The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Login
EN
+7 (495) 482-4118
+7 (495) 482-0604
+8 800 250-18-12
  • (toll-free number for subscriptions)
    Mon-Fri from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m.

  • © 1998-2025
+7 (495) 482-43-29
EN
All journals
Journal
Year
Year
Search result: 0

Byval'tsev V.A.

otdel neĭrokhirurgii i ortopedii Nauchnogo tsentra rekonstruktivnoĭ i vosstanovitel'noĭ khirurgii Sibirskogo otdeleniia RAMN;
NUZ Dorozhnaia klinicheskaia bol'nitsa OAO "RZhD", Irkutsk

Kalinin A.A.

NUZ Dorozhnaia klinicheskaia bol'nitsa OAO "RZhD", Irkutsk

Konovalov N.A.

OOO Klinika spinal'noĭ neĭrokhirurgii «Aksis»;
NII neĭrokhirurgii im. akad. N.N. Burdenko RAMN, Moskva

Minimally invasive spinal surgery: stages of development

Authors:

Byval'tsev V.A., Kalinin A.A., Konovalov N.A.

More about the authors

Journal: Burdenko's Journal of Neurosurgery. 2019;83(5): 92‑100

DOI: 10.17116/neiro20198305192

Views: 4068

Downloaded: 127

Download PDF (RU)
Download PDF
Contact the author
Table of contents

MINIMALLY INVASIVE SPINAL SURGERY: STAGES OF DEVELOPMENT
MINIMALLY INVASIVE SPINAL SURGERY: STAGES OF DEVELOPMENT

To cite this article:

Byval'tsev VA, Kalinin AA, Konovalov NA. Minimally invasive spinal surgery: stages of development. Burdenko's Journal of Neurosurgery. 2019;83(5):92‑100. (In Russ., In Engl.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/neiro20198305192

Подписка 2025-2 (Burdenko's Journal of Neurosurgery)
 
МСФ на ЯМ
Close metadata
Recommended articles:
Comparative analysis of radio-frequency abla­tion and endo­scopic suprascapular nerve deco­mpression methods in aspect of chro­nic shoulder pain treatment in adults. Endo­scopic Surgery. 2024;(2):27-34
Bila­teral LAP flap breast reco­nstruction: a case report. Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medi­cine. 2024;(2):51-60
Exploring the feasibility of pero­ral endo­scopic myotomy for stage IV esophageal acha­lasia patients. Russian Journal of Evidence-Based Gastroenterology. 2024;(2):5-13
The impact of endo­scopy in upper gastrointestinal tract cancer screening programs. Russian Journal of Evidence-Based Gastroenterology. 2024;(2):79-88
The use of «growing» endo­prostheses in the complex treatment of children with post-resection mandibular defe­cts. Stomatology. 2024;(4):10-19
Modern concept of treatment of adolescents with Class III malo­cclusion. Stomatology. 2024;(4):44-53
The role of the Kyoto classification in the endo­scopic diagnosis of gastritis asso­ciated with Heli­cobacter pylori infe­ction. Endo­scopic Surgery. 2024;(4):65-72
Peri­pheral nerves’ function reco­very by intratissual electric stimulation. Problems of Balneology, Physiotherapy and Exercise Therapy. 2024;(4):36-44
Pero­ral endo­scopic myotomy for the treatment of epiphrenic dive­rticulum.(Case series). Russian Journal of Evidence-Based Gastroenterology. 2024;(3):111-117
Asymptomatic cave­rnous hema­ngioma of the duodenum. Endo­scopic Surgery. 2024;(5):49-53

In recent decades, spinal surgery has changed significantly. The active use of modern knowledge of anatomy, various diagnostic modules, specialized surgical equipment and high-tech tools has made it possible to transform classical surgical techniques into a new area of spinal neurosurgery — minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS). Its main goals are to reduce damage to the skin and adjacent tissues, significantly reduce the level of pain, reduce the duration of inpatient treatment and fully restore functional status in the shortest possible time. This article reflects the main criteria for MISS compliance and types of surgical interventions, provides information on the advantages of minimally invasive surgical technologies and their possible disadvantages. Currently, the use of MISS is observed in all areas of vertebrology — for degenerative diseases, tumors, inflammatory and traumatic lesions of the spine. At the same time, minimizing surgical aggression while maximizing the achievement of goal becomes the main rule of modern spinal surgery.

