The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Petrov I.A.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Siberian State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia, Tomsk, Russia

Dmitrieva M.L.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Siberian State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia, Tomsk, Russia

Tikhonovskaya O.A.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Siberian State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia, Tomsk, Russia

Petrova M.S.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Siberian State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia, Tomsk, Russia

Logvinov S.V.

Sibirskiĭ gosudarstvennyĭ meditsinskiĭ universitet, Tomsk

The current view of natural fertility

Authors:

Petrov I.A., Dmitrieva M.L., Tikhonovskaya O.A., Petrova M.S., Logvinov S.V.

More about the authors

Read: 7075 times


To cite this article:

Petrov IA, Dmitrieva ML, Tikhonovskaya OA, Petrova MS, Logvinov SV. The current view of natural fertility. Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2017;17(2):4‑12. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/rosakush20171724-12

Recommended articles:
Reproductive aspe­cts in the treatment of colo­rectal endo­metriosis. Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2024;(6):140-148

References:

  1. Forman M, Mangini L, Hayward Thelus-Jean R. Life-course origins of the ages at menarche and menopause. AHMT. 2013;1. doi:10.2147/ahmt.s15946
  2. Baird DT, Collins J, Egozcue J, Evers LH, Gianaroli L, Leridon H, Sunde A, Templeton A, Van Steirtreghem A, Cohen J, Grosignani PG, Devroey P, Diedrich K, Fauser BC, Fraser L, Glasier A, Liebaers I, Mautone G, Penney G, Tarlatzis B. Fertility and ageing. Human Reproduction Update. 2005;11:3:261-276. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmi006
  3. Schmidt L, Sobotka T, Bentzen J and Nyboe Andersen A. Demographic and medical consequences of the postponement of parenthood. Human Reproduction Update. 2011;18:1:29-43. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmr040
  4. Mills M, Rindfuss R, McDonald P, te Velde E. Why do people postpone parenthood? Reasons and social policy incentives. Human Reproduction Update. 2011;17:6:848-860. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmr026
  5. Leridon H. A new estimate of permanent sterility by age: Sterility defined as the inability to conceive. Population Studies. 2008;62:1:15-24. doi:10.1080/00324720701804207
  6. Mascarenhas M, Flaxman S, Boerma T, Vanderpoel S, Stevens G. National, Regional, and Global Trends in Infertility Prevalence Since 1990: A Systematic Analysis of 277 Health Surveys. PLoS Med. 2012;9:12:e1001356. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001356
  7. Sear R, Lawson D, Kaplan H and Shenk M. Understanding variation in human fertility: what can we learn from evolutionary demography? Phil Trans R Soc B. 2016;371:1692:20150144. doi:10.1098/rstb.2015.0144
  8. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2015). World Fertility Patterns 2015 — Data Booklet (ST/ESA/SER.A/370). http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/fertility/ world-fertility-patterns-2015.pdf
  9. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2015). World Population Prospects: The 2015 Revision, Key Findings and Advance Tables. Working Paper No. ESA/P/WP.241. https://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/Publications/Files/Key_Findings_WPP_2015.pdf
  10. Colleran H. The cultural evolution of fertility decline: Table 1. Phil Trans R Soc B. 2016;371:1692:20150152. doi:10.1098/rstb.2015.0152
  11. Laland K and Brown G. Niche construction, human behavior, and the adaptive-lag hypothesis. Evol Anthropol. 2006;15:3:95-104. doi:10.1002/evan.20093
  12. Lawson D, Borgerhoff MM. The offspring quantity—quality trade-off and human fertility variation. Phil Trans R Soc B. 2016;371:1692:20150145. doi:10.1098/rstb.2015.0145
  13. Li Q, Geng X, Zheng W, Tang J, Xu B, Shi Q. Current understanding of ovarian aging. Science China Life Sciences. 2012;55:8:659-669. doi:10.1007/s11427-012-4352-5
  14. Amanvermez R, Tosun M. An Update on Ovarian Aging and Ovarian Reserve Tests. Int J Fertil Steril. 2016;9:4:411-415.
  15. Velde E. The variability of female reproductive ageing. Human Reprod Update. 2002;8:2:141-154. doi:10.1093/humupd/8.2.141
  16. Sukur Y, Balik Kivancli I, Ozmen B. Ovarian aging and premature ovarian failure. J Turkish German Gynecol Assoc. 2014;15:3:190-196. doi:10.5152/jtgga.2014.0022
  17. Gleicher N, Weghofer A, Barad D. Defining ovarian reserve to better understand ovarian aging. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2011;9:1:23. doi:10.1186/1477-7827-9-23
