The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Login
EN
+7 (495) 482-4118
+7 (495) 482-0604

  • © 1998-2025
+7 (495) 482-43-29
EN
All journals
Journal
Year
Year
Search result: 0

Tikhaeva K.Yu.

Volgograd state medical university

Gavrilova I.S.

Volgograd State Medical Univesity

Nazarov N.O.

KDL-DOMODEDOVO-TEST LLC of the branch of KDL Volgograd

Rogova L.N.

Volgograd state medical university

Povetkina V.N.

Volgograd State Medical Univesity

Shesternina N.V.

Volgograd State Medical Univesity

Tomilov E.V.

Volgograd State Medical Univesity

Dyachkova S.Yu.

Volgograd State Medical Univesity

The role of medical, social and anthropogenic factors in the effectiveness of infertility treatment by methods of assisted reproductive technologies

Authors:

Tikhaeva K.Yu., Gavrilova I.S., Nazarov N.O., Rogova L.N., Povetkina V.N., Shesternina N.V., Tomilov E.V., Dyachkova S.Yu.

More about the authors

Journal: Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2021;27(5): 104‑113

DOI: 10.17116/repro202127051104

Views: 1080

Downloaded: 26

Download PDF (RU)
Contact the author
Table of contents

To cite this article:

Tikhaeva KYu, Gavrilova IS, Nazarov NO, et al. . The role of medical, social and anthropogenic factors in the effectiveness of infertility treatment by methods of assisted reproductive technologies. Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2021;27(5):104‑113. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/repro202127051104

 
МСФ на ЯМ
Close metadata
Recommended articles:
The role of inte­rgenic inte­ractions in the formation of peri­natal complications of gestational diabetes mellitus in pregnant women after assi­sted reproductive technologies. Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2024;(2):51-61
Predictors of success of in vitro fertilization with cryotransfer in patients with chro­nic endo­metritis acco­rding to laser conversion testing. Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2024;(2):62-73
Assi­sted reproductive technologies and the risk of placenta accreta. Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2024;(3):43-49
Calcium-phosphorus meta­bolism and assi­sted reproductive technologies: inte­rsection points. Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2024;(4):19-28
The dile­mma of mana­gement of patients with endo­metrioma and infe­rtility. Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2024;(4):29-37
Arti­ficial inte­lligent systems in the deve­lopment of assi­sted reproductive technologies. Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2024;(2):19-29
Role of hysteroscopy in the diagnosis of uterine pathology in infe­rtility in patients with fami­lial Medi­terranean fever. Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2024;(2):74-80
Expe­rience of combined treatment of patients with infe­rtility operated for exte­rnal geni­tal endo­metriosis. Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2024;(3):77-81
Predicting the risk of decreased ovarian rese­rve after surgical treatment of patients with deep infi­ltrative endo­metriosis using arti­ficial inte­lligence. Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2024;(3):92-102
Correlation depe­ndence of tissue inhi­bitor of meta­lloproteinase-1 levels and follicular fluid morphology in patients with combined (uterine myoma and endo­metriosis) infe­rtility in the ART-programs. Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2024;(4):21-28

A literature review of the infertility treatment efficacy by assisted reproductive technologies (ART) has been carried out. Key surrogate points on the way to take-home baby are highlighted and described. A review of anthropogenic, medical, social, and natural factors affecting the key surrogate points as well as the efficacy of infertility treatment using ART methods is carried out. Fluctuations in external temperature are associated with successful embryo transfer, pregnancy, and the risk of preeclampsia. The aesthetics of the living environment is a more important factor for ART than the comfort of the living environment. Studies have not shown a relationship between the outcome of ART use and the phase of the moon. In the literature, there are conflicting data on the effect of solar radiation on patient fertility, newborn survival and life expectancy. It has been shown that the patient’s psychological comfort affects the effectiveness of infertility treatment. The period of preparation of the patient for the ART procedure is accompanied by psycho-emotional stress and the need to provide emotional support to reduce the level of anxiety and minimize negative biochemical changes in the body that accompany the development of a stress reaction.

Keywords:

infertility
in vitro fertilization
assisted reproductive technologies
the effectiveness of ART
medico-social factors of the effectiveness of ART
natural factors
social factors in medicine
psycho-emotional attitudes of the patient
social inequality
quality of life of patients with ART

Authors:

Tikhaeva K.Yu.

Volgograd state medical university

Gavrilova I.S.

Volgograd State Medical Univesity

Nazarov N.O.