Keywords:

minimally invasive surgery
spine
decompression
stabilization
puncture surgical technology
microsurgery
endoscopy

Authors:

Byval'tsev V.A.

otdel neĭrokhirurgii i ortopedii Nauchnogo tsentra rekonstruktivnoĭ i vosstanovitel'noĭ khirurgii Sibirskogo otdeleniia RAMN;
NUZ Dorozhnaia klinicheskaia bol'nitsa OAO "RZhD", Irkutsk

Kalinin A.A.

NUZ Dorozhnaia klinicheskaia bol'nitsa OAO "RZhD", Irkutsk

Konovalov N.A.

OOO Klinika spinal'noĭ neĭrokhirurgii «Aksis»;
NII neĭrokhirurgii im. akad. N.N. Burdenko RAMN, Moskva

List of references:

  1. Byvaltsev VA, Kalinin AA, Goloborodko VYu, Shepelev VV, Pestryakov YuYa. Possibilities and advantages of minimally invasive dorsal decompression-stabilizing interventions in the treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis in patients of an older age group. Uspekhi gerontologii. 2019;32(1-2):189-197. (In Russ.)
  2. Fehlings MG, Tetreault L, Nater A, Choma T, Harrop J, Mroz T, Santaguida C, Smith JS. The Aging of the Global Population: The Changing Epidemiology of Disease and Spinal Disorders. Neurosurgery. 2015;77(Suppl 4):S1-S5. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0000000000000953
  3. Kreinest M, Rillig J, Grützner PA, Küffer M, Tinelli M, Matschke S. Analysis of complications and perioperative data after open or percutaneous dorsal instrumentation following traumatic spinal fracture of the thoracic and lumbar spine: a retrospective cohort study including 491 patients. European Spine Journal. 2017;26(5):1535-1540. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4911-8
  4. Kumar N, Malhotra R, Zaw AS, Maharajan K, Naresh N, Kumar A, Vellayappan B. Evolution in treatment strategy for metastatic spine disease: Presently evolving modalities. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2017;43(9):1784-1801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2017.05.006
  5. Pak LM, Fogel HA, Chaudhary MA, Kwon NK, Barton LB, Koehlmoos T, Haider AH, Schoenfeld AJ. Outpatient Spine Clinic Utilization is Associated with Reduced Emergency Department Visits Following Spine Surgery. Spine. 2018;43(14):E836-E841. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002529
  6. Grabel ZJ, Hart RA, Clark AJ, Park SH, Shaffrey CI, Scheer JK, Smith JS, Kelly MP, DePasse JM, Gupta MC, Ames CP, Daniels AH. Adult Spinal Deformity Knowledge in Orthopedic Spine Surgeons: Impact of Fellowship Training, Experience, and Practice Characteristics. Spine Deformity. 2018;6(1):60-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2017.06.003
  7. Weiner BK. Spine update: the biopsychosocial model and spine care. Spine. 2008;33(2):219-223. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181604572
  8. José-Antonio SS, Baabor-Aqueveque M, Silva-Morales F. Philosophy and concepts of modern spine surgery. Acta Neurochirurgica. Supplement. 2011;108:23-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-99370-5_5
  9. Byvaltsev VA, Kalinin AA. The possibilities of using minimally invasive dorsal decompressive-stabilizing interventions in patients with overweight and obesity. Voprosy nejrohirurgii im. N.N. Burdenko. 2018;5:69-80. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17116/neiro20188205169
  10. Bisson EF, Rajakumar DV, Mummaneni PV. Introduction. Minimally invasive spine surgery. Neurosurgical Focus. 2017;43(2):E1. https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.5.FOCUS17319
  11. Spetzger U, Von Schilling A, Winkler G, Wahrburg J, König A. The past, present and future of minimally invasive spine surgery: a review and speculative outlook. Minimally Invasive Therapy and Allied Technologies. 2013;22(4):227-241. https://doi.org/10.3109/13645706.2013.821414
  12. Virk SS, Yu E. The Top 50 Articles on Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery. Spine. 2017;42(7):513-519. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001797
  13. Yoon JW, Wang MY. The evolution of minimally invasive spine surgery. Journal of Neurosurgery. Spine. 2019;30:149-158.
  14. Boni L, Benevento A, Cantore F, Dionigi G, Rovera F, Dionigi R. Technological advances in minimally invasive surgery. Expert Review of Medical Devices. 2006;3(2):147-153. https://doi.org/10.1586/17434440.3.2.147
  15. Alexandre A, Masini M, Menchetti PPM. Advances in Minimally Invasive Surgery and Therapy for Spine and Nerves. Springer: Wien New York; 2011.
