The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Login
EN
+7 (495) 482-4118
+7 (495) 482-4329
+8 800 250-18-12
  • (toll-free number for subscriptions)
    Mon-Fri from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m.

  • © 1998-2026
+7 (495) 482-43-29
EN
All journals
Journal
Year
Year
Search result: 0

Konovalov N.A.

Burdenko Neurosurgical Center

Stepanov I.A.

Irkutsk State Medical University

beloborodov V.A.

Irkutsk State Medical University

Korolishin V.A.

Burdenko Neurosurgery Center

Brinyuk E.S.

Burdenko Neurosurgical Center

Smoking as a risk factor of advanced heterotopic ossification in patients after lumbar total disk arthroplasty

Authors:

Konovalov N.A., Stepanov I.A., beloborodov V.A., Korolishin V.A., Brinyuk E.S.

More about the authors

Journal: Burdenko's Journal of Neurosurgery. 2021;85(1): 19‑27

DOI: 10.17116/neiro20218501119

Read: 4271 times

Contact the author
Table of contents

SMOKING AS A RISK FACTOR OF ADVANCED HETEROTOPIC OSSIFICATION IN PATIENTS AFTER LUMBAR TOTAL DISK ARTHROPLASTY
SMOKING AS A RISK FACTOR OF ADVANCED HETEROTOPIC OSSIFICATION IN PATIENTS AFTER LUMBAR TOTAL DISK ARTHROPLASTY

To cite this article:

Konovalov NA, Stepanov IA, beloborodov VA, Korolishin VA, Brinyuk ES. Smoking as a risk factor of advanced heterotopic ossification in patients after lumbar total disk arthroplasty. Burdenko's Journal of Neurosurgery. 2021;85(1):19‑27. (In Russ., In Engl.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/neiro20218501119

Подписка 2025 Журнал «Вопросы нейрохирургии» имени Н.Н. Бурденко (Burdenko's Journal of Neurosurgery)
МСФ на ЯМ
Использование инфографики авторами научных работ
Close metadata
Recommended articles:
Resu­lts of a survey of high school adolescents and seco­ndary specialized institutions on the smoking status and preferred smoking methods. Russian Journal of Preventive Medi­cine. 2025;(8):78-83
Electronic ciga­rettes impact on the medi­cal students’ health. Russian Journal of Preventive Medi­cine. 2025;(8):84-88
Coro­naviruses in human pathophysiology: a brief history of the COVID-19 pandemic. Mole­cular Gene­tics, Microbiology and Viro­logy. 2025;(4-2):55-63
Poly­morphic variants of IL23R, IL6, IL28B, IL17F genes in patients who have survived after coro­navirus SARS-CoV-2 infe­ction. Mole­cular Gene­tics, Microbiology and Viro­logy. 2025;(4-2):129-134
Men’s health: the role of chro­nic noncommunicable diseases modi­fiable risk factors. Russian Journal of Preventive Medi­cine. 2026;(1):116-122
Risk factors of unfa­vorable clinical outcome in orbi­tal granulomatosis with polya­ngiitis. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2026;(1):54-59
Electronic ciga­rettes smoking by teenagers in Russia during the 2019—2020 and 2023—2024 yrs. Russian Journal of Preventive Medi­cine. 2026;(3):70-77
Abstract:

Smoking is an obvious risk factor of adverse events in early and long-term postoperative period after spine surgery including lumbar total disk arthroplasty. Objective. To study the effect of smoking on clinical and radiological outcomes after lumbar total disk arthroplasty.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A single-center retrospective observational cohort study was performed. We have analyzed medical records of patients who underwent single-level lumbar total disk arthroplasty for degenerative disease.

RESULTS

The study included 57 medical records of respondents. The examined medical records were divided into two groups — smokers (n=26) and non-smokers (n=31). There were no significant between-group differences in clinical outcomes. Incidence of adverse events was similar too. Kaplan—Meier event-free survival was similar in both groups. There were no significant between-group differences in X-ray data. Development of heterotopic ossification after lumbar total disk arthroplasty was more active in smokers.

