The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Losev F.F.

Central Research Institute of Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery;
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)

Brailovskaya T.V.

Central Research Institute of Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery;
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)

Sarganov A.F.

Central Research Institute of Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery

Current state of the issue of using surgical templates for dental implantation in the treatment of patients with missing teeth

Authors:

Losev F.F., Brailovskaya T.V., Sarganov A.F.

More about the authors

Journal: Stomatology. 2025;104(6): 60‑66

Read: 403 times


To cite this article:

Losev FF, Brailovskaya TV, Sarganov AF. Current state of the issue of using surgical templates for dental implantation in the treatment of patients with missing teeth. Stomatology. 2025;104(6):60‑66. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/stomat202510406160

Recommended articles:
Protector-retractor device for soft tissues of a surgical angu­lar tip. Russian Journal of Stomatology. 2025;(3):48-54

References:

  1. World Health Organization. Global oral health status report: towards universal health coverage for oral health by 2030. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2015.10.022
  2. Gargallo-Albiol J, Barootchi S, Salomó-Coll O, Wang HL. Advantages and disadvantages of implant navigation surgery. A systematic review. Ann Anat. 2019;225:1-10.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2015.10.022
  3. Widmann G, Fischer B, Berggren JP, Dennhardt A, Schullian P, Reto B, Puelacher W. Cone beam computed tomography vs multislice computed tomography in computer-aided design/computer-assisted manufacture guided implant surgery based on three-dimensional optical scanning and stereolithographic guides: Does image modality matter? Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016;31(3):527-533.  https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.4222
  4. Chen S, Ou Q, Lin X, Wang Y. Comparison between a computer-aided surgical template and the free-hand method: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Implant Dent. 2019;28(6):578-589.  https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000915
  5. Rozov RA, Trezubov VN, Shalaginova AV, Kusevitsky LYa. Comparative in vitro assessment of the accuracy of open-type dental scanners in obtaining a dentition model. Periodontology. 2020;25(3):231-236.  https://doi.org/10.33925/1683-3759-2020-25-3-231-236
  6. Kiatkroekkrai P, Takolpuckdee C, Subbalekha K, Mattheos N, Pimkhaokham A. Accuracy of implant position when placed using static computer-assisted implant surgical guides manufactured with two different optical scanning techniques: A randomized clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020;49(3):377-383.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2019.11.010
  7. Sun Y, Ding Q, Yuan F, Zhang L, Sun Y, Xie Q. Accuracy of a chairside, fused deposition modeling three-dimensional-printed, single tooth surgical guide for implant placement: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022;33(10):1000-1009. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13981
  8. Lee WC, Huang CH, Chung SC, Wei CC. An efficient and accurate approach for fabricating dental implant surgical guides. Biomed Mater Eng. 2014;24(6):2689-2695. https://doi.org/10.3233/BME-141086
  9. Scherer U, Stoetzer M, Ruecker M, Gellrich NC, von See C. Template-guided vs. non-guided drilling in site preparation of dental implants. Clin Oral Investig. 2015;19(6):1339-1346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-014-1403-0
  10. Shen P, Zhao J, Fan L, Qiu H, Xu W, Wang Y, Zhang S, Kim YJ. Accuracy evaluation of computer-designed surgical guide template in oral implantology. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015;43(10):2189-2194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2015.10.022
  11. Stefanelli LV, de Groot BS, Lipton DI, Mandelaris GA. Accuracy of a dynamic dental implant navigation system in a private practice. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019;34(1):205-213.  https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.6939
  12. Salem D. Surgical guides for dental implants. A suggested new classification. J Dent Oral Health. 2019;6:1-8.  https://doi.org/10.16966/2378-7090.245
  13. Tallarico M, Kim YJ, Cocchi F, Martinolli M, Meloni SM. Accuracy of computer-assisted template-based implant placement using two different surgical templates designed with or without metallic sleeves: A randomized controlled trial. Dent J (Basel). 2019;7(3):41.  https://doi.org/10.3390/dj7030041
  14. Tallarico M, Kim YJ, Cocchi F, Martinolli M, Meloni SM. Accuracy of newly developed sleeve-designed templates for insertion of dental implants: A prospective multicenter clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019;21(1):108-113.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12747
  15. Tallarico M, Esposito M, Xhanari E, Caneva M, Meloni SM. Computer-guided vs freehand placement of immediately loaded dental implants: 5-year postloading results of a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2018;11(2):203-213.  https://doi.org/10.3290/j.ejoi.a40195
  16. Tallarico M, Scrascia R, Annucci M, Meloni SM, Lumbau AI, Koshovari A, Xhanari E, Martinolli M. Errors in implant positioning due to lack of planning: A clinical case report of new prosthetic materials and solutions. Materials. 2020;13(7):1883. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13071883
  17. Tallarico M, Martinolli M, Kim Y. Accuracy of computer-assisted template-based implant placement using two different surgical templates designed with or without metallic sleeves: A randomized controlled trial. Dentistry J. 2019;7(2):47.  https://doi.org/10.3390/dj7020047
  18. Skjerven H, Riis UH, Herlofsson BB, Ellingsen JE. In vivo accuracy of implant placement using a full digital planning modality and stereolithographic guides. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019;34(1):124-132.  https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.6939
  19. Saini RS, Bavabeedu SS, Quadri SA, Gurumurthy V, Kanji MA, Kuruniyan MS, Binduhayyim RIH, Avetisyan A, Heboyan A. Impact of 3D imaging techniques and virtual patients on the accuracy of planning and surgical placement of dental implants: A systematic review. Digit Health. 2024;10: 20552076241253550. https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076241253550
  20. Bencharit S, Staffen A, Yeung M, Whitley D 3rd, Laskin DM, Deeb GR. In vivo tooth-supported implant surgical guides fabricated with desktop stereolithographic printers: Fully guided surgery is more accurate than partially guided surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018;76(7):1431-1439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2018.02.010
  21. Unger S, Benic GI, Ender A, Pasic P, Hämmerle CHF, Stadlinger B. Computer-assisted bone augmentation, implant planning and placement: An in vitro investigation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2023;34(7):719-726.  https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.14098
  22. Sennhenn-Kirchner S, Weustermann S, Mergeryan H, Jacobs HG, Borg-von Zepelin M, Kirchner B. Preoperative sterilization and disinfection of drill guide templates. Clin Oral Investig. 2008;12(2):179-187.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-007-0173-2
  23. Smith PN, Palenik CJ, Blanchard SB. Microbial contamination and the sterilization/disinfection of surgical guides used in the placement of endosteal implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011;26(2):274-281.  https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2011.0202
  24. Marei HF, Alshaia A, Alarifi S, Almasoud N, Abdelhady A. Effect of steam heat sterilization on the accuracy of 3D printed surgical guides. Implant Dent. 2019;28(4):372-377.  https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000915

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.