The site of the Media Sphera Publishers contains materials intended solely for healthcare professionals.
By closing this message, you confirm that you are a certified medical professional or a student of a medical educational institution.

Login
EN
+7 (495) 482-4118
+7 (495) 482-4329
+8 800 250-18-12
  • (toll-free number for subscriptions)
    Mon-Fri from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m.

  • © 1998-2026
+7 (495) 482-43-29
EN
All journals
Journal
Year
Year
Search result: 0

Lisichkin I.A.

Kostroma Oncology Dispensary

Goncharov A.N.

Kostroma Oncology Dispensary

Kruglov E.A.

Kostroma Oncology Dispensary

Unguryan V.M.

Kostroma Oncology Center

Vorobyov N.V.

P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute — Branch of the National Medical Radiology Research Center of the Ministry of Health of Russia

Krasheninnikov A.A.

P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute — Branch of the National Medical Radiology Research Center of the Ministry of Health of Russia

Adoption of the technique of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy on the example of the regional cancer center

Authors:

Lisichkin I.A., Goncharov A.N., Kruglov E.A., Unguryan V.M., Vorobyov N.V., Krasheninnikov A.A.

More about the authors

Journal: P.A. Herzen Journal of Oncology. 2022;11(3): 31‑35

DOI: 10.17116/onkolog20221103131

Read: 999 times

Download PDF (RU)
Contact the author
Table of contents

ADOPTION OF THE TECHNIQUE OF LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY ON THE EXAMPLE OF THE REGIONAL CANCER CENTER
ADOPTION OF THE TECHNIQUE OF LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY ON THE EXAMPLE OF THE REGIONAL CANCER CENTER

To cite this article:

Lisichkin IA, Goncharov AN, Kruglov EA, Unguryan VM, Vorobyov NV, Krasheninnikov AA. Adoption of the technique of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy on the example of the regional cancer center. P.A. Herzen Journal of Oncology. 2022;11(3):31‑35. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/onkolog20221103131

Подписка 2026 Онкология. Журнал им. П.А. Герцена (P.A. Herzen Journal of Oncology)
МСФ на ЯМ
Использование инфографики авторами научных работ
Close metadata
Recommended articles:
Remote resu­lts of treatment of patients with prostate cancer who unde­rwent radiation therapy in a combined version. P.A. Herzen Journal of Onco­logy. 2025;(3):14-19
Urogenital endo­metriosis. Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2025;(2):61-67
The effect of the surgeon’s expe­rience on perioperative complications during videothoracoscopic lobe­ctomies in patients with stage I—II lung cancer. Endo­scopic Surgery. 2025;(3):27-35
Technical aspe­cts of lapa­roscopic formation of gastroduodenoanastomosis (Billroth-I) during distal rese­ction in patients with gastric cancer. Endo­scopic Surgery. 2025;(3):44-51
Lapa­roscopic treatment of a patient with torsion of the wandering spleen. Endo­scopic Surgery. 2025;(3):63-68
Posthysterectomy syndrome. Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2025;(3):34-40
Epidemiology and prevention of prostate cancer. Russian Journal of Preventive Medi­cine. 2025;(7):111-118
Comparative analysis of surgical treatment resu­lts in case of distal rese­ction in patients with gastric cancer with reco­nstruction acco­rding to Billroth-I and on the Roux-en-Y loop of the small inte­stine. Endo­scopic Surgery. 2025;(4):37-43
Lapa­roscopic reco­nstructive operations for malformations of the common bile duct in children. Endo­scopic Surgery. 2025;(4):44-53
Cost-effectiveness analysis of triptorelin therapy for patients with prostate cancer in state healthcare system of the Russian Fede­ration. Medi­cal Technologies. Asse­ssment and Choice. 2025;(3):83-92
Abstract:

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the frequency of complications and the duration of surgery and to assess the immediate and oncological results when introducing the technology of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy, by using the example of a regional cancer center.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The database of patients operated on applying a minimally invasive approach to prostate cancer was retrospectively analyzed. This procedure was used to perform 50 operations; the patients were divided into 2 chronological groups depending on the time of adopting the surgical technology: 1) the 30th operation; 2) the 31st to 50th operations. The investigators analyzed the following indicators: the duration of surgery; the volume of blood loss, the frequency of a positive surgical margin, complications, mortality rates, the duration of urethral drainage, and the length of hospital stay after surgery.

RESULTS

The analysis of the main preoperative parameters revealed no substantial differences. There were significant important differences (p<0.05) in the duration of surgery (245.25±36.43 min versus 217.55±29.7 min), the volume of intraoperative blood loss (390.5±210.18 ml versus 212.67±128.11 ml), and the frequency of intraoperative (20% versus 5%) and postoperative (20% versus 5%) complications. Groups 1 and 2 showed no significant differences (p>0.05) in the duration of urethral drainage (14.2±4.97 days versus 12.2±3.7 days), the length of hospital stay after surgery (16 days versus 11 days), and the frequency of a positive surgical margin (13.3% versus 10%).

CONCLUSION

Introduction of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy technology is relatively safe and possible in a regional oncology hospital. Although the learning curve in the regional hospital has not yet been reached, the results are comparable to those reported in the literature.

Keywords:

prostate cancer
laparoscopy
laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
learning curve

Authors:

Lisichkin I.A.

Kostroma Oncology Dispensary

Goncharov A.N.

Kostroma Oncology Dispensary

Kruglov E.A.

Kostroma Oncology Dispensary

Unguryan V.M.

Kostroma Oncology Center

Vorobyov N.V.

P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute — Branch of the National Medical Radiology Research Center of the Ministry of Health of Russia

Krasheninnikov A.A.