KDL-DOMODEDOVO-TEST LLC of the branch of KDL Volgograd

Rogova L.N.

Volgograd state medical university

Povetkina V.N.

Volgograd State Medical Univesity

Shesternina N.V.

Volgograd State Medical Univesity

Tomilov E.V.

Volgograd State Medical Univesity

Dyachkova S.Yu.

Volgograd State Medical Univesity

Received:

13.05.2021

Accepted:

16.06.2021

List of references:

  1. Eskew AM, Jungheim ES. A History of Developments to Improve in vitro Fertilization. Missouri Medicine. 2017;114(3):156-159. 
  2. Isupova OG. Assisted reproductive technologies: new opportunities. Demograficheskoe obozrenie. 2017;4(1):35-64. (In Russ.).
  3. Rusanova NE, Gordeeva VL. Assisted reproductive technologies: needs and regulation in low fertility. Narodonaselenie. 2016;73(3):34-46. (In Russ.).
  4. Otchet registra vspomogatel’nykh reproduktivnykh tekhnologij Rossijskoj assotsiatsii reproduktsii cheloveka za 2018 god. Accessed May 25, 2021. (In Russ.). https://www.rahr.ru/d_registr_otchet/RegistrART2018.pdf
  5. Jirge PR. Ovarian reserve tests. Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences. 2011;4(3):108-113.  https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-1208.92283
  6. Brodin T, Hadziosmanovic N, Berglund L, Olovsson M, Holte J. Comparing four ovarian reserve markers — associations with ovarian response and live births after assisted reproduction. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 2015;94(10):1056-1063. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.12710
  7. Khan HL, Bhatti S, Suhail S, Gul R, Awais A, Hamayun H, Enver F, Abbas S, Hassan Z, Nisar R, Sardar S, Asif W. Antral follicle count (AFC) and serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) are the predictors of natural fecundability have similar trends irrespective of fertility status and menstrual characteristics among fertile and infertile women below the age of 40 years. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology: RB&E. 2019;17(1):20.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-019-0464-0
  8. Dewailly D, Andersen CY, Balen A, Broekmans F, Dilaver N, Fanchin R, Griesinger G, Kelsey TW, La Marca A, Lambalk C, Mason H, Nelson SM, Visser JA, Wallace WH, Anderson RA. The physiology and clinical utility of anti-Müllerian hormone in women. Human Reproduction Update. 2014;20(3):370-385.  https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmt062
  9. Gomez R, Schorsch M, Hahn T, Henke A, Hoffmann I, Seufert R, Skala C. The influence of AMH on IVF success. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2016;293(3):667-673.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-015-3901-0
  10. Munné S, Held KR, Magli CM, Ata B, Wells D, Fragouli E, Baukloh V, Fischer R, Gianaroli L. Intra-age, intercenter, and intercycle differences in chromosome abnormalities in oocytes. Fertility and Sterility. 2012;97(4):935-942.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.01.106
  11. Yadav V, Malhotra N, Mahey R, Singh N, Kriplani A. Ovarian Sensitivity Index (OSI): Validating the Use of a Marker for Ovarian Responsiveness in IVF. Journal of Reproduction and Infertility. 2019; 20(2):83-88. 
  12. Chen L, Wang H, Zhou H, Bai H, Wang T, Shi W, Shi J. Follicular Output Rate and Follicle-to-Oocyte Index of Low Prognosis Patients According to POSEIDON Criteria: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 32,128 Treatment Cycles. Frontiers in Endocrinology. 2020;11:181.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2020.00181
  13. Li Y, Li X, Yang X, Cai S, Lu G, Lin G, Humaidan P, Gong F. Cumulative Live Birth Rates in Low Prognosis Patients According to the POSEIDON Criteria: An Analysis of 26,697 Cycles of in vitro Fertilization/Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection. Frontiers in Endocrinology. 2019;10:642.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2019.00642
  14. Loutradis D, Patsoula E, Minas V, Koussidis GA, Antsaklis A, Michalas S, Makrigiannakis A. FSH receptor gene polymorphisms have a role for different ovarian response to stimulation in patients entering IVF/ICSI-ET programs. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics. 2006;23(4):177-184.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-005-9015-z
  15. van der Gaast MH, Eijkemans MJ, van der Net JB, de Boer EJ, Burger CW, van Leeuwen FE, Fauser BC, Macklon NS. Optimum number of oocytes for a successful first IVF treatment cycle. Reproductive Biomedicine Online. 2006;13(4):476-480.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60633-5
  16. Wu CX, Zhang T, Shu L, Huang J, Diao FY, Ding W, Gao Y, Wang W, Mao YD, Cui YG, Liu JY. Cumulative live birth rates per oocytes retrieved cycle: evaluation of clinical outcomes of IVF/ICSI. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2018;53(3):160-166.  https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567X.2018.03.004
