Optimal method for harvesting and preserving the reversed autologous vein before extended bypass grafting in patients with critical lower limb ischemia

Krepkogorskiy N.V.

Interregional Clinical Diagnostic Center;
Kazan State Medical University

ORCID: 0000-0003-4119-3120

Bredikhin R.A.

Interregional Clinical Diagnostic Center;
Kazan State Medical University

ORCID: 0000-0001-5550-1548

Gizatullina N.F.

Interregional Clinical Diagnostic Center;
Kazan State Medical University

ORCID: 0000-0001-7677-2937

Sokolova E.O.

Interregional Clinical Diagnostic Center;
Kazan State Medical University

ORCID: 0000-0002-5342-3678

Salimkhanov I.A.

Interregional Clinical Diagnostic Center;
Kazan State Medical University

ORCID: 0000-0003-0120-0680

Optimal method for harvesting and preserving the reversed autologous vein before extended bypass grafting in patients with critical lower limb ischemia

Authors:

Krepkogorskiy N.V., Bredikhin R.A., Gizatullina N.F., Sokolova E.O., Salimkhanov I.A.

More about the authors

Journal: Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2024;17(4): 451‑456

DOI: 10.17116/kardio202417041451

Read: 675 times

Contact the author

Table of contents

To cite this article:

Krepkogorskiy NV, Bredikhin RA, Gizatullina NF, Sokolova EO, Salimkhanov IA. Optimal method for harvesting and preserving the reversed autologous vein before extended bypass grafting in patients with critical lower limb ischemia. Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2024;17(4):451‑456. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.17116/kardio202417041451

Подписка 2025-2 (Russian Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery)

Использование инфографики авторами научных работ

Close metadata

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the optimal method for harvesting and preserving the reversed autologous vein before extended bypass grafting in patients with critical lower limb ischemia.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We analyzed postoperative outcomes in 325 patients with atherosclerosis of lower limb arteries: group 1 — 125 patients with extended lesion type C and D, Rutherford grade 4—5 («no touch» reversed vein harvesting and preserving in accordance with original technique); group 2 — 200 patients with similar lesions and standard harvesting and preserving of the vein. Patients were followed-up for 2 years. We assessed limb ischemia, graft patency and stenosis, amputations and mortality.

RESULTS

One year after surgery, the risk of stenosis was 1.99 [95% CI: 1.20—3.37] times higher in group 2. Satisfactory state of the leg (Rutherford class 2—3) after a year was more common (by 3.05 [95% CI: 1.65—5.93] times) in the 1^st group. After 2 years, the odds ratio of satisfactory leg status in group 1 compared to group 2 was 3.85 [95% CI: 1.95—8.1] (adjusted for covariates 3.67 [95% CI: 1.82—7.87], p=0.0005).

CONCLUSION

Vein harvesting and preserving in the first group improved graft patency and reduced the incidence of stenosis.

Keywords:

endoscopic vein harvesting

now touch

bridge technique

hydraulic dilation

graft preservation in saline or autologous blood

femoropopliteal bypass

coronary artery bypass grafting

Authors:

Krepkogorskiy N.V.

Interregional Clinical Diagnostic Center;
Kazan State Medical University

ORCID: 0000-0003-4119-3120

Bredikhin R.A.

Interregional Clinical Diagnostic Center;
Kazan State Medical University

ORCID: 0000-0001-5550-1548

Gizatullina N.F.

Interregional Clinical Diagnostic Center;
Kazan State Medical University

ORCID: 0000-0001-7677-2937

Sokolova E.O.

Interregional Clinical Diagnostic Center;
Kazan State Medical University

ORCID: 0000-0002-5342-3678

Salimkhanov I.A.

