The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Login
EN
+7 (495) 482-4118
+7 (495) 482-4329
+8 800 250-18-12
  • (toll-free number for subscriptions)
    Mon-Fri from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m.

  • © 1998-2026
+7 (495) 482-43-29
EN
All journals
Journal
Year
Year
Search result: 0

Alferova V.V.

Kafedra nevrologii i neĭrokhirurgii Rossiĭskogo gosudarstvennogo meditsinskogo universiteta, Moskva

Mayorova L.A.

Center for Speech Pathology and Neurorehabilitation, Moscow, Russia;
Institute of Higher Nervous Activity of RAS, Moscow, Russia

Ivanova E.G.

Center for Speech Pathology and Neurorehabilitation, Moscow, Russia;
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia

Gekht A.B.

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University;
Solovyov Scientific and Practical Psychoneurological Center

Shklovskiĭ V.M.

Moskovskiĭ NII psikhiatrii

Functional neuroimaging of the brain structures associated with language in healthy individuals and patients with post-stroke aphasia

Authors:

Alferova V.V., Mayorova L.A., Ivanova E.G., Gekht A.B., Shklovskiĭ V.M.

More about the authors

Journal: S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2017;117(3‑2): 71‑78

DOI: 10.17116/jnevro20171173271-78

Read: 2239 times

Download PDF (RU)
Contact the author
Table of contents

FUNCTIONAL NEUROIMAGING OF THE BRAIN STRUCTURES ASSOCIATED WITH LANGUAGE IN HEALTHY INDIVIDUALS AND PATIENTS WITH POST-STROKE APHASIA
FUNCTIONAL NEUROIMAGING OF THE BRAIN STRUCTURES ASSOCIATED WITH LANGUAGE IN HEALTHY INDIVIDUALS AND PATIENTS WITH POST-STROKE APHASIA

To cite this article:

Alferova VV, Mayorova LA, Ivanova EG, Gekht AB, Shklovskiĭ VM. Functional neuroimaging of the brain structures associated with language in healthy individuals and patients with post-stroke aphasia. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2017;117(3‑2):71‑78. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/jnevro20171173271-78

Подписка 2026 Журнал неврологии и психиатрии им. С.С. Корсакова. Спецвыпуски (S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry (special issues))
МСФ на ЯМ
Использование инфографики авторами научных работ
Close metadata
Recommended articles:
Early anti­thrombotic protection of the brain in patients with ischemic stroke. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2025;(8-2):5-10
Resu­lts of the implementation of repe­rfusion technologies in ischemic stroke. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2025;(8-2):32-39
Adju­vant pharmacological modu­lation with Cyto­flavin in reha­bilitation at stages 2—3 in patients with acute cere­bral insu­fficiency and post-intensive care syndrome. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2025;(3):78-85
Anesthetic mana­gement of endo­vascular procedures in patients with ischemic stroke. Russian Journal of Anesthesiology and Reanimatology. 2025;(2):20-25
Comparison of fluoroscopy and intracardiac echo­cardiography for control of endo­vascular closure of patent fora­men ovale. Russian Cardiology Bulletin. 2025;(1):64-69
Mathematical mode­ling of outcomes in patients with clinical combination of ischemic stroke and COVID-19 complicated by multiple organ failure. Russian Journal of Anesthesiology and Reanimatology. 2025;(3):42-49
Socio-economic damage caused by elevated low-density lipo­protein cholesterol levels. Medi­cal Technologies. Asse­ssment and Choice. 2025;(2):88-98
Cere­brolysin with repe­rfusion therapy in ischemic stroke: a prospective analysis of multimodal brain imaging data from the CERE­HETIS trial. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2025;(6):84-98
Prediction of mortality in severe ischemic stroke during COVID-19 in patients with multiorgan dysfunction. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2025;(6):120-127
A clinical case of treating a patient with severe ischemic stroke and cancer. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2025;(8):114-117
Abstract:

The introduction of non-invasive functional neuroimaging techniques such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), in the practice of scientific and clinical research can increase our knowledge about the organization of cognitive processes, including language, in normal and reorganization of these cognitive functions in post-stroke aphasia. The article discusses the results of fMRI studies of functional organization of the cortex of a healthy adult’s brain in the processing of various voice information as well as the main types of speech reorganization after post-stroke aphasia in different stroke periods. The concepts of «effective» and «ineffective» brain plasticity in post-stroke aphasia were considered. It was concluded that there was an urgent need for further comprehensive studies, including neuropsychological testing and several complementary methods of functional neuroimaging, to develop a phased treatment plan and neurorehabilitation of patients with post-stroke aphasia.

