The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Minenok V.A.

Kursk State Medical University

Luneva I.S.

Kursk State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia

Ivanova O.Yu.

Kursk State Medical University

Lebedev A.S.

Center of Information Technologies in Design Russian Academy of Sciences

Pelvic-head disproportion: choice of delivery tactics

Authors:

Minenok V.A., Luneva I.S., Ivanova O.Yu., Lebedev A.S.

More about the authors

Read: 8228 times


To cite this article:

Minenok VA, Luneva IS, Ivanova OYu, Lebedev AS. Pelvic-head disproportion: choice of delivery tactics. Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2023;23(1):17‑22. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/rosakush20232301117

Recommended articles:
The expe­rience of performing metroplasty at placenta accreta in the Repu­blic of Crimea. Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2025;(1):77-81
Cesa­rean section in modern obstetrics: problems and ways to overcome them. Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2025;(4):5-18
Septic complications after abdo­minal deli­very (literature review). Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2024;(6):108-117

References:

  1. Lebedenko EYu, Bespalaya AV, Feoktistova TE, Rymashevskii MA. Analysis of global trends in the level of cesarean section using the Robson classification. Meditsinskii vestnik Yuga Rossii. 2021;12:2:16-21. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21886/2219-8075-2021-12-2-16-21
  2. Singleton birth, delivery by caesarean section. Klinicheskie rekomendatsii. Utv. professional’nym soobshchestvom: Rossiiskoe obshchestvo akusherov-ginekologov, Assotsiatsiya akusherskikh anesteziologov-reanimatologov. M. 2021;106. (In Russ.).
  3. O’Donovan C, O’Donovan J. Why do women request an elective cesarean delivery for non-medical reasons? A systematic review of the qualitative literature. Birth. 2018;45:109-119.  https://doi.org/10.1111/birt.12319
  4. Gondwe T, Betha K, Kusneniwar GN, Bunker CH, Tang G, Simhan H, Reddy PS, Haggerty CL. Maternal factors associated with mode of delivery in a population with a high cesarean section rate. J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2019;9:4:252-258.  https://doi.org/10.2991/jegh.k.191017.001
  5. Dunsworth HM. There is no «obstetrical dilemma» towards a braver medicine with fewer childbirth interventions. Perspect Biolog Med. 2018;61:249-263.  https://doi.org/10.1353/pbm.2018.0040
  6. Fremondiere P, Thollon L, Marchal F. Pelvic and neonatal size correlations in light of evolutionary hypotheses. Am J Hum Biol. 2021;e23619. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.23619
  7. Boerma T, Ronsmans C, Melesse DY, Barros JD, Barros FC, Juan L, Moller A, Say L, Hosseinpoor AR, Yi Mu, De Lyra Rabello Neto D, Temmerman M. Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections. Lancet. 2018;392:1341-1348. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31928-7
  8. Malgazhdarova B.S., Kazbekova G.K. Prevention of birth injuries, the key to preventing disability of children. Vostochno-evropeiskii nauchnyi zhurnal. 2021;65:16-18. (In Russ.).
  9. Holmes LJr, O’Neill L, Elmi H. Implication of vaginal and cesarean section delivery method in black-white differentials in infant mortality in the United States: Linked birth/infant death records. 2007—2016. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;30:31-46.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17093146
  10. Betran AP, Temmerman M, Kingdon C, Mohiddin A, Opiyo N, Torloni MR, Zhang J, Musana O, Wanyonyi SZ, Gülmezoglu AM, Downe S. Interventions to reduce unnecessary caesarean sections in healthy women and babies. The Lancet. 2018;392.10155:1358-1368. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31927-5
  11. Pol’skoi VS, Minenok VA. The relationship between the constitution of the body and the structure of the pelvis in women. Integrativnye tendentsii v meditsine i obrazovanii. 2019;4:58-61. (In Russ.).
  12. Pol’skoi VS, Ryazaeva LM, Minenok VA. The relationship of the constitution of the body of women to the possibility of childbirth in a natural way. Universitetskaya nauka: vzglyad v budushchee. 2020;5:639-643. (In Russ.).