Interregional Clinical Diagnostic Center;
Kazan State Medical University

ORCID: 0000-0003-0120-0680

Received:

25.02.2023

Accepted:

22.08.2023

List of references:

Conte M, Bradbury A, Kolh P et al. Global Vascular Guidelines on the Management of Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. 2019;7:72-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.05.006
Farber A, Menard M, Conte M et al. Surgery or Endovascular Therapy for Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2022;387(25):2305-2316. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2207899
Vaikin V, Medvedev A, Ryazanov M, Demarin O, Maksimov A, Zhiltsov D et al. Comparison of endoscopic and open harvesting of great saphenous vein in coronary artery bypass surgery. Meditsinskii Almanakh. 2015;3(38):76-78. (In Russ.).
Chernyavskiy A, Volkov A, Lavrenyuk O, Terekhov I, Kareva Y. Comparative results of endoscopic and open methods of vein harvesting for coronary artery bypass grafting: a prospective randomized parallel-group trial. Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery. 2015;10(163):1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-015-0353-3
Nikulainen V, Helmiö P, Hurme S, Hakovirta H. Vein Harvest Wound Healing after Bypass Surgery for Critical Limb Ischemia. Annals of Vascular Surgery. 2020;62:375-381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2019.06.007
Guo Q, Huang B, Zhao J. Systematic review and meta-analysis of saphenous vein harvesting and grafting for lower extremity arterial bypass. J Vasc Surg. 2021;73(3):1075-1086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2020.10.013
Gooch K, Firstenberg M, Shrefler B, Scandling B. Biomechanics and Mechanobiology of Saphenous Vein Grafts. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering. 2018;140(2):020804. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4038705
Yokoyama Y, Shimamura J, Takagi H, Kuno T. Harvesting techniques of the saphenous vein graft for coronary artery bypass: Insights from a network meta‐analysis. Journal of Cardiac Surgery. 2021;36(11):4369-4375. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocs.15974
Souza D. A New No-Touch Preparation Technique: Technical notes. Scand The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 1996;30:41-44. https://doi.org/10.3109/14017439609107239
Chen S, Chu Y, Wu V, Tsai F, Nan Y, Lee H, et al. Microenvironment of saphenous vein graft preservation prior to coronary artery bypass grafting. Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery. 2019;28(1):71-78. https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivy201
Rutherford R, Baker J, Ernst C, Johnston K, Porter J, Ahn S, et al. Recommended standards for reports dealing with lower extremity ischemia: Revised version. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 1997;26(3):517-538. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0741-5214(97)70045-4
Norgren L, Hiatt W, Dormandy J, Nehler M, Harris K, Fowkes F. Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease (TASC II). Journal of Vascular Surgery. 2007;45(suppl S):S5-67/
Inaba Y, Yamazaki M, Ohono M, Yamashita K, Izumida H, Hayashi K et al. No-touch saphenous vein graft harvesting technique for coronary artery bypass grafting. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2020;68(3):248-253.
Lednev PV, Belov YuV, Stonogin AV, Lysenko AV, Salagaev GI. No-touch great saphenous vein harvesting. Khirurgiya. Zhurnal im. N.I. Pirogova. 2018;5:117-119. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia20185117-119
Cronenwett J, Johnston K, eds. Rutherford’s Vascular Surgery, 2-Volume Set: Expert Consult Print and Online. 7E. 2447.
Shvalb PG, Ukhov YuI. Abnormalities of venous return from lower extremities. Ryazan: Poligraficheskii kompleks «Tigel’»; 2009. (In Russ.).
Pimentel M, Lobo Filho J, Lobo Filho H et al. Effect of preservation solution and distension pressure on saphenous vein’s endothelium. Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery. 2022;35(3):ivac124. https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivac124
Akchurin RS, Alekyan BG, Apkhanova TV et al. National recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of lower limb artery diseases. M.: Bakulev National Scientific Practical Center for Cardiovascular Surgery; 2019. (In Russ.).
Chang H, Veith FJ, Rockman CB, Maldonado TS, Jacobowitz GR, Cayne NS, et al. Comparative analysis of patients undergoing lower extremity bypass using in-situ and reversed great saphenous vein graft techniques. Vascular. 2023;31(5):931-940. https://doi.org/10.1177/17085381221088082

Close metadata