Keywords:

post-stroke aphasia; ischemic stroke
brain plasticity after stroke
functional imaging
functional reorganization
focal brain lesions
language recovery

Authors:

Alferova V.V.

Kafedra nevrologii i neĭrokhirurgii Rossiĭskogo gosudarstvennogo meditsinskogo universiteta, Moskva

Mayorova L.A.

Center for Speech Pathology and Neurorehabilitation, Moscow, Russia;
Institute of Higher Nervous Activity of RAS, Moscow, Russia

Ivanova E.G.

Center for Speech Pathology and Neurorehabilitation, Moscow, Russia;
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia

Gekht A.B.

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University;
Solovyov Scientific and Practical Psychoneurological Center

Shklovskiĭ V.M.

Moskovskiĭ NII psikhiatrii

Close metadata

References:

  1. Gusev EI, Skvortsova VI, Stakhovskaia LV. Epidemiology of stroke in Russia. Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im. S.S. Korsakova. 2003;8:4-9. (In Russ.).
  2. Brainin M, Tuomilehtob J, Heiss WD. Post-stroke cognitive decline: an update and perspectives for clinical research. European Journal of Neurology. 2015;22(2):229-238. doi:10.1111/ene.12626
  3. Shklovskiĭ VM. Neurorehabilitation of patients after stroke and brain injury. Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im. S.S. Korsakova. 2015;115(3):2:75-81. (In Russ.). doi:10.17116/jnevro201511532
  4. Berthier ML, Pulvermüller F. Recovery patterns and prognosis in aphasia. Nat Rev Neurol. 2011;7(2):86-97.
  5. Plowman E, Hentz B, Ellis C. Post-stroke aphasia prognosis: a review of patient-related and stroke-related factors. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 2012;18(3):689-694. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01650
  6. Hart J. Poststroke recovery. Alternative and Complimentary. Therapies. 2010;16:277-280.
  7. Donald T, Stuss. The future of cognitive neurorehabilitation. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. 2011;21(5):755-768. doi:10.1080/09602011.2011.605590
  8. Lazar R, Speizer A, Festa J. Variability in language recovery after first-time stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2008;79:530-534. doi:10.1136/jnnp.2007.122457
  9. Berthier M. Posstroke aphasia: epidemiology, pathophysiology and treatment. Drugs Aging. 2005;22(2):163-182.
  10. Kadojic D, Bijelic B, Radanovic R. Aphasia in patients with ischemic stroke. Acta Clinica Croatica Impact Factor. 2012;51:221-225.
  11. Bersano A, Burgio F, Gattinoni M. Aphasia burden to hospitalised acute stroke patients: need for an early rehabilitation programme. International Journal Of Stroke Impact Factor. 2009;4(6):443-447. doi:10.1111/j.1747-4949.2009.00349
  12. Tsouli S, Kyritsis AP, Tsagalis G. Significance of aphasia after first-ever acute stroke: impact on early and late outcomes. Neuroepidemiology. 2009;33(2):96-102. doi:10.1159/000222091
  13. Mulert C, Lemieux L. EEG-fMRI. Physiological basis, technique, and applications. 2010.
  14. Ogawa S, Lee T, Kay A. Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast dependent on blood oxygenation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1990;87(24):9868-9872.
  15. Buxton R, Uludag K, Dubowitz DJ. Modeling the hemodynamic response to brain activation. Neuroimage. 2004;23:220-33. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.013
  16. Luriya AR. Osnovnye problemy neirolingvistiki. M.: Librokom; 2009. (In Russ.).
  17. Khomskaya ED. Neiropsikhologiya. SPb.: Piter; 2005. (In Russ.).
  18. Zhang L, Yue Q, Zhang Y. Task-dependent modulation of regions in the left temporal cortex during auditory sentence comprehension. Neuroscience Letters. 2015;584:351-355. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2014.10.054
  19. Hamberger M, Habeck C, Pantazatos S. Shared space, separate processes: Neural activation patterns for auditory description and visual objectnaming in healthy adults. Human Brain Mapping. 2014;35(6):2507-2520. doi:10.1002/hbm.22345
  20. Kim K, Karunanayaka P, Privitera M. Semantic association investigated with functional MRI and independent component analysis. Epilepsy Behavior. 2011;20(4):613-622. doi:10.1016/j.yebeh.2010.11.010
  21. Catani M, Jones D, Ffytche D. Perisylvian language networks of the human brain. Annals Of Neurology. 2005;57(1):8-16.