  16. McAfee PC, Phillips FM, Andersson G, Buvenenadran A, Kim CW, Lauryssen C, Isaacs RE, Youssef JA, Brodke DS, Cappuccino A, Akbarnia BA, Mundis GM, Smith WD, Uribe JS, Garfin S, Allen RT, Rodgers WB, Pimenta L, Taylor W. Minimally invasive spine surgery. Spine. 2010;35(26 Suppl):S271-S273. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31820250a2
  17. Oskouian RJ, Uribe JS. Introduction: minimally invasive spine surgery: the greatest advance in medicine? Neurosurgical Focus. 2013;35(2):Introduction. https://doi.org/10.3171/2013.6.FOCUS13251
  18. Smith ZA, Fessler RG. Paradigm changes in spine surgery: evolution of minimally invasive techniques. Nature Reviews Neurology. 2012;8(8):443-450. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2012.110
  19. Goldstein CL, Phillips FM, Rampersaud YR. Comparative Effectiveness and Economic Evaluations of Open Versus Minimally Invasive Posterior or Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review. Spine. 2016;41(Suppl 8):S74-S89. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001462
  20. Byvaltsev VA, Kalinin AA, Shepelev VV. Comparison of results and cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Vestnik Rossiyskoy akademii meditsinskikh nauk. 2019;74(2):125-135. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15690/vramn1093
  21. Sulaiman WA, Singh M. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis grades 1-2: patient-reported clinical outcomes and cost-utility analysis. Ochsner Journal. 2014;14:32-37.
  22. Sharif S, Afsar A. Learning Curve and Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery. World Neurosurgery. 2018;119:472-478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.06.094
  23. Smith BW, Joseph JR, Kirsch M, Strasser MO, Smith J, Park P. Minimally invasive guidewireless, navigated pedicle screw placement: a technical report and case series. Neurosurgical Focus. 2017;43(2):E9. https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.5.FOCUS17200
  24. Fourney DR, Dettori JR, Norvell DC, Dekutoski MB. Does minimal access tubular assisted spine surgery increase or decrease complications in spinal decompression or fusion? Spine. 2010;35(Suppl 9):S57-S65. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d82bb8
  25. Lin Y, Chen W, Chen A, Li F. Comparison between Minimally Invasive and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Metaanalysis of Clinical Results and Safety Outcomes. Journal of Neurological Surgery, Part A: Central European Neurosurgery. 2016;77(1):2-10. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1554809
  26. Bogduk N. Functional anatomy of the spine. Handbook of Clinical Neurology. 2016;136:675-688. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53486-6.00032-6
  27. Sakçı Z, Önen MR, Fidan E, Yaşar Y, Uluğ H, Naderi S. Radiologic Anatomy of the Lumbar Interlaminar Window and Surgical Considerations for Lumbar Interlaminar Endoscopic and Microsurgical Disc Surgery. World Neurosurgery. 2018;115:e22-e26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.03.049
  28. Overley SC, Cho SK, Mehta AI, Arnold PM. Navigation and Robotics in Spinal Surgery: Where Are We Now? Neurosurgery. 2017;80(3S):S86-S99. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyw077
  29. Cramer J, Quigley E, Hutchins T, Shah L. Educational Material for 3D Visualization of Spine Procedures: Methods for Creation and Dissemination. Journal of Digital Imaging. 2017;30(3):296-300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-017-9950-0
  30. Belykh E, Kalinin AA, Patel AA, Miller EJ, Bohl MA, Stepanov IA, Bardonova LA, Kerimbaev T, Asantsev AO, Giers MB, Preul MC, Byvaltsev VA. Apparent diffusion coefficient maps in the assessment of surgical patients with lumbar spine degeneration. PLoS One. 2017;12(8):e0183697. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.01836972017
  31. Rieger B. SENDS criteria from the diversification of MAST procedures. Implementation of preoperative simulation. Radiologe. 2015;55(10):878-885. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00117-015-0020-7
  32. Keric N, Doenitz C, Haj A, Rachwal-Czyzewicz I, Renovanz M, Wesp DMA, Boor S, Conrad J, Brawanski A, Giese A, Kantelhardt SR. Evaluation of robot-guided minimally invasive implantation of 2067 pedicle screws. Neurosurgical Focus. 2017;42(5):E11. https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.2.FOCUS16552
  33. Yoon JW, Chen RE, Han PK, Si P, Freeman WD, Pirris SM. Technical feasibility and safety of an intraoperative head-up display device during spine instrumentation. International Journal of Medical Robotics. 2017;13(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.1770
