A protocolized-personalized approach for hemodynamics management in major abdominal surgery

Kharlamov K.E.; Yadgarov M.Ya.; Berikashvili L.B.; Kadantseva K.K.; Likhvantsev V.V.; Gracheva N.D.; Grebenchikov O.A.

doi:https://doi.org/10.17116/anaesthesiology202301156

Kharlamov K.E.

Institute of General Resuscitation Federal Research and Clinical Center for Reanimatology and Rehabilitology

Yadgarov M.Ya.

Federal Scientific and Clinical Center of Intensive Care and Rehabilitation

ORCID: 0000-0003-3792-1682

Berikashvili L.B.

Federal Scientific and Clinical Center of Intensive Care and Rehabilitation

Kadantseva K.K.

Federal Scientific and Clinical Center of Intensive Care and Rehabilitation;
Moscow Clinical Scientific and Practical Center named after A.S. Loginov Department of Health of Moscow

Likhvantsev V.V.

Federal Scientific and Clinical Center of Intensive Care and Rehabilitation

Gracheva N.D.

Institute of General Resuscitation Federal Research and Clinical Center for Reanimatology and Rehabilitology

Grebenchikov O.A.

Federal Research and Clinical Center for Intensive Care and Rehabilitation

A protocolized-personalized approach for hemodynamics management in major abdominal surgery

Authors:

Kharlamov K.E., Yadgarov M.Ya., Berikashvili L.B., Kadantseva K.K., Likhvantsev V.V., Gracheva N.D., Grebenchikov O.A.

More about the authors

Journal: Russian Journal of Anesthesiology and Reanimatology. 2023;(1): 56‑62

DOI: 10.17116/anaesthesiology202301156

Read: 1941 times

Download PDF (RU)

Contact the author

Table of contents

To cite this article:

Kharlamov KE, Yadgarov MYa, Berikashvili LB, Kadantseva KK, Likhvantsev VV, Gracheva ND, Grebenchikov OA. A protocolized-personalized approach for hemodynamics management in major abdominal surgery. Russian Journal of Anesthesiology and Reanimatology. 2023;(1):56‑62. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/anaesthesiology202301156

Использование инфографики авторами научных работ

Close metadata

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of a protocolized-personalized approach to hemodynamic management (PPHM) on 30-day mortality in elderly patients undergoing major abdominal surgery and to determine predictors of mortality.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective-prospective clinical study of PPHM effectiveness in perioperative period of major abdominal surgery in elderly patients was carried out. We analyzed the effect of non-modifiable (gender, age, comorbidities) and modifiable (cardiac index, NT-proBNP, surgery time, duration of anesthesia) factors on 30-day mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 90 patients treated with PPHM were eligible for inclusion/exclusion criteria and retrospectively matched with 89 historical control patients with standard postoperative management. There was no significant relationship between PPHM and 30-day mortality (p=0.813). PPHM was followed by shorter ICU-stay (2 (1.0-8.3) days vs. 6 (2.0-16.5) days; p<0.001) and hospital-stay (12 (10-20) days vs. 18 (12-26) days; p<0.001). Multivariate regression analysis identified two independent predictors of mortality: age ≥72 years (adj. OR 12.37; 95% CI 3.38-45.36, p<0.001) and cardiac index at admission ≤2.1 L/min /m² (adj. OR 4.80; 95% CI 1.28-18.06; p=0.02).

CONCLUSION

Age over 72 years and lower cardiac index at admission (≤2.1 L/min/m²) are associated with higher mortality risk. PPHM in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery was not associated with any changes in 30-day mortality. However, this approach reduces ICU-stay and hospital-stay.

Keywords:

abdominal surgery

hemodynamics

mortality

cardiac index

NT-proBNP

Authors:

Kharlamov K.E.

Institute of General Resuscitation Federal Research and Clinical Center for Reanimatology and Rehabilitology

Yadgarov M.Ya.

Federal Scientific and Clinical Center of Intensive Care and Rehabilitation

ORCID: 0000-0003-3792-1682

Berikashvili L.B.

Federal Scientific and Clinical Center of Intensive Care and Rehabilitation

Kadantseva K.K.

Federal Scientific and Clinical Center of Intensive Care and Rehabilitation;
Moscow Clinical Scientific and Practical Center named after A.S. Loginov Department of Health of Moscow

Likhvantsev V.V.

Federal Scientific and Clinical Center of Intensive Care and Rehabilitation

Gracheva N.D.

Institute of General Resuscitation Federal Research and Clinical Center for Reanimatology and Rehabilitology

Grebenchikov O.A.

