The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Login
EN
+7 (495) 482-4118
+7 (495) 482-4329
+8 800 250-18-12
  • (toll-free number for subscriptions)
    Mon-Fri from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m.

  • © 1998-2026
+7 (495) 482-43-29
EN
All journals
Journal
Year
Year
Search result: 0

Avanesov A.M.

Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russia

Sedov Yu.G.

Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russia

Mordanov O.S.

Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russia

Morphology of mandibular lingual concavities

Authors:

Avanesov A.M., Sedov Yu.G., Mordanov O.S.

More about the authors

Journal: Stomatology. 2019;98(5): 113‑117

DOI: 10.17116/stomat201998051113

Read: 1882 times

Download PDF (RU)
Contact the author
Table of contents

MORPHOLOGY OF MANDIBULAR LINGUAL CONCAVITIES
MORPHOLOGY OF MANDIBULAR LINGUAL CONCAVITIES

To cite this article:

Avanesov AM, Sedov YuG, Mordanov OS. Morphology of mandibular lingual concavities. Stomatology. 2019;98(5):113‑117. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/stomat201998051113

Подписка 2026 Стоматология (Stomatology)
МСФ на ЯМ
Использование инфографики авторами научных работ
Close metadata
Abstract:

The aim of the study is the literature review on assessment of lingual concavities in posterior mandibula with CBCT to prevent complications such as perforations during dental implant placement. Methods. The electronic search of full-text articles on lingual concavity studies with CBCT was performed. The data on the prevalence, depth and angle of concavities was analyzed. Results. The analysis included 5 articles from 2011 to 2016 years. Totally 1713 mandibular concavities were evaluated in 1232 patients. The prevalence was 46.7—68%; mean depth was from 2.4 mm to 5.4 mm; and the mean angle varied from 143 to 156.6 degrees. Conclusion. Though morphologic data of lingual concavities showed similar pattern it is necessary to provide CBCT evaluation prior to dental implant placement to define available bone and its morphology. It is recommended to use guided surgery if U-type is evident.

Keywords:

dental implant placement
lingual concavities
cone-beam computed tomography

Authors:

Avanesov A.M.

Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russia

Sedov Yu.G.

Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russia

Mordanov O.S.

Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russia

Close metadata

References:

  1. Chan HL, Brooks SL, Fu JH, Yeh CY, Rudek I, Wang HL. Cross-sectional analysis of the mandibular lingual concavity using cone beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2011;22:201-206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02018.x
  2. Kalpidis CD, Setayesh RM. Hemorrhaging associated with endosseous implant placement in the anterior mandible: a review of the literature. J Periodontol. 2004;75:631-645. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2004.75.5.631
  3. Froum S, Casanova L, Byrne S, Cho SC. Risk assessment before extraction for immediate implant placement in the posterior mandible: a computerized tomographic scan study. J Periodontol. 2011;82:395-402. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2010.100360
  4. Guizetti B, Radlanski RJ. Development of the parotid gland and its closer neighboring structures in human embryos and fetuses of 19—67 mm CRL. Ann Anat. 1996;178:503-508. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0940-9602(96)80105-1
  5. Carlson GW. The salivary glands. Embryology, anatomy and surgical applications. Surg Clin North Am. 2000;80:261-273.
  6. Lamas Pelayo J, Peñarrocha Diago M, Martí Bowen E, Peñarrocha Diago M. Intraoperative complications during oral implantology. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2008;13:239-243.
  7. Scaravilli MS, Mariniello M, Sammartino G. Mandibular lingual vascular canals (MLVC): evaluation on dental CTs of a case series. Eur J Radiol. 2010;76:173-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.06.002
  8. Kalpidis CD, Setayesh RM. Hemorrhaging associated with endosseous implant placement in the anterior mandible: A review of the literature. J Periodontol. 2004;75:631-645. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2004.75.5.631
  9. Givol N, Chaushu G, Halamish-Shani T, Taicher S. Emergency tracheostomy following life threatening hemorrhage in the floor of the mouth during immediate implant placement in the mandibular canine region. J Periodontol. 2000;71:1893-1895. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2000.71.12.1893
  10. Chan HL, Leong DJ, Fu JH, Yeh CY, Tatarakis N, Wang HL. The significance of the lingual nerve during periodontal/implant surgery. J Periodontol. 2010;81:372-377. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2009.090506
  11. Parnia F, Fard EM, Mahboub F, Hafezeqoran A, Gavgani FE. Tomographic volume evaluation of submandibular fossa in patients requiring dental implants. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010;109:32-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.08.035
  12. Kalpidis CD, Setayesh RM. Hemorrhaging associated with endosseous implant placement in the anterior mandible: a review of the literature. J Periodontol. 2004;75:631-645. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2004.75.5.631
  13. Chan HL, Brooks SL, Fu JH, Yeh CY, Rudek I, Wang HL. Cross-sectional analysis of the mandibular lingual concavity using cone beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2011;22:201-206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02018.x
  14. Watanabe H, Mohammad Abdul M, Kurabayashi T, Aoki H. Mandible size and morphology determined with CT on a premise of dental implant operation. Surg Radiol Anat. 2010;32:343-349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-009-0570-3
  15. Ganz SD. Cone beam computed tomography-assisted treatment planning concepts. (viii)Dent Clin North Am. 2011;55:515-536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2011.02.019
  16. Herranz-Aparicio J, Marques J, Almendros-Marqués N, Gay-Escoda C. Retrospective study of the bone morphology in the posterior mandibular region. Evaluation of the prevalence and the degree of lingual concavity and their possible complications. Medicina Oral, Patología Oral y Cirugía Bucal. 2016;21(6):731-736. https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.21256.
  17. Huang R-Y, Cochran DL, Cheng WC, Lin MH, Fan WH, Sung CE, Mau LP, Huang PH, Shieh YS. Risk of lingual plate perforation for virtual immediate implant placement in the posterior mandible. J Am Dental Assoc. 2015;146(10):735-742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adaj.2015.04.027
  18. Nickenig H-J, Wichmann M, Eitner S, Zöller JE, Kreppel M. Lingual concavities in the mandible: A morphological study using cross-sectional analysis determined by CBCT. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015;43(2):254-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2014.11.018
  19. Chan HL, Brooks SL, Fu JH, Yeh CY, Rudek I, Wang HL. Cross-sectional analysis of the mandibular lingual concavity using cone beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22(2):201-296. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02018.x
  20. Kamburoğlu K, Acar B, Yüksel S, Paksoy CS. CBCT quantitative evaluation of mandibular lingual concavities in dental implant patients. Surg Radiol Anat. 2015;37:1209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-015-1493-9
  21. Chiapasco M, Abati S, Romeo E, Vogel G. Clinical outcome of autogenous bone blocks or guided bone regeneration with e-PTFE membranes for the reconstruction of narrow edentulous ridges. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1999;10:278-288.
  22. Gupta J, Ali SP. Cone beam computed tomography in oral implants. National J Maxillofacial Surg. 2013;4(1):2-6. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-5950.117811.
  23. Froum S, Casanova L, Byrne S, Cho SC. Risk assessment before extraction for immediate implant placement in the posterior mandible: a computerized tomographic scan study. J Periodontol. 2011;82:395-402. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2010.100360
  24. Angelopoulos C, Aghaloo T. Cone Beam Computed Tomography for the Implant Patient. Dental Clinics of North America. 2011;55(1):141-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2010.08.001
  25. Chan HL, Benavides E, Yeh CY, Fu JH, Rudek IE, Wang HL. Risk assessment of lingual plate perforation in posterior mandibular region: a virtual implant placement study using cone-beam computed tomography. J Periodontol. 2011;82(1):129-135. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2010.100313
Contact the author
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

Contact us
If you have any questions, complaints or suggestions, please use this feedback form.
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.
Submit Application

You can become an author of one of our magazines, send a request and we will consider it in during the day.

Name
Phone
E-mail
Message
Login
Registration
E-mail
Password
Forgot Password?

Log in to the site using your account in one of the services

Password recovery
E-mail
Login
Register

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.