Modern aspects of one-stage dental implantation in the aesthetic zone of the upper jaw with alveolar bone atrophy

Losev F.F.; Brailovskaya T.V.; Abaev A.Z.; Troitsky S.S.

doi:https://doi.org/10.17116/stomat2025104041112

Losev F.F.

Central Research Institute of Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery;
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)

Brailovskaya T.V.

Central Research Institute of Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery;
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)

ORCID: 0000-0003-0407-0885

Abaev A.Z.

Central Research Institute of Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery

ORCID: 0009-0000-6499-9448

Troitsky S.S.

Central Research Institute of Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery

ORCID: 0009-0000-7883-3107

Modern aspects of one-stage dental implantation in the aesthetic zone of the upper jaw with alveolar bone atrophy

Authors:

Losev F.F., Brailovskaya T.V., Abaev A.Z., Troitsky S.S.

More about the authors

Journal: Stomatology. 2025;104(4): 112‑115

DOI: 10.17116/stomat2025104041112

Read: 408 times

Contact the author

Table of contents

To cite this article:

Losev FF, Brailovskaya TV, Abaev AZ, Troitsky SS. Modern aspects of one-stage dental implantation in the aesthetic zone of the upper jaw with alveolar bone atrophy. Stomatology. 2025;104(4):112‑115. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/stomat2025104041112

Подписка 2026 Стоматология (Stomatology)

Использование инфографики авторами научных работ

Recommended articles:

Prospects for developing domestic instruments for dental implantation in various clinical conditions. Russian Journal of Stomatology. 2024;(4):4-11

Comparative analysis of the state of the microvasculature of the oral mucosa in persons with metabolic syndrome in the aspect of orthopedic dental rehabilitation. Stomatology. 2024;(6-2):15-22

Model selection for determination of primary stability of dental implants in experimental studies. Stomatology. 2024;(6-2):53-57

Analysis of complications of dental treatment using orthopedic structures with different types of fixation on dental implants. Russian Journal of Stomatology. 2025;(1):23-29

Short and long-term results of bone grafting of the maxillary alveolar process in patients with alveolar ridge cleft. Stomatology. 2025;(2):24-29

Xenogenic collagen matrix for the treatment of multiple gingival recessions. Stomatology. 2025;(3):33-38

Esthetic evaluation of gingival recession plastic surgery in patients using collagen matrices. Stomatology. 2025;(4):57-61

Ossification of the gum over intraosseal implant. Russian Journal of Archive of Pathology. 2024;(6):70-73

Artificial intelligence-based software for digital assessment of reparative bone tissue regeneration. Regenerative Biotechnologies, Preventive, Digital and Predictive Medicine. 2025;(1):19-24

Bone grafting and implantation in facial contouring: synergy or opposition?. Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine. 2025;(2):25-41

Abstract:

Single-stage dental implantation in the aesthetic zone of the upper jaw is currently a promising method for restoring the dentition, but it requires a highly qualified dental surgeon. The success of treatment depends on careful planning, taking into account the anatomical and physiological characteristics of the aesthetic zone of patients and the use of modern diagnostic methods, as well as strict adherence to treatment protocols. Analysis of modern scientific literature shows that long-term clinical studies are needed to determine optimal protocols, improve them and evaluate the long-term results of single-stage dental implantation in the frontal zone of the upper jaw. Further research should be aimed at developing new methods for preventing and treating aesthetic and functional complications.

Keywords:

one-stage dental implantation

aesthetic zone

dental implantation

alveolar ridge atrophy

gingival recession

gingival biotype

bone grafting

soft tissue grafting

Authors:

Losev F.F.

Central Research Institute of Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery;
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)

Brailovskaya T.V.

Central Research Institute of Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery;
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)

ORCID: 0000-0003-0407-0885

Abaev A.Z.

Central Research Institute of Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery

ORCID: 0009-0000-6499-9448

Troitsky S.S.

Central Research Institute of Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery

ORCID: 0009-0000-7883-3107

Received:

30.05.2025

Accepted:

13.06.2025

Close metadata

References:

Buser D, Martin W, Belser UC. Optimizing esthetics for implant restorations in the anterior maxilla: anatomic and surgical considerations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19(Suppl):43-61. PMID: 15635945.
Morton D, Chen ST, Martin WC, Levine RA, Buser D. Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding optimizing esthetic outcomes in implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29(Suppl): 216-220. PMID: 24660199. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2013.g3
Zweers J, Thomas RZ, Slot DE, Weisgold AS, Van der Weijden FG. Characteristics of periodontal biotype, its dimensions, associations and prevalence: a systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. 2014 Oct;41(10):958-971. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12275.
Spray JR, Black CG, Morris HF, Ochi S. The influence of bone thickness on facial marginal bone response: stage 1 placement through stage 2 uncovering. Ann Periodontol. 2000 Dec;5(1):119-128. https://doi.org/10.1902/annals.2000.5.1.119
Frost NA, Mealey BL, Jones AA, Huynh-Ba G. Periodontal Biotype: Gingival Thickness as It Relates to Probe Visibility and Buccal Plate Thickness. J Periodontol. 2015 Oct;86(10):1141-1149. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2015.140394
Bondarenko NN, Balakhontseva EV. Measurement of optical density of bone tissue of the alveolar process of the jaws in periodontal diseases using three-dimensional computed tomography. Kazan Medical Journal. 2012; 4:660-661. (In Russ.).
Chibisova MA, Orekhova LYu, Serova NV. Features of the diagnostic examination technique for patients with periodontal diseases using a cone beam computed tomograph. Institute of Dentistry. 2014;1(62):84-87. (In Russ.).
Ron GI, Uvarova LV, Elovikova TM. Experience of synchronous visualization of the mineral density of the lower jaw of a patient with periodontitis on three-dimensional reconstruction. Problems of Dentistry. 2015;1:15-19. (In Russ.).
Timock AM, Cook V, McDonald T, Leo MC, Crowe J, Benninger BL, Covell DA Jr. Accuracy and reliability of buccal bone height and thickness measurements from cone-beam computed tomography imaging. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Nov;140(5):734-744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.06.021.PMID:22051495
Dobrovolskaya OV, Dobrovolsky AV, Pavlish IV, Lugovaya LA. Surgical methods of forming the gingival margin at the second stage of implantation. Ukrainian Dental Almanac. 2016;4:87-90. (In Russ.).
Novikov VS. Dental “pink” aesthetics. DentArt. 2008;4:33-40. (In Russ.).
Reddy AA, Kumar PA, Sailaja S, Chakravarthy Y, Chandra RV. Concomitant Correction of a Soft-Tissue Fenestration with Keratinised Tissue Augmentation By Using A Rotated Double-Pedicle Flap During Second-Stage Implant Surgery. A Case Report. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Dec;9(12):ZD16-ZD19. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2015/17026.6996
Park JB. Widening Keratinized Tissue Using Modified Free Gingival Graft. J Oral Implantol. 2016 Feb;42(1):114-116. https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-D-13-00353
Gorbatova EA. Topographical features of the gums. Periodontology. 2003; 4(29):19-20. (In Russ.).
Ramanauskaite A, Sader R. Esthetic complications in implant dentistry. Periodontol 2000. 2022 Feb;88(1):73-85. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12412.PMID:35103323
Weng D, Nagata MJ, Bell M, de Melo LG, Bosco AF. Influence of microgap location and configuration on peri-implant bone morphology in nonsubmerged implants: an experimental study in dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010 May-Jun;25(3):540-547. PMID: 20556253.
Juodzbalys G. Socket morphology based treatment for implant es-thetics: A pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010;25:970-978.
Hu L, Han X, Zhang D, Wu J, Huang S. Buccal plate preservation with immediate post-extraction implant placement and provisionalization in anterior maxillary tooth: Preliminary results of a new technique using Teruplug collagen. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023 Dec;124(6S):101536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2023.101536
Dyachkova EYu, Tarasenko SV, Sudyev SA, Ivanov SS, Kuznetsov AI, Atef SA, Bekasov IS. Improvements to the protocol of one-stage dental implantation surgery for patients with tooth loss. Problems of Dentistry. 2022; 18(4):73-79. (In Russ.).
Malchiodi L, Cucchi A, Ghensi P, Consonni D, Nocini PF. Influence of crown-implant ratio on implant success rates and crestal bone levels: a 36-month follow-up prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Feb; 25(2):240-251. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12105
Zhao B, Xu H, Wang W, Li X. Single Immediate Implant Placement into Anterior Maxillary Sockets with Facial Bone Defects: A 5-Year Retrospective Study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2023 Mar-Apr;38(2):374-380. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.10160.PMID:37083918
Olesova VN. Morphological characteristics of the oral mucosa before and after intraosseous implantation in various conditions of the tissue bed. New in Dentistry. 1997;6:26. (In Russ.).
Chen ST, Beagle J, Jensen SS, Chiapasco M, Darby I. Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding surgical techniques. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24:272-278. PMID: 19885450.
Januário AL, Duarte WR, Barriviera M, Mesti JC, Araújo MG, Lindhe J. Dimension of the facial bone wall in the anterior maxilla: a cone-beam computed tomography study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 Oct;22(10):1168-1171. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02086.x