  13. Pol’skoi VS, Minenok VA. On the issue of studying the narrow pelvis in women. Integrativnye tendentsii v meditsine i obrazovanii. 2021;1:91-94. (In Russ.).
  14. Potapenko VYu. The relationship of anthropometric data with the degree of narrowing and the shape of the pelvis in women (literature review). Nedelya molodezhnoi nauki-2021. 2021;5:386. (In Russ.).
  15. Bugaevskii K.A. Anatomical and morphological features of the bone pelvis in young athletes engaged in various types of martial arts. Edinoborstva. 2018;5:30-41. (In Russ.).
  16. Kitai T, Hyodo Y, Morikawa H. Development of CT pelvimetry using deep learning based reconstruction. Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi. 2020;76:1:16-25.  https://doi.org/10.6009/jjrt.2020_JSRT_76.1.16
  17. Ibragimov BF, Khudoyarova DR. Modern methods of diagnosis of hyperandrogenic conditions in gynecology. Dostizheniya nauki i obrazovaniya. 2019;10:51-53. (In Russ.).
  18. Chernykh AV, Belov EV, Sudakov DV. Clinical and morphological parallels in the diagnosis of transversely narrowed pelvis in young primiparous. Odnoralovskie morfologicheskie chteniya. 2018;5:245-249. (In Russ.).
  19. Pavlicev M, Romero R, Mitteroecker P. Evolution of the human pelvis and obstructed labor: new explanations of an old obstetrical dilemma. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;222:1:3-16.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2019.06.043
  20. Fremondiere P, Thollon L, Marchal F. The emergence of obstetrical mechanism: From Lucy to Homo sapiens. Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senologie. 2017;45:164-171.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gofs.2017.01.011
  21. Grunstra ND, Zachos FE. Humans and inverted bats: A comparative approach to the obstetric conundrum. Am J Hum Biol. 2019;31:1-18.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.23227
  22. Stansfield E, Fischer B, Grunstra N, Pouca MV, Mitteroecker P. The evolution of pelvic canal shape and rotational birth in humans. BMC Biol. 2021;19:1:224.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-021-01150-w
  23. Betti L, Manica A. Human variation in the shape of the birth canal is significant and geographically structured. Proceed Royal Soc B. 2018;285:1-9.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2018.1807
  24. Eide KT, Morken NH, Baeroe K. Maternal reasons for requesting planned cesarean section in Norway: a qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19:1:102.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2250-6
  25. Franz M, von Bismarck A, Delius M, Ertl-Wagner B, Deppe C, Mahner S, Hasbargen U, Hübener C. MR pelvimetry: prognosis for successful vaginal delivery in patients with suspected fetopelvicdisproportion or breech presentation at term. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017;295:2:351-359.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-016-4276-6
  26. Goonewardene M, Peiris M, Kariyawasam S, Mallawaaratchi S, Kadawathage D, Sanjeewa L, Widanapathirana P, Sandeepani I. Analysis of high caesarean section rates: the second step after audits using the Ten Group Classification System. Ceylon Med J. 2017;62:3:149-158.  https://doi.org/10.4038/cmj.v62i3.8518
  27. Carvalho Neto RH, Viana Junior AB, Moron AF, Araujo Junior E. Pubic arch angle measurement by transperineal ultrasonography: A Prospective cross-sectional study. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2020;42:4:181-187.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1709690
  28. Siccardi M, Valle C, Di Matteo F, Angius VA. Postural approach to the pelvic diameters of obstetrics: the dynamic external pelvimetry test. Cureus. 2019;11:11:e6111. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.6111
  29. Mudrov VA. Possibilities for predicting abnormal labor at the present stage. Zhurnal akusherstva i zhenskikh boleznei. 2020;69:13-26. (In Engl.). https://doi.org/10.17816/KMJ2021-47
  30. Pol’skoi VS, Minenok VA. Prediction of childbirth depending on the shape and degree of narrowing of the pelvis. Integrativnye tendentsii v meditsine i obrazovanii. 2020;1:62-65. (In Russ.).