  17. Drakopoulos P, Blockeel C, Stoop D, Camus M, de Vos M, Tournaye H, Polyzos NP. Conventional ovarian stimulation and single embryo transfer for IVF/ICSI. How many oocytes do we need to maximize cumulative live birth rates after utilization of all fresh and frozen embryos? Human Reproduction. 2016;31(2):370-376.  https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dev316
  18. Shen S, Khabani A, Klein N, Battaglia D. Statistical analysis of factors affecting fertilization rates and clinical outcome associated with intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertility and Sterility. 2003;79(2): 355-360.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(02)04675-7
  19. Tannus S, Son WY, Gilman A, Younes G, Shavit T, Dahan MH. The role of intracytoplasmic sperm injection in non-male factor infertility in advanced maternal age. Human Reproduction. 2017;32(1): 119-124.  https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dew298
  20. Speyer B, O’Neill H, Saab W, Seshadri S, Cawood S, Heath C, Gaunt M, Serhal P. In assisted reproduction by IVF or ICSI, the rate at which embryos develop to the blastocyst stage is influenced by the fertilization method used: a split IVF/ICSI study. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics. 2019;36(4):647-654.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-018-1358-3
  21. Hatırnaz Ş, Kanat Pektaş M. Day 3 embryo transfer versus day 5 blastocyst transfers: A prospective randomized controlled trial. Turkish Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2017;14(2):82-88.  https://doi.org/10.4274/tjod.99076
  22. Sigalos GΑ, Triantafyllidou O, Vlahos NF. Novel embryo selection techniques to increase embryo implantation in IVF attempts. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2016;294(6):1117-1124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-016-4196-5
  23. Niu X, Long J, Gong F, Wang W. Does ICSI for in vitro fertilization cause more aneuploid embryos? Molecular Cytogenetics. 2020; 13:27.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13039-020-00497-z
  24. Fesahat F, Montazeri F, Sheikhha MH, Saeedi H, Dehghani Firouzabadi R, Kalantar SM. Frequency of chromosomal aneuploidy in high quality embryos from young couples using preimplantation genetic screening. International Journal of Reproductive Biomedicine. 2017;15(5):297-304. 
  25. Cárdenas-Nieto D, Forero-Castro M, Moreno-Ortiz H, Lucena-Quevedo E, Cuzzi J, Esteban-Pérez C. Analysis of a Preimplantation Genetic Test for Aneuploidies in Embryos from Colombian Couples: A Report of Cases. Journal of Reproduction and Infertility. 2020;21(1):17-33. 
  26. Orvieto R, Shimon C, Rienstein S, Jonish-Grossman A, Shani H, Aizer A. Do human embryos have the ability of self-correction? Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology: RB&E. 2020;18(1):98.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-020-00650-8
  27. ESHRE Working group on Time-lapse technology, Apter S, Ebner T, Freour T, Guns Y, Kovacic B, Le Clef N, Marques M, Meseguer M, Montjean D, Sfontouris I, Sturmey R, Coticchio G. Good practice recommendations for the use of time-lapse technology. Human Reproduction Open. 2020;2020(2):hoaa008. https://doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoaa008
  28. Zaninovic N, Irani M, Meseguer M. Assessment of embryo morphology and developmental dynamics by time-lapse microscopy: is there a relation to implantation and ploidy? Fertility and Sterility. 2017;108(5):722-729.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.10.002
  29. Larue L, Keromnes G, Massari A, Roche C, Moulin J, Gronier H, Bouret D, Cassuto NG, Ayel JP. Transvaginal ultrasound-guided embryo transfer in IVF. Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction. 2017;46(5):411-416.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2017.02.015
  30. Revelli A, Rovei V, Dalmasso P, Gennarelli G, Racca C, Evangelista F, Benedetto C. Large randomized trial comparing transabdominal ultrasound-guided embryo transfer with a technique based on uterine length measurement before embryo transfer. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2016;48(3):289-295.  https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.15899
  31. Arora P, Mishra V. Difficult Embryo Transfer: A Systematic Review. Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences. 2018;11(3):229-235.  https://doi.org/10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_59_18
  32. Phillips JA, Martins WP, Nastri CO, Raine-Fenning NJ. Difficult embryo transfers or blood on catheter and assisted reproductive outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology. 2013;168(2): 121-128.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.12.030
  33. Coughlan C. What to do when good-quality embryos repeatedly fail to implant. Best Practice and Research. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2018;53:48-59.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2018.07.004
