The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Shmatova Yu.E.

Vologda Scientific Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Razvarina I.N.

Vologda Scientific Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Trends of the medical and social characteristics of pregnant women: an experience of regional monitoring for the healthy generation formation

Authors:

Shmatova Yu.E., Razvarina I.N.

More about the authors

Journal: Russian Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2023;26(2): 14‑23

Read: 2615 times


To cite this article:

Shmatova YuE, Razvarina IN. Trends of the medical and social characteristics of pregnant women: an experience of regional monitoring for the healthy generation formation. Russian Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2023;26(2):14‑23. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/profmed20232602114

Recommended articles:
Modern aspe­cts of gestational diabetes mellitus: defi­nition, risk factors. Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2025;(2):35-41
Diagnosis and treatment of ovarian cancer in pregnancy. Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2025;(3):27-33

References:

  1. GBD 2019 Demographics Collaborators. Global age-sex-specific fertility, mortality, healthy life expectancy (HALE), and population estimates in 204 countries and territories, 1950—2019: a comprehensive demographic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. The Lancet. 2020;396 (10258):1160-1203. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30977-6
  2. Churilova E, Zakharov S. Reproductive Attitudes of the Russian Population: Is there a Reason for Optimism? Vestnik obshhestvennogo mnenija. 2019; 2(129):69-89. (In Russ.).
  3. Arkhangel’skiy VN, Kalachikova ON. Women and men: differences in fertility rates and reproductive behavior. Ekonomicheskiye i sotsial’nyye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz. 2021;14(5):165-185. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.15838/esc.2021.5.77.10
  4. Arkhangel’skiy VN, Kalachikova ON. Influence of the standard of living on the reproductive behavior of russians: gender aspect. Zhenshchina v rossiyskom obshchestve. 2021; Spetsial’nyy vypusk: 3-24. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21064/WinRS.2021.0.1
  5. Kostina SN, Trynov AV. Cluster analysis of the dynamics of the birth rate of the fourth and subsequent children in the regions of the Russian Federation. Ekonomicheskiye i sotsial’nyye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz. 2021;14(3): 232-245. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.15838/esc.2021.3.75.14
  6. Makarenceva AO. The Impact of the Epidemiological Situation on the Reproductive Intentions of the Population. Monitoring ehkonomicheskojj situacii v Rossii. Tendencii i vyzovy social’no-ehkonomicheskogo razvitija. 2020; 17(119):25-30. (In Russ.).
  7. Sivopliasova SYu. Reproductive Attitudes of Modern Youth to Having Many Children: Patterns and Contradictions. Ekonomicheskiye i sotsial’nyye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz. 2022;15(1):223-242. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.15838/esc.2022.1.79.12
  8. Razvarina IN, Natsun LN. Health of children in the Vologda region from 0 to 3 years. Sotsial’nyye aspekty zdorov’ya naseleniya. Elektronnyj nauchnyj zhurnal. 2019;65(1). Accessed September 22, 2022. (In Russ.). https://vestnik.mednet.ru/content/view/1047/30/lang,ru
  9. Razvarina IN, Gruzdeva MA. School health of children: risk factors. Ponimaniye obshchestva i bezopasnosti. 2019;2(4):115-120. (In Russ.).
  10. Estebsari F, Kandi ZR, Bahabadi FJ, Filabadi ZR, Estebsari K, Mostafaei D. Health-related quality of life and related factors among pregnant women. Journal of Education and Health Promotion. 2020;9:299.  https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_307_20
  11. McKiever M, Frey H, Costantine MM. This person is not on Research Gate, or hasn’t claimed this research yet. Challenges in conducting clinical research studies in pregnant women. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics. 2020;47(4):287-293.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10928-020-09687-z
  12. Shabunova AA, Kalachikova ON. Demographic studies of the VolRC RAS: the formation of a scientific school. Ekonomicheskiye i sotsial’nyye peremeny: fakty, nablyudeniya, prognoz. 2021;14(1):9-22. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.15838/esc.2021.1.73.1
  13. Genomika povedeniya: detskoye razvitiye i obrazovaniye. Pod red. Malykh S.B., Kovas Yu.V., Gaysinoy D.A. Tomsk: Izdatel’skiy Dom Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta; 2016. (In Russ.).
  14. Shabunova AA, Kondakova NA. Health and development of children: results of 20-year monitoring. Ekonomicheskiye i sotsial’nyye peremeny: fakty, nablyudeniya, prognoz. 2014;5(35):33-54. (In Russ.).
