The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Perepelova T.A.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kursk State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia, Kursk, Russia

Gazazian M.G.

Kafedra akusherstva i ginekologii GBOU VPO "Kurskiĭ gosudarstvennyĭ meditsinskiĭ universitet" Minzdrava Rossii

Bezhin A.I.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kursk State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia, Kursk, Russia

Ishunina T.A.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kursk State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia, Kursk, Russia

Diagnosis of the lower uterine segment after cesarean section

Authors:

Perepelova T.A., Gazazian M.G., Bezhin A.I., Ishunina T.A.

More about the authors

Read: 6167 times


To cite this article:

Perepelova TA, Gazazian MG, Bezhin AI, Ishunina TA. Diagnosis of the lower uterine segment after cesarean section. Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2016;16(5):61‑65. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/rosakush201616561-65

Recommended articles:
The expe­rience of performing metroplasty at placenta accreta in the Repu­blic of Crimea. Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2025;(1):77-81
Cesa­rean section in modern obstetrics: problems and ways to overcome them. Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2025;(4):5-18
Septic complications after abdo­minal deli­very (literature review). Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2024;(6):108-117

References:

  1. Bolotova OV. Modern possibilities of the fetus condition. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya 2009;5:7. (In Russ.).
  2. Savel'eva GM. Caesarean section and its role in modern obstetrics. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya. 2008;3:10. (In Russ.).
  3. Krasnopol'skii VI, Logutova LS, Buyanova SN. Reproduktivnye problemy operirovannoi matki. [Reproductive problems the operated uterus]. M.: Miklosh. 2005;160. (In Russ.).
  4. Strizhakov AN, Lededev VA. Kesarevo sechenie v sovremennom akusherstve. [Caesarean section in modern obstetrics]. M.: Medicina. 1998;304. (In Russ.).
  5. Krasnopol'skii VI, Logutova LS, Buyanova SN, Novikova EG, Popov AA, Chechneva MA, Krasnopol'skaya KV, Fedorov AA. Reproductive problems of the operated uterus. Rossiiskii vestnik akushera-ginekologa. 2013;13:1:78-81. (In Russ.).
  6. Krasnopol'skii VI, Logutova LS, Petrukhin VA, Titchenko LI. Delivery of pregnant women with uterine scar after Caesarean section. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya. 2007;5:33-38. (In Russ.).
  7. Cunningham FG, Mac Donald PC, Gant NF. Caesaerean delivery and Caesaerean hysterectomy.Williams Obstetrics. 2001;537-567.
  8. Ravasia DJ, Wood SL, Pollard JK. Uterine rupture during induced trial of labor among women with previous Cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183:1176-1179.
  9. Rodrigues AL, Porter KB, O’Brien WR. Blunt versus sharp expansion of the uterine incision in low segment Caesarean section. Obstet Gynecol. 1994;171:1022-1025.
  10. Anan'ev VA. Results of Caesarean section with applying single-row and double-row suture on the uterus. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya 2000;4:26-29. (In Russ.).
  11. Chapman SJ, Owen J, Hauth JC. One- versus two- layer closure of a low transverse Cesaerean: the next pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89:16-18.
  12. Ailamazyan EK, Kuz'minykh TU. Reculiarites of the reparation of the myometrium after caesarean section. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya. 2008;1:34-36. (In Russ.).
  13. Ailamazyan EK, Pavlova NG, Polenov NI, Kuz'minykh TU, Shelaeva EV. Morphofunctional evaluation of the lower segment of the uterus at the end of pregnancy and in pregnant women with uterine scar. Zhurnal akusherstva i zhenskikh boleznei. 2006;55:4:11-18. (In Russ.).
  14. Gustovarova TA, Ivanyan AN, Korzhuev SI. Management of pregnancy and labor in patients with uterine scar after Caesarean section. Rossiiskii vestnik akushera-ginekologa. 2007;7:4:45-49. (In Russ.).
  15. Krasnopol'skii VI. Alternative delivery pregnant women with the operated uterus. Zhurnal akusherstva i zhenskikh boleznei. 2003;52:1:20-25. (In Russ.).
  16. Gorbacheva AV. Diagnostics of the condition of the uterine scar in pregnant women undergoing Caesarean section. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya. 2008;1:40-44. (In Russ.).
  17. Zalesnyi AV. A comprehensive assessment of the uterine scar after Caesarean section. Zhurnal akusherstva i zhenskikh boleznei 2010;59:5:118-125. (In Russ.).
  18. Grigoreva YuV, Yamschikov NV, Bormotov AV. Reparative regeneration of tissues of the lower segment of the uterus of rats in experimental stretching. Izvestiya Samarskogo nauchnogo centra Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. 2013;15:3:6:1760-1763. (In Russ.).

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.