Methods of assessment of movement functions in the upper limb

Prokopenko S.V.; Mozheĭko E.Iu.; Alekseevich G.V.

doi:https://doi.org/10.17116/jnevro201611671101-107

Close metadata

Recommended articles:

Validation of ballistocardiography data for predicting the sleep efficiency in healthy individuals and patients with insomnia. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2024;(10):60-66

The influence of hydrokinesitherapy on motor and cardiorespiratory functions in hereditary myopathy of childhood. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2024;(11-2):88-95

Stroke: current state of the problem. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2024;(11):7-18

Evaluation of the effectiveness of the drug Cortexin in combination with the use of the application Aphasia.No (Afaziyam.Net) in the correction of speech disorders in patients with cerebral infarction. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2024;(11):147-151

Dynamics of motor and functional disorders in the early recovery period after ischemic stroke. Problems of Balneology, Physiotherapy and Exercise Therapy. 2024;(5):13-22

Rehabilitation potential of patients with ischemic heart disease who underwent autovenous coronary artery bypass surgery in the evaluation of rehabilitation treatment effectiveness. Problems of Balneology, Physiotherapy and Exercise Therapy. 2024;(5):29-39

Impact of various rehabilitation programs on anxiety and depression after surgery of early-stage cervical cancer. Problems of Balneology, Physiotherapy and Exercise Therapy. 2024;(5):40-44

Electromagnetic stimulation in diaphragm dysfunction: repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation as a method of choice during the rehabilitation period after stroke. (Literature review). Problems of Balneology, Physiotherapy and Exercise Therapy. 2024;(5):57-65

Efficiency of complex medical rehabilitation after pulmonary endarterectomy. Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2024;(6):629-636

Sanogenetic commonality of ultraviolet irradiation of blood and intravenous ozone therapy. Choice of the optimal method of this impact for rehabilitation of patients after nephrolitholapaxy. Regenerative Biotechnologies, Preventive, Digital and Predictive Medicine. 2024;(4):95-99

Abstract:

An analysis of the results of domestic and foreign studies as well as the own data on the movement impairment in the paretic arm due to the stroke is presented. Advantages and shortcomings of commonly used scales for the assessment of upper limb functioning and possibilities of their using in different stages of stroke are analyzed.

Keywords:

stroke

hemiparesis

rehabilitation

assessment of movement disorders

learned nonuse

the Fugl-Meyer Assesment Upper Extremity

the Wolf Motor Function Test

the Nine-Hole Peg Test

motor assessment

Authors:

Prokopenko S.V.

Kafedra nervnykh bolezneĭ, traditsionnoĭ meditsiny Krasnoiarskogo gosudarstvennogo meditsinskogo universiteta im. prof. V.F. Voĭno-Iasenetskogo, Krasnoiarsk

Mozheĭko E.Iu.

Kafedra nervnykh bolezneĭ, traditsionnoĭ meditsiny Krasnoiarskogo gosudarstvennogo meditsinskogo universiteta im. prof. V.F. Voĭno-Iasenetskogo, Krasnoiarsk

Alekseevich G.V.

Voino-Yasenetsky Krasnoyarsk State Medical University, Krasnoyarsk, Russia

Close metadata

References:

Stahovskaja LV, Klochihina OA, Bogatyreva MD, Kovalenko VV. Jepidemiologija insul'ta v Rossii po rezul'tatam territorial'no-populjacionnogo registra (2009-2010). Zhurnal nevrologii i psihiatrii im. C.C. Korsakova. 2013;113(5):4-10. (In Russ.).
Prokopenko SV, Mozhejko EJu, Alekseevich GV. Vozmozhnosti vosstanovlenija tonkoj motoriki kisti s ispol'zovaniem sensornoj perchatki u bol'nyh, perenesshih insul't. Sibirskoe medicinskoe obozrenie. 2014;2:72-77. (In Russ.).
Lin K, Chuang L, Wu C, Hsieh Y, Chang W. Responsiveness and validity of three dexterous function measures in stroke rehabilitation. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development. 2010;47(6):563-572. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2009.09.0155.
Dean CM, Mackey FH. Motor assessment scale scores as a measure of rehabilitation outcome following stroke. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy. 1992;38:31-35. doi: 10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60548-1.
Kadykov AS, Chernikova LA, Shahporonova NV. Reabilitacija nevrologicheskih bol'nyh. M.: MEDpress-inform; 2008. (In Russ.).
Crow JL, Kwakkel G, Bussmann JB, Goos JA, Harmeling-van der Wel. Are the hierarchical properties of the Fugl-Meyer assessment scale the same in acute stroke and chronic stroke? Phys Ther. 2014;94(7):977-986. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20130170.
Woodbury ML, Velozo CA, Richards LG, Duncan PW, Studenski S, Sue-Min Lai. Longitudinal Stability of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89:1563-1569. doi.10.1016/j.apmr.2007.12.041.
Duncan PW, Propst M, Nelson SG. Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Sensorimotor Recovery Following Cerebrovascular Accident. Physical Therapy. 1983;63:1606-1610.
Lewis C, Shaw K. Motor Assessment for Patients With Stroke. Physical Therapy & Rehab Medicine. 2007;18:16:8.
Gladstone DJ, Danells CJ, Black SE. The Fugl-Meyer assessment of motor recovery after stroke: a critical review of its measurement properties. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2002;16(3):232-240. doi: 10.1177/154596802401105171.
Velozo CA, Woodbury ML. Translating measurement findings into rehabilitation practice: an example using Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity with patients following stroke. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development. 2011;48(10):1211-1222. doi.10.1682/jrrd.2010.10.0203jsp.
Carole L, Keiba S. The Fugl-Meyer Assessment After Stroke. Physical Therapy & Rehab Medicine. 2007;18(8):9.
Crow JL, Harmeling-van der Wel BC. Hierarchical Properties of the Motor Function Sections of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale for People After Stroke: A Retrospective Study. Phys Ther. 2008;88(12):1554-1567. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20070186.
Pickering RL, Hubbard IJ, Baker KG, Parsons MW. Assessment of the upper limb in acute stroke: The validity of hierarchal scoring for the Motor Assessment Scale. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal. 2010;57:174-182. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1630.2009.00810.x.
Rabadi MH, Rabadi FM. Comparison of the action research arm test and the Fugl-Meyer assessment as measures of upper-extremity motor weakness after stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2006;87(7):962-966. doi.10.1016/j.apmr.2006.02.036.
Belov AN, Prokopenko SV. Nejroreabilitacija. 3-e izd., pererab. i dop. M. 2010. (In Russ.).
Page SJ, Fulk GD, Boyne P. Clinically Important Differences for the Upper-Extremity Fugl-Meyer Scale in People With Minimal to Moderate Impairment Due to Chronic Stroke. Physical Therapy. 2012;92(6):791-798. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20110009.
Bogard K, Wolf S, Zhang Q, Thompson P, Morris D, Nichols-Larsen D. Can the Wolf Motor Function Test Be Streamlined? Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009;23:422. doi: 10.1177/1545968308331141.
Woodbury M, Velozo CA, Thompson PA, Light K, Uswatte G, Taub E, Winstein CJ, Morris D, Blanton S, Nichols-Larsen DS, Wolf SL. Measurement Structure of the Wolf Motor Function Test: Implications for Motor Control Theory. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010;24(9):791-801. doi: 10.1177/1545968310370749.
Ching-yi Wu, Tiffany Fu, Keh-chung Lin, Chi-tzu Feng, Kuang-ping Hsieh, Hung-wen Yu, Chia-huang Lin, Ching-ju Hsieh. Assessing the Streamlined Wolf Motor Function Test as an Outcome Measure for Stroke Rehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011;25:19. doi: 10.1177/1545968310381249.
Wolf SL, Catlin PA, Ellis M, Archer AL, Morgan B, Piacentino A. Assessing Wolf Motor Function Test as Outcome Measure for Research in Patients After. Stroke. 2001;32:1635-1639. doi: 10.1161/01.str.32.7.1635.
Carr JH, Shepherd RB, Nordholm L, Lynne D. Investigation of a New Motor Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients. Phys Ther. 1985;65(2):175-180.
McDonnell M. Action Research Arm Test. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy. 2008;54:220. doi.10.1016/s0004-9514(08)70034-5.
Loewen SC, Anderson BA. Reliability of the Modified Motor Assessment Scale and the Barthel Index. Phys Ther. 1988;68(7):1077-1081.
Neurology section outcome measures recommendations. Available at: http://www.neuropt.org/go/healthcare-professionals/neurology-section-outcome-measures-recommendations. Accessed april 13, 2015.
Putilina MV. Osobennosti kombinirovannoj nejroprotektornoj terapii ostryh narushenij mozgovogo krovoobrashhenija. Russkij medicinskij zhurnal. 2009;9(4):261-266. (In Russ.).
Chen HM, Chen CC, Hsueh I P, Huang SL, Hsieh CL. Test-retest reproducibility and smallest real difference of 5 hand function tests in patients with stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009;23(5):435-440. doi: 10.1177/1545968308331146.
