The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Login
EN
+7 (495) 482-4118
+7 (495) 482-0604
+8 800 101-59-87
  • (toll-free number for subscriptions)
    Mon-Fri from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m.

  • © 1998-2024
+7 (495) 482-43-29
EN
All journals
Journal
Year
Year
Search result: 0

Korzhavina A.V.

Krasnov Research Institute of Eye Diseases

Sheludchenko V.M.

Krasnov Research Institute of Eye Diseases

Yusef Yu.N.

Krasnov Research Institute of Eye Diseases;
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)

Kosova J.V.

Krasnov Research Institute of Eye Diseases

Volzhanin A.V.

Krasnov Research Institute of Eye Diseases

Possibilities of physiotherapy in glaucomatous optic neuropathy after glaucoma surgery

Authors:

Korzhavina A.V., Sheludchenko V.M., Yusef Yu.N., Kosova J.V., Volzhanin A.V.

More about the authors

Journal: Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2024;140(3): 88‑94

DOI: 10.17116/oftalma202414003188

Views: 570

Downloaded: 2

Buy for 200₽
Contact the author
Table of contents

To cite this article:

Korzhavina AV, Sheludchenko VM, Yusef YuN, Kosova JV, Volzhanin AV. Possibilities of physiotherapy in glaucomatous optic neuropathy after glaucoma surgery. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2024;140(3):88‑94. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma202414003188

Подписка 2025 (Russian Annals of Ophthalmology)
 
МСФ на ЯМ
Close metadata
Recommended articles:
The effect of phacoemulsification of age-related cata­ract on intraocular pressure and iridocorneal angle para­meters in primary open-angle glaucoma. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2023;(6):60-68
Comparison of the effe­ctiveness and safety of glaucoma drugs in the therapy of primary open-angle glaucoma. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2023;(6):101-108
Factors affe­cting the hypo­tensive effect of sele­ctive laser trabeculoplasty in primary open-angle glaucoma. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2024;(2):54-62
Three-component tear substitute as preoperative support in glaucoma surgery. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2024;(3):51-58
The role of mito­chondrial dysfunction in the stabilization of the glaucomatous process. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2024;(4):49-58
Perioperative prevention of bleeding in glaucoma surgery. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2024;(5):118-124
The impact of therapy with Mexi­dol on neurological defi­cit and functional outcome in patients with ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2023;(12-2):49-60
Cognitive impairment in patients with arte­rial hype­rtension. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2024;(4-2):41-48
Pharmacological effe­cts of fonturacetam (Actitropil) and prospects for its clinical use. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2024;(8):21-31

The current primary approach to the therapeutic and surgical management of glaucoma is limited to lowering intraocular pressure (IOP). While normalization of IOP stabilizes some functional parameters, there is still potential for further restoration of lost visual function in the post-operative period while maintaining the “therapeutic window”. Neuroprotection refers to the modification of retinal ganglion cells and the neuronal microenvironment to promote their survival and function. Numerous studies have identified effective neuroprotective methods for glaucoma; however, their implementation into clinical practice remains a significant challenge. This review presents the most clinically significant treatment strategies, as well as the latest therapeutic advances in physiotherapy.

Keywords:

primary open-angle glaucoma
glaucoma surgery
neuroprotection
glaucoma physiotherapy

Authors:

Korzhavina A.V.

Krasnov Research Institute of Eye Diseases

Sheludchenko V.M.

Krasnov Research Institute of Eye Diseases

Yusef Yu.N.

Krasnov Research Institute of Eye Diseases;
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)

Kosova J.V.

Krasnov Research Institute of Eye Diseases

Volzhanin A.V.

Krasnov Research Institute of Eye Diseases

Received:

31.07.2023

Accepted:

29.09.2023

List of references:

  1. Tang Y, Shah S, Cho KS, Sun X, Chen DF. Metabolomics in Primary Open Angle Glaucoma: A Systematic Review and MetaAnalysis. Front Neurosci. 2022;16:835736. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.835736
  2. Movsisyan AB, Kuroedov AV, Arkharov MA, et al. Epidemiological analysis of primary open-angle glaucoma incidence and prevalence in Russia. RMJ Clinical Ophthalmology = RMZh. Klinicheskaya oftal’mologiya. 2022;22(1): 3-10. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.32364/2311-7729-2022-22-1-3-10
  3. Plyaskina US, Biryukov VV, Frolov MA. Optical coherence tomography and microperimetry in the early diagnosis of glaucoma. Russian Ophthalmological Journal = Rossiyskiy oftal’mologicheskiy zhurnal. 2022;15(3):163-167. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21516/2072-0076-2022-15-3-163-167
  4. Zhang N, Wang J, Chen B, Li Y, Jiang B. Prevalence of Primary Angle Closure Glaucoma in the Last 20 Years: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review. Front Med. 2021;7:624179. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2020.624179
  5. Soto I, Howell GR. (2014). The complex role of neuroinflammation in glaucoma. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectiv Med. 2014;4(8):a017269. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a017269
  6. Tezel G. (2013). Immune regulation toward immunomodulation for neuroprotection in glaucoma. Curr Opinion Pharmacol. 2013;13(1):23-31.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coph.2012.09.013
  7. Yücel YH, Zhang Q, Gupta N, Kaufman PL, Weinreb RN. Loss of neurons in magnocellular and parvocellular layers of the lateral geniculate nucleus in glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol (Chicago, Ill.: 1960). 2000;118(3):378-384.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.118.3.378
  8. Vickers JC, Hof PR, Schumer RA, Wang RF, Podos SM, Morrison JH. (1997). Magnocellular and parvocellular visual pathways are both affected in a macaque monkey model of glaucoma. Austral N Zeal J Ophthalmol. 1997; 25(3):239-243.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9071.1997.tb01400.x
  9. Imamura K, Onoe H, Shimazawa M, Nozaki S, Wada Y, Kato K, Nakajima H, Mizuma H, Onoe K, Taniguchi T, Sasaoka M, Hara H, Tanaka S, Araie M, Watanabe Y. Molecular imaging reveals unique degenerative changes in experimental glaucoma. Neuroreport. 2009;20(2):139-144.  https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0b013e32831d7f82
  10. Lam DY, Kaufman PL, Gabelt BT, To EC, Matsubara JA. Neurochemical correlates of cortical plasticity after unilateral elevated intraocular pressure in a primate model of glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44(6): 2573-2581. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.02-0779
  11. European Glaucoma Society Terminology and Guidelines for Glaucoma, 4th Edition — Chapter 2: Classification and terminologySupported by the EGS Foundation: Part 1: Foreword; Introduction; Glossary; Chapter 2 Classification and Terminology. Brit J Ophthalmol. 2017;101(5):73-127.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-EGSguideline.002
  12. Souza C, Tran DH, Loman J, Law SK, Coleman AL, Caprioli J. Long-term outcomes of Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation in refractory glaucomas. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;144(6):893-900.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2007.07.035
  13. Gedde SJ, Panarelli JF, Banitt MR, Lee RK. Evidenced-based comparison of aqueous shunts. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2013;24(2):87-95.  https://doi.org/10.1097/ICU.0b013e32835cf0f5
  14. Yu DY, Morgan WH, Sun X, Su EN, Cringle SJ, Yu PK, House P, Guo W, Yu X. The critical role of the conjunctiva in glaucoma filtration surgery. Progr Retin Eye Res. 2009;28(5):303-328.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2009.06.004
  15. Nguyen QH, Budenz DL, Parrish RK, 2nd. Complications of Baerveldt glaucoma drainage implants. Arch Ophthalmol (Chicago, Ill.:1960). 1998;116(5): 571-575.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.116.5.571
  16. Minckler DS, Hill RA. Use of novel devices for control of intraocular pressure. Exper Eye Res. 2009;88(4):792-798.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2008.11.010
  17. Saheb H, Ahmed II. Micro-invasive glaucoma surgery: current perspectives and future directions. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2012;23(2):96-104.  https://doi.org/10.1097/ICU.0b013e32834ff1e7
  18. Movsisyan AB, Egorov AE, Kuroyedov AV. Effectiveness of minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (review of international experience). National Journal Glaucoma = Natsional’nyy zhurnal Glaukoma. 2022;21(4):56-63. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.53432/2078-4104-2022-21-4-56-63
  19. Francis BA, Singh K, Lin SC, et al. Novel glaucoma procedures: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2011;118(7): 1466-1480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.03.028
  20. Reinthal EK, Rohrbach JM, Grisanti S. Glaucoma drainage implants. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2010;227(1):49-55. Epub 2010 Jan 20.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1109789