  18. Tilly J, Sinclair D. Germline energetics, aging, and female infertility. Cell Metabolism. 2013;17:6:838-850. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2013.05.007
  19. Nazarenko TA. Ovarial'nyi rezerv: opredelenie, diagnostika i znachenie pri stimulyatsii funktsii yaichnikov. Stimulyatsiya funktsii yaichnikov. [Ovarian reserve: definition, diagnosis and importance in stimulation of ovarian function. Ovarian stimulation]. M. 2010;35-43. (In Russ.).
  20. Boyarskii CYu, Gaidukov SN, Chkuaseli AS. Factors which can predict ovarian reserve. Zhurnal akusherstva i zhenskikh boleznei. 2009;58:2:65-71. (In Russ.).
  21. Zhordanidze DO, Nazarenko TA, Durinyan ER, Ivanets TYu. The ovarian reserve in some forms of functional infertility. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya. 2010;5:25-31. (In Russ.).
  22. Findlay J, Hutt K, Hickey M, Anderson R. What is the «ovarian reserve»? Fertil Steril. 2015;103:3:628-630. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.10.037
  23. Sills E, Alper M, Walsh A. Ovarian reserve screening in infertility: Practical applications and theoretical directions for research. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009;146:1:30-36. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.05.008
  24. Monniaux D, Clement F, Dalbies-Tran R, Estienne A, Fabre S, Mansanet C, Monget P. The Ovarian Reserve of Primordial Follicles and the Dynamic Reserve of Antral Growing Follicles: What Is the Link? Biol Reprod. 2014;90:4:85-85. doi:10.1095/biolreprod.113.117077
  25. Pelosi E, Forabosco A, Schlessinger D. Genetics of the ovarian reserve. Front Genet. 2015;6:20. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4606124/pdf/fgene-06-00308.pdf. doi:10.3389/fgene.2015.00308
  26. Lass A, Silye R, Abrams D, Krausz T, Hovatta O, Margara R, Winston R. Follicular density in ovarian biopsy of infertile women: a novel method to assess ovarian reserve. Human Reprod. 1997;12:5:1028-1031. doi:10.1093/humrep/12.5.1028
  27. Kwok R, Johnson N. Ovarian biopsy has no role as a routine diagnostic test of ovarian reserve: a systematic review. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 2012;24:5:492-495. doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.01.020
  28. Sharara F. Assessment of ovarian reserve. Is there still a role for ovarian biopsy?: First do no harm! Human Reprod. 2004;19:3:470-471. doi:10.1093/humrep/deh110
  29. Ovarial'nyi rezerv i fertil'nost': slozhnosti XXI veka. Ratsional'nyi podkhod k sokhraneniyu reproduktivnogo rezerva kak zalog fertil'nosti i osoznannogo detorozhdeniya. Informatsionnoe pis'mo. Ed. Radzinskii VE. M.: Redaktsiya zhurnala Status Praesens. 2015;24. (In Russ.).
  30. Gardner DG, Shoback D. Greenspan's Basic & Clinical Endocrinology. London: McGraw-Hill Higher Education. 2016;896.
  31. Testing and interpreting measures of ovarian reserve: a committee opinion. Fertility and Sterility. 2012;98:6:1407-1415. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.09.036
  32. Broekmans F, Kwee J, Hendriks D, Mol B, Lambalk C. A systematic review of tests predicting ovarian reserve and IVF outcome. Human Reprod Update. 2006;12:6:685-718. doi:10.1093/humupd/dml034
  33. Popovic-Todorovic B. A prospective randomized clinical trial comparing an individual dose of recombinant FSH based on predictive factors versus a 'standard' dose of 150 IU/day in 'standard' patients undergoing IVF/ICSI treatment. Human Reproduction. 2003;18:11:2275-2282. doi:10.1093/humrep/deg472
  34. Tsafrir A, Simon A, Revel A, Reubinoff B, Lewin A, Laufer N. Retrospective analysis of 1217 IVF cycles in women aged 40 years and older. Reprod BioMedicine Online. 2007;14:3:348-355. doi:10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60878-4
  35. Klinkert E. Expected poor responders on the basis of an antral follicle count do not benefit from a higher starting dose of gonadotrophins in IVF treatment: a randomized controlled trial. Human Reprod. 2005;20:3:611-615. doi:10.1093/humrep/deh663
  36. Maheshwari A, Fowler P and Bhattacharya S. Assessment of ovarian reserve—should we perform tests of ovarian reserve routinely? Human Reprod. 2006;21:11:2729-2735. doi:10.1093/humrep/del188
  37. Verhagen T, Hendriks D, Bancsi L, Mol B, Broekmans F. The accuracy of multivariate models predicting ovarian reserve and pregnancy after in vitro fertilization: a metaanalysis. Human Reprod Update. 2008;14:2:95-100. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmn001
  38. Broer S, Mol B, Hendriks D, Broekmans F. The role of antimullerian hormone in prediction of outcome after IVF: comparison with the antral follicle count. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:3:705-714. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.12.013