  22. Mcgilchrist I. Reciprocal organization of the cerebral hemispheres. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2010;12(4):503-515.
  23. Vincent J, Kahn I, Snyder A. Evidence for a frontoparietal control system revealed by intrinsic functional connectivity. Journal Of Neurophysiology. 2008;100(6):3328-3342. doi:10.1152/jn.90355.2008
  24. Spreng R, Stevens W, Chamberlain J. Default network activity, coupled with the frontoparietal control network, supports goal-directed cognition. Neuroimage. 2010;53(1):303-317. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.016
  25. Raboyeau G, De Boissezon X, Marie N. Right hemisphere activation in recovery from aphasia: lesion effect or function recruitment? Neurology. 2008;70(4):290-298. doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000287115.85956.87
  26. Hickok G, Poeppel D. Towards a functional neuroanatomy of speech perception. Trends In Cognitive Sciences. 2000;4(4):131-138.
  27. Knecht S, Dräger B, Deppe M. Handedness and hemispheric language dominance in healthy humans. Brain. 2000;123(2):2512-2518.
  28. Vigneau M, Beaucousin V, Hervé P. What is right-hemisphere contribution to phonological, lexico-semantic, and sentence processing? Insightsfrom a meta-analysis. Neuroimage. 2011;54(1):577-593. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.07.036
  29. Belopasova AV, Kadykov AS, Konovalov RN. Organizatsiya neironal'noi rechevoi sistemy u zdorovykh lits i ee reorganizatsiya u patsientov s postinsul'tnoi afaziei. Annaly klinicheskoi i eksperimental'noi nevrologii. 2013;7(1):25-30. (In Russ.).
  30. Poeppel D, Hickok G.Towards a new functional anatomy of language. Cognition. 2004;92(1-2):1-12. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2003.11.001
  31. Mahowald K, Fedorenko E. Reliable individual-level neural markers of high-level language processing: A necessary precursor for relating neural variability to behavioral and genetic variability. Neuro Image. 2016;139:74-93. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.05.073
  32. Dehaene-Lambertz G, Dehaene S, Hertz-Pannier L. Functional neuroimaging of speech perception in infants. Science. 2002;298(5600):2013-2015. doi:10.1126/science.1077066
  33. La C, Garcia-Ramos C , Nair V. Age-Related Changes in BOLD Activation Pattern in Phonemic Fluency Paradigm: An Investigation ofActivation, Functional Connectivity and Psychophysiological Interactions. Front Aging Neurosci. 2016;8:110. doi:10.3389/fnagi.2016.00110
  34. Luriya AR. Vysshie korkovye funktsii cheloveka. SPb: Piter; 2008. (In Russ.).
  35. Robinson J, Laird A, Glahn D. Metaanalytic connectivity modeling: delineating the functional connectivity of the human amygdala. Human Brain Mapping. 2010;31(2):173-184. doi:10.1002/hbm.20854
  36. Laird A, Lancaster J, Fox P. BrainMap: the social evolution of a human brain mapping database. Neuroinformatics. 2005;3(1):65-78.
  37. Ardila A, Bernal B, Rosselli M. Language and visual perception associations: meta-analytic connectivity modeling of Brodmann area 37. Behavioural Neurology. 2015. doi:10.1155/2015/565871
  38. Cohen L, Martinaud O. Visual Word Recognition in the Left and Right Hemispheres: Anatomical and Functional Correlates of Peripheral Alexias. Cereb Cortex. 2003;13(12):1313-1333.
  39. Benson D, Ardila A. Aphasia: A Clinical Perspective. Oxford University Press. 1996.
  40. Posner M, Rothbart M, Sheese B. The anterior cingulate gyrus and the mechanism of self-regulation. Cognitive, Affective Behavioral Neuroscience. 2007;7(4):391-395.
  41. Brodmann’s. Interactive Atlas. 2013. http://www.fmriconsulting.com/brodmann
  42. Luriya AR. Osnovy neiropsikhologii. M.: Akademiya; 2003. (In Russ.).
  43. Anderson V, Spencer-Smith M, Wood A. Do children really recover better? Neurobehavioural plasticity after early brain insult. Brain. 2011;134(8):2197-2221. doi:10.1093/brain/awr103. Epub 2011 Jul 22
  44. Fridriksson J, Baker J, Moser D. Cortical mapping of naming errors in aphasia. Human Brain Mapping. 2009;30(8):2487-2498. doi:10.1002/hbm.20683
  45. Fridriksson J, Richardson J, Fillmore P. Left hemisphere plasticity and aphasia recovery. Neuroimage. 2012;60(2):854-863. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.12.057