CONCLUSION

Smoking has no significant effect on clinical and radiological outcomes in patients after single-level after lumbar total disk arthroplasty. On the other hand, smoking significantly increases formation of heterotopic ossification after lumbar total disk arthroplasty.

Keywords:

lumbosacral spine
intervertebral disc
degenerative disease
total arthroplasty
smoking
clinical outcomes
radiological outcomes

Authors:

Konovalov N.A.

Burdenko Neurosurgical Center

Stepanov I.A.

Irkutsk State Medical University

beloborodov V.A.

Irkutsk State Medical University

Korolishin V.A.

Burdenko Neurosurgery Center

Brinyuk E.S.

Burdenko Neurosurgical Center

Received:

22.03.2020

Accepted:

28.08.2020

Close metadata

References:

  1. Schnake KJ, Rappert D, Storzer B, Schreyer S, Hilber F, Mehren C. Lumbale Spondylodese — Indikationen und Techniken [Lumbar fusion-Indications and techniques]. Orthopade. 2019;48(1):50-58.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-018-03670-w
  2. Lan T, Hu SY, Zhang YT, Zheng YC, Zhang R, Shen Z, Yang XJ. Comparison between Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. World Neurosurgery. 2018;112:86-93.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.01.021
  3. Mo Z, Li D, Zhang R, Chang M, Yang B, Tang S. Comparative effectiveness and safety of posterior lumbar interbody fusion, Coflex, Wallis, and X-stop for lumbar degenerative diseases: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery. 2018;172:74-81.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.06.030
  4. Phan K, Thayaparan GK, Mobbs RJ. Anterior lumbar interbody fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion — systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Neurosurgery. 2015;29(5):705-711.  https://doi.org/10.3109/02688697.2015.1036838
  5. Bydon M, De la Garza-Ramos R, Macki M, Baker A, Gokaslan AK, Bydon A. Lumbar fusion versus nonoperative management for treatment of discogenic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques. 2014;27(5):297-304.  https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000000072
  6. Yamashita T, Okuda S, Aono H, Matsumoto T, Takafumi M, Sugiura T, Iwasaki M. Controllable Risk Factors for Neurologic Complications in Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion as Revision Surgery. World Neurosurgery. 2018;116:1181-1187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.05.197
  7. Satyarthee GD. Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Utility and Perioperative Complications. World Neurosurgery. 2017;102:690-691.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.03.065
  8. Zhong ZM, Deviren V, Tay B, Burch S, Berven SH. Adjacent segment disease after instrumented fusion for adult lumbar spondylolisthesis: Incidence and risk factors. Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery. 2017;156:29-34.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2017.02.020
  9. Rundell SA, Isaza JE, Kurtz SM. Biomechanical evaluation of a spherical lumbar interbody device at varying levels of subsidence. SAS Journal. 2011;5(1):16-25.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esas.2010.12.001
  10. Furunes H, Storheim K, Brox JI, Johnsen LG, Skouen JS, Franssen E, Solberg TK, Sandvik L, Hellum C. Total disc replacement versus multidisciplinary rehabilitation in patients with chronic low back pain and degenerative discs: 8-year follow-up of a randomized controlled multicenter trial. Spine Journal. 2017;17(10):1480-1488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2017.05.011
  11. Garcia R Jr, Yue JJ, Blumenthal S, Coric D, Patel VV, Leary SP, Dinh DH, Buttermann GR, Deutsch H, Girardi F, Billys J, Miller LE. Lumbar Total Disc Replacement for Discogenic Low Back Pain: Two-year Outcomes of the activL Multicenter Randomized Controlled IDE Clinical Trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015;40(24):1873-1881. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001245
  12. Ding F, Jia Z, Zhao Z, Xie L, Gao X, Ma D, Liu M. Total disc replacement versus fusion for lumbar degenerative disc disease: a systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses [published correction appears in Eur Spine J. 2018 Oct;27(10):2663]. European Spine Journal. 2017;26(3):806-815.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4714-y
  13. Nie H, Chen G, Wang X, Zeng J. Comparison of Total Disc Replacement with lumbar fusion: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons — Pakistan: JCPSP. 2015;25(1):60-67. 
  14. Chapin L, Ward K, Ryken T. Preoperative Depression, Smoking, and Employment Status are Significant Factors in Patient Satisfaction after Lumbar Spine Surgery. Clinical Spine Surgery. 2017;30(6):725-732.  https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000000331