  39. Hendriks D, Kwee J, Mol B, te Velde E, Broekmans F. Ultrasonography as a tool for the prediction of outcome in IVF patients: a comparative metaanalysis of ovarian volume and antral follicle count. Fertil Steril. 2007;87:4:764-775. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.11.006
  40. Hendriks D, Mol B, Bancsi L, te Velde E, Broekmans F. Antral follicle count in the prediction of poor ovarian response and pregnancy after in vitro fertilization: A metaanalysis and comparison with basal follicle-stimulating hormone level. Fertil Steril. 2005;83:2:291-301. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.10.011
  41. Broekmans F, Soules M, Fauser B. Ovarian Aging: Mechanisms and Clinical Consequences. Endocrine Rev. 2009;30:5:465-493. doi:10.1210/er.2009-0006
  42. Bancsi L. Performance of basal follicle-stimulating hormone in the prediction of poor ovarian response and failure to become pregnant after in vitro fertilization: a metaanalysis. Fertil Steril. 2003;79:5:1091-1100. doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(03)00078-5
  43. van Loendersloot L, Repping S, Bossuyt P, van der Veen F, van Wely M. Prediction models in in vitro fertilization; where are we? A mini review. J Advanced Res. 2014;5:3:295-301. doi:10.1016/j.jare.2013.05.002
  44. van Loendersloot L, van Wely M, Limpens J, Bossuyt P, Repping S,d van der Veen F. Predictive factors in in vitro fertilization (IVF): a systematic review and metaanalysis. Human Reprod Update. 2010;16:6:577-589. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmq015
  45. Rienzi L, Vajta G, Ubaldi F. Predictive value of oocyte morphology in human IVF: a systematic review of the literature. Human Reprod Update. 2010;17:1:34-45. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmq029
  46. Ingilizova G, Ivanov D, Kovachev E, Evrev M, Kostov I, Necheva V. Oocyte quality as a predictive marker for assessment of IVF/ICSI procedure outcome. Akush Ginekol (Sofiia). 2014;53:6:41-46.
  47. Gleicher N, Kushnir V, Sen A, Darmon S, Weghofer A, Wu Y, Wang Q, Zhang L, Albertini D, Barad D. Definition by FSH, AMH and embryo numbers of good-, intermediate- and poor-prognosis patients suggests previously unknown IVF outcome-determining factor associated with AMH. J Translational Med. 2016. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles /PMC4901433/pdf/12967_2016_Article_924.pdf doi: 10.1186/s12967-016-0924-7
  48. Venturella R, Lico D, Sarica A, Falbo M, Gulletta E, Morelli M, Zupi E, Cevenini G, Cannataro M, Zullo F. OvAge: a new methodology to quantify ovarian reserve combining clinical, biochemical and 3D-ultrasonographic parameters. J Ovarian Res. 2015. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4392473/pdf/13048_2015_Article_149.pdf doi: 10.1186/s13048-015-0149-z
  49. Ferraretti A, La Marca A, Fauser B, Tarlatzis B, Nargund G, Gianaroli L. ESHRE consensus on the definition of 'poor response' to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: the Bologna criteria. Human Reprod. 2011;26:7:1616-1624. doi:10.1093/humrep/der092
  50. Younis J, Ben-Ami M, Ben-Shlomo I. The Bologna criteria for poor ovarian response: a contemporary critical appraisal. J Ovarian Res. 2015. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4650906/pdf/13048_2015_Article_204.pdf doi: 10.1186/s13048-015-0204-9
  51. Iwase A, Nakamura T, Nakahara T, Goto M, Kikkawa F. Assessment of ovarian reserve using anti-Müllerian hormone levels in benign gynecologic conditions and surgical interventions: a systematic narrative review. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2014;12:1:125. doi:10.1186/1477-7827-12-125
  52. Jenabi E, Shobeiri F, Hazavehei S, Roshanaei G. Assessment of questionnaire measuring quality of life in menopausal women: A Systematic Review. Oman Med J. 2015;30:3:151-156. doi:10.5001/omj.2015.34
  53. Castelo-Branco C, Hernández-Angeles C. Early menopause: A hazard to a woman's health. Indian J Med Res. 2016;143:4:420. doi:10.4103/0971-5916.184283
  54. Soules M, Sherman S, Parrott E, Rebar R, Santoro N, Utian W, Woods N. Executive summary: Stages of Reproductive Aging Workshop (STRAW). DCLI. 2001;4:4:267-272. doi:10.1080/713605136
  55. Harlow S, Crawford S, Dennerstein L, Burger H, Mitchell E, Sowers M, and for the ReSTAGE Collaboration. Recommendations from a multi-study evaluation of proposed criteria for Staging Reproductive Aging. Climacteric. 2007;10:2:112-119. doi:10.1080/13697130701258838
  56. Harlow S, Gass M, Hall J, Lobo R, Maki P, Rebar R, Sherman S, Sluss P, de Villiers T. Executive summary of the Stages of Reproductive Aging Workshop +10: addressing the unfinished agenda of staging reproductive aging. Climacteric. 2012;15:2:105-114. doi:10.3109/13697137.2011.650656

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.