  34. Gautschi OP, Stienen MN, Corniola MV, Schaller K. Minimal invasive surgery: historical review, current status and perspective. Praxis. 2014;103(22):1323-1329. https://doi.org/10.1024/1661-8157/a001832
  35. Bryant J, Mohan R, Koottappillil B, Wong K, Yi PH. Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery: Analyzing Internet-based Education Material. Clinical Spine Surgery. 2018;31(3):E166-E170. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000000602
  36. Twitchell S, Karsy M, Reese J, Guan J, Couldwell WT, Dailey A, Bisson EF. Assessment of cost drivers and cost variation for lumbar interbody fusion procedures using the Value Driven Outcomes database. Neurosurgical Focus. 2018;44(5):E10. https://doi.org/10.3171/2018.1.FOCUS17724
  37. Smith DG. Viewpoint: envisioning the successful integration of EBM and humanism in the clinical encounter: fantasy or fallacy? Academic Medicine. 2008;83(3):268-273. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181637de4
  38. Saarni SI, Gylling HA. Evidence based medicine guidelines: a solution to rationing or politics disguised as science? Journal of Medical Ethics. 2004;30(2):171-175. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2003.003145
  39. Snyder LA, O’Toole J, Eichholz KM, Perez-Cruet MJ, Fessler R. The technological development of minimally invasive spine surgery. BioMed Research International. 2014;2014:293582. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/293582
  40. Andersson GB, Bridwell KH, Danielsson A, Dolan LA, Everett CR, Fisher CG, Mercado E, Mulpuri K, Richards BS, Rubery PT, Sponseller PD, Weinstein JN. Evidence-based medicine summary statement. Spine. 2007;32(19 Suppl):S64-S65. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e318134eb03
  41. Fisher CG, Vaccaro AR. Evidence-based medicine in spine surgery: a cross-sectional outcome analysis. Spine. 2015;40(5):E307-S308. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000000732
  42. Fehlings MG, Ahuja CS, Mroz T, Hsu W, Harrop J. Future Advances in Spine Surgery: The AOSpine North America Perspective. Neurosurgery. 2017;80(3S):S1-S8. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyw112
  43. Ascher PW, Heppner F. CO2-Laser in neurosurgery. Neurosurgical Review. 1984;7(2-3):123-133.
  44. Erbas YC, Pusat S, Erdogan E. Percutaneous Laser Disc Decompression: Retrospective Analysis of 197 Cases and Review of the Literature. Turkish Neurosurgery. 2015;25(5):766-770. https://doi.org/10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.14692-15.2
  45. Lee CH, Chung CK, Kim CH. The efficacy of conventional radiofrequency denervation in patients with chronic low back pain originating from the facet joints: a metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. Spine Journal. 2017;17(11):1770-1780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2017.05.006
  46. Scoville WB, Whitcomb BB. Lateral rupture of cervical intervertebral disks. Postgraduate Medicine. 1966;39(2):174-180. https://doi.org/10.1080/00325481.1966.11696921
  47. Adamson TE. Microendoscopic posterior cervical laminoforaminotomy for unilateral radiculopathy: results of a new technique in 100 cases. Journal of Neurosurgery. 2001;95(Suppl 1):51-57. https://doi.org/10.3171/spi.2001.95.1.0051
  48. Williams RW. Microlumbar discectomy: a conservative surgical approach to the virgin herniated lumbar disc. Spine. 1987;3(2):175-182.
  49. Palmer S, Turner R, Palmer R. Bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis involving a unilateral approach with microscope and tubular retractor system. Journal of Neurosurgery. 2002;97(Suppl 2):213-217. https://doi.org/10.3171/spi.2002.97.2.0213
  50. Thomé C, Zevgaridis D, Leheta O, Bäzner H, Pöckler-Schöniger C, Wöhrle J, Schmiedek P. Outcome after less-invasive decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized comparison of unilateral laminotomy, bilateral laminotomy, and laminectomy. Journal of Neurosurgery. Spine. 2005;3(2):129-141. https://doi.org/10.3171/spi.2005.3.2.0129
  51. Faubert C, Caspar W. Lumbar percutaneous discectomy. Initial experience in 28 cases. Neuroradiology. 1991;33(5):407-410. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00598613
  52. Koebbe CJ, Maroon JC, Abla A, El-Kadi H, Bost J. Lumbar microdiscectomy: a historical perspective and current technical considerations. Neurosurgical Focus. 2002;13(2):E3.
  53. Fang HSY, Ong GB. Direct anterior approach to the upper cervical spine. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume. 1962;44:1588-1604.
