The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Kodyleva T.A.

Academician V.I. Kulakov Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology of Ministry of Health of Russia Federation, Moscow, Russia, 117997

Shafei R.A.

Faculty of biology M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Leninskie Gory 1/12, Moscow Russia, 119991

Lapina V.S.

Academician V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia, Moscow, Russia, 117997

Mishieva N.G.

FGU "Nauchnyĭ tsentr akusherstva, ginekologii i perinatologii im. akad. V.I. Kulakova" Minzdravsotsrazvitiia Rossii, Moskva

Korolkova A.I.

Department of Preservation and Restoration of Reproductive Function National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology named after Academician V.I. Kulakov of Ministry of Healthcare of Russia. Academic Oparin str. 4, Moscow, Russia, 117997

Semenova M.L.

Faculty of biology M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Leninskie Gory 1/12, Moscow Russia, 119991

Abubakirov A.N.

FGU "Nauchnyĭ tsentr akusherstva, ginekologii i perinatologii im. akad. V.I. Kulakova" Minzdravsotsrazvitiia Rossii, Moskva

Morphological evaluation of human oocytes in IVF practice (a review)

Authors:

Kodyleva T.A., Shafei R.A., Lapina V.S., Mishieva N.G., Korolkova A.I., Semenova M.L., Abubakirov A.N.

More about the authors

Journal: Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2017;23(6): 54‑59

Read: 6871 times


To cite this article:

Kodyleva TA, Shafei RA, Lapina VS, Mishieva NG, Korolkova AI, Semenova ML, Abubakirov AN. Morphological evaluation of human oocytes in IVF practice (a review). Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2017;23(6):54‑59. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/repro201723654-59

Recommended articles:
The expe­rience of using the nasal form of GnRH agonists in in vitro fertilization programs. Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2024;(6):79-84
Medi­cal and social characteristics of mate­rnal deaths after extracorporeal fertilization. Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2025;(2):5-14

References:

  1. Loutradis D, Drakakis P, Vlismas A, Antsaklis A. Corifollitropin alfa, a long-acting follicle-stimulating hormone agonist for the treatment of infertility. Women’s Health. 2010;6(5):372-380. https://doi.org/10.2217/whe.10.56
  2. Polyzos NP, Devroey P. A systematic review of randomized trials for the treatment of poor ovarian responders: is there any light at the end of the tunnel? Fertility and Sterility. 2011;96(5):1058-1061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.09.048
  3. Nelson SM, Yates RW, Lyall H, Jamieson M, Traynor I, Gaudoin M, Mitchell P, Ambrose P, Fleming R. Anti-mullerian hormone-based approach to controlled ovarian stimulation for assisted conception. Human Reproduction. 2009;24(4):867-875. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/den480
  4. La Marka A, Sunkara SK. Individualization of controlled ovarian stimulation in IVF using ovarian reserve markers: from theory to practice. Human Reproduction Update. 2014;20(1):124-140. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmt037
  5. Sunkara SK, Rittenberg V, Raine-Flenning N, Bhattacharya S, Zamora J, Coomarasamy A. Association between the number of eggs and live birth in IVF treatment: an analysis of 400 153 treatment cycles. Human Reproduction. 2011;26(7):1768-1774. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/der106
  6. Ji J, Liu Y, Hong Tong X, Luo L, Ma J, Chen Z. The optimum number of oocytes in IVF treatment: an analysis of 2455 cycles in China. Human Reproduction. 2013;28(10):2728-2734. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/det303
  7. Rienzi L, Balaban B, Ebner T, Mandelbaum J. The oocyte. Human Reproduction. 2012;27(1):i2-i21. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/des200
  8. Arav A, Arovo A, Yavin S, Roth Z. Prediction of embryonic developmental competence by time-lapse observation and ‘shortest-half’ analysis. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 2008;17(5):669-675. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60314-8
  9. Lemmen JG, Agerholm I, Ziebe S. Kinetic markers of human embryo quality using time-lapse recordings of IVF/ICSI-fertilized oocytes. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 2008;17(3):385-391. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60222-2
  10. Gilchrist RB, Lane M, Thompson JG. Oocyte-secreted factors: regulators of cumulus cell function and oocyte quality. Human Reproduction Update. 2008;14(2):159-177. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmm040
  11. Rienzi L, Vajta G, Ubaldi F. Predictive value of oocyte morphology in human IVF: a systematic review of the literature. Human Reproduction Update. 2011;17(1):34-45. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmq029
  12. Van Soom A, Vandaele L, Goossens K, De Kruif A, Peelman L. Gamete origin in relation to early embryo development. Theriogenology. 2007;68(1):S131-S137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.03.019
  13. Swain JE, Pool TB. ART failure: oocyte contributions to unsuccessful fertilization. Human Reproduction Update. 2008;14(5):431-446. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmn025
  14. De Sutter P, Dozortsev D, Qian C, Dhont M. Oocyte morphology does not correlate with fertilization rate and embryo quality after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Human Reproduction. 1996;11(3):595-597. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/11.3.595
  15. Xia P. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection: correlation of oocyte grade based on polar body, perivitelline space and cytoplasmic inclusions with fertilization rate and embryo quality. Human Reproduction. 1997;12(8):1750-1755. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/12.8.1750
  16. Balaban B, Urman B, Sertac A, Alatas C, Aksoy S, Mercan R. Oocyte morphology does not affect fertilization rate, embryo quality and implantation rate after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Human Reproduction. 1998;13(12):3431-3433. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/13.12.3431
  17. Mikkelsen AL, Lindenberg S. Morphology of in-vitro matured oocytes: impact on fertility potential and embryo quality. Human Reproduction. 2001;16(8) 1714-1718. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/16.8.1714
  18. Balaban B, Urman B. Effect of oocyte morphology on embryo development and implantation. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 2006;12(5):608-615. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1472-6483(10)61187-x
  19. Ebner T, Moser M, Tews G. Is oocyte morphology prognostic of embryo developmental potential after ICSI? Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 2006;12(4):507-512. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1472-6483(10)62006-8
  20. Rienzi L, Ubaldi FM, Iacobelli M, Minasi MG, Romano S, Ferrero S, Sapienza F, Baroni E, Litwicka K, Greco E. Significance of metaphase II human oocyte morphology on ICSI outcome. Fertility and Sterility. 2008;90(5):1692-1700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.09.024
  21. Alpha Scientists in Reproductive medicine and ESHRE Special Interest Group of Embryology. The Istanbul consensus workshop on embryo assessment: proceedings of an expert meeting. Human Reproduction. 2011;26(6):1270-1283. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/der037
  22. Kovalskaya EV, Makarova NP, Syrkasheva AG, Dolgushina NV, Kurilo LF. Mechanisms of smooth endoplasmic reticulum aggregates creation in oocytes cytoplasm in IVF cycles and its clinical relevance (literature review). Tsitologia. 2015;57(2):129-134. (In Russ.)