Federal Research and Clinical Center for Intensive Care and Rehabilitation

Received:

29.07.2022

Accepted:

28.09.2022

Close metadata

References:

Tan HL, Chia STX, Nadkarni NV, Ang SY, Seow DCC, Wong TH. Frailty and functional decline after emergency abdominal surgery in the elderly: A prospective cohort study. World Journal of Emergency Surgery. 2019;14:62. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-019-0280-z
Chung J-Y, Chang W-Y, Lin T-W, Lu J-R, Yang M-W, Lin C-C, Chang C-J, Chou A-H. An analysis of surgical outcomes in patients aged 80 years and older. Acta Anaesthesiologica Taiwanica. 2014;52(4):153-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aat.2014.09.003
Shen Y, Hao Q, Zhou J, Dong B. The impact of frailty and sarcopenia on postoperative outcomes in older patients undergoing gastrectomy surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Geriatrics. 2017;17(1):188. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-017-0569-2
Besov VA, Barinov DV, Smolkina AV, Belova SV, Nozhkin IYu, Komarov AS, Gerasimov NA. Pancreatoduodenal resection in the emergency department. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya. 2013;4:137. (In Russ.).
Annamalai A, Kakarla VR, Nandipati K. Predictors of mortality following pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary cancer. OA Surgery. 2014;2(1):2.
Saugel B, Vincent J-L, Wagner JY. Personalized hemodynamic management. Current Opinion in Critical Care. 2017;23(4):334-341. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCC.0000000000000422
Feldheiser A, Conroy P, Bonomo T, Cox B, Garces TR, Spies C, Anaesthesia Working Group of the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Society; Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Society. Development and feasibility study of an algorithm for intraoperative goaldirected haemodynamic management in noncardiac surgery. Journal of International Medical Research. 2012;40(4):1227-1241. https://doi.org/10.1177/147323001204000402
Conway DH, Mayall R, Abdul-Latif MS, Gilligan S, Tackaberry C. Randomised controlled trial investigating the influence of intravenous fluid titration using oesophageal Doppler monitoring during bowel surgery. Anaesthesia. 2002;57(9):845-849. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2044.2002.02708.x
Noblett SE, Snowden CP, Shenton BK, Horgan AF. Randomized clinical trial assessing the effect of Doppler-optimized fluid management on outcome after elective colorectal resection. British Journal of Surgery. 2006;93(9):1069-10676. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.5454
Kharlamov KE, Yadgarov MYa, Likhvantsev VV. A protocolized-personalized approach to managing hemodynamics as part of the ERAS protocol in operations on the abdominal organs. Vestnik anesteziologii i reanimatologii. 2021;18(4):55-61. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21292/2078-5658-2021-18-4-55-61
Pearse RM, Moreno RP, Bauer P, Pelosi P, Metnitz P, Spies C, Vallet B, Vincent JL, Hoeft A, Rhodes A; European Surgical Outcomes Study (EuSOS) group for the Trials groups of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine and the European Society of Anaesthesiology. Mortality after surgery in Europe: A 7-day cohort study. Lancet. 2012;380(9847):1059-1065. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61148-9
Pearse RM, Harrison DA, MacDonald N, Gillies MA, Blunt M, Ackland G, Grocott MP, Ahern A, Griggs K, Scott R, Hinds C, Rowan K; OPTIMISE Study Group. Effect of a perioperative, cardiac output-guided hemodynamic therapy algorithm on outcomes following major gastrointestinal surgery: A randomized clinical trial and systematic review. JAMA. 2014;311(21):2181-2190. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.5305
Salzwedel C, Puig J, Carstens A, Bein B, Molnar Z, Kiss K, Hussain A, Belda J, Kirov MY, Sakka SG, Reuter DA. Perioperative goal-directed hemodynamic therapy based on radial arterial pulse pressure variation and continuous cardiac index trending reduces postoperative complications after major abdominal surgery: A multi-center, prospective, randomized study. Critical Care. 2013;17(5):R191. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc12885
Trembach NV, Zabolotskikh IB. Critical incident prediction model in advanced abdominal surgery. Anesteziologiya i Reanimatologiya. 2021;(2): 98-104. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/anaesthesiology202102198
Zabolotskikh IB, Gorobets ES, Grigoryev EV, Kozlov IA, Kotovskaya YuV, Lebedinskii KM, Musaeva TS, Mkhitaryan EA, Ovechkin AM, Ostapenko VS, Rozanov AV, Runikhina NK, Tkacheva ON, Trembach NV, Khoronenko VE, Cherdak MA. Perioperative management of geriatric patients. Anesteziologiya i Reanimatologiya. 2018;(1):5-20. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/anaesthesiology201801-0215
Eamer G, Al-Amoodi MJH, Holroyd-Leduc J, Rolfson DB, Warkentin LM, Khadaroo RG. Review of risk assessment tools to predict morbidity and mortality in elderly surgical patients. American Journal of Surgery. 2018; 216(3):585-594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.04.006
Ryding ADS, Kumar S, Worthington AM, Burgess D. Prognostic value of brain natriuretic peptide in noncardiac surgery: A meta-analysis. Anesthesiology. 2009;111(2):311-319. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181aaeb11
Khurshaidi MN, Waqar A, Asghar MS, Kiran A, Tariq A, Kanwal N, Jawed R, Rasheed U, Hassan M, Mazhar A. Prognostic Value of Preoperative Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide: Early Predictor of Cardiovascular Complications and Mortality after Major Abdominal Surgery. Cureus. 2020;12(11):e11338. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.11338
Likhvantsev VV, Ubasev YuV, Skripkin YuV, Zabelina TS, Sungurov VA, Lomivorotov VV, Marchenko DN. Preoperative prevention of heart failure in non-cardiac surgery. Obshchaya reanimatologiya. 2016;12(3):48-61. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.15360/1813-9779-2016-3-48-61