  54. Frempong-Boadu AK, Faunce WA, Fessler RG. Endoscopically assisted transoral-transpharyngeal approach to the craniovertebral junction. Neurosurgery. 2002;51(Suppl 5):S60-S66.
  55. Jacobeus HC. Possibility of the use of the cystoscope for investigation of serous cavities. Münchener Medizinische Wochenschrift. 1910;57:2090-2092.
  56. Lall RR, Smith ZA, Wong AP, Miller D, Fessler RG. Minimally invasive thoracic corpectomy: surgical strategies for malignancy, trauma, and complex spinal pathologies. Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery. 2012;2012:213791. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/213791
  57. Lehman RA, Vaccaro AR, Bertagnoli R, Kuklo TR. Standard and minimally invasive approaches to the spine. Orthopedic Clinics of North America. 2005;36(3):281-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocl.2005.02.012
  58. Mack MJ, Regan JJ, Bobechko WP, Acuff TE. Application of thoracoscopy for diseases of the spine. Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 1993;56(3):736-738. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4975(93)90966-l
  59. Jho HD. Endoscopic microscopic transpedicular thoracic discectomy. Technical note. Journal of Neurosurgery. 1997;87(1):125-129. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1997.87.1.0125
  60. Benzel EC, Perry TG. Minimally invasive thoracic microendoscopic diskectomy: a tool for all surgeons? World Neurosurgery. 2013;80(3-4):319-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2013.01.059
  61. Wong AP, Lall RR, Dahdaleh NS, Lawton CD, Smith ZA, Wong RH, Harvey MJ, Lam S, Koski TR, Fessler RG. Comparison of open and minimally invasive surgery for intradural-extramedullary spine tumors. Neurosurgical Focus. 2015;39(2):E11. https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.5.FOCUS15129
  62. Hijikata S, Yamagishi M, Nakayama T, Oomori K. Percutaneous discectomy: a new treatment method for lumbar disc herniation. Journal of the Tokyo Den-ryoku Hospital. 1975;5:39-44.
  63. Forst R, Hausmann B. Nucleoscopy — a new examination technique. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery. 1983;101(3):219-221.
  64. Kambin P, Zhou L. History and current status of percutaneous arthroscopic disc surgery. Spine. 1996;21(Suppl 24):57S-61S. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199612151-00006
  65. Mayer HM, Brock M. Percutaneous endoscopic discectomy: surgical technique and preliminary results compared to microsurgical discectomy. Journal of Neurosurgery. 1993;78(2):216-225. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1993.78.2.0216
  66. Mathews HH. Transforaminal endoscopic microdiscectomy. Neurosurgery Clinics of North America.1996;7(1):59-63.
  67. Ditsworth DA. Endoscopic transforaminal lumbar discectomy and reconfiguration: a postero-lateral approach into the spinal canal. Surgical Neurology. 1998;49(6):588-597. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0090-3019(98)00004-4
  68. Foley KT, Smith MM, Rampersaud YR. Microendoscopic approach to far-lateral lumbar disc herniation. Neurosurgical Focus. 1999;7(5):e5. https://doi.org/10.3171/foc.1999.7.6.6
  69. Ahn Y, Lee SH, Lee JH, Kim JU, Liu WC. Transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for upper lumbar disc herniation: clinical outcome, prognostic factors, and technical considerations. Acta Neurochirurgica. 2009;151(3):199-206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-009-0204-x
  70. Ruetten S, Komp M, Merk H, Godolias G. A new fullendoscopic technique for cervical posterior foraminotomy in the treatment of lateral disc herniations using 6.9-mm endoscopes: prospective 2-year results of 87 patients. Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery. 2007;50(4):219-226. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-985860
  71. Ruetten S, Komp M, Merk H, Godolias G. Full-endoscopic interlaminar and transforaminal lumbar discectomy versus conventional microsurgical technique: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Spine. 2008;33(9):931-939. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816c8af7
  72. Yeung AT, Tsou PM. Posterolateral endoscopic excision for lumbar disc herniation: surgical technique, outcome and complications in 307 consecutive cases. Spine. 2002;27(7):722-731. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200204010-00009
  73. Wiltse LL, Spencer CW. New uses and refinements of the paraspinal approach to the lumbar spine. Spine. 1988;13(6):696-706.
