The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Login
EN
+7 (495) 482-4118
+7 (495) 482-4329
+8 800 250-18-12
  • (toll-free number for subscriptions)
    Mon-Fri from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m.

  • © 1998-2025
+7 (495) 482-43-29
EN
All journals
Journal
Year
Year
Search result: 0

Oyuntugs R.

Mongolian National University Medical Sciences

Ganjargal G.

Mongolian National University Medical Sciences

Enebish S.

Mongolian National University Medical Sciences

Sunjidmaa Z.

Mongolian National University Medical Sciences

Erdenebulgan B.

Mongolian National Diagnostic Center

Juramt B.

Mongolian National University Medical Sciences

Delgertsetseg J.

Mongolian National University Medical Sciences

Evaluation of morphology of incisor section of the upper jaw using cone beam computed tomography in Mongolians

Authors:

Oyuntugs R., Ganjargal G., Enebish S., Sunjidmaa Z., Erdenebulgan B., Juramt B., Delgertsetseg J.

More about the authors

Journal: Stomatology. 2025;104(5): 53‑56

DOI: 10.17116/stomat202510405153

Read: 335 times

Buy for 300₽
Contact the author
Table of contents

EVALUATION OF MORPHOLOGY OF INCISOR SECTION OF THE UPPER JAW USING CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY IN MONGOLIANS
EVALUATION OF MORPHOLOGY OF INCISOR SECTION OF THE UPPER JAW USING CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY IN MONGOLIANS

To cite this article:

Oyuntugs R, Ganjargal G, Enebish S, Sunjidmaa Z, Erdenebulgan B, Juramt B, Delgertsetseg J. Evaluation of morphology of incisor section of the upper jaw using cone beam computed tomography in Mongolians. Stomatology. 2025;104(5):53‑56. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/stomat202510405153

Подписка 2026 Стоматология (Stomatology)
МСФ на ЯМ
Использование инфографики авторами научных работ
Recommended articles:
Digi­tal dental approach in reha­bilitation of a patient treated for unilateral anky­losis of a temporomandibular joint using condylotomy. Stomatology. 2025;(1):9-16
Features of the temporomandibular joint morphology and function in the adults with different growth patterns. Stomatology. 2025;(1):29-36
Clinical and radiological features of inflammatory collateral cysts: retrospective case series. Stomatology. 2025;(2):64-71
Diagnostics and study of the prevalence of Kimmerle’s anomaly among patients with malo­cclusion. Russian Journal of Stomatology. 2025;(2):17-17
Comparison of different types of maxi­llary expa­nsion in patients with transversal jaw anomalies. Russian Journal of Stomatology. 2025;(3):55-61
3D-morphometric analysis of stomatognatic system in patients with class II malo­cclusion acco­rding to CBCT. Stomatology. 2025;(5):37-42
Application of two-dimensional X-ray studies in asymmetric defo­rmations of the maxi­llofacial region. Russian Journal of Operative Surgery and Clinical Anatomy. 2024;(4-2):64-75
Expe­rimental and clinical evaluation of the safety and effi­cacy of Poly­dexa spray with phenylephrine in acute rhinosinusitis. Russian Bulletin of Otorhinolaryngology. 2025;(4):39-46
Morphometric analysis of the topo­graphic-anatomical rela­tionships between the fora­men ovale and other skull base stru­ctures in the context of exoendoscopic Gasserion ganglion anatomy. Russian Journal of Operative Surgery and Clinical Anatomy. 2025;(3):12-22
Abstract:

THE AIM OF THE STUDY

High precise evaluation of the premaxilla morphology is essential to perform detailed diagnosis and treatment plans in implantology and the orthodontic field. We aimed to study morphometric analysis measurements of the premaxilla.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, maxillary CBCT images from 208 patients were evaluated in the Maxillofacial Radiology department between 2014—2024. Sagittal views were assessed to determine thickness of the anterior part in three levels. The difference in canal diameter and length between genders was evaluated using an One Way ANOVA test.

RESULTS

When determining the thickness of the alveolar ridge of the anterior part of the maxillary bone in the sagittal plane at the upper level, it was 11.00±1.65 mm in men and 10/70±1.78 mm in women (f=0.32), (p=0.811), at the lower level 5.62±0.97 mm in men and 5.35±0.78 mm in women (f=0.54), (p=0.66) and an average level of 6.05±141 mm in men and 5.70±1.18 mm in women (f=0.29), (p=0.83), respectively, statistically significant no gender difference was observed.

CONCLUSION

The average superior thickness of the maxillary anterior bone was 10.85±1.71 mm, the medium thickness was 5.87±1.29 mm, the inferior thickness was 5.48±0.87 mm, among Mongolian adults. We observed that the maxillary anterior bone thickness is increased from tip to base of the them.

Keywords:

CBCT
maxillary anterior bone thickness
method by Mousumi
morphometry

Authors:

Oyuntugs R.

Mongolian National University Medical Sciences

Ganjargal G.

Mongolian National University Medical Sciences

Enebish S.

Mongolian National University Medical Sciences

Sunjidmaa Z.

Mongolian National University Medical Sciences

Erdenebulgan B.

Mongolian National Diagnostic Center

Juramt B.

Mongolian National University Medical Sciences

Delgertsetseg J.