  34. Harper MJ. The implantation window. Bailliere’s Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 1992;6(2):351-371.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0950-3552(05)80092-6
  35. Şanverdi İ, Özkaya E, Kutlu T, Şenol T, Akalın M, Sayar Akalın E, Şahin Y, Karateke A. Non-invasive prediction of implantation window in controlled hyperstimulation cycles: Can the time from the menstrual day at embryo transfer to expected menstrual cycle give a clue? Turkish Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2016;13(3): 116-122.  https://doi.org/10.4274/tjod.34651
  36. Harari YuN. Sapiens. Kratkaya istoriya chelovechestva. M.: Sindbad; 2019. (In Russ.).
  37. Laidoune A, Rahal Gharbi Mel H. Analysis Testing of Sociocultural Factors Influence on Human Reliability within Sociotechnical Systems: The Algerian Oil Companies. Safety and Health at Work. 2016;7(3):194-200.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2015.12.005
  38. Canipari R, De Santis L, Cecconi S. Female Fertility and Environmental Pollution. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020;17(23):8802. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17238802
  39. Skjærvø GR, Fossøy F, Røskaft E. Solar activity at birth predicted infant survival and women’s fertility in historical Norway. Proceedings. Biological Sciences. 2015;282(1801):20142032. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.2032
  40. Davis GE Jr, Lowell WE. Solar energy at birth and human lifespan. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology. 2018;186: 59-68.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2018.07.006
  41. Zhao M, Zhang H, Waters THB, Chung JPW, Li TC, Chan DYL. The effects of daily meteorological perturbation on pregnancy outcome: follow-up of a cohort of young women undergoing IVF treatment. Environmental Health. 2019;18(1):103.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-019-0538-7
  42. Casey G, Shayegh S, Moreno-Cruz J, Bunzl M, Galor O, Caldeira K. The impact of climate change on fertility. Environmental Research Letters. 2019;14(5):054007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab0843
  43. Mulik AB, Ulesikova IV, Mulik IG, Nazarov NO, Shatyr YuA. Comfort and aesthetics of the environment in the formation of the phenotypic and social status of a person. Ekologiya cheloveka. 2019; 2:31-38. (In Russ.).
  44. Voropaeva EE, Chukhnina EG, Kazachkova EA, Kazachkov EL, Koshkina AI. The effect of vitamin D on the outcomes of assisted reproductive technology programs (literature review). Ural’skij meditsinskij zhurnal. 2009;178(10):8-15. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.25694/URMJ.2019.10.03
  45. Das S, Dodd S, Lewis-Jones DI, Patel FM, Drakeley AJ, Kingsland CR, Gazvani R. Do lunar phases affect conception rates in assisted reproduction? Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics. 2005; 22(1):15-18.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-005-0815-y
  46. Shashar S, Kloog I, Erez O, Shtein A, Yitshak-Sade M, Sarov B, Novack L. Temperature and preeclampsia: Epidemiological evidence that perturbation in maternal heat homeostasis affects pregnancy outcome. PLoS One. 2020;15(5):e0232877. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232877
  47. Farland LV, Correia KFB, Missmer SA, Racowsky C. Seasonal variation, temperature, day length, and IVF outcomes from fresh cycles. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics. 2020;37(10): 2427-2433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-020-01915-2
  48. Pal L, Kidwai N, Kayani J, Grant WB. Donor egg IVF model to assess ecological implications for ART success. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics. 2014;31(11):1453-1460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-014-0322-0
  49. Carré J, Gatimel N, Moreau J, Parinaud J, Leandri R. Influence of air quality on the results of in vitro fertilization attempts: A retrospective study. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology. 2017;210:116-122.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.12.012
  50. Gaskins AJ, Hart JE, Mínguez-Alarcón L, Chavarro JE, Laden F, Coull BA, Ford JB, Souter I, Hauser R. Residential proximity to major roadways and traffic in relation to outcomes of in vitro fertilization. Environment International. 2018;115:239-246.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2018.03.029
  51. Lass A, Chaudary W, Lass G. Correlation between gross domestic product, utilization of in vitro fertilization, and pregnancy success rate across the world. Journal of Medical Economics. 2019;22(9): 878-882.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2019.1609484