  74. Guiroy A, Sícoli A, Masanés NG, Ciancio AM, Gagliardi M, Falavigna A. How to perform the Wiltse posterolateral spinal approach: Technical note. Surgical Neurology International. 2018;9:38. https://doi.org/10.4103/sni.sni_344_17
  75. Kambin P, Brager MD. Percutaneous posterolateral discectomy. Anatomy and mechanism. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 1987;223:145-154.
  76. Gerges FJ, Lipsitz SR, Nedeljkovic SS. A systematic review on the effectiveness of the Nucleoplasty procedure for discogenic pain. Pain Physician. 2010;13(2):117-132.
  77. Rooij JD, Gadjradj PS, Soria van Hoeve JS, Huygen FJ, Aukes HA, Harhangi BS. Percutaneous Nucleoplasty for the Treatment of a Contained Cervical Disk Herniation. Clinical Spine Surgery. 2017;30(9):389-391. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000000583
  78. Haji FA, Cenic A, Crevier L, Murty N, Reddy K. Minimally invasive approach for the resection of spinal neoplasm. Spine. 2011;36(15):E1018-E1026. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31820019f9
  79. Verdú-López F, Vanaclocha-Vanaclocha V, Mayorga-Villa JD. Minimally invasive spine surgery in spinal infections. Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences. 2017;61(3):303-315. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0390-5616.16.03911-4
  80. Fessler RG, O’Toole JE, Eichholz KM, Perez-Cruet MJ. The development of minimally invasive spine surgery. Neurosurgery Clinics of North America. 2006;17(4):401-409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nec.2006.06.007
  81. Galibert P, Deramond H. Percutaneous acrylic vertebroplasty as a treatment of vertebral angioma as well as painful and debilitating diseases. Chirurgie. 1990;116(3):326-334.
  82. Garfin SR, Yuan HA, Reiley MA. New technologies in spine: kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty for the treatment of painful osteoporotic compression fractures. Spine. 2001;26(14):1511-1515. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200107150-00002
  83. Konovalov NA, Nazarenko AG, Asyutin DS, Zelenkov PV, Onoprienko RA, Korolishin VA, Cherkiev IU, Martynova MA, Zakirov BA, Timonin SYu, Kosyrkova AV, Pimenova LF, Pogosyan AL, Batyrov AA. Modern methods of treatment of degenerative diseases of the intervertebral disk. Literature review. Voprosy neirokhirurgii im. N.N. Burdenko. 2016;80(4):102-108. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17116/neiro2016804102-108
  84. Filippiadis DK, Marcia S, Masala S, Deschamps F, Kelekis A. Percutaneous Vertebroplasty and Kyphoplasty: Current Status, New Developments and Old Controversies. CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology. 2017;40(12):1815-1823. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-017-1779-x
  85. Semaan H, Obri T, Bazerbashi M, Paull D, Liu X, Sarrouj M, Elgafy H. Clinical outcome and subsequent sequelae of cement extravasation after percutaneous kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty: a comparative review. Acta Radiologica. 2018;59(7):861-868. https://doi.org/10.1177/0284185117732599
  86. Magerl FP. Stabilization of the lower thoracic and lumbar spine with external skeletal fixation. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 1984;189:125-141.
  87. Foley KT, Gupta SK, Justis JR, Sherman MC. Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation of the lumbar spine. Neurosurgical Focus. 2001;10(4):E10.
  88. Volkov IV, Karabaev ISh, Ptashnikov DA, Konovalov NA, Khlebov VV. Diagnosis and interventional treatment of pain syndromes after surgical interventions for degenerative-dystrophic diseases of the lumbar spine. Voprosy neirokhirurgii im. N.N. Burdenko. 2018;82(5):55-61. (In Russ.)
  89. Senoglu M, Karadag A, Kinali B, Bozkurt B, Middlebrooks EH, Grande AW. Cortical Bone Trajectory Screw for Lumbar Fixation: A Quantitative Anatomic and Morphometric Evaluation. World Neurosurgery. 2017;103:694-701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.03.137
  90. Wang MY, Ludwig SC, Anderson DG, Mummaneni PV. Percutaneous iliac screw placement: description of a new minimally invasive technique. Neurosurgical Focus. 2008;25(2):E17. https://doi.org/10.3171/FOC/2008/25/8/E17
  91. Khoo LT, Palmer S, Laich DT, Fessler RG. Minimally invasive percutaneous posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Neurosurgery. 2002;51(Suppl 5):S166-S181.
  92. Holly LT, Schwender JD, Rouben DP, Foley KT. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: indications, technique, and complications. Neurosurgical Focus. 2006;20(3):E6.