Bot SD, Terwee CB, van der Windt DA, Bouter LM, Dekker J, de Vet HC. Clinimetric evaluation of shoulder disability questionnaires: a systematic review of the literature. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2004;63(4):335-341. doi: 10.1136/ard.2003.007724.
Uswatte G, Taub E, Morris D, Vignolo M, McCulloch K. Reliability and Validity of the Upper-Extremity Motor Activity Log-14 for Measuring Real-World Arm Use. Stroke. 2005;36:2493-2496. doi: 10.1161/01.str.0000185928.90848.2e.
Bernspang B, Asplund K, Eriksson S, Fugl-Meyer AR. Motor and perceptual impairments in acute stroke patients: effects on self-care ability. Stroke. 1987;18:1081-1086. doi: 10.1161/01.str.18.6.1081.
Lin KC, Chuang LL, Wu CY, Hsieh YW, Chang WY. Responsiveness and validity of three dexterous function measures in stroke rehabilitation. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2010;47(6):563-571. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2009.09.0155.
Slota GP, Enders LR, Na Jin Seo. Improvement of hand function using different surfaces and identification of difficult movement post stroke in the Box and Block Test. Applied Ergonomics. 2013;45(4):833-838. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2013.10.014.
Desrosiers J, Bravo G, Hébert R, Dutil E, Mercier L. Validation of the Box and Block Test as a measure of dexterity of elderly people: reliability, validity, and norms studies. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75(7):751-755.
van der Lee JH, Beckerman H, Knol DL, de Vet HCW, Bouter LM. Clinimetric Properties of the Motor Activity Log for the Assessment of Arm Use in Hemiparetic Patients.Stroke. 2004;35:1410-1414. doi: 10.1161/01.str.0000126900.24964.7e.
Canny ML, Thompson JM, Wheeler MJ. Reliability of the Box and Block Test of Manual Dexterity for Use With Patients With Fibromyalgia. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2009;63(4):506-510. doi.10.5014/ajot.63.4.506.
Bohannon RW, Smith MB. Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. Phys Ther. 1987;67(2): 206-207.
Ansari NN, Naghdi S, Hasson S, Mousakhani A, Nouriyan A, Omidvar Z. Inter-rater reliability of the Modified Modified Ashworth Scale as a clinical tool in measurements of post-stroke elbow flexor spasticity. Neuro Rehabilitation. 2009;24(3):225-229. doi: 10.3233/NRE-2009-0472.
Haugh AB, Pandyan AD, Johnson GR. A systematic review of the Tardieu Scale for the measurement of spasticity. Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28(15):899-907. doi: 10.1080/09638280500404305.
Mehrholz J, Wagner K, Meissner D, Grundmann K, Zange C, Koch R, Pohl M. Reliability of the Modified Tardieu Scale and the Modified Ashworth Scale in adult patients with severe brain injury: a comparison study. Clin Rehabil. 2005;19(7):751-759. doi: 10.1191/0269215505cr889oa.
Annechien B, Tommy RL. Grip strength ratio: a grip strength measurement that correlates well with DASH score in different hand/wrist conditions. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2014;15:336. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-336.
Gummesson C, Atroshi I, Ekdahl C. The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) outcome questionnaire: longitudinal construct validity and measuring self-rated health change after surgery. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2003;4:11.
Forget NJ, Jerosch-Herold C, Shepstone L, Higgins J. Psychometric evaluation of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) with Dupuytren’s contracture: validity evidence using Rasch modeling. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2014;15:361. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-361.
Veehof MM, Sleegers EJ, van Veldhoven NH, Schuurman AH, van Meeteren NL. Psychometric qualities of the Dutch language version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (DASH-DLV). Journal of Hand Ther. 2002;15:347-354. doi.10.1016/s0894-1130(02)80006-0.
Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Am J Ind Med. 1996;29(6):602-608. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0274(199606)29:6<602::aid-ajim4>3.0.co;2-l.
Carr J, Shepherd R. Modified Motor Assessment Scale. Phys Ther. 1989;69:780.
Davit O. Abrahamyan MD, Yaghjyan G. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand. Institute for work & health, plastic reconstructive surgery and microsurgery center, university hospital No 1. 2006. Available at: http://dash.iwh.on.ca/system/files/translations/DASH_Russian.pdf
Uswatte G, Taub E, Morris D, Light K, Thompson PA. The Motor Activity Log-28: assessing daily use of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. Neurology. 2006;67(7):1189-1194. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000238164.90657.c2.
Atroshi I, Gummesson C, Andersson B, Dahlgren E, Johansson A. The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) outcome questionnaire: reliability and validity of the Swedish version evaluated in 176 patients. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000;71(6):613-618. doi: 10.1080/000164700317362262.
Beaton D E, Wright JG, Katz JN, Amadio P, Bombardier C, Cole D, Davis A, Hudak P, Marx R, Hawker G, Makela M, Punnett L. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group. Development of the QuickDASH: comparison of three item-reduction approaches. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(5):1038-1046.
Gummesson C, Ward MM, Atroshi I. The shortened disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (QuickDASH): validity and reliability based on responses within the full-length DASH. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2006;44(7):1186.