Mongolian National University Medical Sciences

Received:

08.01.2025

Accepted:

05.04.2025

Close metadata

References:

  1. Venkatesh E, Elluru SV. Cone beam computed tomography: basics and applications in dentistry. J Istanb Univ Fac Dent. 2017;51(3 Suppl 1):S102-S121. https://doi.org/10.17096/jiufd.00289
  2. Kumar M, Shanavas M, Sidappa A, Kiran M. Cone Beam Computed Tomography — Know its Secrets. Cone Beam Comput Tomogr. J Int Oral Health. 2015;7(2):64-68. 
  3. Misch CE, Perel ML, Wang HL Implant Success, Survival, and Failure: The International Congress of Oral Implantologists (ICOI) Pisa Consensus Conference. Implant Dent. 2008;17(1):5-15.  https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0b013e3181676059
  4. Lee KJ, Joo E, Kim KD, Lee JS, Park YC, Yu HS. Computed tomographic analysis of tooth-bearing alveolar bone for orthodontic miniscrew placement. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop Off Publ Am Assoc Orthod Its Const Soc Am Board Orthod. 2009;135(4):486-494.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.05.019
  5. Baumgaertel S, Hans MG. Buccal cortical bone thickness for mini-implant placement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;136(2):230-235.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.10.045
  6. Santiago RC, de Paula FO, Fraga MR, Picorelli Assis NMS, Vitral RWF. Correlation between miniscrew stability and bone mineral density in orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;136(2):243-250.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AJODO.2007.08.031
  7. Soumya P, Koppolu P, Pathakota KR, Chappidi V. Maxillary Incisive Canal Characteristics: A Radiographic Study Using Cone Beam Computerized Tomography. Radiol Res Pract. 2019;2019:6151253. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6151253
  8. Kim JH, Shibata S, Abe H, Murakami G, Rodríguez-Vázquez JF. Topographical variations of the incisive canal and nasopalatine duct in human fetuses. Anat Cell Biol. 2019;52(4):426-435.  https://doi.org/10.5115/acb.19.111
  9. Panjnoush M, Norouzi H, Kheirandish Y, Shamshiri AR, Mofidi N. Evaluation of Morphology and Anatomical Measurement of Nasopalatine Canal Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography. J Dent Tehran Iran. 2016; 13(4):287-294. 
  10. Brajlovskaya T.V., Nadtochij A.G., Gadzhikulieva A.K., Abaev M. Vozmozhnost’ polucheniya kostnogo autotransplantata s nebnoj poverhnosti al’veolyarnogo otrostka verhnej chelyusti dlya ustraneniya ogranichennyh kostnyh defektov. Stomatologiya. 2023;102(5):40-49. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/stomat202310205140.
  11. Panda Masumi, Tatapudi Shankar, Anjana Raut, Shruti Dev, Ashwini Kumar Kar, Sadanand Hota. Cone beam computerized tomography evaluation of incisive canal and anterior maxillary bone thickness for placement of immediate implants. Accessed April 11, 2022. https://www.j-ips.org/article.asp?issn=0972-nda4052;year=2018;volume=18;issue=4;spage=356;epage=363;aulast=Pa
  12. Oyuntugs R., Ganjargal G., Enebish S., Sunjidmaa Z., Erdenebulgan B., Juramt B. Evaluation of the morphology of the nasopalatine canal using cone beam computed tomography. J Stomatol. 2022;101(1): 66-69.  https://doi.org/10.17116/stomat202210101166.
  13. Kim YT, Lee JH, Jeong SN. Three-dimensional observations of the incisive foramen on cone-beam computed tomography image analysis. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2020;50(1):48-55.  https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2020.50.1.48
  14. Salemi F, Atarbashi Moghadam F, Shakibai Z, Farhadian M. Three-dimensional Assessment of the Nasopalatine Canal and the Surrounding Bone Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography. J Periodontol Implant Dent. 2018; 8(1):1-7.  https://doi.org/10.15171/jpid.2016.001
  15. Braut V, Bornstein MM, Belser U, Buser D. Thickness of the anterior maxillary facial bone wall-a retrospective radiographic study using cone beam computed tomography. Int J Periodont Restorat Dent. 2011;31(2):125-131. 
  16. Choi JH, Yu HS, Lee KJ, Park YC. Three-dimensional evaluation of maxillary anterior alveolar bone for optimal placement of miniscrew implants. Korean J Orthod. 2014;44(2):54-61.  https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2014.44.2.54
  17. Almasoud NN, Tanneru N, Marei HF. Alveolar bone density and its clinical implication in the placement of dental implants and orthodontic mini-implants. Saudi Med J. 2016;37(6):684-689.  https://doi.org/10.15537/Smj.2016.6.14274
  18. Porto Ocl, SILVA BS de F, Silva JA. CBCT assessment of bone thickness in maxillary and mandibular teeth: an anatomic study. J Appl Oral Sci. 28: e20190148. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2019-0148
  19. Mousumi P, Thatapudi Sh, Anjana R, Shruti D, Aswini K, and Sadanand H. Cone beam computerized tomography evaluation of incisive canal and anterior maxillary bone thickness for placement of immediate implants. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2018;18(4):356-363.  https://doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_167_18.
  20. Holm M, Jost-Brinkmann PG, Mah J, Bumann A. Bone thickness of the anterior palate for orthodontic miniscrews. Angle Orthod. 2016;86(5):826-831.  https://doi.org/10.2319/091515-622.1
  21. Al-Amery S, Nambiar P, Jamaludin M, John J, Ngeow WC. Cone Beam Computed Tomography Assessment of the Maxillary Incisive Canal and Foramen: Considerations of Anatomical Variations When Placing Immediate Implants. PloS One. 2015;10:0117251. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117251
Contact the author
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

Contact us
If you have any questions, complaints or suggestions, please use this feedback form.
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.
Submit Application

You can become an author of one of our magazines, send a request and we will consider it in during the day.

Name
Phone
E-mail
Message
Login
Registration
E-mail
Password
Forgot Password?

Log in to the site using your account in one of the services

Password recovery
E-mail
Login
Register

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.