The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Kutlubaev M.A.

Bashkir State Medical University

Mustafina I.A.

Bashkir State Medical University

Lyutov O.V.

Bashkir State Medical University

Karimova G.I.

Bashkir State Medical University

Rakhmatullin A.R.

Bashkir State Medical University

Digital technologies in the assessment of neurological status

Authors:

Kutlubaev M.A., Mustafina I.A., Lyutov O.V., Karimova G.I., Rakhmatullin A.R.

More about the authors

Read: 2264 times


To cite this article:

Kutlubaev MA, Mustafina IA, Lyutov OV, Karimova GI, Rakhmatullin AR. Digital technologies in the assessment of neurological status. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2023;123(6):129‑134. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/jnevro2023123061129

Recommended articles:
Cognitive impairment in patients with multiple scle­rosis. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2025;(4-2):67-73
Diagnosis and treatment of ovarian cancer in pregnancy. Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2025;(3):27-33
Remote technologies in the mana­gement of patients with vestibular pathology. Russian Bulletin of Otorhinolaryngology. 2025;(3):53-59
Changes in diagnosis-related group payment model in the Russian Fede­ration in 2025. Medi­cal Technologies. Asse­ssment and Choice. 2025;(2):18-30
Sacral dysmorphism in patients with traumatology and orthopedics. Russian Journal of Operative Surgery and Clinical Anatomy. 2025;(2):30-37

References:

  1. Digital Economy of the Russian Federation. [archive]. The link is active on 12/26/2022. (In Russ.). https://digital.gov.ru/ru/activity/directions/858/
  2. Safavi K, Mathews SC, Bates DW, et al. Top-Funded Digital Health Companies And Their Impact On High-Burden, High-Cost Conditions. Health Aff (Millwood). 2019;38(1):115-123.  https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05081
  3. Rahmatullin AR, Kutlubaev MA. An analysis of clinical and laboratory characteristics of patients with ischemic stroke and COVID-19. Zhurnal Nevrologii i Psikhiatrii im. S.S. Korsakova. 2022;122(11-2):34-37. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/jnevro202212211234
  4. Cohen AB, Nahed BV. The Digital Neurologic Examination. Digit Biomark. 2021;5(1):114-126.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000515577
  5. Petukhova NV, Farkhadov MP, Zamegrad MV, Grachev SP. Digital technologies in the diagnosis and treatment of neurological diseases. Nevrologiya, neiropsikhiatriya, psikhosomatika = Neurology, Neuropsychiatry, Psychosomatics. 2019;11(4):104-110. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.14412/2074-2711-2019-4-104-110
  6. Jongstra S, Wijsman LW, Cachucho R, et al. Cognitive Testing in People at Increased Risk of Dementia Using a Smartphone App: The iVitality Proof-of-Principle Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017;5(5):e68.  https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.6939
  7. Chinner A, Blane J, Lancaster C, et al. Digital technologies for the assessment of cognition: a clinical review. Evid Based Ment Health. 2018;21(2):67-71.  https://doi.org/10.1136/eb-2018-102890
  8. Piau A, Wild K, Mattek N, Kaye J. Current State of Digital Biomarker Technologies for Real-Life, Home-Based Monitoring of Cognitive Function for Mild Cognitive Impairment to Mild Alzheimer Disease and Implications for Clinical Care: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(8):e12785. https://doi.org/10.2196/12785
  9. Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. Patient-Focused Drug Development: Collecting Comprehensive and Representative. Input. 2020. Accessed on 1 June 2022. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/patient-focuseddrug-development-collecting-comprehensive-and-representative-input
  10. Ding Z, Lee TL, Chan AS. Digital Cognitive Biomarker for Mild Cognitive Impairments and Dementia: A Systematic Review. J Clin Med. 2022;11(14):4191. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11144191
  11. Harms RL, Ferrari A, Meier IB, et al. Digital biomarkers and sex impacts in Alzheimer’s disease management — potential utility for innovative 3P medicine approach. EPMA J. 2022;13(2):299-313.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13167-022-00284-3
  12. Milne R, Costa A, Brenman N. Digital Phenotyping and the (Data) Shadow of Alzheimer’s Disease. Big Data & Society, Jan. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211070748
  13. Alfalahi H, Khandoker AH, Chowdhury N, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of keystroke dynamics as digital biomarkers for fine motor decline in neuropsychiatric disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):7690. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-11865-7
  14. Brouillette RM, Foil H, Fontenot S, et al. Feasibility, reliability, and validity of a smartphone based application for the assessment of cognitive function in the elderly. PLoS One. 2013;8(6):e65925. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065925
  15. Zhou H, Park C, Shahbazi M, et al. Digital Biomarkers of Cognitive Frailty: The Value of Detailed Gait Assessment Beyond Gait Speed. Gerontology. 2022;68(2):224-233.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000515939
  16. Giaquinto F, Battista P, Angelelli P. Touchscreen Cognitive Tools for Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia Used in Primary Care Across Diverse Cultural and Literacy Populations: A Systematic Review. J Alzheimers Dis. 2022;90(4):1359-1380. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-220547
  17. Beattie ZT, Gothard S, Barnes LL, et al. The Collaboration and Harmonization of Digital Biomarkers for Alzheimer’s Research. Alzheimers Dement. 2022;18(suppl 2):e067984. https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.067984
  18. Snitz K, Perl O, Honigstein D, et al. SmellSpace: An Odor-Based Social Network as a Platform for Collecting Olfactory Perceptual Data. Chem Senses. 2019;44(4):267-278.  https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjz014
  19. Snitz K, Honigstein D, Weissgross R, et al. An olfactory self-test effectively screens for COVID-19. Commun Med (Lond). 2022;2:34.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-022-00095-7
  20. Yuen J, Pike S, Khachikyan S, Nallasamy S. Telehealth in Ophthalmology. In: Linwood SL, editor. Digital Health [Internet]. Brisbane (AU): Exon Publications; 2022 Apr 29. Chapter 4. 
  21. Muhsen S, Roto A, Al-Sabbagh MQ, et al. Smartphone ophthalmoscopy versus slit-lamp biomicroscopy for optic nerve head evaluation: A digital apparatus into medical education. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2022;11206721221113827. https://doi.org/10.1177/11206721221113827
  22. Hu T, Wang X, Xu H. Eye-Tracking in Interpreting Studies: A Review of Four Decades of Empirical Studies. Front Psychol. 2022;13:872247. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.872247
  23. Azri M, Young S, Lin H, et al. Diagnosis of Ocular Myasthenia Gravis by means of tracking eye parameters. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2014;2014:1460-1464. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2014.6943876
  24. Nguyen MNL, van der Walt A, Fielding J, et al. Tracking Eye Movements for Diagnosis in Myasthenia Gravis: A Comprehensive Review. J Neuroophthalmol. 2022;42(4):428-441.  https://doi.org/10.1097/WNO.0000000000001668
  25. Cohen M, Hesse S, Polet K, et al. Lebrun-Frenay C. Reliability of mobile video-oculography in multiple sclerosis patients using an iPad: A prospective validation study. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2022;64:103944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2022.103944
  26. Morisada MV, Tollefson TT, Shaye DA, Steele TO. The digital doctor: telemedicine in facial plastic surgery. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021;29(4):271-276.  https://doi.org/10.1097/MOO.0000000000000722
  27. Miotto R, Danieletto M, Scelza JR, et al. Reflecting health: smart mirrors for personalized medicine. NPJ Digit Med. 2018;1:62.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-018-0068-7
  28. de Sire A, Marotta N, Agostini F, et al. Telerehabilitation Approach to Chronic Facial Paralysis in the COVID-19 Pandemic Scenario: What Role for Electromyography Assessment? J Pers Med. 2022;12(3):497.  https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12030497
  29. Wasmann JW, Pragt L, Eikelboom R, Swanepoel W. Digital Approaches to Automated and Machine Learning Assessments of Hearing: Scoping Review. J Med Internet Res. 2022;24(2):e32581. https://doi.org/10.2196/32581
  30. Whitton JP, Hancock KE, Shannon JM, Polley DB. Validation of a Self-Administered Audiometry Application: An Equivalence Study. Laryngoscope. 2016;126(10):2382-2388. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.25988
  31. Kumar D, Dutta A, Das A, et al. SmartEye: Developing a Novel Eye Tracking System for Quantitative Assessment of Oculomotor Abnormalities. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2016;24(10):1051-1059. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2016.2518222
  32. Zhang Y, Wang H, Yao Y, et al. Walking stability in patients with benign paroxysmal positional vertigo: an objective assessment using wearable accelerometers and machine learning. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2021;18(1):56.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-021-00854-y
  33. Yamanobe Y, Fujioka M, Ohashi M, Ozawa H. Potential Usefulness of Tracking Head Movement via a Wearable Device for Equilibrium Function Testing at Home. J Med Syst. 2022;46(11):80.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-022-01874-4
  34. Cadogan A, Laslett M, Hing W, et al. Reliability of a new hand-held dynamometer in measuring shoulder range of motion and strength. Man Ther. 2011;16(1):97-101.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2010.05.005
  35. Shin SH, Ro du H, Lee OS, et al. Within-day reliability of shoulder range of motion measurement with a smartphone. Man Ther. 2012;17(4):298-304.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2012.02.010
  36. Fanella G, De Salvo G, Frasca V, et al. Inghilleri, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS): Telemedicine system for home care and patient monitoring. Clinical Neurophysiology. 2019;130(1):9-10.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2018.09.066
  37. Riddhi D, Jebasingh F, Thomas N, et al. NEURO TOUCH: A novel digital device for assessment and screening of peripheral neuropathy. Foot (Edinb). 2022;51:101888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foot.2021.101888
  38. Shetty A, Delanerolle G, Zeng Y, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of digital application use in clinical research in pain medicine. Front Digit Health. 2022;4:850601. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2022.850601
  39. Hoang TH, Zehni M, Xu H, et al. Towards a Comprehensive Solution for a Vision-Based Digitized Neurological Examination. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2022;26(8):4020-4031. https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2022.3167927
  40. Haji Mukhti MI, Ibrahim MI, Tengku Ismail TA, et al. Exploring the Need for Mobile Application in Stroke Management by Informal Caregivers: A Qualitative Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(19):12959. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912959
  41. Carlin R, Zhang N, Demaerschalk BM. Validation of the Telestroke Mimic Score in Mayo Clinic Population. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2021;30(10):106021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.106021

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.