  46. Cornelissen K, Laine M, Tarkiainen A. Adult brain plasticity elicited by anomia treatment. J Cognitive Neuroscience. 2003;15(3):444-461. doi:10.1162/089892903321593153
  47. Naeser M, Martin P, Baker E. Overt propositional speech in chronic nonfluent aphasia studied with the dynamic susceptibility contrast fMRI method. Neuroimage. 2004;22(1):29-41. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.11.016
  48. Heiss W, Thiel A. A proposed regional hierarchy in recovery of post-stroke aphasia. Brain Language. 2006;98(1):118-123. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2006.02.002
  49. Crosson B, Fabrizio K, Singletary F. Treatment of naming in nonfluent aphasia through manipulation of intention and attention: a phase 1 comparison of two novel treatments. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2007;13(4):582-594. doi:10.1017/S1355617707070737
  50. Szaflarski J, Eaton K, Ball A. Poststroke aphasia recovery assessed with functional magnetic resonance imaging and a picture identification task. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases. 2011;20(4):336-345. doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2010.02.003
  51. Dancause N, Barbay S, Frost S. Extensive cortical rewiring after brain injury. Neuroscience. 2005;25:10167-10179. doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3256-05.2005
  52. Lee R, van Donkelaar P, Can J. Mechanisms underlying functional recovery following stroke. Neurological Sciences. 1995;22(4):257-263.
  53. Abo M, Senoo A, Watanabe S. Language-related brain function during word repetition in post-stroke aphasics. Neuroreport. 2004;15(12):1891-1894.
  54. Crosson B, McGregor K, Gopinath K. Functional MRI of language in aphasia: a review of the literature and the methodological challenges. Neuropsychology Review. 2007;17(2):157-177. doi:10.1007/s11065-007-9024-z
  55. Tillema J, Byars A, Jacola L. Cortical reorganization of language functioning following perinatal left MCA stroke. Brain and Language. 2008;105(2):99-111. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2007.07.127
  56. Turkeltaub P, Messing S, Norise C. Are networks for residual language function and recovery consistent across aphasic patients? Neurology. 2011;76(20):1726-1734. doi:0.1212/wnl.0b013e31821a44c1
  57. Kognitivnaya nauka v Moskve: novye issledovaniya. Pod red. Pechenkova E.V., Falikman M.V. M.: Buki Vedi; 2015. (In Russ.).
  58. Fridriksson J, Bonilha L, Baker J. Activity in Preserved Left Hemisphere Regions Predicts Anomia Severity in Aphasia. Cerebral Cortex. 2010;20(5):1013-1019. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhp160
  59. Postman-Caucheteux W, Birn R, Pursley R. Single-trial fMRI Shows contralesional activity linked to overt naming errors in chronic aphasic patients. Cognitive Neuroscience. 2010;22(6):1299-1318. doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21261
  60. Szaflarski J, Allendorfer J, Banks C. Vannest J, Holland SK. Recovered vs. not-recovered from post-stroke aphasia: the contributions from the dominant and non-dominant hemispheres. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2013;31(4):347-360. doi:10.3233/rnn-120267
  61. Maĭorova LA, Martynova OV, Fedina ON, Petrushevskiĭ AG.FMRI-study of speech perception impairment in post-stroke patients with sensory aphasia]. Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im. I.P. Pavlova. 2013;63(3):328-337. PMID: 24450164. (In Russ.).
  62. Hamilton R, Chrysikou E, Coslett B. Mechanisms of aphasia recovery after stroke and the role of noninvasive brain stimulation. Brain and Language. 2011;118(1-2):40-50. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2011.02.005
  63. Hickok G, Poeppel D. The cortical organization of speech processing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2007;8(5):393-402. doi:10.1038/nrn2113
  64. Naeser M, Martin P, Baker E. Overt propositional speech in chronic nonfluent aphasia studied with the dynamic susceptibility contrast fMRI method. Neuroimage. 2004;22(1):29-41. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.11.016