  52. Campo-Engelstein L. Reproductive technologies are not the cure for social problems. Journal of Medical Ethics. 2020;46(2):85-86.  https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2019-105981
  53. Braga DPAF, Melamed RMM, Setti AS, Zanetti BF, Figueira RCS, Iaconelli A Jr, Borges E Jr. Role of religion, spirituality, and faith in assisted reproduction. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and & Gynecology. 2019;40(3):195-201.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0167482X.2018.1470163
  54. Tierney K, Cai Y. Assisted reproductive technology use in the United States: a population assessment. Fertility and Sterility. 2019;112(6): 1136-1143.e4.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.07.1323
  55. Rao A, Sibbritt D, Phillips JL, Hickman LD. Prayer or spiritual healing as adjuncts to conventional care: a cross sectional analysis of prevalence and characteristics of use among women. BMJ Open. 2015;5(6):e007345. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007345
  56. Levin J. Partnerships between the faith-based and medical sectors: Implications for preventive medicine and public health. Preventive Medicine Reports. 2016;4:344-350.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2016.07.009
  57. Paulk L.B. Embryonic. Personhood: Implications for Assisted Reproductive Technology in International Human Rights Law. Journal of Gender, Social Policy and the Law. 2017;22(4):781. 
  58. Mikhnevich AV, Samoilova VV. Legal grounds for the use of assisted reproductive technologies as a type of biomedical technologies. Mezhdunarodnyj zhurnal gumanitarnykh i estestvennykh nauk. 2020; 44(5-4):91-95. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24411/2500-1000-2020-10607
  59. Quinn M, Fujimoto V. Racial and ethnic disparities in assisted reproductive technology access and outcomes. Fertility and Sterility. 2016;105(5):1119-1123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.03.007
  60. Malina A, Pooley JA. Psychological consequences of IVF fertilization — Review of research. Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine: AAEM. 2017;24(4):554-558.  https://doi.org/10.5604/12321966.1232085
  61. Huang MZ, Kao CH, Lin KC, Hwang JL, Puthussery S, Gau ML. Psychological health of women who have conceived using assisted reproductive technology in Taiwan: findings from a longitudinal study. BMC Women’s Health. 2019;19(1):97.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-019-0801-7
  62. Imai Y, Endo M, Kuroda K, Tomooka K, Ikemoto Y, Sato S, Mitsui K, Ueda Y, Deshpande GA, Tanaka A, Sugiyama R, Nakagawa K, Sato Y, Kuribayashi Y, Itakura A, Takeda S, Tanigawa T. Risk factors for resignation from work after starting infertility treatment among Japanese women: Japan-Female Employment and Mental health in Assisted reproductive technology (J-FEMA) study. Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2020;78(6):426-432.  https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2020-106745
  63. Zemzyulina IN. Clinical and psychological aspects of the success of the in vitro fertilization procedure. Lichnost’ v menyayushchemsya mire: zdorov’e, adaptatsiya, razvitie. 2019;7(2/25):364-378. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.23888/humJ20192364-378
  64. Skvirsky V, Taubman-Ben-Ari O, Shlomo SB, Azuri J, Horowitz E. Are mothers a source of support for women entering fertility treatment? Health Care for Women International. 2018;39(7):719-733.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07399332.2018.1424170
  65. Ben-Kimhy R, Youngster M, Medina-Artom TR, Avraham S, Gat I, Marom Haham L, Hourvitz A, Kedem A. Fertility patients under COVID-19: attitudes, perceptions and psychological reactions. Human Reproduction. 2020;35(12):2774-2783. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deaa248
  66. Kato T, Sampei M, Saito K, Morisaki N, Urayama KY. Depressive symptoms, anxiety, and quality of life of Japanese women at initiation of ART treatment. Scientific Reports. 2021;11(1):7538. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-87057-6
  67. Tuncay G, Yıldız S, Karaer A, Reyhani I, Özgöcer T, Ucar C, Karabulut U, Unal S. Stress in couples undergoing assisted reproductive technology. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2020; 301(6):1561-1567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05549-8

Close metadata

Contact the author
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

Contact us
If you have any questions, complaints or suggestions, please use this feedback form.
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.
Submit Application

You can become an author of one of our magazines, send a request and we will consider it in during the day.

Name
Phone
E-mail
Message
Login
Registration
E-mail
Password
Forgot Password?

Log in to the site using your account in one of the services

Password recovery
E-mail
Login
Register

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.