  93. Khan NR, Clark AJ, Lee SL, Venable GT, Rossi NB, Foley KT. Surgical Outcomes for Minimally Invasive vs Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: An Updated Systematic Review and Metaanalysis. Neurosurgery. 2015;77(6):847-874. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0000000000000913
  94. Xie L, Wu WJ, Liang Y. Comparison between Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Conventional Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: An Updated Metaanalysis. Chinese Medical Journal. 2016;129:1969-1986. https://doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.187847
  95. Wang MY, Chang PY, Grossman J. Development of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) approach for lumbar spinal fusion. Journal of Neurosurgery. Spine. 2017;26:411-418. https://doi.org/10.3171/2016.9.SPINE16375
  96. Obenchain TG. Laparoscopic lumbar discectomy: case report. Journal of Laparoendoscopic Surgery. 1991;1(3):145-149.
  97. Albee FH. Transplantation of a portion of the tibia into the spine for Pott’s disease: a preliminary report 1911. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2007;460:14-16. https://doi.org/10.1097/BLO.0b013e3180686a0f
  98. lwahara T. A new method of vertebral body fusion. Surgery. 1944;271:8.
  99. Mayer HM. A new microsurgical technique for minimally invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine. 1997;22(6):691-699. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199703150-00023
  100. McAfee PC, Regan JJ, Geis WP, Fedder IL. Minimally invasive anterior retroperitoneal approach to the lumbar spine. Emphasis on the lateral BAK. Spine. 1998;23(13):1476-1484. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199807010-00009
  101. Pimenta L, Schaffa TL. Lateral endoscopic transpsoas retroperitoneal approach for lumbar spine surgery. Paper presented at the VIII Brazilian Spine Society Meeting. Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil 2001; 2001.
  102. Ozgur BM, Aryan HE, Pimenta L, Taylor WR. Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF): a novel surgical technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion. The Spine Journal. 2006;6(4):435-443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2005.08.012
  103. Kotwal S, Kawaguchi S, Lebl D, Hughes A, Huang R, Sama A, Cammisa F, Girardi F. Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Clinical and Radiographic Outcome at a Minimum 2-year Follow-up. Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques. 2015;28(4):119-125. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182706ce7
  104. Salzmann SN, Shue J, Hughes AP. Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion-Outcomes and Complications. Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine. 2017;10(4):539-546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-017-9444-1
  105. Silvestre C, Mac-Thiong JM, Hilmi R, Roussouly P. Complications and Morbidities of Mini-open Anterior Retroperitoneal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion in 179 Patients. Asian Spine Journal. 2012;6(2):89-97. https://doi.org/10.4184/asj.2012.6.2.89
  106. Li JX, Phan K, Mobbs R. Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Technical Aspects, Operative Outcomes, and Complications. World Neurosurgery. 2017;98:113-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2016.10.074
  107. Marotta N, Cosar M, Pimenta L, Khoo LT. A novel minimally invasive presacral approach and instrumentation technique for anterior L5-S1 intervertebral discectomy and fusion: Technical description and case presentations. Neurosurgical Focus. 2006;20:E9.
  108. Aryan HE, Newman CB, Gold JJ, Acosta FL, Coover C, Ames CP. Percutaneous axial lumbar interbody fusion (AxiaLIF) of the L5-S1 segment: Initial clinical and radiographic experience. Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery. 2008;51:225-230. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1080915

Close metadata

Contact the author
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

Contact us
If you have any questions, complaints or suggestions, please use this feedback form.
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.
Submit Application

You can become an author of one of our magazines, send a request and we will consider it in during the day.

Name
Phone
E-mail
Message
Login
Registration
E-mail
Password
Forgot Password?

Log in to the site using your account in one of the services

Password recovery
E-mail
Login
Register

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.