  21. Egorov EA, Erichev VP, Strahov VV, Petrov SIu, Romanova TB, Vasina MV, Zinina VS, Makarova AS, Kazanova SYu, Yartsev AV. Structural and functional changes in the retina of patients with primary open-angle glaucoma and compensated intraocular pressure while undergoing retinoprotective therapy. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology = Vestnik oftal’mologii. 2019;135(3): 20-30. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma201913503120
  22. Erichev VP, Antonov AA, Kozlova IV. Objective criteria of neuroprotective glaucoma treatment efficacy. National Journal Glaucoma = Natsional’nyy zhurnal Glaukoma. 2018;17(3):50-57. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.25700/NJG.2018.03.06
  23. Zaporozhets LA, Martynova EB, Levko MA, Malevannaya OA. Computer perimetry indices in glaucoma stage assessment. National Journal Glaucoma = Natsional’nyy zhurnal Glaukoma. 2019;18(2):38-46. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.25700/NJG.2019.02.05
  24. Erichev VP, Antonov AA, Vitkov AA, Grigoryan LA. Static automated perimetry in the diagnosis of glaucoma. Part 1: Basic principles. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology = Vestnik oftal’mologii. 2021;137(5-2):281-288. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma2021137052281
  25. Rao HL, Pradhan ZS, Suh MH, Moghimi S, Mansouri K, Weinreb RN. Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in Glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2020; 29(4):312-321.  https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000001463
  26. Bowd C, Weinreb RN, Williams JM, Zangwill LM. The retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in ocular hypertensive, normal, and glaucomatous eyes with optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol (Chicago, Ill.: 1960). 2000; 118(1):22-26.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.118.1.22
  27. Schuman JS, Hee MR, Arya AV, Pedut-Kloizman T, Puliafito CA, Fujimoto JG, Swanson EA. Optical coherence tomography: a new tool for glaucoma diagnosis. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 1995;6(2):89-95.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00055735-199504000-00014
  28. Bussel II, Wollstein G, Schuman JS. OCT for glaucoma diagnosis, screening and detection of glaucoma progression. Brit J Ophthalmol. 2014;98 (suppl 2):ii15-ii19. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-304326
  29. Leung CK, Cheung CY, Weinreb RN, Qiu K, Liu S, Li H, Xu G, Fan N, Pang CP, Tse KK, Lam DS. Evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer progression in glaucoma: a study on optical coherence tomography guided progression analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51(1):217-222.  https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.09-3468
  30. Haugh-Scheidt LM, Griff ER, Linsenmeier RA. Light-evoked oxygen responses in the isolated toad retina. Exper Eye Res. 1995;61(1):73-81.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0014-4835(95)80060-3
  31. Kirillova MO, Zueva MV, Tsapenko IV, Zhuravleva AN. Electrophysiological markers of preclinical diagnosis of glaucomatous optic neuropathy. Russian Ophthalmological Journal = Rossiyskiy oftal’mologicheskiy zhurnal. 2021; 14(1):35-41. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21516/2072-0076-2021-14-1-35-41
  32. Suetov AA, Alekperov SI, Odinokaya MA, Kostina AA. Multifocal electroretinography in the study of focal and diffuse damage to the rabbit retina. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology = Vestnik oftal’mologii. 2020;136(4):47-56. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma202013604147
  33. Ventura LM, Feuer WJ, Porciatti V. Progressive loss of retinal ganglion cell function is hindered with IOP-lowering treatment in early glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53(2):659-663.  https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.11-8525
  34. Bach M, Brigell MG, Hawlina M, Holder GE, Johnson MA, McCulloch DL, Meigen T, Viswanathan S. ISCEV standard for clinical pattern electroretinography (PERG): 2012 update. Doc Ophthalmol. 2013;126(1):1-7.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-012-9353-y
  35. Holder GE, Robson AG, Hogg CR, Kurz-Levin M, Lois N, Bird AC. Pattern ERG: clinical overview, and some observations on associated fundus autofluorescence imaging in inherited maculopathy. Doc Ophthalmol. 2003; 106(1):17-23.  https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1022471623467
  36. Holder GE. Electrophysiological assessment of optic nerve disease. Eye (Lond). 2004;18(11):1133-1143. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.eye.6701573
  37. Chang EE, Goldberg JL. Glaucoma 2.0: neuroprotection, neuroregeneration, neuroenhancement. Ophthalmology. 2012;119(5):979-986.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.11.003
  38. Banitt MR, Ventura LM, Feuer WJ, Savatovsky E, Luna G, Shif O, Bosse B, Porciatti V. Progressive loss of retinal ganglion cell function precedes structural loss by several years in glaucoma suspects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54(3):2346-2352. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.12-11026
  39. Ozkiriş A. Pattern electroretinogram changes after intravitreal bevacizumab injection for diabetic macular edema. Doc Ophthalmol. 2010;120(3):243-250.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-010-9219-0