  31. Siccardi M, Valle C, Di Matteo F. Dynamic external pelvimetry test in third trimester pregnant women: Shifting positions affect pelvic biomechanics and create more room in obstetric diameters. Cureus. 2021;13:3:e13631. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.13631
  32. Dadabaev VK, Tkachuk OI, Komionskaya ER. Development and implementation of methods for predicting a narrow pelvis, in order to create a cabinet for the prevention of birth injuries. Tverskoi meditsinskii zhurnal. 2018;3:36-44. (In Russ.).
  33. Cohen WR, Friedman EA. Clinical evaluation of labor: an evidence- and experience-based approach. J Perinat Med. 2020;49:3:241-253.  https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2020-0256
  34. Fischer B, Mitteroecker P. Covariation between human pelvis shape, stature, and head size alleviates the obstetric dilemma. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2015;112:5655-5660. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1420325112
  35. Silva Charvalho P, Bittar MH, Stjernholm YV. Indications for increase in caesarean delivery. Reprod Health. 2018;16:1:1-6.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-019-0723-8
  36. Mochalova M.N., Ponomareva Yu.N., Mudrov A.A., Mudrov V.A. Modern methods of diagnosis and prediction of clinically narrow pelvis. Zhurnal akusherstva i zhenskikh boleznei. 2016;5:82-91. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17816/JOWD65582-91
  37. Melamed N, Yogev Y, Meizner I, Mashiach R, Bardin R, Ben-Haroush A. Sonographic fetal weight estimation. Which model should be used? J Ultrasound Med. 2019;28:617-629.  https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.2009.28.5.617
  38. Phexell E, Akesson A, Söderberg M, Bolejko A. Intra- and inter-rater reliability in a comparative study of cross-sectional and spiral computed tomography pelvimetry methods. Acta Radiologica Open. 2019;8:6:2058460119855187. https://doi.org/10.1177/2058460119855187
  39. Gleason RL Jr, Yigeremu M, Debebe T, Teklu S, Zewdeneh D. Weiler M, Frank N, Tolentino L, Attia S, Dixon JB, Kwon C, Pokutta-Paskaleva A, Gleason KA. A safe, low-cost, easy-to-use 3D camera platform to assess risk of obstructed labor due to cephalopelvic disproportion. PLoSOne. 2018;13:9:e0203865. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203865
  40. Phexell E, Söderberg M, Bolejko A. Estimation of foetal radiation dose in a comparative study of pelvimetry with conventional radiography and different computer tomography methods. Int J Radiol Radiat Ther. 2018;5:243-247. 
  41. Pattinson RC, Cuthbert A, Vannevel V. Pelvimetry for fetal cephalic presentations at or near term for deciding on mode of delivery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;3:CD000161. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000161.pub2
  42. Alekseeva AYu, Ziganshin AM. The historical formation of methods for calculating the estimated weight of the fetus. Sibirskoe meditsinskoe obozrenie. 2021;4:18-25. (In Russ.).
  43. Mochalova MN, Mudrov VA, Mudrov AA. The role of ultrasound in the diagnosis of clinically narrow pelvis. Zabaikal’skii meditsinskii vestnik. 2019;2:48-56. (In Russ.).
  44. Fremondiere P, Thollon L, Adalian P, Delotte J, Marchal F. Which foetal-pelvic variables are useful for predicting caesarean section and instrumental assistance? Med Princ Pract. 2017;26:4:359-367.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000477732
  45. Harper LM, Odibo AO. Radiographic measures of the mid pelvis to predict cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;208:1-6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2013.02.050
  46. Mel’nikov AP, Akhvlediani KN, Ostrina SYa, Mammadova AR. Spontaneous uncomplicated delivery in a patient with an obliquely oval contracted pelvis. Rossiskii vestnik akushera-ginekologa. 2020;20:3:68-70. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/rosakush20202003168
  47. Wells JC, Figueiroa JN, Alves JG. Maternal pelvic dimensions and neonatal size: Implications for growth plasticity in early life as adaptation. Evol Med Public Health. 2018;1:191-200.  https://doi.org/10.1093/emph/eox016

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.