  15. Nauehn MS. The Method of Cohort Analysis in Sociology. Zhurnal sociologii i social’nojj antropologii. 2006;3:137-144. (In Russ.).
  16. Il’in VA, Shabunova AA, Kalachikova ON. The potential for increasing the birth rate and family and demographic policy in Russia. Vestnik Rossiyskoy akademii nauk. 2021;9:831-844. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31857/S0869587321090048
  17. Lau Y, Yin L. Maternal, obstetric variables, perceived stress and health-related quality of life among pregnant women in Macao, China. Midwifery. 2011;27(5):668-673. 
  18. McLeod C, Ebeling MD, Baatz JE, Shary JR, Mulligan JR, Wagner CL. Sociodemographic factors affecting perceived stress during pregnancy and the association with immune-mediator concentrations. Journal of Perinatal Medicine. 2021;50(2):192-199.  https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2021-0227
  19. Bodin M, Stern J, Folkmarson L, Tydén T, Larsson M. Coherence of pregnancy planning within couples expecting a child. Midwifery. 2015;31(10): 973-978.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2015.06.009
  20. Razvarina I, Natsun L, Shmatova YU, Gordiyevskaya A. Environment as a risk factor for the health of newborns. Zdorov’ye cheloveka, teoriya i metodika fizicheskoy kul’tury i sporta. 2021;22(2):39-53. (In Russ.).
  21. Kalachikova ON, Gruzdeva MA. Social vulnerability of families with children in modern Russia. Ekonomicheskiye i sotsial’nyye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz. 2019;2:147-160. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.15838/esc.2019.2.62.9
  22. Kovalyuk TV, Benyuk VA. Osobennosti raciona pitaniya beremennyh s normal’noj i nedostatochnoj massoj tela. Sovremennaya medicina: aktual’nye voprosy. Sbornik statej po materialam XXVI mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii №12(26). Novosibirsk: SibAK; 2013. Accessed September 22, 2022. (In Russ.). https://sibac.info/conf/med/xxvi/35827
  23. Maughan B, Taylor B, Taylor A, Butler N, Bynner J. Pregnancy Smoking and Childhood Conduct Problems: A Causal Association? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 2001;42(8):1021-1028. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-7610.00800
  24. Udovika NA, Stepura VV. Compliance with the principle of preconception preparation: what the doctor and future parents need to know (part 1). Mezhdunarodnyye obzory: klinicheskaya praktika i zdorov’ye. 2015;3(15):39-41. (In Russ).
  25. Papaleontiou M, Haymart MR. Thyroid nodules and cancer during pregnancy, post-partum and preconception planning: Addressing the uncertainties and challenges. Best Practice and Research Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2020;34(4):101363. Accessed August 25, 2022. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31786102/
  26. Diniz SG, Chacham AS. «The cut above» and «the cut below»: the abuse of caesareans and episiotomy in Sa˜o Paulo, Brazil. Reproductive Health Matters. 2004;12 (23):100-110. 
  27. Gamble JA, Creedy DK. Women’s request for a cesarean section: A critique of the literature. Birth. 2000;27(4):256-263.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-536x.2000.00256.x
  28. Topicu S, Brown P. The impact of technology on pregnancy and childbirth: creating and managing obstetrical risk in different cultural and socio-economic contexts. Health, Risk and Society. 2019;21(3-4):89-99.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13698575.2019.1649922
  29. Schantz C, de Loenzien M, Goyet S, Ravit M, Dancoisne A, Dumont A. How is women’s demand for caesarean section measured? A systematic literature review. PLoS OnE. 2019;14(3):e0213352. Accessed August 25, 2022. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0213352
  30. Blondel B, Coulmn B, Bonnet C, Goffinet F, Le Ray C. National Coordination Group of the National Perinatal Surveys. Trends in perinatal health in metropolitan France from 1995 to 2016: Results from the French National Perinatal Surveys. Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction. 2017;46(10):701-713.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2017.09.002
  31. Schantz C, Pantelias AC, de Loenzien M, Ravit M, Rozenberg P, Louis-Sylvestre C, Goyet S. «A caesarean section is like you’ve never delivered a baby»: a mixed methods study of the experience of childbirth among French women. Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online. 2021;12:69-78.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbms.2020.10.003
  32. Goldstein E, Bakhireva LN, Nervik K, Hagen S, Turnquist A, Zgierska AE, Marquez LE, McDonald R, Lo J, Chambers C. Recruitment and retention of pregnant women in prospective birth cohort studies: A scoping review and content analysis of the literature. Neurotoxicology and Teratology. 2021; 85:106974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ntt.2021.106974

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.