  40. Zueva MV, Tsapenko IV, Lantukh EP, Maglakelidze NM. Functional examinations of visual channels: clinical aspects. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology = Vestnik oftal’mologii. 2017;133(2):114-119. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma20171332114-119
  41. Schechter I, Butler PD, Zemon VM, Revheim N, Saperstein AM, Jalbrzikowski M, Pasternak R, Silipo G, Javitt DC. Impairments in generation of early-stage transient visual evoked potentials to magno- and parvocellular selective stimuli in schizophrenia. Clin Neurophysiol. 2005;116:2204-2215. https://doi.org/10/1016/j.clinph.2005.06.013
  42. Epstein E. Fibrosing response to aqueous. Its relation to glaucoma. The British journal of ophthalmology. 1959;43(11):641-647.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.43.11.641
  43. Krasnov MM. Sinusotomy glaucoma. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology = Vestnik oftal’mologii. 1964;37-41. (In Russ.).
  44. Sugar HS. Experimental trabeculectomy in glaucoma. American journal of ophthalmology. 1961;51(4):623-627.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.03.031
  45. Cairns JE. Trabeculectomy. Preliminary report of a new method. American journal of ophthalmology. 1968;66(4):673-679. 
  46. Fedorov SN, Ioffe DI, Ronkina TI. Antiglaukomatoznaia operatsiia--glubokaia skleréktomiia. Glaucoma surgery — deep sclerectomy. Vestnik oftalmologii. 1982;(4):6-10. (In Russ.).
  47. Zimmerman T, Kandarakis A, Ziegler L, et al. Argon laser trabeculoplasty (AL T): 180° vs 360°, Blacks vs Whites. ARVO Abstracts. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1984;25(suppl):95. 
  48. Kozlov VI, Bagrov SN, Anisimova SYu. Nepronikayushchaya glubokaya sklerektomiya s kollagenoplastikoj. Oftal’mohirurgiya. 1990;(3):44-46. (In Russ.).
  49. Skottun BC, Skoyles JR. On Identifying Magnocellular and Parvocellular Responses on the Basis of Contrast-Response Functions. Schizophr Bull. 2011;37(1):23-26.  https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbq114
  50. Razumovskaya AM, Razumovsky MI, Koroviansky YuA, Razumovsky ES. Estimation of Therapeutic Effect of Endonasal Electrophorosis with Methylethylpyridinol in Partial Optic Nerve Atrophy. Ophthalmology in Russia = Oftal’mologiya. 2018;15(2):219-224. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2018-2-219-224
  51. Drakon AK, Korchazhkina NB, Katsnelson VV. Justifi cation of the complex application of physical therapy methods in the treatment of visual analyzer diseases. Russian Journal of the Physial Therapy, Balneotherapy and Rehabilitation = Fizioterapiya, bal’neologiya i reabilitatsiya. 2019;18(6):401-407. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17816/1681-3456-2019-18-6-401-407
  52. Drakon AK, Korchazhkina NB, Sheludchenko VM, Yusef Yu, Kosova JV, Makarova MA, Elfimov MA. Results of the application of complex physiotherapeutic neurostimulation in optical neuropathies of various genesis. Voprosy kurortologii, fizioterapii, i lechebnoi fizicheskoi kultury. 2022;99(4-2): 72-77. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/kurort20229904272
  53. Drakon AK, Kosova JV, Sheludchenko VM, Korchazhkina NB. Modern treatment of different forms of optic nerve atrophy. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology = Vestnik oftal’mologii. 2021;137(5-2):340-345. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma2021137052340
  54. Shandurina AN. Kliniko-fiziologicheskie osnovy novogo sposoba vosstanovleniya zreniya putem pryamoj elektrostimulyacii povrezhdennyh nervov cheloveka. Fiziologiya cheloveka. 1984;19(5):710-746. (In Russ.).
  55. Siesky B, Harris A, Kagemann L, Stefansson E, McCranor L, Miller B, Bwatwa J, Regev G, Ehrlich R. Ocular blood flow and oxygen delivery to the retina in primary open-angle glaucoma patients: the addition of dorzolamide to timolol monotherapy. Acta Ophthalmologica. 2010;88(1):142-149.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-3768.2009.01604.x
  56. Ushnikov AN. Ispol’zovanie razlichnyh vidov stimulyacij v lechenii atrofii zritel’nogo nerva pri glaukome. Aktual’nye problemy sovremennoj oftal’mologii. Saratov. 1996;260-262. (In Russ.).
  57. Drakon AK, Pateyuk LS, Sheludchenko VM, Korchazhkina NB. Ocular iontophoresis. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology = Vestnik oftal’mologii. 2021; 137(6):119-127. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma2021137061119
  58. Sheludchenko VM, Yusef YuN, Raifeld AK, Kosova JV, Elfimov MA, Makarova MA, Pateyuk LS, Kurguzova AG, Smirnova TV, Korzhavina AV. Physical therapy — the main focus of modern ophthalmic rehabilitation. Russian Annals of Ophthalmology = Vestnik oftal’mologii. 2023;139(3-2):113-127. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma2023139032113

Close metadata

Contact the author
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

Contact us
If you have any questions, complaints or suggestions, please use this feedback form.
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.
Submit Application

You can become an author of one of our magazines, send a request and we will consider it in during the day.

Name
Phone
E-mail
Message
Login
Registration
E-mail
Password
Forgot Password?

Log in to the site using your account in one of the services

Password recovery
E-mail
Login
Register


We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.