Clinical and Ultrasound Semiotics of Varicose Vein Recurrence

Close metadata

OBJECTIVE

To study clinical and ultrasound semiotics of primary varicose vein recurrence after invasive treatment.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We analyzed 64 consecutive patients with varicose vein recurrence after invasive treatment (crossectomy, stripping (35 patients) and thermal obliteration (27 patients)). Ehere were 21 men (32.8%) and 43 women (67.2%) (mean age 50.8±1.6). Recurrence variants and their combinations were analyzed. Reflux sources were recorded in accordance with the REVAS classification. We estimated time interval after surgery, period between surgery and recurrence, the number of invasive interventions, localization of recurrent varicose veins, including their relationship with sites of previous interventions, CEAP class.

RESULTS

The median period after invasive treatment was 53 months. Recurrence within the area of previous procedure was registered in 14 patients (21.9%), outside these areas — in 11 patients (17.2%). Combined localization was revealed in 39 patients (60.9%). Recurrence due to disease progression was detected in 11 patients (17.2%), residual veins — in 2 patients (3.1%), recurrent veins — in 3 patients (4.7%), combination — in 48 patients (75%). Neovascularization was detected in 11 patients (17.2%). One source of reflux out of seven possible according to the REVAS classification was detected only in 7 patients (10.9%). Other 57 (89.1%) ones had two or more sources. Trunk insufficiency was detected in 53 patients (82.8%). Incompetent segments of the main saphenous veins after open and endovenous procedures were detected in 11 and 24 patients, respectively (35%/54.7%). Insufficiency of veins that were intact before the first procedure was detected in 18 (28.1%) patients. When analyzing the subgroups after high ligation with stripping and thermal ablation, we found significant differences in time after the first procedure, localization of recurrent varicose veins, incidence of trunk incompetence and previous treatment mistakes.

CONCLUSION

The structure of recurrences is similar after high ligation with stripping and thermal obliteration with phlebectomy. Differences in rates of certain recurrence are probably associated with tactical and technical features of two treatment approaches.

Keywords:

varicose veins

recurrence

duplex ultrasound

residual varicose veins

Authors:

Gavrilov E.K.

Kirov Military Medical Academy

ORCID: 0000-0002-6653-2320

Akhadov R.A.

Kirov Military Medical Academy

ORCID: 0000-0002-5614-0147

Artemova A.S.

Multidisciplinary Network of Clinics «Dynasty» LLC

ORCID: 0000-0003-4885-8156

Babinets E.A.

Mariinsky St. Petersburg City Hospital

ORCID: 0000-0003-0036-0527

Khubulava G.G.

Kirov Military Medical Academy

ORCID: 0000-0002-9242-9941

Received:

17.08.2024

Accepted:

27.12.2024

List of references:

Kamaev AA, Bulatov VL, Vakhratyan PE, Volkov AM, Volkov AS, Gavrilov EK, Golovina VI, Efremova OI, Ivanov OO, Ilyukhin EA, Katorkin SE, Konchugova TV, Kravtsov PF, Maksimov SV, Mzhavanadze ND, Pikhanova ZhM, Pryadko SI, Smirnov AA, Sushkov SA, Chabbarov RG, Shimanko AI, Yakushkin SN, Apkhanova TV, Derkachev SN, Zolotukhin IA, Kalinin RE, Kirienko AI, Kulchitskaya DB, Pelevin AV, Petrikov AS, Rachin AP, Seliverstov EI, Stoyko YuM, Suchkov IA. Varicose Veins. Journal of Venous Disorders. 2022;16(1):41-108. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/flebo20221601141
Serdechno-sosudistaja hirurgija. Uchebnoe posobie dlja medicinskih vuzov: v 2 t. Pod red. chl.-korr. RAN Hubulavy GG, doc. Luk’janova NG. Sankt-Peterburg: VMA im. S.M. Kirova; 2017. (In Russ.).
Belyanina EO, Gavrilov EK, Gudymovich VG, Ermakov NA, Zamyatin MN, Lavrenko SV, Lytkin MI, Lyadov KV, Sabelnikov VV, Sokolov AL, Stoyko YuM, Tsarev OI, Shaydakov EV, Shevchenko YuL, Shishova TV. Osnovy klinicheskoj flebologii. Nacional’nyj medicinsko-hirurgicheskij centr im. N.I. Pirogova. Moskva: Medicina: Shiko; 2005. (In Russ.).
Koutsos T, Koutsos C, Kim PS, Kokkosis AA, Gasparis AP. Etiology and management recurrent varicose veins. Handbook of Venous Disorders Guidelines of the American Venous Forum, 5rd edition; by ed. P. Gloviczki. Boca Raton; 2024.
Perrin MR, Guex JJ, Ruckley CV, dePalma RG, Royle JP, Eklof B, Nicolini P, Jantet G. Recurrent varices after surgery (REVAS), a consensus document. REVAS group. Cardiovasc Surg. 2000;8(4):233-245.
Eklöf B, Perrin M, Delis KT, Rutherford RB, Gloviczki P. Updated terminology of chronic venous disorders: The VEIN-TERM transatlantic interdisciplinary consensus document. J Vasc Surg. 2009;49:498-501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2008.09.014
De Maeseneer MG, Kakkos SK, Aherne T, Baekgaard N, Black S, Blomgren L, Giannoukas A, Gohel M, de Graaf R, Hamel-Desnos C, Jawien A, Jaworucka-Kaczorowska A, Lattimer CR, Mosti G, Noppeney T, van Rijn MJ, Stansby G, Esvs Guidelines Committee, Kolh P, Bastos Goncalves F, Chakfé N, Coscas R, de Borst GJ, Dias NV, Hinchliffe RJ, Koncar IB, Lindholt JS, Trimarchi S, Tulamo R, Twine CP, Vermassen F, Wanhainen A, Document Reviewers, Björck M, Labropoulos N, Lurie F, Mansilha A, Nyamekye IK, Ramirez Ortega M, Ulloa JH, Urbanek T, van Rij AM, Vuylsteke ME. European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2022 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Chronic Venous Disease of the Lower Limbs. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2022;63(2):184-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.12.024
Gloviczki P, Lawrence PF, Wasan SM, Meissner MH, Almeida J, Brown KR, Bush RL, Di Iorio M, Fish J, Fukaya E, Gloviczki ML, Hingorani A, Jayaraj A, Kolluri R, Murad MH, Obi AT, Ozsvath KJ, Singh MJ, Vayuvegula S, Welch HJ. The 2023 Society for Vascular Surgery, American Venous Forum, and American Vein and Lymphatic Society clinical practice guidelines for the management of varicose veins of the lower extremities. Part II: Endorsed by the Society of Interventional Radiology and the Society for Vascular Medicine. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2023:S2213-333X(23)00322-0. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2023.08.011
Recek C. Significance of Reflux Abolition at the Saphenofemoral Junction in Connection with Stripping and Ablative Methods. Int J Angiol. 2015;24(4):249-261. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1546439
Fischer R, Linde N, Duff C, Jeanneret C, Chandler JG, Seeber P. Late recurrent saphenofemoral junction reﬂux after ligation and stripping of the greater saphenous vein. J Vasc Surg. 2001;34(2):236-240.
Savelyev VS, Kirienko AI, Zolotukhin IA, Andriyashkin AV. Inadequate estial ligation of the great saphenous vein as a cause of recurrence of varicose veins. Angiology and vascular surgery. 2007;13(3):73-77. (In Russ.).
Kheirelseid EAH, Crowe G, Sehgal R, Liakopoulos D, Bela H, Mulkern E, McDonnell C, O’Donohoe M. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials evaluating long-term outcomes of endovenous management of lower extremity varicose veins. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2018;6(2):256-270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2017.10.012
Semkin VD, Akimov SS, Mazajshvili KV. Podhody k lecheniju recidiva varikoznoj bolezni posle jendovenoznoj lazernoj obliteracii. Vestnik SurGU. Medicina. 2020;3(45):43-48. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.34822/2304-9448-2020-3-43-48
Khorev NG, Beller AV, Kotov VI. When Phlebectomy May Be Preferred Over Endovenous Ablation? Journal of Venous Disorders. 2022;16(2):175-180. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/flebo202216021175

Close metadata