of outcomes. J Pediatr Urol. 2021;17(4):528.e1-528.e7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2021.02.016
  30. Sorensen MD, Delostrinos C, Johnson MH et al. Comparison of the learning curve and outcomes of robotic assisted pediatric pyeloplasty. J Urol. 2011;185(6 suppl):2517-2522.
  31. Spampinato G, Binet A, Fourcade L, Mendoza Sagaon M, Villemagne T, Braik K, Grosos C, Lardy H, Ballouhey Q. Comparison of the Learning Curve for Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty Between Senior and Junior Surgeons. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2021;31(4):478-483.  https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2020.0822
  32. Hares L, Roberts P, Marshall K, Slack M. Using end-user feedback to optimize the design of the versius surgical system, a new robot-assisted device for use in minimal access surgery. BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol. 2019;1:e000019.

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.