ЖурналыПодпискаАрхивКнигиПроектыО насРекламаДоставка/ОплатаКонтакты
+7 (495) 482-43-29
  • Главная
  • / Журналы
  • / Вернуться в журнал
  • / Содержание номера
  • / Статья
Postoperative complications in patients with breast hypertrophy following reduction mammoplasty depending on vascular pedicle

Postoperative complications in patients with breast hypertrophy following reduction mammoplasty depending on vascular pedicle

Authors:
Дмитрий Владимирович Мельников,
Наталья Евгеньевна Мантурова,
Виталий Юрьевич Проданов,
Евгения Дмитриевна Демидчик,
Артем Владиславович Беляков

Журнал: Пластическая хирургия и эстетическая медицина. 2026;(2-2):18-23.

DOI: 10.17116/plast.hirurgia202602218

Read: 1685 раз

Download PDF (RU)Download PDF (EN)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the incidence of postoperative complications associated with reduction mammoplasty depending on pedicle (lateral, medial, upper, and lower).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A prospective study involved 100 patients with breast hypertrophy (mean age 46.4 years, mean BMI 26.4 kg/m²) who underwent reduction mammoplasty between 2023 and 2026. Lateral pedicle was used in 40% of patients, medial pedicle in 30%, upper and lower pedicles in 15% each. The follow-up period was 12 months and included clinical examinations, palpation and breast ultrasound. Complications included hematomas, necrosis of NAC, delayed wound healing, loss of NAC sensitivity, liponecrosis / cysts and infectious complications.

RESULTS

The most common complication across all groups was loss of NAC sensitivity. Lateral pedicle significantly reduced the risks of various complications compared to other pedicles. There was lower risk of lost NAC sensitivity compared to all other pedicle types (p<0.05), lower risk of partial NAC necrosis and delayed wound healing compared to medial pedicle (p<0.05), lower risk of liponecrosis/cysts compared to medial and upper pedicles (p<0.05), and lower risk of infectious complications compared to upper and lower pedicles (p<0.05). However, no significant differences were found in the incidence of hematomas and total NAC necrosis (p>0.05). These findings align with global data on high incidence of complications associated with lower pedicle. However, there are few researches comparing lateral pedicle with others. Our results demonstrate the advantages of lateral pedicle in preserving sensitivity and preventing ischemic and infectious complications.

CONCLUSION

Lateral pedicle in reduction mammoplasty is associated with significantly lower rate of postoperative complications compared to medial, upper and lower pedicles. Nevertheless, choice of technique should be individual.

Keywords

  • reduction mammoplasty
  • lateral dermoglandular pedicle
  • complications

Дата поступления: 21.03.2026

Дата принятия в печать: 14.04.2026

Дата публикации: 21.05.2026

References
  1. Wampler AT, Powelson IA, Homa K, Freed GL. BREAST-Q Outcomes before and after Bilateral Reduction Mammaplasty. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2021;147(3):382e-390e. https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000007605
  2. Crittenden TA, Watson DI, Ratcliffe J, Griffin PA, Dean NR. Outcomes of Breast Reduction Surgery Using the BREAST-Q: A Prospective Study and Comparison with Normative Data. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2019;144(5):1034-1044. https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000006114
  3. Ogunleye AA, Leroux O, Morrison N, Preminger AB. Complications after reduction mammaplasty: a comparison of wise pattern/inferior pedicle and vertical scar/superomedial pedicle. Annals of Plastic Surgery. 2017;79(1):13-16. https://doi.org/10.1097/sap.0000000000001059
  4. Lewin R, Göransson M, Elander A, Thorarinsson A, Lundberg J, Lidén M. Risk factors for complications after breast reduction surgery. Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery. 2013;48(1):10-14. https://doi.org/10.3109/2000656x.2013.791625
  5. Widmark-Jensen E, Bernhardsson S, Eriksson M, Hallberg H, Jepsen C, Jivegård L, Liljegren A, Petzold M, Svensson M, Wärnberg F, Hansson E. A systematic review and meta-analysis of risks and benefits with breast reduction in the public healthcare system: priorities for further research. BMC Surgery. 2021;21(1):343. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-021-01336-7
  6. Ren T, Galenchik-Chan A, Wang K, Bui DT. Comparison of Clinical Associations and Outcomes between Superomedial and Inferior Pedicle Breast Reduction Surgery: A Retrospective Study. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. 2025; 49(23):6518-6521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-025-05041-1
  7. Cang Z-Q, Zhang Y, Mu SQ, Peng P, Li Y, Zhang ZX, Cao J. Complications of Superomedial Versus Inferior Pedicle Reduction Mammaplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. 2025; 49(1):184-197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-024-04201-z
  8. Uebel CO, Piccinini PS, Ramos RFM, Meneguzzi K. Breast Reduction: The Superolateral Dermoglandular Pedicle Revisited. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. 2018;43(1):36-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-018-1225-8
  9. Manahan MA, Buretta KJ, Chang D, Mithani SK, Mallalieu J, Shermak MA. An Outcomes Analysis of 2142 Breast Reduction Procedures. Annals of Plastic Surgery. 2015;74(3):289-292. https://doi.org/10.1097/sap.0b013e31829d2261
slide-cover

Recommended articles:

Extent of surgical access in open lateral sinus lift as a predictor of complications: an anatomical and clinical rationale for minimally invasive and microscope-assisted approaches (literature review).Stomatology. 2026;105(5):87-90

Endothelial glycocalyx damage markers as early predictors of pneumonia after thoracic aortic surgery.Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2026;19(5):13-18

Acute appendicitis: diagnostic discrepancies and clinical significance of delayed diagnosis.Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2026;(10):103-108

Bimodal diagnosis of venous congestion in skin flaps after facelift: data of laser Doppler flowmetry and optical coherence tomography angiography.Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine. 2026;(3):8-15

Colon stenting for colorectal cancer complicated by intestinal obstruction.P.A. Herzen Journal of Oncology. 2026;15(4):109-115

Comparative analysis of intracorporeal and extracorporeal anastomotic techniques in laparoscopic right colectomy: assessment of surgical safety and short-term outcome.Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2026;(7):112-122

Complications of atopic dermatitis: current state of the problem.Russian Journal of Clinical Dermatology and Venereology. 2026;25(3):341-346

Perioperative predictors of acute mesenteric ischemia in patients undergoing on-pump cardiac surgery.Russian Journal of Anesthesiology and Reanimatology. 2026;(3):17-24

Late complications associated with silicone breast implants.Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine. 2026;(2):114-122

TECAR therapy for complications after brachioplasty.Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine. 2026;(2):62-67

Издательство «Медиа Сфера»
РекламаДоставка/ОплатаО насКонтактыОбучение для редакцийПолитика конфиденциальностиПолитика обработки персональных данныхПубличная оферта на реализацию издательской продукции
ЖурналыПодпискаАрхивКнигиПроекты
  • RuStore

© 1998-2026

  • Телефоны издательства:

  • +7 (495) 482-41-18
  • +7 (495) 482-43-29
  • Прямой телефон отдела подписки
    (только по вопросам заказов и доставки журналов)

  • +7 (800) 250-18-12
  • пн-пт с 10:00 до 18:00

  • Telegram
  • VK
info@mediasphera.ru
  • Почтовый адрес:

  • Издательство «Медиа Сфера»,
    а/я 54, Москва, Россия, 127238

  • RuStore

© 1998-2026