  65. Rosen H, Petersen S, Linenweber M. Neural correlates of recovery from aphasia after damage to left inferior frontal cortex. Neurology. 2000;55(12):1883-1894.
  66. Kang EK, Kim YK, Sohn HM, Cohen LG, Paik NJ. Improved picture naming in aphasia patients treated with cathodal tDCS to inhibit the right Broca'shomologue area. Restor Neurol Neuroscience. 2011;29(3):141-152. doi:10.3233/rnn-2011-0587
  67. Marangolo P, Fiori V, Calpagnano M. tDCS over the left inferior frontal cortex improves speech production in aphasia. Frontiers In Human Neuroscience. 2013;6;7:539. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00539
  68. Price CJ, Crinion J. The latest on functional imaging studies of aphasic stroke. Current Opinion In Neurology. 2005;18(4):429-434.
  69. Fernandez B, Cardebat D, Demonet J. Functional MRI follow-up study of language processes in healthy subjects and during recovery in a case ofaphasia. Stroke. 2004;35(9):2171-2176. doi:10.1161/01.str.0000139323.76769.b0
  70. Saur D, Lange R, Baumgaertner A. Dynamics of language reorganization after stroke. Brain. 2006;129(Pt 6):1371-1384. doi:10.1093/brain/awl090/
  71. Jarso S, Li M, Faria A. Distinct mechanisms and timing of language recovery after stroke. Cognitive Neuropsychology. 2013;30(7-8):454-475. doi:10.1080/02643294.2013.875467
  72. Thulborn K, Carpenter P, Just M. Plasticity of language-related brain function during recovery from stroke. Stroke. 1999;30(4):749-754.
  73. Winhuisen L, Thiel A, Schumacher B, Kessler J, Rudolf J, Haupt WF, Heiss WD. Role of the contralateral inferior frontal gyrus in recovery of language function in poststroke aphasia: acombined repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and positron emission tomography study. Stroke. 2005;36(8):1759-1763. doi:10.1161/01.str.0000174487.81126.ef
  74. Suslin AS. Diffuzionno-vzveshennaya i perfuzionnaya MRT v ostrom periode ishemicheskogo insul'ta (kliniko-neirovizualizatsionnoe sopostavlenie): Dis. ... kand. med. nauk. M.; 2008. (In Russ.). Available now www.dslib.net Медицинские науки Нервные болезни
  75. Wintermark M, Albers G, Broderick J. Acute Stroke Imaging Research Roadmap II. Stroke. 2013;44(9):2628-2639. doi:10.1161/strokeaha.113.002015
  76. Fridriksson J, Holland A, Coull B. Aphasia severity: Association with cerebral perfusion and diffusion. Aphasiology. 2002;16(9):859-871. doi:10.1080/02687030244000347
  77. Price C, Warburton E, Moore C. Dynamic diaschisis: anatomically remote and context-sensitive human brain lesions. Cognitive Neuroscience. 2001;13:419-429.
  78. Krainik A, Hund-Georgiadis M, Zysset S. Regional impairment of cerebrovascular reactivity and BOLD signal in adults after stroke. Stroke. 2005;36:1146-1152.
  79. Hillis A, Wityk R, Barker P. Subcortical aphasia and neglect in acute stroke: the role of cortical hypoperfusion. Brain. 2002;125:1094-1104.
  80. Jessica D. Richardson, Julie M. Baker, Paul S. Cerebral perfusion in chronic stroke: Implications for lesion-symptom mapping and functional MRI. Behavioural Neurology. 2011;24(2):117-122. doi:10.3233/ben-2011-0283
  81. Petrushevskii AG, Maiorova LA, Martynova OV, Fedina ON. Faktory, vliyayushchie na kharakteristiki BOLD-otveta u patsientov posle insul'ta. Vestnik Rossiiskogo Nauchnogo Tsentra Rentgenoradiologii Minzdrava Rossii. 2013;4(13):18. (In Russ.).
  82. Altamura C, Reinhard M, Vry MS, et al. The longitudinal changes of BOLD response and cerebral hemodynamics from acute to subacute stroke. AfMRI and TCD study. BMC Neuroscience. 2009;10:151. doi:10.1186/1471-2202-10-151
  83. Berthier ML, Pulvermüller F. Neuroscience insights improve neurorehabilitation of poststroke aphasia. Nature Reviews Neurology. 2011;7(2):86-97. doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2010.201
  84. Hart J. Poststroke recovery. Alternative and Complimentary Therapies. 2010;16:277-280.
Contact the author
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

Submit Application

You can become an author of one of our magazines, send a request and we will consider it in during the day.

Name
Phone
E-mail
Message
Login
Registration
E-mail
Password
Forgot Password?

Log in to the site using your account in one of the services

Password recovery
E-mail
Login
Register

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.