Experience of using assisted reproductive technologies in the Republic of Bashkortostan

Close metadata

BACKGRAUND

Infertility is a heterogeneous disease of various etiologies, which can be caused by both male and female factors, and despite progress in reproductive technologies, infertility remains an unresolved issue.

OBJECTIVE

Generalization of the experience of IVF, IVF/ICSI procedures and assessment of the effectiveness of these procedures over a 13-year period of using assisted reproductive technologies in the Republic of Bashkortostan.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The analysis of the cards of 5727 patients who underwent IVF, IVF/ICSI, transfer of thawed embryos was carried out. All data refer to treatment cycles that were carried out between 2006 and 2018.

RESULTS

76695 married couples with infertility were examined and 5727 IVF and ECSI procedures (7.47%) were performed, including 4879 cases (85.19%) IVF without ICSI and 848 cases (14.81%) IVF with ICSI. Pregnancy occurred in 2097 women (36.6%), of which 1806 after IVF (86.1%), 291 after ICSI (13.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

According to the analysis of data in the period from 2006 to 2018, there is an increase in the number of procedures performed, as well as indicators of pregnancy and childbirth, however, it is necessary to introduce modern technologies for assessing the quality and viability of embryos, widespread introduction of preimplantation genetic testing to exclude the birth of sick children, termination of pregnancy and improve the availability of assisted reproductive technologies for the general population.

Keywords:

in vitro fertilization (IVF)

infertility

cryo transfer

IVF efficiency

assisted reproductive technologies

Authors:

Sugurova A.T.

Bashkir State Medical University

Minniakhmetov I.R.

Bashkir State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation;
Republican Medico Genetics Centre

Zabelin M.V.

Republican Medico Genetics Centre

Yashchuk A.G.

Bashkir State Medical University

Khusainov R.I.

Bashkir State Medical University

Received:

28.02.2021

Accepted:

24.06.2021

List of references:

Mascarenhas MN, Flaxman SR, Boerma T, Vanderpoel S, Stevens GA. National, regional, and global trends in infertility prevalence since 1990: a systematic analysis of 277 health surveys. PLoS Medicine. 2012;9(12):e1001356. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001356
Cunningham J. Infertility: A primer for primary care providers. JAAPA: Journal of the American Academy of Physician Assistants. 2017;30(9):19-25. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.JAA.0000522130.01619.b7
Dadhich P, Ramasamy R, Lipshultz LI. The male infertility office visit. Minerva Urologica e Nefrologica. 2015;67(2):157-168.
Zelenaya KV, Petrosyan TR, Smirnova SN. Psikhologicheskie osobennosti suprugov pri lechenii besplodiya metodom ekstrakorporal’nogo oplodotvoreniya. Sem’ya v sovremennom mire. Sbornik trudov Vserossijskoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferentsii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem. Tekstovoe (simvol’noe) elektronnoe izdanie (4 Mb). Kursk: KGMU; 2017. (In Russ.).
Malina A, Błaszkiewicz A, Owczarz U. Psychosocial aspects of infertility and its treatment. Ginekologia Polska. 2016;87(7):527-531. https://doi.org/10.5603/GP.2016.0038
Starc A, Trampuš M, Pavan Jukić D, Rotim C, Jukić T, Polona Mivšek A. Infertility and sexual dysfunctions: a systematic literature review. Acta Clinica Croatica. 2019;58(3):508-515. https://doi.org/10.20471/acc.2019.58.03.15
Bahamondes L, Makuch MY, Infertility care and the introduction of new reproductive technologies in poor resource settings. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology: RB&E. 2014;12:87. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-12-87
Ombelet W, Cooke I, Dyer S, Serour G, Devroey P. Infertility and the provision of infertility medical services in developing countries. Human Reproduction Update. 2008;14(6):605-621. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmn042
Lapshtaeva AV, Radaeva OA, Novikova LV, Gerasemenko AV. Sposob prognozirovaniya rezul’tativnosti programmy ekstrakorporal’nogo oplodotvoreniya. Patent na izobretenie RU 2646822 C1, 07.03.2018. Zayavka №2017100381 ot 11.01.17. (In Russ.).
Gardanova ZhR, Ilgov VI, Esaulov VI, Gardanov AK. Trevozhnye rasstrojstva u zhenshchin starshego reproduktivnogo vozrasta v programme ekstrakorporal’nogo oplodotvoreniya (EKO). Zhenskoe psikhicheskoe zdorov’e: mezhdistsiplinarnyj status. Materialy Vserossijskogo nauchno-prakticheskogo kongressa s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem, posvyashchennogo 100-letiyu kafedry psikhiatrii Pervogo Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo meditsinskogo universiteta im. akad. I.P. Pavlova, byvshego Zhenskogo meditsinskogo instituta. SPb: Alta Astra; 2018. (In Russ.).
ORC Macro and the World Health Organization. Infecundity, infertility, and childlessness in developing countries. DHS Comparative Reports No. 9. Calverton, Maryland, USA: World Health Organization; 2004.
Ziebe S, Loft A, Petersen JH, Andersen AG, Lindenberg S, Petersen K, Andersen AN. Embryo quality and developmental potential is compromised by age. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 2001;80(2):169-174. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0412.2001.080002169.x
Sharma R, Agarwal A, Rohra VK, Assidi M, Abu-Elmagd M, Turki RF. Effects of increased paternal age on sperm quality, reproductive outcome and associated epigenetic risks to offspring. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology: RB&E. 2015;13:35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-015-0028-x
Hu L, Du J, Lv H, Zhao J, Chen M, Wang Y, Wu F, Liu F, Chen X, Zhang J, Ma H, Jin G, Shen H, Chen L, Ling X, Hu Z. Influencing factors of pregnancy loss and survival probability of clinical pregnancies conceived through assisted reproductive technology. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology: RB&E. 2018;16(1):74. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-018-0390-6
Platteau P, Staessen C, Michiels A, Van Steirteghem A, Liebaers I, Devroey P. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in women older than 37 years. Fertility and Sterility. 2005;84(2): 319-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.02.019
Tarín JJ, Pascual E, García-Pérez MÁ, Gómez R, Cano A. Women’s morbid conditions are associated with decreased odds of live birth in the first IVF/ICSI treatment: a retrospective single-center study. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics. 2019;36(4): 697-708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-019-01401-4
Nachtigall RD. International disparities in access to infertility services. Fertility and Sterility. 2006;85(4):871-875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.08.066
Deshpande PS, Gupta AS. Causes and Prevalence of Factors Causing Infertility in a Public Health Facility Priyanka Sanjay Deshpande. Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences. 2019;12(4):287-293. https://doi.org/10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_140_18
Nechunaeva AN, Botoeva EA. Infertility. Evaluation of the effectiveness of the program of preparation for IVF in terms of women’s consultation GBUZ “City Polyclinic No. 1”. Vestnik Buryatskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Meditsina i farmatsiya. 2018;2:59-63. (In Russ.).
Likhacheva VV, Markdorf AG, Bazhenova LG, Vlasenko AE, Shramko SV. Assessment of the influence of clinical factors on the effectiveness of in vitro fertilization programs. Byulleten’ sibirskoj meditsiny. 2018;17(2):49-59. (In Russ.).

Close metadata