  23. Rienzi L, Ubaldi FM, Iacobelli M, Minasi MG, Romano S, Greco E. Meiotic spindle visualization in living human oocytes. Reproduction BioMedicine Online. 2005;10(2):192-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60940-6
  24. Rienzi L, Ubaldi FM, Gardner DK, Weissman A, Howles CM, Shoham Z. Oocyte retrieval and selection, textbook of assisted reproductive technologies: laboratory and clinical perspectives. 3rd ed. UK Informa Healthcare. 2009;5-101. https://doi.org/10.3109/9780203092934-8
  25. Cohen Y, Malcov M, Schwartz T, Mey-Raz N, Carmon A, Cohen T, Lessing J, Cohen Y, Malcov M, Schwartz T, Mey-Raz N, Carmon A, Cohen T, Lessing JB, Amit A, Azem F. Spindle imaging: a new marker for optimal timing of ICSI? Human Reproduction. 2004;19(3):649-654. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deh113
  26. Ebner T, Shebl O, Moser M, Sommergruber M, Tews G. Developmental fate of ovoid oocytes. Human Reproduction. 2008;23(1):62-66. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dem280
  27. Shen Y, Stalf T, Mehnert C, Eichenlaub-Ritter U, Tinneberg HR. High magnitude of light retardation by the zona pellucida is associated with conception cycles. Human Reproduction. 2005;20(6):1596-1606. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deh811
  28. Miao YL, Kikuchi K, Sun QY, Schatten H. Oocyte aging: cellular and molecular changes, developmental potential and reversal possibility. Human Reproduction Update. 2009;15(5):573-585. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmp014
  29. Ebner T, Moser M, Sommergruber M, Yaman C, Pfleger U, Tews G. First polar body morphology and blastocyst formation rate in ICSI patients. Human Reproduction. 2002;17(9):2415-2418. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/17.9.2415
  30. Ten J, Mendiola J, Vioque J, de Juan J, Bernabeu R. Donor oocyte dysmorphisms and their influence on fertilization and embryo quality. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 2007;14(1):40-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60762-6
  31. Balaban B, Ata B, Isiklar A, Yakin K, Urman B. Severe cytoplasmic abnormalities of the oocyte decrease cryosurvival and subsequent embryonic development of cryopreserved embryos. Human Reproduction. 2008;23(8):1778-1785. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/den127
  32. Otsuki J, Nagai Y, Chiba K. Damage of embryo development caused by peroxidized mineral oil and its association with albumin in culture. Fertility and Sterility. 2009;91(5):1745-1749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.03.001
  33. Otsuki J, Nagai Y, Chiba K. Lipofuscin bodies in human oocytes as an indicator of oocyte quality. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics. 2007;24(7):263-270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-007-9130-0
  34. Otsuki J, Okada A, Morimoto K, Nagai Y, Kubo H. The relationship between pregnancy outcome and smooth endoplasmic reticulum clusters in MII human oocytes. Human Reproduction. 2004;19(7):1591-1597. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deh258
  35. Esfandiari N, Burjaq H, Gotlieb L, Casper RF. Brown oocytes: implications for assisted reproductive technology. Fertility and Sterility. 2006;86(5):1522-1525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.03.056
  36. Kahraman S, Yakin K, Donmez E, Samli H, Bahce M, Gengiz G, Sertyel S, Salmi M, Imirzalioglu N. Relationship between granular cytoplasm of oocytes and pregnancy outcome following intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Human Reproduction. 2000;15(11):2390-2393. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/15.11.2390
  37. Baerwald AR, Adams GP, Pierson RA. A new model for ovarian follicular development during the human menstrual cycle. Fertility and Sterility. 2003;80(1):116-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(03)00544-2
  38. Baerwald AR, Adams GP, Pierson RA. Characterization of ovarian follicular wave dynamics in women. Biology of Reproduction. 2003;69(3):1023-1031. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.103.017772
  39. Bedoshi GM, de Albuquerque FO, Ferriani RA, Navarro PA. Ovarian stimulation during the luteal phase for fertility preservation of cancer patients: case reports and review of the literature. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics. 2010;27(8):491-494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-010-9429-0
  40. Cakmak H, Katz A, Cadars MI, Rosen MP. Effective method for emergency fertility preservation: random-start controlled ovarian stimulation. Fertility and Steriliry. 2013;100(6):1673-1680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.07
  41. Ubaldi FM, Capalbo A, Vaiarelli A. Follicular versus luteal phase ovarian stimulation during the same menstrual cycle (DuoStim) in a reduced ovarian reserve population results in a similar euploid blastocyst formation rate: new insight in ovarian reserve exploitation. Fertility and Sterility. 2016;105(6):1488-1495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.03.002
  42. Sonmezer M, Turkcuoglu I, Coskun U, Oktay K. Random-start controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for emergency fertility preservation in letrozole cycles. Fertility and Sterility. 2011;95(6):2125.e9-2125.e611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.01.030
  43. Kuang Y, Chen Q, Hong Q, Lyu Q, Ai A, Fu Y, Shoham Z. Double stimulations during the follicular and luteal phases of poor responders in IVF/ICSI programmes (Shanghai protocol). Reprodictive BioMedicine Online. 2014;29:684-691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.08.009

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.