  15. Kong L, Liu Z, Meng F, Shen Y. Smoking and Risk of Surgical Site Infection after Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Surgical Infections. 2017;18(2):206-214.  https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2016.209
  16. Martin CT, Gao Y, Duchman KR, Pugely AJ. The Impact of Current Smoking and Smoking Cessation on Short-Term Morbidity Risk after Lumbar Spine Surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016;41(7):577-584.  https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001281
  17. Fujiwara A, Tamai K, Yamato M, An HS, Yoshida H, Saotome K, Kurihashi A. The relationship between facet joint osteoarthritis and disc degeneration of the lumbar spine: an MRI study. European Spine Journal. 1999;8(5):396-401.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s005860050193
  18. Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB. The Oswestry Disability Index. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25(22):2940-2952. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200011150-00017
  19. Faiz KW. VAS — visuell analog skala [VAS — visual analog scale]. Tidsskrift for den Norske Laegeforening: Tidsskrift for Praktisk Medicin, ny Raekke. 2014;134(3):323.  https://doi.org/10.4045/tidsskr.13.1145
  20. McAfee PC, Cunningham BW, Devine J, Williams E, Yu-Yahiro J. Classification of heterotopic ossification (HO) in artificial disk replacement. Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques. 2003;16(4):384-389.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00024720-200308000-00010
  21. World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013;310(20):2191-2194. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053
  22. Rich JT, Neely JG, Paniello RC, Voelker CC, Nussenbaum B, Wang EW. A practical guide to understanding Kaplan-Meier curves. Otolaryngology — Head and Neck Surgery. 2010;143(3):331-336.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otohns.2010.05.007
  23. Zigler JE, Blumenthal SL, Guyer RD, Ohnmeiss DD, Patel L. Progression of Adjacent-level Degeneration after Lumbar Total Disc Replacement: Results of a Post-hoc Analysis of Patients with Available Radiographs from a Prospective Study With 5-year Follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018;43(20):1395-1400. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002647
  24. Tohmeh AG, Smith WD. Lumbar total disc replacement by less invasive lateral approach: a report of results from two centers in the US IDE clinical trial of the XL TDR® device. European Spine Journal. 2015;24(suppl 3):331-338.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-3843-z
  25. Rao MJ, Cao SS. Artificial total disc replacement versus fusion for lumbar degenerative disc disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery. 2014;134(2):149-158.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-013-1905-4
  26. Jacobs W, Van der Gaag NA, Tuschel A, de Kleuver M, Peul W, Verbout AJ, Oner FC. Total disc replacement for chronic back pain in the presence of disc degeneration. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2012;9:CD008326. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008326.pub2
  27. Choy W, Barrington N, Garcia RM, Kim RB, Rodriguez H, Lam S, Dahdaleh N, Smith ZA. Risk Factors for Medical and Surgical Complications Following Single-Level ALIF. Global Spine Journal. 2017;7(2):141-147.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568217694009
  28. Huang DS, Liang AJ, Ye W, Su PQ, Liu SL, Ma RF, Liang BL, Li GZ. The risk factors and preventive strategies of heterotopic ossification after artificial disc replacement in lumbar spine. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2006;44(4):242-245. 
  29. Bertagnoli R, Yue JJ, Kershaw T, Shah RV, Pfeiffer F, Fenk-Mayer A, Nanieva R, Karg A, Husted DS, Emersonet JW. Lumbar total disc arthroplasty utilizing the ProDisc prosthesis in smokers versus nonsmokers: a prospective study with 2-year minimum follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31(9):992-997.  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000214970.07626.68
Contact the author
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

Contact us
If you have any questions, complaints or suggestions, please use this feedback form.
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.
Submit Application

You can become an author of one of our magazines, send a request and we will consider it in during the day.

Name
Phone
E-mail
Message
Login
Registration
E-mail
Password
Forgot Password?

Log in to the site using your account in one of the services

Password recovery
E-mail
Login
Register

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.