P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute — Branch of the National Medical Radiology Research Center of the Ministry of Health of Russia

Received:

07.12.2021

Accepted:

25.01.2022

Close metadata

References:

  1. Rider JR, Wilson KM, Sinnott JA, Kelly RS, Mucci LA, Giovannucci EL. Ejaculation prequency and risk of prostate cancer: Updated results with an additional decade of follow-up. Eur Urol. 2016;70:974. 
  2. Pernar CH, Ebot EM, Wilson KM, Mucci LA. The epidemiology of prostate cancer. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2018 Jan 08. pii: a030361. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a030361.8/
  3. Hegarty J, Beirne PV, Walsh E, Comber H, Fitzgerald T, Kazer MW. Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting for prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;11. 
  4. Hamdy FC, Donovan JL, Lane JA, Mason M, Metcalfe C, Holding P, Davis M, Peters TJ, Turner EL, et al. 10-Year outcomes after monitoring, surgery, or radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:1415.
  5. Good DW, Stewart GD, Stolzenburg JU, McNeill SA. Analysis of the pentafecta learning curve for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. World J Urol. 2014;32:1225-1233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-013-1198-9
  6. Guillonneau B, Vallancien G. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris experience. J Urol. 2000;163:418-422.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67512-X.
  7. Mitre AI, Chammas MF Jr, Rocha JE Jr, Duarte RJ, Ebaid GX, Rocha FT. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: The learning curve of a low volume surgeon. Sci World J. 2013;2013. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/974276. 974276
  8. Klar M, Jochmann A, Foeldi M, Stumpf M, Gitsch G, Stickeler E, Watermann D. The MSKCC nomogram for prediction the likelihood of non-sentinel node involvement in a German breast cancer population. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008;112(3):523-531.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-007-9884-1
  9. Rassweiler J, Sentker L, Seemann O, Hatzinger M, Stock C, Frede T.Rassweiler J, Sentker L, Seemann O, Hatzinger M, Stock C, Frede T. Heilbronn laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2001;40(1):54-64.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000049749
  10. Akdere H, Aktoz T, Arıkan MG, Atakan İH, Veneziano D, Gözen AS. Embarking with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and dealing with the complications and collateral problems: A single-center experience. Turk J Urol. 2020;46(1):37-43. 
  11. Gregori A, Simonato A, Lissiani A, Bozzola A, Galli S, Gaboardi F. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: perioperative complications in an initial and consecutive series of 80 cases. Eur Urol. 2003;44:190-194.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0302-2838(03)00261-6
  12. Eden CG, Cahill D, Vass JA, Adams TH, Dauleh MI. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the initial UK series. BJU Int. 2002;90: 876-882.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-410X.2002.03049.x
  13. Guillonneau B, Rozet F, Cathelineau X, Lay F, Barret E, Doublet JD, et al. Perioperative complications of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: The Montsouris 3-year experience. J Urol. 2002;167:51-56.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00005392-200201000-00014
  14. Rassweiler J, Sentker L, Seemann O, Hatzinger M, Rumpelt HJ. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with the Heilbronn technique: An analysis of the first 180 cases. J Urol. 2001;166:2101-2108. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005392-200112000-00020
  15. Katz R, Borkowski T, Hoznek A, Salomon L, de la Taille A, Abbou CC. Operative management of rectal injuries during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urology. 2003;62:310-313.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(03)00326-1
  16. Bhayani SB, Pavlovich CP, Strup SE, Dahl DM, Landman J, Fabrizio MD, et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A multi-institutional study of conversion to open surgery. Urology. 2004;63:99-102.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2003.08.018
  17. Blumberg JM, Lesser T, Tran VQ, Aboseif SR, Bellman GC, Abbas MA. Management of rectal injuries sustained during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urology. 2009;73:163-166. 
  18. Permpongkosol S, Link RE, Su LM, Romero FR, Bagga HS, Pavlovich CP, et al. Complications of 2,77 and removed the clip 5 urological laparoscopic procedures: 1993 to 2005. J Urol. 2007; 177:580-585.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2006.09.031
  19. Rassweiler J, Sentker L, Seemann O, Hatzinger M, Stock C, Frede T. Heilbronn laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Technique and results after 100 cases. Eur Urol. 2001;40:54-64.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000049749
  20. Teber D, Gozen AS, Cresswell J, Canda AE, Yencilek F, Rassweiler J. Prevention and management of ureteral injuries occurring during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: The Heilbronn experience and a review of the literature. World J Urol. 2009;27:613-618.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-009-0428-7
  21. Hruza M, Weiss HO, Pini G, Goezen AS, Schulze M, Teber D, et al. Complications in 2200 consecutive laparoscopic radical prostatectomies: standardised evaluation and analysis of learning curves. Eur Urol. 2010;58:733-741.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2010.08.024
  22. Secin FP, Savage C, Abbou C, de La Taille A, Salomon L, Rassweiler J, et al. The learning curve for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: An international multicenter study. J Urol. 2010;184: 2291-2296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2010.08.003
Contact the author
Email
Message
The publishing house "Media Sphere" does not provide treatment services, does not give recommendations on contacting medical institutions and specific specialists, on the prescription of medicines and dietary supplements.

Email Confirmation

An email was sent to test@gmail.com with a confirmation link. Follow the link from the letter to complete the registration on the site.

Email Confirmation

Submit Application

You can become an author of one of our magazines, send a request and we will consider it in during the day.

Name
Phone
E-mail
Message
Login
Registration
E-mail
Password
Forgot Password?

Log in to the site using your account in one of the services

Password recovery
E-mail
Login
Register

We use cооkies to improve the performance of the site. By staying on our site, you agree to the terms of use of cооkies. To view our Privacy and Cookie Policy, please. click here.